• Local Produce
  • Buy Local
  • Local Seafood
  • Local Food
  • Local Music
  • Local Art
  • Local Churches

CAPE CHARLES MIRROR

Reflections on Cape Charles and the Eastern Shore

  • Local Services
  • Local Rentals
  • Local Employment
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Classifieds
  • Pets
  • Contact Us
  • Rant and Rave
  • Asses&Villains

Medicare for all would cost $32.6 TRILLION

August 5, 2018 by 1 Comment

Feel the Bern…or Not

Washington (AP) — Sen. Bernie Sanders’ “Medicare for all” plan would increase government health care spending by $32.6 trillion over 10 years, according to a study by a university-based libertarian policy center. This is a similar conclusion to the Urban Institute’s study.

Sanders-style Medicare-for-All would cost $32.6 TRILLION. That’s: -Nearly twice our annual GDP -54x our annual defense spending -Over 8x our annual federal budget -281x the private sector’s annual medical R&D investment -867x the federal government’s annual medical R&D investment.

The latest plan from the Vermont independent would require historic tax increases as government replaces what employers and consumers now pay for health care, according to the analysis being released Monday by the Mercatus Center at George Mason University in Virginia. It would deliver significant savings on administration and drug costs, but increased demand for care would drive up spending, the analysis found.

Sanders’ plan builds on Medicare. All U.S. residents would be covered with no copays and deductibles for medical services. The insurance industry would be relegated to a minor role.

“Enacting something like ‘Medicare for all’ would be a transformative change in the size of the federal government,” said Charles Blahous, the study’s author. Blahous was a senior economic adviser to former President George W. Bush and a public trustee of Social Security and Medicare during the Obama administration.

Death Wish

Hospital costs are predominantly the expenses involved in staffing and equipping various medical departments, and therefore to a large extent fixed in the short run. Hospital prices do not reflect marginal costs involved in treating each patient, so much as attempts to spread daily running costs overall patients. It is, therefore, possible for Medicare to pay hospitals 87 percent of their average costs so long as private insurance pays 144 percent of their average costs. But such an arrangement would clearly not be sustainable if all rates were brought down to Medicare levels, as Medicare rates are below average costs at two-thirds of hospitals.

hospitals are often able to reduce their costs across the board when payment rates are cut, reducing costs means cutting staff and closing departments, which unsurprisingly tends to come at the expense of quality and access to care. For instance, following the reductions in hospital-payment rates made by the 1997 Balanced Budget Act, relative heart-attack mortality rose at the facilities subjected to the steepest cuts. Hospitals across rural America are already struggling financially, and it is fantastical to imagine that substantial savings can be gained without widespread closures. Americans, 77 percent of whom are happy with their own health-care arrangements, are unlikely to tolerate the collapse of services at their local hospitals.

As the government assumes the entirety of hhealth carecosts, this would require a massive tax increase. It would also have to reduce costs by streamlining and cutting services. But the cost of coverage would easily outpace the savings from reduced operations and services. The government would more than likely have to double all individual and corporate taxes.

The most politically sophisticated single-payer advocates understand this, and acknowledge that taxpayers would have to make up for hospital revenues currently financed by private insurers. Indeed, the honest calculation of how much this would cost was the reason why Vermont’s single-payer initiative collapsed. No other state has since been able to realize such a scheme — and plenty of liberal ones have tried.

That said, the political momentum for single-payer reforms in liberal circles is now such that it is unlikely advocates will simply give up.
Rising medical costs are a genuine problem, and voters may prefer politicians with flawed proposals to those who fail to offer any solutions at all. Yet reforms that eliminate barriers to hospital competition are likely to do a better job of cutting the fat out of the system than those that simply truncate funding for facilities. Republicans need not fear the specter of single-payer, but should instead work to develop better alternatives and sell them to voters.

Filed Under: Bottom, News

Comments

  1. David Boyd says

    August 5, 2018 at 3:18 pm

    From the same article where you quote that 77 percent of Americans are happy with their health care arrangements
    “Most Americans say the U.S. healthcare system is troubled: Nearly three-quarters of employed Americans (73%) say the healthcare system is “in a state of crisis” or “has major problems” in Gallup’s most recent survey. There is little difference between American workers’ attitudes on the healthcare system and the overall U.S. public, among which 71% say the system is “in a state of crisis” or “has major problems.”

    By the way the article does NOT say 77 percent are happy with their health care arrangements.
    It says they rate their personal healthcare as good or excellent. My reading is they are happy with the quality, not necessarily the cost. There is a difference.

    It is easy to selectively quote things to make them say what you want.

    Note: Good point, and this is why we like comments. This article was not very well written, as the main point is that our medical care is pretty good now…are we willing to accept less care, but not paying, or severely lowering costs? 32 trillion is something the market can bear, but for the taxpayer, well….

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search

Join the Conversation!

Send letters, opinion, goings on or photos to capecharlesmirror@gmail.com

Mirrors

Recent Comments

  • Come Here To Stay on Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • Chuck Heffen on Giant Megalodon tooth discovered in Chesapeake Bay by 9-year-old
  • Joseph Smitten on Captain of Ever Forward gives up pilot license
  • Paul Plante on Timeline of Obama/Biden Corruption in Ukraine
  • Blue Hoss on Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • Stuart Bell on Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • Boy on Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • Paul Plante on Op-Ed: Madness and Insanity in a Time of Joe Biden
  • Stuart Bell on Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • Paul Plante on Timeline of Obama/Biden Corruption in Ukraine
  • A Come Here to stay on Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • Paul Plante on Biden depletes Strategic Petroleum Reserve
  • BRAND on Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • Paul Plante on Timeline of Obama/Biden Corruption in Ukraine
  • Stuart Bell on Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • BRAND on Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • Paul Plante on Timeline of Obama/Biden Corruption in Ukraine
  • Paul Plante on Timeline of Obama/Biden Corruption in Ukraine
  • Paul Plante on Op-Ed: Biden’s GREEN Body Count 
  • Don Green on Untangling the Mystery of the Little Farm: Part 1

Trending Now

  • Has Real Estate Investment Ruined the Shore?
  • Untangling the Mystery of the Little Farm: Part 1
  • Special Meeting: Banning Short-Term Rentals
  • Follow the Money: Influence of the National Association of Realtors
  • Northampton County Public Schools Names New Superintendent
  • Trash: Leftists Celebrate Ryan Newman Crash Because He Supported Trump
  • Op-Ed: Compare George Orwell's 1984 to Society Today
  • RFI: Who wants to Lease or Buy the Eastville Inn?
  • Timeline of Obama/Biden Corruption in Ukraine
  • Giant Megalodon tooth discovered in Chesapeake Bay by 9-year-old

Copyright © 2023 · News Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

 

Loading Comments...