Op-Ed: Adam Schiff and the Russian Connection

5 thoughts on “Op-Ed: Adam Schiff and the Russian Connection”

1. “PUTIN WON!”

   That is a sensationalistic headline being screamed at us by the Wall Street Journal in an article entitled “‘Putin Has Won’: Mueller Report Details How Russia Interfered in 2016 Election” by Dustin Volz and Alan Cullison on 19 April 2019, and if that statement is true, that Putin did win something here, it was with the financial aid and assistance of the Democrat-controlled Soviet Socialist Republic of California, home of Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Maxine Waters, and the Soviet Socialist Republic of New York, home of the “Closet Commie” AOC, which makes it seem very much like New York and California are giving aid and comfort to an enemy of the United States in a time of war, which seems very much like treason to me, anyway, which takes us back to that Wall Street Journal article as follows:

   WASHINGTON—Robert Mueller’s long-awaited report is unambiguously clear on this point: Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election and sought to help Donald Trump win the White House.

   The report from Mr. Mueller will likely serve as the definitive document about Russia’s use of an array of digital weapons to influence the American electorate in 2016.

   It will also bolster warnings from senior U.S. intelligence officials that Russia and other hostile foreign powers remain intent on disrupting future elections, including the 2020 presidential contest.

   Mr. Mueller asserted on the very first page of the report that the Russian government “interfered in the 2016 presidential election in sweeping and systematic fashion.”

   end quotes

   Now, given the financial support given to Mother Russia by its socialist satellites California and New York here in the United States, doesn’t it seem very likely that by giving this financial aid to Mother Russia, California and New York are in essence aiding and abetting a form of state-sponsored terrorism intended to bring down Republican government here in America so it can be replaced with Soviet-style socialism as exists in Putin’s Mother Russia?

   And what am I saying, of course it does.

   So when can we expect an investigation into the actions of California and New York of aiding Russian interference in our elections through financial support?

   Soon, one would hope, for the sake of this seriously divided nation.

   Reply

2. One thing that you can say in praise of the Democrats is that when they shovel ****, they use a real big shovel, and that is a fact, which takes us to a POLITICO article entitled “Schiff: ‘Ample evidence of collusion in plain sight’” by David Cohen on 04/21/2019, where we have as follows:

   Responding to attacks by White House counselor Kellyanne Conway, Rep. Adam Schiff on Sunday insisted his criticism of the Trump administration was not wrong, saying there was “ample evidence of collusion in plain sight.”

   end quotes

   And as we can see from the above article from RT News entitled “California among top 10 investors in Russian debt thanks to cops & firefighters” by Max Whittake of Reuters published 12 Oct. 2018, and the RT News story “Sanctioned Russian assets attracting investment from biggest US pension funds” by Sergey Pyatakov/Sputnik published 22 Oct. 2018, and the Russia Business Today article entitled “California Pension Fund Invests in Russia’s Sovereign Debt” on October 12, 2018, there most certainly is ample evidence of collusion between the Soviet Socialist Republic of California and Mother Russia right there in as plain of sight as plain sight can be, and yet, curiously, Adam Schiff totally disregards that ample evidence and instead tries to focus our attention on Trump, as we can see by returning to the Politico article as follows:

   “And the fact that a candidate for president and now president of the United States would not only not stand up and resist Russian interference in our election but would welcome it goes well beyond anything Nixon did.“

   end quotes

   Yes, I see, I see, but then, what about California and New York, home of Democrat “Jumping Jerry” Nadler, who were actively financing that interference, Adam?

   What commentary can you give us on that, dude?

   Reply

3. Politics makes strange bedfellows. Democrats are going to do what they do. Republicans will do what they do. The policy makers of their parties will do what they do. The Fundraisers will do what they do. The Image makers do what they do. The talking heads out front digest all the info, all the talking points, and influence and sway the media and voters in order to win votes in the big show on election day. They all work together and all create the bigger bang depending on the bigger buck that they have. It’s all about the benjamins. The more benjamins they have the more meetings they have, signs they make, ads they buy , influence they peddle, eyes and ears they reach, and when better presented that the opposition, the more votes and power they get.
   It’s the reason the democrats have so many people running. They believe the more candidates that run, the more money they will raise from every corner of their party, and then they will have more money left over for the general election.
   Sound bytes work. Sadly the press uses them to support their own agenda, and the reduction of The American Concentration Span”. Then political flip flops sound “new” and sexy to the distracted brain.
   Pay attention. Support your candidate. America isn’t easy.
   The democrats know they have a hard uphill battle on their hands. They are waving and screaming, with the help of the press, that they are raising lots of money. Is that because empty barrels make the most noise ? Is that because they know Trump has been raising $ since his last election and they will never catch the $ amount republicans have raised ?
   In the meantime, and locally, The Mirror is even already press releasing for democrats about their local candidate in the 100th district of Va. EH ? In the spirit of equal time, are any press releases pending for Delegate Bloxom ? Local guy. Solid family guy. Solid political bloodlines. Hard working prior “rookie of the year” as elected by fellow delegates. Yet the “sound bytes” talk about the new guy, and his education, and democrat affiliations he has infused with name dropping. hmmmmmmm………

   Reply

   1. Many points to consider, Jack, many points, indeed, and yes, of course, this is America, so it is about the Benjamins, but in this specific case, it is about California, home of Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff and Maxine Waters, and the corrupt ****hole of New York, home of AOC and Charley “Chuck” Schumer and Young Andy Cuomo sending those Benjamins over to Mother Russia, at that same time that we are hearing all these Democrats, some of whom seem to be reporting in from somewhere over the rainbow, like Elijah “The Prophet” Cummings, who was just quoted in a CBS NEWS article entitled “Top Democrat says he can foresee impeachment proceedings ‘possibly coming'” by Grace Segers on 21 April 2019 as saying, “The American people — a lot of them clearly still don’t believe that President Trump is doing things to destroy our democracy and has done a lot of things very poorly,” and, “so I think that number one, we need to make sure the Congress has all the information and then we need to be able to have the public know that information so that they can see that they have a president that basically has been about the business, I think, of doing great harm not only to our country but to our democracy.” and “We’re in a fight for the soul of our democracy, no doubt about it,” that Mother Russia owns Trump and is America’s adversary, as we see in the FOX NEWS story “Elizabeth Warren doubles down on Trump impeachment push, says it’s ‘bigger than politics’” by Adam Shaw on 20 April 2019 where we hear an apparently hysterical and out-of-control Lizzie Warren shrilly screeching in a tone reminiscent of Hillary Clinton’s shrill screeching that “We cannot be an America that says it is OK for a president of the United States to try and block an investigation into a foreign attack on our country or an investigation into that president’s own misbehavior — so I have called on the House to initiate impeachment proceedings,” and “A hostile foreign government attacked our 2016 election in order to help Donald Trump; Donald Trump welcomed that help; and when the federal government tried to investigate what happened, Donald Trump took multiple steps to try and derail or obstruct the investigations.”

      So, Jack, not looking to the right, or left here, given what Lizzie is saying there, the central question in this thread is WHY are there no investigation of the treasonous acts of California and New York in funding those terroristic actions of Mother Russia, given that it is a hostile foreign government that attacked our 2016 election in order to help Donald Trump.

      As to candidates strutting their stuff here in the Cape Charles Mirror, how come Bloxom isn’t availing himself of the opportunity clearly offered by the Cape Charles Mirror to tell the people of the world who he is?

      Does he expect the Cape Charles Mirror to do that for him?

      If so, wouldn’t that be a sign he is simply lazy and would make a lousy office holder?

      If the Cape Charles Mirror was on the side of the Democrats, do you honestly think that our voices would be allowed to be heard in here, as if this were the politically biased Washington Post?

      Reply

4. And while we are on the subject of “collusion” with Russia, in the light of the facts that both California and New York state are actively providing financial support to Mother Russia and Putin, let’s drop back in time to an Associated Press article entitled “Russian-American lobbyist joined Trump’s son’s meeting, too” by Desmond Butler and Chad Day on 14 July 2107, for some very necessary background to this on-going political farce, as follows:

   WASHINGTON — A prominent Russian-American lobbyist and former Soviet military officer attended a meeting with President Donald Trump’s son, son-in-law and campaign chairman last year, the lobbyist said Friday, adding a new wrinkle to the Trump team’s evolving explanations about the June 2016 session.

   Rinat Akhmetshin confirmed his involvement to The Associated Press in an interview.

   He had not been previously identified as a participant in the meeting at Trump Tower in New York, which was billed as part of a Russian government effort to help the Republican’s White House campaign.

   end quotes

   So, okay, people – here we are, the stage is set, the actors are coming out from behind the curtains, or maybe out of the woodwork, and the show is going to be all about what was been billed by the rabid, foaming-at-the-mouth Democrats and their media lackeys in the MSM as a part of a Russian government effort to help the Trump’s White House campaign, which has led to the charges we are hearing today, over and over and over and over again, about collusion and obstruction of justice by trump, which the Democrats are calling an impeachable offence, which is serious business indeed if any of it is true, which takes us back to 14 July 2107 and the Associated Press article as follows:

   The meeting has heightened questions about whether Trump’s associates coordinated with Russia to meddle in the presidential election – to help him and thwart Hillary Clinton – and whether they’ve been forthcoming about their foreign contacts.

   Federal and congressional investigators are probing possible connections between the campaign and Moscow.

   end quotes

   And there is the ALPHA which has led us to the OMEGA of the Mueller Report today, and all this continuous shrieking and caterwauling and hysterical screeching we are hearing today from such Democrat notables as Democratic Socialist superstar, media darling and TWITTER QUEEN AOC, and the foul-mouthed Rashida Tlaib and Lizzie Warren, who are all now calling for Trump to be impeached in some large part based on that meeting, as we clearly see from this CNN article entitled “Elizabeth Warren calls for House to begin impeachment proceedings on Trump” by MJ Lee, CNN Political Correspondent, on 20 April 2019, as follows:

   Sen. Elizabeth Warren called on the House of Representatives to begin impeachment proceedings against President Donald Trump Friday.

   “The Mueller report lays out facts showing that a hostile foreign government attacked our 2016 election to help Donald Trump and Donald Trump welcomed that help.”

   “Once elected, Donald Trump obstructed the investigation into that attack,” the 2020 Democratic presidential candidate wrote on Twitter.

   end quotes

   Quite frankly, people, Lizzie is hysterical and full of ****, but, if any of that crap about “facts showing that a hostile foreign government attacked our 2016 election” were to be true, what also would be true is the undisputed fact that both California and New York state are giving financial support to that hostile foreign government, and thus are supporting its efforts to undermine our Republican frame of government in this country, which is treason if what Lizzie Warren says is true, which takes us back to 14 July 2107 and the Associated Press article, to wit:

   In emails posted by Donald Trump Jr. earlier this week, a music publicist said he arranged the meeting because a Russian lawyer wanted to pass on negative information about Democrat Clinton.

   In a statement Sunday, Trump Jr. said the attorney had said she had information that people tied to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Clinton, a description that Akhmetshin backed up in his interview with the AP.

   end quotes

   WHOA, hold it a second – can we back the tape up just a minute here and get a read-back?

   Yes, stop right there, that’s what we want to focus on, thank you: the attorney said she had information that people tied to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Clinton, a description that Akhmetshin backed up in his interview with the AP.

   Now, contrast that revelation that people tied to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Clinton, a description that Akhmetshin backed up in his interview with the AP, which we never heard another peep about from Hillary Clinton, who never denied it, and who was gifted with expensive Cognac by Putin himself, or the DNC, or the Democrats themselves, or Mueller, who couldn’t have been ignorant of that fact, given he knew all about the meeting from those who were there, with what has been subsequently reported in a Wall Street Journal article entitled “‘Putin Has Won’: Mueller Report Details How Russia Interfered in 2016 Election” by Dustin Volz and Alan Cullison on 19 April 2019, as follows:

   WASHINGTON—Robert Mueller’s long-awaited report is unambiguously clear on this point: Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential election and sought to help Donald Trump win the White House.

   end quotes

   Based on the facts which the Mueller team consisting of Clinton Democrat lawyers apparently buried to protect Hillary, who is an untouchable, the story appears to be quite diffferent – Team Trump was handed evidence that people tied to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Clinton, a description that Akhmetshin backed up in his interview with the AP, and now, they faced a serious quandary – what to do with that evidence, given that the DBC controlled the White House, and through the White House the Department of Justice and the FBI, which is political, not impartial.

   Who could they take evidence to that Hillary Clinton was dirty and in bed with the Russians?

   Hussein Obama, who had personally selected Hillary to be his successor to carry on his legacy of stupidity and incompetence?

   Was Hussein going to turn on Hillary?

   And could Hussein himself have been ignorant of the fact that that people tied to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Clinton, a description that Akhmetshin backed up in his interview with the AP?

   Not likely is my thought.

   So how about Loretta Lynch then?

   But wait, she was the one who met with Hillary’s straying husband Bill on the tarmac for the express purpose of making sure that no kind of “dirt” like that fact that Hillary was in bed with the Russians could get out.

   So hey, how about Comey and the FBI?

   Gosh, you would think that some dude like Comey would be salivating to jump all over the fact that that people tied to Russia were funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Clinton, a description that Akhmetshin backed up in his interview with the AP, wouldn’t you?

   HAH HAH HAH!

   Getting back to 14 July 2107 and the Associated Press article, we have:

   In his first public interview about the meeting, Akhmetshin said he accompanied Veselnitskaya to Trump Tower where they met an interpreter.

   He said he had learned about the meeting only that day when Veselnitskaya asked him to attend.

   Veselnitskaya brought with her a plastic folder with printed-out documents that detailed what she believed was the flow of illicit funds to the Democrats, Akhmetshin said.

   Veselnitskaya presented the contents of the documents to the Trump associates and suggested that making the information public could help the campaign, he said.

   “This could be a good issue to expose how the DNC is accepting bad money,” Akhmetshin recalled her saying.

   Trump Jr. asked the attorney if she had sufficient evidence to back up her claims, including whether she could demonstrate the flow of the money.

   But Veselnitskaya said the Trump campaign would need to research it more.

   After that, Trump Jr. lost interest, according to Akhmetshin.

   end quotes

   So where is that evidence today then, and why didn’t Mueller investigate it further, if he and his team were really intent on finding the truth here, as opposed to conducting a combination witch hunt of Trump on the one hand and cover-up/white-wash of wrongdoing by Hillary on the other?

   And that takes us back to 14 July 2107 and the Associated Press article and Adam Schiff, as follows:

   The confirmation of Akhmetshin’s participation in the meeting drew swift reaction from the top Democrat on the House intelligence committee.

   Rep. Adam Schiff of California said whether Akhmetshin is connected to Russian intelligence or not “it is clear the Kremlin got the message that Donald Trump welcomed the help of the Russian government in providing dirt on Hillary Clinton.”

   Schiff said Trump Jr.’s omission of Akhmetshin’s role in his public account of the meeting and the president’s son’s shifting explanations “paint a portrait of consistent dissembling and deceit.”

   Kushner disclosed the meeting on his security clearance paperwork, but Schiff said the Akhmetshin revelation raises questions about how much Kushner disclosed about it.

   end quotes

   Now, whether or not Kushner, who really doesn’t come across as being very bright, disclosed any information about that meeting, it is incandescently clear that the Associated Press knew about the meeting, since they reported on it, and since the smarmy little Democrat Adam Schiff is quoted in that article, it is also incandescently clear that he would have to be very much aware that the meeting was about people tied to Russia funding the Democratic National Committee and supporting Clinton, a description that Akhmetshin backed up in his interview with the AP, so why did we never hear another peep from Adam Schiff about that?

   WHY THE ******* COVER-UP?

   Oh, right, Adam is a top Democrat fundraiser, and he is not going to jeopardize that by turning on his own dirty party, which again takes us back to 14 July 2107 and the Associated Press article, to wit:

   Akhmetshin said he has not been contacted by the U.S. special counsel’s office or the FBI about the meeting with Trump Jr.

   end quotes

   WOW, a real big surprise there, isn’t it?

   And now a word from our sponsors as we take a break for station identification!

   Reply