CAPE CHARLES, Va. — The Cape Charles Town Council met Tuesday to discuss four options for a new Town Hall, ranging from new construction on vacant land to leasing and renovating an existing church building. Each scenario carries tradeoffs in cost, accessibility, and long-term value to the town.
Option 1: Cassatt Parkway
The Cassatt Parkway site is projected to cost $7.8 million. It would involve new construction on land already owned by the town, avoiding acquisition costs. The site is centrally located with a developed plan and adequate space for municipal needs.
Pros include:
- No land acquisition costs
- A completed site plan
- Ample space for town functions
- Proximity to the geographic center of Cape Charles
Cons include:
- Extensive site work required
- Long water, sewer, and golf cart path extensions
- Poor walkability for residents and staff
Option 2: Meatland Site
Estimated at $10.86 million, the Meatland site would not only provide a new Town Hall but also upgrade the town’s entrance corridor. Town leaders say the site could be partially funded through the town’s endowment, easing the impact on taxpayers and preserving reserves for future needs.
Pros include:
- Removal of a longstanding eyesore
- Highly walkable with golf cart access
- Extra space for parking and landscaping
- Less costly site development due to existing infrastructure
Cons include:
- High acquisition cost of $3.5 million
- Demolition costs of $100,000
- Need for a new site plan ($60,000)
- Loss of commercial property from the tax base
Option 3: Town-Owned Lots on Randolph Avenue
At $7.53 million, the Randolph lots offer a slightly lower-cost option with no acquisition fees. Like the Meatland site, it benefits from its walkability and location close to the town center.
Pros include:
- No cost for land acquisition
- Lower site development costs
- Easy access by foot or golf cart
Cons include:
- Tight fit could lead to a congested appearance at the entrance to the historic district
- Additional street parking may be needed
- Underground stormwater retention would add $250,000
- A new site plan would be required ($75,000)
Option 4: Trinity United Methodist Church
The most cost-effective on paper, Option 4 would repurpose space in the Trinity United Methodist Church through a 25-year lease arrangement, paired with renovations to the existing Town Hall and Police Station for an estimated total of $4.7 million. However, the town would not gain equity, and lease terms are still under negotiation.
Pros include:
- Immediate availability of a building that meets ADA and fire safety standards
- Functional HVAC and electrical systems
- Lower upfront costs
Cons include:
- No ownership or equity from lease payments
- Aged infrastructure requiring upgrades, including IT cabling
- Insufficient parking
- Unclear long-term lease terms and maintenance responsibilities
Town officials are expected to review public feedback and financial analyses in upcoming meetings before making a final decision. Each option reflects a different balance of investment, location benefits, and long-term impact on Cape Charles’ civic infrastructure.

I believe JD Vance would disagree with you.
There are only two genders. Period.
Because its easier to beat one charge than two. You're 100% correct, there should be two charges.
Please. NO MORE STRs! Planning Commission already addressed this several years ago. Where would people staying in an ADU park?…
THANK you for SHARING that delightful comment by DON & Deborah BENDER! WE can ALL sleep better at night KNOWING…