October 5, 2025

4 thoughts on ““Secret” Meeting with Royal Farms Shields Process from Public View

  1. I agree with your comments regarding Mr. Hogg’s presence. Granville has been pursuing traffic safety concerns since long before his current tenure as our District 1 Supervisor. He has called his own meetings to bring these issues to light, specifically concerning this particular project. I’m positive he would have attended if invited.
    It doesn’t bode well for inter-agency cooperation, or for cordial feelings on the Board of Supervisors, to have excluded him from this meeting.

  2. The article says that Bill Parr attended the meeting as a representative of the JIDA. If this is true, he should have declared that he has a conflict of interest. Parr worked as the agent for Royal Farms dating back more than a decade to when the company first explored coming to Northampton County. I don’t know if he is still its agent or how much money he stands to make from the deal, but it sounds like an insider using his government position to grease the skids of the money train.

  3. I get concerned when a meeting is called “secret”. However, after reading this piece, this was not a secret meeting; it was as staff level meeting with County Staff and VDOT staff and other interested parties. These type of meetings occur often to iron out technical details of a project. The outcome was not “legislation”/zoning which requires advertising and public input. Nor was the Sup. Hogg meeting held later a “public” meeting in the sense of public hearing. It was a meeting which the public attended, but a far cry from an advertised public meeting or hearing which is required in order to adopt new legislation. Context is important.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *