• Local Produce
  • Buy Local
  • Local Seafood
  • Local Food
  • Local Music
  • Local Art
  • Local Churches

CAPE CHARLES MIRROR

Reflections on Cape Charles and the Eastern Shore

  • Local Services
  • Local Rentals
  • Local Employment
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Classifieds
  • Pets
  • Contact Us
  • Rant and Rave
  • Asses&Villains

Does Guilt Have a Place in Animal Rights Activism?

December 12, 2021 by Leave a Comment

Special to the Mirror by Karen Davis, the President and Founder of United Poultry Concerns.

This article was first published today, December 6th on Animals 24-7.

If animals are largely overlooked in the range of human endeavors, is it any wonder that their suffering is barely accorded human knowledge, and that it makes sense to speak of the “secret” and “hidden” suffering of animals?

Even so, many people regard pain and suffering as morally objectionable and would agree with the Reverend Dr. Humphry Primatt, who wrote in 1776, “Pain is Pain, whether it be inflicted on man or on beast; and the creature that suffers it, whether man or beast, being sensible of the misery of it whilst it lasts, suffers Evil.”

Ecology of Pain and Suffering

Yet the idea that pain and suffering are evil per se is not always true. Pain can be constructive as well as debilitating. Pain that is degrading in one situation may be uplifting in another, as when a person suffers for the sake of a loved one or a worthwhile cause. Philosopher Jeff Sebo writes, for example, that “people often claim that traumatic events serve as catalysts for rational behavior, helping them to reprioritize their lives and focus on what is important.”

At the most basic level, pain is informative. Physical pain informs us biologically that we are injured or ill, while the pang of guilt informs us morally that we have done or are doing something wrong. Few would argue that a morally pain-free person is enviable simply because lacking a conscience is soothing and freedom from moral restraint is gratifying.

The fact is, not all pain is the same. While it is true that pain is pain regardless of who suffers it, other considerations apply. For instance, if I have to choose between suffering from cancer and suffering in a concentration camp, I will choose cancer. Why? Because cancer is not a sign of human character; it’s a malignant physical disease, not a malignant assertion of human will. Cancer is unfortunate, whereas a concentration camp is evil.

The contrast between human agency and random occurrence is important to counter the claim that it makes no difference whether a human or a nonhuman animal, say, starves to death from natural causes or as part of someone’s research; whether she or he suffers in the course of natural predation or in the machinery of somebody’s factory farm. Pain has a context. There are not only degrees and durations of pain; there are also causes and conditions. There may be motives and attitudes that enter into it that include a guilty, if unacknowledged, consciousness.

Clearly seen, each episode of pain reflects the environment that produced it. Images of animals undergoing vivisection and slaughter, Auschwitz inmates recounting their experience of being experimented on by Nazi doctors, the testimony of the doctors themselves, all show that there is a moral ecology of pain and suffering, as well as a natural ecology of misfortune, which may or may not overlap.

Pain is a symbol in the sense of something that is a part of – that stands out from and illuminates – a larger reality. To talk meaningfully about pain, we must take into account the conditions in which it occurs, including whether those conditions are primarily moral – involving human attitudes, motives, and conduct – or natural, like a plague or an earthquake. We will not then be confounded when someone dares to assert, as I once heard a researcher say at the National Institutes of Health concerning the head-bashing experiments that were being conducted on baboons at the University of Pennsylvania, that what “happens” to animals in laboratories isn’t so bad, because “life is full of suffering.” A guilt-free mind is indeed a great comfort.

By contrast, Thomas Coates, who is quoted at the beginning of this article, goes on to say in his Facebook comment, “There are a lot of things I used to do that were immoral. Guilt has continuously guided me to learn and improve. I’d hope that anyone watching this footage [of turkeys enduring massive cruelty on a turkey farm] will experience guilt and use it to make more educated and kinder decisions.”

Can Guilt Constructively Penetrate the Wall?

Animal advocates struggle with how to get people to care enough about animals to do more than just passively agree that animals shouldn’t be made to suffer. Speaking of activist efforts in China in words with global applicability, Mercy For Animals’ president, Leah Garcés, was recently quoted in Why the future of animal welfare lies beyond the West: “I think we have to keep throwing spaghetti at the wall and see what sticks. We have not cracked the code. Nobody has.”

Should the “spaghetti” we throw include an effort to induce consciousness of guilt in people who are in a position to make a positive difference for animals in their personal lives? B.R. Myers wrote in The Atlantic, in 2007, in Hard to Swallow: The gourmet’s ongoing failure to think in moral terms: “Try forcing most Americans to consider the suffering of the animals they consume, and they will conclude . . . that the whole exercise has more to do with punishment than persuasion.”

As for encouraging people to feel guilty about contributing without reasonable cause to the suffering and death of a fellow creature, I think guilt is an appropriate and even a necessary feeling to have toward one’s innocent victims, as long as it empowers rather than impairs the ability to think and act better as a result. Guilt can be motivating along with pity and remorse and the uplift of deciding to wash one’s hands of contributing further to an abuse, and in this way transform the guilt incurred when one behaved less mindfully.

Further Reading: Moral Injury in Animal Advocates and Nonhuman Animals and the Commonality of Being Reduced to “Lesser Beings”

KAREN DAVIS, PhD is the President and Founder of United Poultry Concerns, a nonprofit organization that promotes the compassionate and respectful treatment of domestic fowl including a sanctuary for chickens in Virginia. Inducted into the National Animal Rights Hall of Fame for Outstanding Contributions to Animal Liberation, Karen is the author of numerous books, essays, articles and campaigns. Her latest book is For the Birds – From Exploitation to Liberation: Essays on Chickens, Turkeys, and Other Domesticated Fowl published by Lantern Publishing & Media.

Filed Under: Activism, Animal Activism, Bottom, News

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Join the Conversation!

Send letters, opinion, goings on or photos to capecharlesmirror@gmail.com

Mirrors

Recent Comments

  • Paul Plante on Cape Charles Businesses Rock the Best of Virginia Readers Survey
  • bd on Does Cape Charles need a Cart Narc?
  • Stuart Bell on Asses&Villains: Roe vs. Wade Edition
  • Stuart Bell on Asses&Villains: Roe vs. Wade Edition
  • Christine Parks on Virginia to Receive More Than $20 Billion for Bridge Replacement Program, Appalachian Development Highway System
  • Doug Luther on Cape Charles Businesses Rock the Best of Virginia Readers Survey
  • Blue Hoss on Does Cape Charles need a Cart Narc?
  • DJ Stupid Birthday on Does Cape Charles need a Cart Narc?
  • Jacob on Asses&Villains: Baby Formula edition
  • Paul Plante on Asses&Villains: Baby Formula edition
  • Steve on Virginia to Receive More Than $20 Billion for Bridge Replacement Program, Appalachian Development Highway System
  • Paul Plante on Does Cape Charles need a Cart Narc?
  • Paul Plante on Asses&Villains: Baby Formula edition
  • Paul Plante on Asses&Villains: Roe vs. Wade Edition
  • Hank Mayer on Virginia to Receive More Than $20 Billion for Bridge Replacement Program, Appalachian Development Highway System
  • Brand on Does Cape Charles need a Cart Narc?
  • Daniel Burke on Does Cape Charles need a Cart Narc?
  • Jason on Does Cape Charles need a Cart Narc?
  • Brian Collins on Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission will monitor Rockfish every year
  • Bob on Does Cape Charles need a Cart Narc?

Trending Now

  • List Of Clinton Associates Who Allegedly Died Mysteriously Or Committed Suicide Before Testimony
  • Does Cape Charles need a Cart Narc?
  • Op-Ed: Compare George Orwell's 1984 to Society Today
  • Cape Charles Police Stats for April 2022
  • Letter: Removal of Tourist Cottages Northampton County Zoning Ordinance
  • Cape Charles Businesses Rock the Best of Virginia Readers Survey
  • Central Park Concert Calendar 2022
  • Virginia's Recreational Fishing Regulations For Marine Waters
  • Asses&Villains: Baby Formula edition
  • Did Mary Give Consent to Have the Baby Jesus?

Subscribe to CC Mirror via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe

Copyright © 2022 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in