September 27, 2025

2 thoughts on “PhRMA Joins Legal Battle to Rip Away Drug Savings for Millions of Seniors

  1. Everyone would like lower drug costs. But in this case, the government is not negotiating drug prices. It is setting price controls in Medicare Part D. Anyone that has some basic knowledge about economics understands that price controls do not work. They distort markets, hurt innovation, and create shortages.

    In fact, private negotiations were already occurring in Medicare Part D and had been for years. Pharmacy Benefit Managers in Medicare Part C plans (Medicare Advantage) or in Medicare Part D pharmacy benefit plans were already negotiating on behalf of their customers. What has driven up costs in the past few years was government interference in Medicare Part D plans, starting with the Affordable Care Act. It began implementing price controls in the coverage gap, sometimes called the “donut hole.” It added more cost controls in 2018. Those price controls distorted the market and helped fuel the higher costs today. Now the government has doubled down on price controls.

    Other countries began using price controls on their pharmaceuticals years ago to help pay for their nationalized healthcare. Because they adopted those actions, the United States became the leader in drug research and development. Unfortunately, if this current policy stands in the U.S., there will be hundreds of innovative drugs that will never be developed.

    Certainly, Medicare Part D needed some reform, first to remove the government mandates that distorted the market in the first place and updating its structure to provide real incentives to lower drug prices. American Action Forum, a center-right think tank that studies domestic fiscal policy had such a plan.
    https://www.americanactionforum.org/research/redesigning-medicare-part-d-realign-incentives-1/

    Congress and President Biden decided instead to offer a big government solution, found in the misnamed, “Inflation Reduction Act.” Several conservative groups opposed this plan and explained why in a letter.
    https://e217a245-0934-448f-b4ac-5bb0ce3995ec.usrfiles.com/ugd/e217a2_f73d9298ccad4325b28e89459fed3713.pdf

    Unfortunately, they did not listen.

Leave a Reply to Paul R. Plante Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *