In the Netflix series Narcos Mexico, season 2 finds that the Mexican government’s PRI party candidate Carlos Salinas de Gortari would lose against a breakaway independent candidate from the party, Cuauhtémoc Cárdenas. During the elections, a computer system was put into place to tabulate votes as they came in real-time from various cities and districts. This would allow the media early access to gauge what the final tally would be while ballots were still being counted, though it wouldn’t be final.
A coding team working with the Mexican Cartel comes up with a fake algorithm that will allow them to produce results indicating PRI’s in the lead. By sending this false information to the media, they hope to discourage PRI’s opponents from turning out for the election–nobody wants to vote for a loser.
While somewhat dramatized, this event actually happened in Mexico in the 1980s.
This is where Hugo Chavez may have gotten his ideas.
The Mirror has obtained an affidavit from a Military officer who witnessed the Venezuelan election being monitored and manipulated in real time in a control room. The affidavit is part of ongoing court proceedings in Georgia.
From the witness, recounting the Chavez dealings with voting software company Smartmatic, “I want to alert the public and let the world know the truth about the corruption, manipulation, and lies being committed by a conspiracy of people and companies intent upon betraying the honest people of the United States and their legally constituted institutions and fundamental rights as citizens. This conspiracy began more than a decade ago in Venezuela and has spread to countries all over the world. It is a conspiracy to wrongfully gain and keep power and wealth. It involves political leaders, powerful companies, and other persons whose purpose is to gain and keep power by changing the free will of the people and subverting the proper course of governing.”
According to the document, he witnessed the creation of asophisticated electronic voting system that permitted the leaders of the Venezuelan government to manipulate the tabulation of votes for national and local elections and select the winner of those elections in order to gain and maintain their power.
The creation and operation of an electronic voting system in a conspiracy between a company known as Smartmatic and the leaders of conspiracy with the Venezuelan government. This conspiracy specifically involved President Hugo Chavez Frias, the person in charge of the National Electoral Council named Jorge Rodriguez, and principals, representatives, and personnel from Smartmatic.
It should be noted that the software and fundamental design of the electronic electoral system and software of Dominion and other election tabulating companies relies upon software that is a descendant of the Smartmatic Electoral Management System. In short, the Smartmatic software is in the DNA of every vote tabulating company’s software and system. Dominion software was used in those places where mysterious dumps of millions of Biden votes appeared.
Chavez was insistent that Smartmatic design the system in a way
that the system could change the vote of each voter without being
detected. He wanted the software itself to function in such a manner that
if the voter were to place their thumb print or fingerprint on a scanner,
then the thumbprint would be tied to a record of the voter’s name and
identity as having voted, but that voter would not tracked to the changed
vote. He made it clear that the system would have to be setup to not leave
any evidence of the changed vote for a specific voter and that there would
be no evidence to show and nothing to contradict that the name or the
fingerprint or thumb print was going with a changed vote. Smartmatic
agreed to create such a system and produced the software and hardware
that accomplished that result for President Chavez.
“After the Smartmatic Electoral Management System was put in place, I closely observed several elections where the results were manipulated using Smartmatic software. One such election was in December 2006 when Chavez was running against Rosales. Chavez won with a landslide over Manuel Rosales – a margin of nearly 6 million votes for Chavez versus 3.7 million for Rosales.”
In 2013, the software was used to manipulate the election between Capriles Radonskyday and Nicolás Maduro. By early afternoon, Capriles Radonsky was ahead of Nicolás Maduro by two million votes. The Smartmatic machines used for voting in each state were connected to the internet and reported their information over the internet to the Caracas control center in real-time. So, the decision was made to reset the entire system.
Maduro’s and his supporters ordered the network controllers to take the internet itself offline in practically all parts in Venezuela and to change the results. It took the voting system operators approximately two hours to make the adjustments in the vote from Radonsky to Maduro.
Then, when the internet came back on and the on-line reporting was up and running again, they checked each screen state by state to be certain where they could see that each vote was changed in favor of Nicholas Maduro. At that moment the Smartmatic system changed votes that were for Capriles Radonsky to Maduro. By the time the system operators finished, they had achieved a convincing, but narrow victory of 200,000 votes for Maduro.
Internet taken offline. Counting stopped. Votes altered. Internet turned back on. Maduro magically wins. Didn’t the same thing happen in GA, PA, MI, and WI?
Dominion is one of three major companies that tabulates votes in the United States. Dominion uses the same methods and fundamentally same software design for the storage, transfer and computation of voter identification data and voting data. Dominion and Smartmatic did business together.
The software, hardware and system have the same fundamental flaws which allow multiple opportunities to corrupt the data and mask the process in a way that the average person cannot detect any fraud or manipulation.
The fact that the voting machine displays a voting result that the voter intends and then prints out a paper ballot which reflects that change does not matter. It is the software that counts the digitized vote and reports the results. The software itself is the one that changes the information electronically to the result that the operator of the software and vote counting system intends to produce that counts.
That’s how it is done. So the software, the software itself configures the vote and voting result — changing the selection made by the voter. The software decides the result regardless of what the voter votes.
It is chilling watching the media, and social media twist themselves into pretzels trying to “debunk” this story. They haven’t debunked anything. That won’t happen until we get examine the code-not modified code, but the version used on November 3rd in the United States of America. Forensics can determine which version of was used for our elections.
Show us the code. Show us the damn code.