Starbucks “and other coffee sellers must put a cancer warning on coffee sold in California, a Los Angeles judge has ruled, possibly exposing the companies to millions of dollars in fines,” per Reuters:
A little-known not-for-profit group sued some 90 coffee retailers, including Starbucks, on grounds they were violating a California law requiring companies to warn consumers of chemicals in their products that could cause cancer.
One of those chemicals is acrylamide, a byproduct of roasting coffee beans that is present in high levels in brewed coffee.
Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elihu Berle said in a decision dated Wednesday that Starbucks and other companies had failed to show there was no significant risk from a carcinogen produced in the coffee roasting process, court documents showed.
Starbucks and other defendants have until April 10 to file objections to the decision.
Starbucks declined to comment, referring reporters to a statement by the National Coffee Association (NCA) that said the industry was considering an appeal and further legal actions.
“Cancer warning labels on coffee would be misleading. The U.S. government’s own Dietary Guidelines state that coffee can be part of a healthy lifestyle,” the NCA statement said.
About the Author
*** She raised particular concern over what she described as the unauthorized insertion of language into draft ordinances by town…
What is a panek-a-tak ?
Once again, Another Vow of Tran$parency... How refre$hing.
Well written article. Let's see who is listening to the voters. Everyone's vote counts. What's behind the curtain should be…
Panek A. Tak is quite confident in her assertions about the alleged criminal activities of a former town employee. Perhaps…