October 16, 2025

5 thoughts on “Op-Ed: “Sniper … A Sneaky Bastard”

  1. It’s a shame that people believe everything they hear in a political ad paid for by companies and people not even in the Commonwealth. Please do some more research on what actually happened and not what Lying ads want you to think. Have some independent thought like you keep dreaming she has. She read from A notebook the entire debate last week and couldn’t answer questions that she could not find on the pages…. that is real independent thought there. Scott Taylor has done a great job in his first term and has been honorable in serving the District. Lies and money from the Left does not qualify someone to be in Congress. Vote Scott Taylor on November 6 …..
    Jobs not Mobs

    1. Funny thing is, in a normal political environment I would have considered voting for her, mainly because I like the idea that none of our politicians get complacent.

      However, we are not in a normal political environment.

      We have one party declaring that if they take the House they will immediately start impeachment proceedings not only against the president but also the newest justice on the SC.

      Putting aside the president for a moment, it is deeply concerning that the Democrats would go after Kavanaugh , because the Constitution’s structure cautions against removing Supreme Court justices in any but the most extreme circumstances……..being a constitutionalist is NOT an extreme position, unless you’re a far left progressive.

      Judges are meant to be independent of the people, instead, beholden to the Constitution.

      Alexander Hamilton concluded that an independent judiciary comprised “the best expedient which can be devised in any government, to secure a steady, upright and impartial administration of the laws.”…..They would uphold the Constitution and statutes passed under it. And such steady, upright and impartial administration of law protected all persons against momentary fits of majority tyranny”.

      In a nutshell, allowing easy, frequent removal of federal judges risks undermining a crucial constitutional safeguard. In effect, it places judges under the control of Congress, which means that without a will of their own, the judicial power would combine with the legislative. This is expressly opposite to what the founding fathers desired.

      Now, if we bring in the president back into the conversation, it seems to me that attempting impeachment when they know it wouldn’t go anywhere in the Senate, where they would need 67 Senators’ approvals to remove the president, smacks of very poor judgement and shows more concern for their base’s approval than the welfare of the country.

      So, though I’m not happy about it, I have to go with the idea that “any Republican is better than all Democrats”.

      1. Of course there is.

        Both as predicted, and as foretold!

        And as Mr. Otton so brilliantly points about above, it is now a matter of positioning.

        Efficient and effecatious focusing of intellectual gravity.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *