June 15, 2025

3 thoughts on “Asses&Villains: Ukraine Money Laundering Edition

  1. And once again, the lunacy of the world we now live in (it is a new millennium, afterall, perhaps even the long sought-after Age of Aquarius when the moon is in the Seventh House and Jupiter aligns with Mars when peace will guide the planets and love will steer the stars) is presented to us in an easy-to-digest capsule summary form.

    Very well done!

    The Daily Mail

    “Biden is caught with cheat sheet at G20 informing him when to sit, speak and take a photo”

    Vanessa Serna For Dailymail.Com

    16 November 2022

    Joe Biden is caught once again with a cheat sheet that instructs him when to sit and take photos while at the G20 Summit.

    A close up snap of the President sitting down showed him with a list of instructions that said ‘YOU will sit at the center’ and ‘YOU will deliver opening remarks.’

    In his notes, Biden was also instructed when to take photos with other leaders before sitting down.

    The notes Biden held in his hands contained instructions for the opening remarks for the G20 event.

    From taking a photos to delivering the opening remarks, Biden was walked through how to handle himself leading to his speech.

    At the top and bottom of the notes, clear instructions in bold told Biden to turn the page for his opening statement notes.

    Other detailed notes tell Biden what projects he will announce and that he is responsible for closing the event along with his co-host.

    The notes specifically refer to the President as ‘YOU’ instead of his name.

    In the June meeting with wind executives at the White House, the President flashed the plan on how to conduct himself.

    The detailed instructions were titled ‘Offshore Wind Drop-By Sequence of Events’ and told Biden to ‘enter the Roosevelt Room and say hello to participants.’

    The strip of paper told him to sit down: ‘YOU take YOUR seat’, it instructed.

    The note then told the president to speak once the reporters had been brought into the room: ‘YOU give brief comments (2 minutes).’

    After the reporters departed, Biden was told to speak to some of those present at the meeting. ‘YOU ask Liz Shuler, President, AFL-CIO, a question’ and then ‘YOU thank participants’ and ‘YOU depart.’

  2. Full transcript from President Joe Biden’s address to a joint session of Congress on 28 April 2021

    To all the transgender Americans watching at home – especially the young people who are so brave – I want you to know that your president has your back.

    ****************************

    The Washington Examiner

    “Courts deliver the first blow against Biden’s egregious embrace of gender ideology”

    Kaylee McGhee White

    16 November 2022

    The courts delivered the first blow this week against President Joe Biden’s unconstitutional rewrite of Title IX, which his administration is using to force schools, medical centers, and other institutions to comply with gender ideology.

    In Texas, Judge Matthew Kacsmaryk ruled that Biden cannot force medical professionals to perform irreversible sex-change treatments if those treatments violate their religious beliefs.

    The case, Neese v. Becerra, was brought by two Texas physicians who argued Biden’s mandate would force them to choose between their jobs and their consciences.

    Dr. Susan Neese, one of the plaintiffs, said it would violate her beliefs to provide sex-change treatments, such as puberty blockers, to a minor patient or refer that minor for a surgical sex-change procedure.

    Neese noted she has treated many transgender patients in the past, but argued medical ethics require doctors to consider each patient and situation carefully and deny care in cases “where a patient’s denial of biological realities will endanger their life or safety.”

    Biden’s mandate would prevent her from using her medical judgment to help each patient individually and would harm a great number of patients as a result, she explained.

    Likewise, Dr. James Hurly “recognizes that some biological men may identify as women (and vice versa),” but also understands that biology is fundamental in the practice of medicine and cannot be ignored.

    In one case, for example, Hurly “diagnosed a biological male patient with prostate cancer, but the patient refused to accept Dr. Hurly’s diagnosis because he identified as a woman and insisted that he could not have a prostate.”

    Under Biden’s mandate, Hurly would have been forced to acquiesce to this patient’s demands, even if those demands put the patient’s life at risk.

    Unlike Neese and Hurly, the Biden administration doesn’t seem to care at all about the medical and ethical consequences of denying biological reality.

    It argued in court that the Affordable Care Act’s Section 1557, which prohibits “discrimination on the basis of sex,” allows the Department of Health and Human Services to force its will on concerned doctors.

    But that argument relies on an even faultier line of legal reasoning: Biden’s decision to redefine “sex” in Title IX to include “sexual orientation” and “gender identity.”

    Kacsmaryk cut to the core of this argument, pointing out that neither Congress nor the Supreme Court has accepted this redefinition of sex.

    Biden’s redefinition of sex has far-reaching implications that go well beyond the medical community, as Kacsmaryk noted.

    It would strip doctors of their right to ethical judgment, force prisons and homeless shelters to put inmates and those in need at risk by opening up their rooms to members of the opposite sex, and destroy female athletes’ right to fair competition by allowing physically advantaged males to compete against them.

    “Defendants’ reinterpretation of Title IX … imperils the very opportunities for women Title IX was designed to promote and protect — categorically forcing biological women to compete against biological men,” he wrote.

    “Title IX says nothing about ‘sexual orientation’ and ‘gender identity.”

    “And why would it?”

    “Title IX’s protections center on differences between the two biological sexes.”

    This is a robust defense of biological sex and an important rebuke of Biden’s efforts to redefine it.

    Biden does not have the authority to rewrite the law via executive fiat, nor does he have the right to force the Left’s distortion of reality onto the public.

    Men are men and women are women, and denying that fact will only open both sexes up to harm, both physically and emotionally.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *