Themes for the Lawsuit In Georgia

History Note: The Obama-Biden Administration illegally surveilled the 2016 Trump campaign and weaponized the intelligence community to attack his administration. When Trump won, they used a fake dossier to investigate him for 3 years to undermine him. They proved they can’t be trusted. Verify every legal vote. Throw out all ballots that cannot be validated by an address, registration and ID.

The lawsuit in Georgia contains many allegations familiar to those following these legal challenges, with two big themes:

Numerous irregularities in vote-counting based on ad hoc law/procedure changes, including putting ballots in the wrong stacks en masse, pre-printed ballots that were “pristine” and unlined; blocking Republican observers from vote-tabulation tables; counting votes after the so-called “pipe burst” election night even though there were no Rep. observers.

And the second big theme is that the Dominion voting machines are easily hackable and experts have written scripts to show how one can manually manipulate vote tallies, alter settings so as to put more ballots into a “question” pile, and then just delete them.

These are serious allegations, and maybe the evidence (some of it filed and some of it under seal provisionally) will persuade. Either of these big themes would be enough to change the election results given the narrow margin for Biden.

The easiest way to reach that Goal is something much simpler alleged in the complaint at para. 121: That thousands of specific, identifiable voters, cast ballots after they moved out of state as evidenced in their registration in a national database, and may even have cast votes in their new states also which can easily be checked against the other state’s records.

This accounts for thousands of votes. The other category Matt Braynard has researched and documented, are thousands of identifiable, specific registrations at fraudulent addresses such as P.O. Boxes, non-residential, etc.

These seem to be specific and of a sufficient volume that their disqualification would affect the outcome of the election. This may be the most central attack and is much easier to grasp and prove than the more complicated theories.

To critics who say this is too late, it really isn’t. How are you supposed to allege that someone cast a ballot from a fraudulent registration address or after moving, before the election? This is something that can only be checked after the votes are cast and tallied, particularly where last-minute registrations are permitted by increasingly lax voter registration policies pushed by Democrats, followed by no signature verification or other safeguards, as the lawsuit alleges.

The “Braynard” allegations may have legs and should be pursued aggressively. A court should want to know which thousands of specific, identifiable people illegally cast ballots in Georgia. I hope the federal court allows inquiry into this low-tech challenge even if it does not bite on the more expert-and statistically-based theories.

About the Author

Wayne Creed

Administrator

View All Posts