Biden’s handlers think we are as confused, lost, and stupid as he is…the people who cried that instead of buying Twitter, Elon Musk could “solve world hunger” with $44 billion… are completely silent now that Democrats voted to spend $80 billion to expand the IRS. They no longer even care that we know they are moronic liars. They just throw a random idiotic stuff out there hoping some people will buy in.
The states created the federal government to be a government of limited powers. Our Founders never envisioned The Administrative State. It is out of control. Self-government is based on accountability. Right now there is none.
Attorney General Merrick Garland approved an FBI raid on the former president who personally revoked his nomination for the Supreme Court when he won the presidency. Read that sentence a couple of times.
The FBI completed an unannounced raid of President Trump’s home at Mar-A-Lago. America is devolving into a Third-World Nation and this latest escalation by Merrick Garland and the Biden Regime should shock every single American—regardless of who you voted for in 2020.
The FBI immediately leaked the details of the raid to The New York Times. But yeah, it’s not political. Hillary Clinton destroying 30K classified emails with a hammer and bleach doesn’t get your home searched. Remember that.
Seven email chains from Hillary Clinton’s personal email were considered classified to the highest degree. Why didn’t the FBI raid her home?
People who HAVEN’T been raided by the FBI:
- Pedophiles associated with Jeffrey Epstein
- Hillary Clinton
- Hunter Biden
- Rep. Swalwell for sleeping with a Chinese spy
This FBI:
- Pushed Russia collusion hoax
- Spied on law-abiding Americans
- Lied to FISA court
- Ignored Hillary’s server escapades
- Ignored Biden Family criminal activity
- Persecutes journalists at Project Veritas
- Treats J6 trespassers like terrorists
- Goes after PTA moms/
We should take a moment to thank the FBI for stopping the attack on Salman Rushdie, preventing these horrible school shootings, and for solving the Las Vegas killer mystery.
COINCIDENCE: Judge Reportedly Behind Mar A Lago Raid Warrant Is Former Jeffrey Epstein Lawyer, Obama Donor. Bruce Reinhart who helped Epstein get off and then went on to represent Epstein’s accomplices is THE JUDGE who signed off on the FBI raiding President Trump. If you wrote that into a movie script the studio would laugh at you because it’s such unbelievable corruption.
First, did Attorney General Garland personally sign off on this action? (YES)
Second, why break into the safe rather than seize it, take it into custody, and then seek a warrant to open it?
Third, why obtain and execute a search warrant rather than first seeking the items in question either through an informal process or with a subpoena?
Fifth, perhaps there’s something here we don’t know—something that, once known, will clarify the reasons for the raid. If there is, FBI needs to bring forward the justification for this unprecedented action—as soon as possible. But if there isn’t, we’ve got problems at the FBI.
Sixth, classification authority belongs to the president of the United States — and NOT to bureaucrats at the National Archives.
Seventh, if this turns out to be the product of the growing political weaponization of federal law enforcement agencies, shouldn’t this incident cause all Americans to be even more outraged by the Democrats’ plan to hire an additional 87,000 agents?
Eighth, how is this aggressive action defensible in light of the FBI/DOJ treatment of Hillary Clinton, who was never subjected to a raid like this, even though she (1) mishandled classified material, and (2) destroyed evidence?
Ninth, what should we make of the fact that this is occurring while FBI and DOJ have taken no discernible action regarding (for example) flagrant violations of the law by (a) Hunter Biden, or (b) pro-abortion extremists threatening Supreme Court justices at their homes?
Tenth, why should we assume that the FBI is above targeting Republicans when it creates documents like this one, which encourages agents to be suspicious of people who display the Betsy Ross Flag or the “don’t tread on me” Gadsden Flag?
Twelfth, shouldn’t all Americans be suspicious of the FBI based on its use of warrantless “backdoor searches” under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (about which Christopher Wray expressed very little concern when questioned at last week’s hearing)?
Update: “The Justice Department also subpoenaed surveillance footage from Mar-a-Lago recorded over a 60-day period, including views from outside the storage room.” Same DOJ concealing 14k hours of surveillance video from Capitol on January 6.
“It’s a scam. The objective isn’t to get the farmers to behave in an organic, responsible, ecologically opposite manner. Far from it. It’s in order to bankrupt the farmers so that their land can be grabbed.”
~ Russell Brand. The Netherlands are saying they will have to shut down over 11 000 farms in order to meet the nitrogen climate goals. In other words, they are planning on shutting down around 1/5 of all farms in the country.
Shot: “Today we received news that our economy had zero percent inflation in the month of July. Zero percent.” -Biden
Chaser: Complete lie. Inflation in July was 8.5%.
Those Ukraine flags are going to disappear real quick once they realize that their “student loan forgiveness” money is going to Ukraine. However, Pelosi took her son, Paul Jr. on this last trip to Asia & to Ukraine. Turns out Paul Jr is on the boards of 2 lithium companies in Taiwan. Her office blocked his name out anytime it was mentioned in official records. Now we know why she went. Looks like another Hunter situation.
We just wanna thank Democrats for having the guts to give subsidies to people earning over $300K. SURE, 65% of families live paycheck to paycheck but more importantly, a hedge fund manager will FINALLY get help buying an electric Porsche for his side chick. Justice at long last.
Americans are being economically crushed, their IRS is being weaponized against them — and yet they are being forced to subsidize the existence of an Eastern European kleptocracy run by a narcissistic crook in Ukraine.
Sooo… Just to review: the Inflation Reduction Act, “reduces inflation” by printing billions of dollars, increasing taxes on the middle class… then giving that money to corporations and special interest groups who pretend they have the power to control the weather… got it.
Once again, a GREAT read!
Clear and concise and to the point, as always!
Excellent. Keep telling the truth. There is definitely not enough of it out there.
Is it true that the IRS has purchased 5 million rounds of ammunition? Didn’t know you need ammo to conduct audits. What’s really going on here? Are you really better off with Dementia Man and his cronies in the White House then when Mr Mean Tweets was in power?
So Wayne where did you copy and paste the article from? Interesting it goes from “Frist” to “Third” to “Fifth” and so forth.
“First, did Attorney General Garland personally sign off on this action? (YES)
Second, why break into the safe rather than seize it, take it into custody, and then seek a warrant to open it?”
The above was written by someone who has no idea of the law or how Search Warrants work. The Search Warrant will state they are looking for ” a or a couple” of named documents in the safe. They don’t know what else is in , they wont take the whole safe.
“Third, why obtain and execute a search warrant rather than first seeking the items in question either through an informal process or with a subpoena?”
Umm, they did but the subpoena and all requests were ignored? Was the author living under a rock or maybe didn’t bother checking facts?
“… FBI needs to bring forward the justification for this unprecedented action—as soon as possible. But if there isn’t, we’ve got problems at the FBI. …”
Umm, they did. It’s call a Probable Cause and all Search Warrants need to have one.
“Sixth, classification authority belongs to the president of the United States — and NOT to bureaucrats at the National Archives.” Right. Let’s see the proof that he did. He can’t just say ” I unclassified these documents. We all know he didn’t. Still waiting on proof of the rigged election by the way
“Tenth, why should we assume that the FBI is above targeting Republicans when it creates documents like this one, which encourages agents to be suspicious of people who display the Betsy …” Is the author so stupid to believe that people identify themselves as Republican and Democratic and not Americans who actually uphold their oaths? I did know the FBI and Judicial branch was purged of all Republicans when Biden won.
Carla, maybe you should reread the article again. We know Paul has never let facts get in the way of a rant and Curmudgeon, maybe you should climb back under the rock.
Speaking of never letting facts get in the way of a rant, which is a skill set our J Wheaton possesses to a high degree, far, far above the rest of us who don’t even come close, do you recall, J Wheaton, Elbridge Gerry, a former vice president of the United States, like Joe Biden was before Nancy Pelosi appointed him president, saying in a meeting of the Committee of the Whole on Wednesday, June 6, 1787, as follows:
Much depends on the mode of election.
In England the people will probably lose their liberty from the smallness of the proportion having a right of suffrage.
Our danger arises from the opposite extreme.
Hence in Massachusetts the worst men get into the Legislature.
Several members of that body had lately been convicted of infamous crimes.
Men of indigence, ignorance, and baseness, spare no pains, however dirty, to carry their point against men who are superior to the artifices practised.
end quotes
Do you remember that, J Wheaton?
And are you asking us to believe that in the intervening time, anything has changed, especially in Washington, D.C.?
Are you telling us that in America today, it is not the worst men and women who get into the Legislature in Washington, D.C.?
Are you telling us that today in Washington. D.C., men and women of indigence, ignorance, and baseness no longer spare any pains, however dirty, to carry their point against men who are superior to the artifices practised?
Do you seriously expect us to believe that?
And that as a result, the political police of the FBI today are not a joke?
Get real, J Wheaton, for that is a sale you cannot make, and for proof of that assertion, all we need do is go to a CBS News article titled “McCabe: Possible ‘inappropriate relationship’ between Trump, Russia prompted probe” by Emily Tillett on 17 February 2019, where we have the unprofessional clown show that is the FBI depicted in black and white, as follows:
Former Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe said the possibility of an “inappropriate relationship” between President Trump and the government of Russia prompted his decision to launch obstruction of justice and counterintelligence investigations into the president.
end quotes
And that was all just plain HORSE****, J Wheaton – purely political HORSE****, which is why the FBI are appropriately called the “political police.”
And McCabe, as we will recall, was fired in March 2018 by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions after the Justice Department’s inspector general determined he had misled internal investigators about his involvement in a news media leak, which firing was the subject of a Politico article by Myah Ward on 10/14/2021 titled “‘I don’t feel free’: McCabe expects to remain Trump target after winning back pension,” where we have even more political drama and intrigue from the bowels of the FBI in Washington, D.C., as follows:
McCabe sued in 2019, saying his firing was an effort by Trump to purge the FBI of officials he saw as disloyal.
McCabe became acting director of the FBI after Trump fired James Comey, who was leading an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
McCabe has repeatedly denied deception.
He has not faced criminal charges and has said his firing was politically motivated.
In an interview with CNN Thursday night, he again said “never at any time did I mislead anyone.”
“This was clearly an act of vindication against a perceived political enemy,” McCabe said, adding that the current DOJ is “standing up for fairness and standing up for the rule of law.”
“In the settlement agreement itself, they agree that members of the executive branch should not interfere in internal personnel matters because it creates the appearance of political influence,” he said.
McCabe didn’t mince his words when it came to talking about the toll the process has taken on his family.
“I can’t tell you what this has been like going through.”
“What this whole vindictive campaign has put my wife through.”
“My children.”
“My parents,” he said.
“I mean, to know that you essentially have a target on your back from the most powerful person in the world.”
“… It was like upside-down world.”
And McCabe doesn’t think he’s seen the end of it.
“I don’t feel free.”
“I don’t kid myself to think that the president is going to put aside his horrific judgment, his constant lying and his tormenting of me and my family,” he said.
“I’m sure this will just add another log to the fire.”
“He’ll probably be saying all kinds of things about it tomorrow.”
“But you know what?”
“I’m just to the point where I don’t care.”
“I don’t care what that guy has to say.”
end quotes
And talk about a drama queen, J Wheaton, I would say Andy McCabe runs a close second to Cassidy Hutchinson, which takes us back to the CBS story, to wit:
In a clip that aired on “Face the Nation” from McCabe’s “60 Minutes” interview, McCabe told correspondent Scott Pelley he launched the investigations shortly after speaking with Mr. Trump on details surrounding the dramatic 2017 firing of McCabe’s own boss, former FBI Director James Comey.
“It’s many of those same concerns that caused us to be concerned about a national security threat.”
“And the idea is, if the president committed obstruction of justice, fired the director of the FBI to negatively impact or to shut down our investigation of Russia’s malign activity and possibly in support of his campaign, as a counterintelligence investigator you have to ask yourself, ‘Why would a president of the United States do that?’” McCabe said.
He added, “So all those same sorts of facts cause us to wonder, is there an inappropriate relationship, a connection between this president and our most fearsome enemy, the government of Russia?”
end quotes
Our most fearsome enemy, J Wheaton?
That’s rich!
And that takes us to an Associated Press article titled “Ex-FBI official: ‘Crime may have been committed’ by Trump” by Eric Tucker on 18 February 2019, for more political BULL**** from the FBI, to wit:
WASHINGTON — Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe said in an interview that aired Sunday that a “crime may have been committed” when President Donald Trump fired the head of the FBI and tried to publicly undermine an investigation into his campaign’s ties to Russia.
McCabe also said in the interview with “60 Minutes” that the FBI had good reason to open a counterintelligence investigation into whether Trump was in league with Russia, and therefore a possible national security threat, following the May 2017 firing of then-FBI Director James Comey.
Asked whether Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was onboard with the obstruction and counterintelligence investigations, McCabe replied, “Absolutely.”
In the interview Sunday, McCabe also said Rosenstein in the days after Comey’s firing had proposed wearing a wire to secretly record the president.
McCabe said he took the remark seriously, though the Justice Department last September — responding last September to a New York Times report that first revealed the conversation — issued a statement from an unnamed official who was in the room and interpreted the remark as sarcastic.
McCabe said the remark was made during a conversation about why Trump had fired Comey.
“And in the context of that conversation, the deputy attorney general offered to wear a wire into the White House.”
“He said, ‘I never get searched when I go into the White House.’”
“‘I could easily wear a recording device.’”
“‘They wouldn’t know it was there,’” McCabe said.
end quotes
And from there we go to a NBC News story titled “McCabe says he told Congress ‘Gang of 8’ leaders about FBI probe into Trump, and they had no objection” by Allan Smith on 19 February 2019, as follows:
Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe told NBC’s “Today” show on Tuesday that he briefed congressional leaders about the counterintelligence investigation he had opened into President Donald Trump and that “no one objected.”
“That’s the important part here,” McCabe told Savannah Guthrie, who had asked if he had informed the “Gang of 8” bipartisan group of leaders on the Hill.
“No one objected.”
“Not on legal grounds, not on constitutional grounds and not based on the facts.”
The purpose of the briefing in 2017 was to let the congressional leadership, including Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, then-House Speaker Paul Ryan and their Democratic counterparts, know what the FBI was doing in the probe into Russian election interference and possible collusion by the Trump campaign, McCabe said.
“Opening a case of this nature (is) not something that an FBI director, not something that an acting FBI director would do by yourself, right?” McCabe said on “Today.”
“This was a recommendation that came to me from my team.”
“I reviewed it with our lawyers.”
“I discussed it at length with the deputy attorney general, and I told Congress what we had done.”
In that CBS interview, which aired in full on Sunday, McCabe said he ordered obstruction of justice and counterintelligence investigations into Trump after he fired Comey and said Rosenstein had discussed the possibility of removing Trump through the 25th Amendment in addition to wearing a wire during a future conversation with the president.
In a statement Thursday, the Justice Department disputed McCabe’s assertions in the interview, calling his recollections “inaccurate and factually incorrect.”
McCabe disputed the DOJ pushback in his Tuesday interview with NBC.
end quotes
Isn’t Washington, D.C. so fun, J Wheaton, and especially the FBI?
And that takes us to a CNN article titled “McCabe: ‘I think it’s possible’ Trump is a Russian asset” by Kate Sullivan and Laura Jarrett on February 20, 2019, as follows:
(CNN) — Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe said Tuesday it is possible President Donald Trump is a Russian asset.
“Do you still believe the President could be a Russian asset?” asked CNN’s Anderson Cooper during an interview with McCabe on “Anderson Cooper 360.”
“I think it’s possible.
“I think that’s why we started our investigation, and I’m really anxious to see where (special counsel Robert) Mueller concludes that,” McCabe said.
McCabe is promoting his new book, “The Threat,” which paints a stark portrait of his time at the bureau under Trump, describing in vivid detail his version of interactions with top officials at the White House and Justice Department.
The book was released Tuesday and became an instant best-seller.
The former acting FBI director went on the record in that “60 Minutes” interview confirming some previous reports about Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein: That he raised the idea of wiring himself to surreptitiously record interactions with the President, and mused about which Cabinet officials might support an effort to invoke the 25th Amendment to oust Trump from office.
Rosenstein has previously said that comment was mischaracterized.
end quotes
That all reads like a farce from National Lampoon back in the 1970s, when they were lampooning John Mitchell.
And you want us to take them seriously?
Yeah, right, J Wheaton, fat chance of that!
Try arguing the facts – the search warrant is legal. The search warrant was the last resort. Trump had been subpoenaed and ignore it.
His lawyer, who represents Trump said all documents were turned over which proved to be false
Trump can’t click his heels 3 times and say the documents are unclassified.
Probable Cause should not be released. We argue guilt or innocence in a court of law, not on Fox News.
!787 or 2017 has no bearing on this event. If you like to talk history how about the possibility that Benedict Arnold may finally be topped by Donald Trump.
J Wheaton says @ AUGUST 16, 2022 AT 11:27 PM: Try arguing the facts – the search warrant is legal.
RESPONSE: Oh, really?
And how is it that you find yourself in possession of that knowledge, given that according to Bloomberg the other day in an article titled “DOJ Opposes Release of Affidavit in Trump Search, Citing Probe” by Chris Strohm and Erik Larson on August 15, 2022, the Justice Department said Monday it opposes the release of an FBI affidavit justifying a search warrant used to remove documents from former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home in Florida last week.
So how is it that you know the search warrant is legal?
And the plain and simple answer is that you don’t.
You’re just saying that because that is something you would say, and then challenge us with to prove you false.
But we don’t have to prove you false, because you have no evidence to support what you are saying, and without evidence that what you are saying is true, I’m not believing you.
And I know you can’t stand Trump’s guts because he beat Hillary Clinton in 1996, but isn’t Trump innocent until PROVEN guilty?
Or is there a different standard for Trump, because he did beat Hillary Clinton in 1996?
And Trump beating out Benedict Arnold?
Yeah, okay, if that’s what you want to believe, but I think that it is a ridiculous premise.
Your grasp of law is mind-boggling. The Probable Cause lists all the reasons/facts why a Search Warrant is needed. You contest your arrest in Court not the court of public opinion.
Using your rationale your neighborhood drug dealer should be able to obtain the Probable Cause before they are arrested so they can bump off all the witnesses.
Hey, here is a question for you – why take sei documents concerning nuclear weapons??? Sure they could fetch a pretty penny.
The Washington Examiner
“Grassley wants answers on Clinton ‘kid gloves’ treatment after FBI Trump raid”
Jerry Dunleavy
16 August 2022
A top Republican senator is demanding answers from the FBI, arguing former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton received “kid gloves” treatment during the bureau’s investigation into her private email server, especially compared to the raid of Mar-a-Lago.
“Based on news reports, Trump has not been provided the same treatment given to Secretary Clinton and her associates,” Grassley said, adding that he raised concerns in 2016 with Obama Attorney General Loretta Lynch about Clinton and her associates “receiving kid gloves treatment.”
The senator asked, “Did the FBI engage in the same conduct with respect to former President Trump and Mar-a-Lago?”
“If not, why not?”
Attorney General Merrick Garland said last week that he “personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant.
The Justice Department is opposing making public the underlying affidavit justifying the raid.
HEH HEH HEH HEH HEH HEH, J Wheaton!
Great lines!
Kudos to your script writer!
That is truly some dynamite prose!
Trump has a Top Secret Clearance….what a disgrace the FBI has become.
Frank, that means you can view the documents. Not TAKE the documents. Really? What a disgrace Trump is you mean.
Note: He can not only take and then negotiate with the Nat. Archives, but the POTUS is the last classification authority. Who is stupid enough to believe that Trump would actually try and sell Nuke secrets? Stop it.
I don’t care if Trump snorted coke out of the crack of a hooker’s rear end every day since he was 13….I care about what is really hurting our nation…people like you.
J Wheaton says @ AUGUST 17, 2022 AT 11:31 PM: Hey, here is a question for you – why take sei documents concerning nuclear weapons???
Sure they could fetch a pretty penny.
RESPONSE: You know, J Wheaton, I do not know the answer to that question.
It is beyond my ken, and I would be dishonest pretending or saying otherwise.
And why be so?
And if Joe Biden’s pet poodle Attorney General Merrick Garland said last week that he “personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant,” then it is certain that Joe Biden was the one who ordered the hit, er, sorry, the raid on Trump’s home to toss the place, as Joe continues his personal vendetta against his political rival to remove him as a political threat using the full powers of his office to go after Trump to destroy him, starting with Joe’s DOJ.
Interesting Paul, Trump selling nuclear secrets was beyond your ken but the issuing of the Search Warrant is a personal vendetta. As I said before facts and rationale thinking don’t really seem to be your forte
J Wheaton, you are a true gift to thinking people in here who like to continually stretch and grow their intellects solving the many and varied conundrums you are always presenting us with, like your assertion that Trump, who in your narrative is a Russian asset, is broke and needs money real bad to pay off Rudoph Giuliani for legal services from the 2021 election, so in your narrative, which is quite interesting from Le Carre “cloak-and-dagger” or “spy thriller” perspective, you have Trump selling nuclear secrets to the Russians and maybe North Korea as well, given Trump is tight with that dude, to raise some coin to pay Rudolph with, which is an interesting theory, indeed.
Thanks for presenting it to us for our consideration.
As to the judge who signed that search warrant, don’t you think it was more than a bit hinky advancing him to the head of the pack to be a magistrate judge with his record, which included being the co-chair of the white collar crime practice group of a national firm with his practice focused on white collar criminal defense?
So that anyone who WAS NOT a defense lawyer for white collar criminals and HAD NOT represented one or more of Epstein’s employees and HAD NOT been sued by the DOJ was out of the running as not qualified?
You down with that, J Wheaton?
No problems with it, appearance-wise?
And how about the fact, given you are big on facts, as am I, and a dude as tuned in and savvy about this **** as you are from the top down, the bottom up, the middle out and six ways to Sunday is going to know this cold and hope the rest of us are too stupid to find it out on our own, that it was this same Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart, the Florida judge who approved the warrant for the FBI raid of former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, who was formerly assigned to oversee a lawsuit in which Trump sued Hillary Clinton.
How about that, J Wheaton?
Reinhart, I believe, worked for Bill Clinton in his treasury department, and once you are in bed with the Clintons, like being in the AB, it is for life – you can check out any time you want, but you can never leave.
In the case of Trump v. Clinton, Trump made some very serious political enemies even more of an enemy by suing Hillary Clinton on March 24, 2022 along with the Democratic National Committee, Perkins Coie, LLC, Michael Sussmann, Marc Elias, Debbie Wasserman Schultz, Charles Halliday Dolan, Jr., Jakes Sullivan, John Podesta, Fusion GPS, Nellie Ohr, Bruce Ohr, Christopher Steele, Igor Danchenko, James Comey, Peter Strzok, Lisa Page, Andrew McCabe, and many others.
As you will no doubt clearly recall, the Trump lawsuit alleged that Clinton “and her cohorts … maliciously conspired to weave a false narrative that their Republican opponent [Trump] was colluding with a hostile foreign sovereignty.”
The scheme included “falsifying evidence, deceiving law enforcement, and exploiting access to highly sensitive data sources,” and was “conceived, coordinated and carried out by top-level officials at the Clinton Campaign and the DNC.”
Reinhart was assigned to the case on April 6, 2022, after the previous magistrate judge, Ryon McCabe, was recused.
On April 15, Reinhart conducted a scheduling conference in the case, according to court documents obtained by The Center Square.
He oversaw scheduling of a June 2 status conference on May 4 and 31 and oversaw the actual conference.
Reinhart also signed another order on June 14, setting another status conference for July 6, but by June 22 Reinhart cancelled the conference and recused himself.
Less than two months later, on Monday, August 9, he signed a warrant for the FBI to raid Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate over an alleged dispute over White House documents.
So do us a favor and entertain us further by putting your spin on all of that to see where it is you can take us next as you try to walk us all down the garden path.
You find Trump an impossible Russian/North Korean asset but then you push some conspiracy/ revenge theory ? LMAO
Hear that sound, Paul? It’s the sound of the marbles leaving you and falling on the floor. Your logic is as strong as a wet paper sack.
Go howl at the moon.
J Wheaton, what an excellent emotional response to the reality that confronts you herein that you are so ill-equipped to deal with emotionally, that your Bruce, your “honest” federal magistrate judge who issued the search warrant for Trump’s house on behalf of his president, Joe Biden, appears to have taken a dive on behalf of the Clintons and the Democrat party by stuffing Trump’s civil lawsuit in the toilet as a magistrate judge in charge of the pre-trial proceedings when he appears to have gotten a far better deal that would affect his career in a positive way from the Clintons and the Democrat party who hold the power here than he was going to get from them if he came down on Trump’s side in the civil lawsuit.
The magistrate judge’s first role is to make sure all the parties and witnesses follow proper court room procedure which is of vital importance to the legal system, designed to ensure that everyone who comes to court gets a fair trial.
Except if his name is Trump.
And then it is okay to treat him like a bum, because a clear majority have already determined that he is guilty, and in a democracy, that is all it takes.
I do not care what a Liberal like you thinks. You are part of a big problem that will be solved before this page in our nation’s his-story is turned.
Have you thanked a Liberal for the Social Security check you collect each month?
And Liberals aren’t the problem – the problem is people like you who can’t think rationally. Yup the Liberals/ Democrats have taken over the CIA, FBI, the media, Hollywood, Starbucks, and the Armed Forces and soon will be replacing you with a pod – don’t go to sleep!!!
As that little kid says “People are getting stupider and stupider” What happened to our education system in the 50s and 60s?
It got infiltrated and contaminated with RED COMMIES who believed quite rightly that to take over America, it had to be done from the inside and to do that, generations of ignorant citizens had to be created, who would have no way of knowing what was happening around them, because they would have no context, no history to draw from.
RED COMMIES are very scientific in their approach to taking over governments, as well as patient and persistent.
Their science goes back to Marx and Engels and was honed by Lenin and then Stalin into something quite formidable, based on applied psychology as it is.
And my goodness, but this is all quite old news now, and has never been a secret except to those who are unaware of it.
And so much for Joe Biden’s sanctions on Russia which are crushing the economies of Joe’s hapless allies while Putin keeps on rolling along, enjoying the “JOE SHOW” as Joe single-handedly destroys the economy of Europe:
Rigzone
“Oil Posts Weekly Loss as Recession Fears Offset Demand”
by Bloomberg | Devika Krishna Kumar and Sheela Tobben
Friday, August 19, 2022
Despite US and EU sanctions, Russian oil exports are robust, with the country shipping 7.4 million barrels a day in July, according to the International Energy Agency.
Reuters
“House panel seeks social media data on FBI threats made after Trump search”
Reuters
August 19, 2022
Aug 19 (Reuters) – U.S. Democratic lawmakers on Friday asked social media platforms to turn over data regarding an increase in online threats aimed at law enforcement following a search of former President Donald Trump’s Florida home and asked how they planned to respond.
Last week the FBI and U.S Department of Homeland Security alerted law enforcement agencies of an increase in threats.
The Democrats want to know if the uptick in online threats was linked to what they described as “reckless statements” issued by Trump and Republicans condemning the search.
Isn’t J Wheaton so fun, people?
I think so, anyway, as I get a lot of enjoyment out of watching J Wheaton flailing around as he tries to make his points in here, whatever in fact they may be.
As to inflammatory language and incendiary language by Trump leading up to 6 January 2021 and on that day, J Wheaton, bless his little heart, wants us to believe even if we would be silly to do so, that never before in our nation’s history, which J Wheaton is clearly unaware of, has an American president uttered such words, and he is, of course, wrong in that assertion as we can see by going back to 11th grade American history, which J Wheaton apparently skipped and the impeachment trial of DEMOCRAT Andy Johnson between March 30, 1868 and Apr 9, 1868 where in Article 10 of the Articles of Impeachment, we had as follows:
ARTICLE 10. That said Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, unmindful of the high duties of his high office and the dignity and proprieties thereof, and of the harmony and courtesies which ought to exist and be maintained between the executive and legislative branches of the Government of the United States, designing and intending to set aside the rightful authorities and powers of Congress, did attempt to bring into disgrace, ridicule, hatred, contempt and reproach, the Congress of the United States, and the several branches thereof, to impair and destroy the regard and respect of all the good people of the United States for the Congress and the legislative power thereof, which all officers of the government ought inviolably to preserve and maintain, and to excite the odium and resentment of all good people of the United States against Congress and the laws by it duly and constitutionally enacted; and in pursuance of his said design and intent, openly and publicly and before divers assemblages of citizens of the United States, convened in divers parts thereof, to meet and receive said Andrew Johnson as the Chief Magistrate of the United States, did, on the eighteenth day of August, in the year of our Lord one thousand eight hundred and sixty-six, and on divers other days and times, as well before as afterwards, make and declare, with a loud voice, certain intemperate, inflammatory and scandalous harangues, and therein utter loud threats and bitter menaces, as well against Congress as the laws of the United States duly enacted thereby, amid the cries, jeers and laughter of the multitudes then assembled in hearing, which are set forth in the several specifications hereinafter written, in substance and effect, that it to say:
“Specification First.”
“In this, that at Washington, in the District of Columbia, In the Executive Mansion, to a committee of citizens who called upon the President of the United States, speaking of and concerning the Congress of the United States, heretofore, to wit: On the 18th day of August, in the year of our Lord, 1866, in a loud voice, declare in substance and effect, among other things, that is to say:”
“So far as the Executive Department of the government is concerned, the effort has been made to restore the Union, to heal the breach, to pour oil into the wounds which were consequent upon the struggle, and, to speak in a common phrase, to prepare, as the learned and wise physician would, a plaster healing in character and co-extensive with the wound.”
“We thought and we think that we had partially succeeded, but as the work progresses, as reconstruction seemed to be taking place, and the country was becoming reunited, we found a disturbing and moving element opposing it.”
“In alluding to that element it shall go no further than your Convention, and the distinguished gentleman who has delivered the report of the proceedings, I shall make no reference that I do not believe, and the time and the occasion justify.”
“We have witnessed in one department of the government every endeavor to prevent the restoration of peace, harmony and union.”
“We have seen hanging upon the verge of the government, as it were, a body called or which assumes to be the Congress of the United States, while in fact it is a Congress of only part of the States.”
“We have seen this Congress pretend to be for the Union, when its every step and act tended to perpetuate disunion and make a disruption of States inevitable.”
“We have seen Congress gradually encroach, step by step, upon constitutional rights, and violate day after day, and month after month, fundamental principles of the government.”
“We have seen a Congress that seemed to forget that there was a limit to the sphere and scope of legislation.”
“We have seen a Congress in a minority assume to exercise power which, if allowed to be consummated, would result in despotism or monarchy itself.”
“Specification Second.”
“In this, that at Cleveland, in the State of Ohio, heretofore to wit: On the third day of September, in the year of our Lord, 1866, before a public assemblage of citizens and others, said Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, speaking of and concerning the Congress of the United States, did, in a loud voice, declare in substance and effect, among other things, that is to say:”
“I will tell you what I did do?”
“I called upon your Congress that is trying to break up the government.”
“In conclusion, beside that Congress had taken much pains to poison the constituents against him, what has Congress done?”
“Have they done anything to restore the union of the States?”
“No.”
“On the contrary, they had done everything to prevent it: and because he stood now where he did when the Rebellion commenced, he had been denounced as a traitor,”
“Who had run greater risks or made greater sacrifices than himself?”
“But Congress, factions and domineering, had undertaken to poison the minds of the American people.”
“Specification Third.”
“In this case, that at St. Louis, in the State of Missouri, heretofore to wit: On the 8th day of September, in the year of our Lord 1866, before a public assemblage of citizens and others, said Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, speaking of acts concerning the Congress of the United States, did, in a loud voice, declare in substance and effect, among other things, that is to say:”
“Go on; perhaps if you had a word or two on the subject of New Orleans you might understand more about it than you do, and if you will go back and ascertain the cause of the riot at New Orleans, perhaps you will not be so prompt in calling out New Orleans.”
“If you will take up the riot of New Orleans and trace it back to its source and its immediate cause, you will find out who was responsible for the blood that was shed there.”
“If you will take up the riot at New Orleans and trace it back to the Radical Congress, you will find that the riot at New Orleans was substantially planned.”
“If you will take up the proceedings in their caucuses you will understand that they knew that a convention was to be called which was extinct by its powers having expired; that it was said that the intention was that a new government was to be organized, and on the organization of that government the intention was to enfranchise one portion of the population, called the colored population, and who had been emancipated, and at the same time disfranchise white men.”
“When you design to talk about New Orleans you ought to understand what you are talking about.”
“When you read the speeches that were made, and take up the facts on the Friday and Saturday before that convention sat, you will find that speeches were made incendiary in their character, exciting that portion of the population, the black population, to arm themselves and prepare for the shedding of blood.”
“You will also find that convention did assemble in violation of law, and the intention of that convention was to supersede the organized authorities in the State of Louisiana, which had been organized by the government of the United States, and every man engaged in that rebellion, in the convention, with the intention of superseding and upturning the civil government which had been recognized by the Government of the United States, I say that he was a traitor to the Constitution of the United States, and hence you find that another rebellion was commenced, having its origin in the Radical Congress.”
“So much for the New Orleans riot.”
“And there was the cause and the origin of the blood that was shed, and every drop of blood that was shed is upon their skirts and they are responsible.”
“I could test this thing a little closer, but will not do it here to-night.”
“But when you talk about the causes and consequences that resulted from proceedings of that kind, perhaps, as I have been introduced here and you have provoked questions of this kind, though it does not provoke me, I will tell you a few wholesome things that have been done by this Radical Congress in connection with New Orleans and the extension of the elective franchise.”
“I know that I have been traduced and abused.”
“I know it has come in advance of me here, as elsewhere, that I have attempted to exercise an arbitrary power in resisting laws that were intended to be forced upon the government; that I had exercised that power; that I had abandoned the party that elected me, and that I was a traitor, because I exercised the veto power in attempting, and did arrest for a time, that which was called a ‘Freedmen’s Bureau’ bill.”
“Yes, that I was a traitor.”
“And I have been traduced; I have been slandered; I have been maligned; I have been called Judas Iscariot, and all that.”
“Now, my countrymen, here to-night, it is very easy to indulge in epithets; it is easy to call a man a Judas, and cry out traitor, but when he is called upon to give arguments and facts he is very often found wanting.”
“Judas Iscariot?”
“Judas!”
“There was a Judas, and he was one of the twelve Apostles.”
“O, yes, the twelve Apostles had a Christ, and he never could have had a Judas unless he had twelve Apostles.”
“If I have played the Judas who has been my Christ that I have played the Judas with?”
“Was it Thad. Stevens?”
“Was it Wendell Phillips?”
“Was it Charles Sumner?”
“They are the men that stop and compare themselves with the Savior, and everybody that differs with them in opinion, and tries to stay and arrest their diabolical and nefarious policy is to be denounced as a Judas.”
“Well, let me say to you, if you will stand by me in this action, if you will stand by me in trying to give the people a fair chance, soldiers and citizens, to participate in these office, God be willing, I will kick them out.”
“I will kick them out just as fast as I can.”
“Let me say to you, in concluding, that what I have said is what I intended to say; I was not provoked into this, and care not for their menaces, the taunts and the jeers.”
“I care not for threats, I do not intend to be bullied by enemies, nor overawed by my friends.”
“But, God willing, with your help, I will veto their measures whenever any of them come to me.”
“Which said utterances, declarations, threats and harangues, highly censurable in any, are peculiarly indecent and unbecoming in the Chief Magistrate of the United States, by means whereof the said Andrew Johnson has brought the high office of the President of the United States into contempt, ridicule and disgrace, to the great scandal of all good citizens, whereby said Andrew Johnson, President of the United States, did commit, and was then and there guilty of a high misdemeanor in office.”