Generations of voting for the “lesser of two evils” have gotten us to this point.
Liberals haven’t seemed this angry since Elon bought Twitter. I’m pretty sure we threw the whole “my body, my choice” thing out the window when we banned people who didn’t get a shot from participating in society. But, you know, it’s possible to be pro-choice up to a certain point, and pro-life beyond a certain point. Pro-choice versus pro-life is a false binary. Americans are moderate on the issue of abortion; most are in favor of abortion super early in a pregnancy, then oppose it in the second trimester, and are broadly morally uncomfortable with what the procedure entails.
News Flash: Abortion will never be illegal, and ROE is just a bad law.
Roe is judicially created social legislation pretending to be constitutional law. It is more in the weeds than Miranda and Griswold, and as bogus an attempt to impose a settlement on a political question as the Dred Scott decision denying the rights of blacks. A constitutionalist Supreme Court should excise it from its body of work. Roe struck down 50 state laws and has made it all but impossible to regulate abortion, except in the narrowest circumstances. The argument that its particular set of policy preferences is mandated by the Constitution is wrong.
Brief interruption from the stupidity of the ROE v WADE crap: Every American needs to watch this now. We know Biden’s thugs wanted to call Homeland Security’s Misinformation Guidance Board the Knowledge Guidance Board (KGB)…Is Rand Paul the only person left in Congress protecting the American People?
Note: at this point, this far down the road, abortions should be legal at the woman’s discretion within a certain time period. Stop trying to be so black and white, and forcing a choice is between a ban on abortion and unrestricted elective abortions at 9 months. Common sense, please.
Note: And just like that, leftists know what a woman is.
If there’s not a thorough criminal investigation into who leaked privileged documents from the United States Supreme Court then we live in a clown show state. For Perspective: The FBI sent 15 people to investigate a garage pull in Bubba Wallace’s race car area. It’s impossible to overstate the tremor this will cause inside the Court, in terms of the destruction of trust among the Justices and staff. This leak is unforgivable. Former Clerk: “This leak has to come from a clerk or Justice themselves. It is intended to blow up the court. A criminal investigation needs to happen now.” They suggest Sotomayor has the most radical leftist staff.
When they start violating the sanctity of the Supreme Court, it makes you wonder if they could even fix an election someday. People who would betray the confidentiality of the Supreme Court over a decision they didn’t like would certainly disregard the Constitution to arrive at the one they did and feel supremely righteous in both cases.
Progressives have given away their two favorite go-to responses on abortion. “My body my choice” rings pretty hollow after Vax mandates. “It’s a women’s issue” is tough if there’s no definition of a woman. You can’t say “no uterus, no opinion” anymore. You gave that up when you said trans women are women.
Guess who supported the idea to let states overturn Roe v. Wade in 1981? Joe Biden.
Today’s “non-position” of the White House on the targeting of justices at their homes is one of the lowest moments in American politics. We have finally hit the bedrock of rage in American politics…If neither the President nor the left can muster the courage to condemn such conduct, we have reached a tragic but familiar point in our politics” — Jonathan Turley. However, we have not reached the “bedrock”. This is but the beginning of our descent and these people haven’t even begun to show you what they’ll do for power. Violence and intimidation are what they do best…
BREAKING – Naomi Wolf just broke that Pfizer knew their 100mg dose destroyed recipients’ white blood cells or suppressed them at a minimum. Claims this could be why the vaccinated keep getting Covid or other illnesses.
Roe was leaked to push more moderates back to the left, but worse, to take heat off of the Pfizer data dump. The vaccine information is bad, very very bad. Pfizer released 80,000 pages of data. Pfizer knew the vaccine harmed the fetus in pregnant women, and that the vaccine was not 95% effective, Pfizer data shows it has a 12% efficacy rate. Pfizer just posted a *profit* of $7.86 billion in Q1. That’s not revenue. That’s PROFIT. The government is negotiating sweetheart contracts that are making Pfizer execs filthy rich while forcing their product on the consumer. It’s all one giant criminal racket. Pfizer, CDC, and our government all were less than truthful.
Other stuff…Biden saying the “MAGA crowd” is the “most extreme political organization” in history is disgusting. No matter our political affiliation or how we feel about the “MAGA crowd,” we all must condemn Biden’s authoritarian effort to intimidate those who oppose him politically into silence. The MAGA crowd did not burn cities and causes $millions in destruction….who did all that??
Side note: Joe Biden wants Americans who didn’t graduate from college (the vast majority of Americans) to assume ~$13,000 in student loan debt per family. Biden has had a lot of bad ideas, but this may be his worst one yet.
Discover more from CAPE CHARLES MIRROR
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
All I can do is sit here and shake my head at the stupidity and ignorance that flow down like excrement from on high in this country, where hack politicians in the federal city vie with each other as to who can be the most stupid one of them all, and thus, become a candidate for the presidency, just like Joe Biden did, and yes, indeed, have no doubt about it, we are living in a clown show state.
How else to describe it!
Jen Psaki bids farewell to the White House, and the American people bid Jen good riddance …
Wonder how basement Biden can be a practicing Catholic and support a party that believes in killing unborn babies?
Joe is ULTRA-MAGA!
That should explain it all!
As far as I can tell, ULTRA-MAGA is a serious brain condition that afflicts Joe Biden, and thus, affects how he might act at any given moment of time.
A woman can do anything she wants to her body…she can shoot heron, snort coke, cut herself 1000 times with a razor blade or smoke crack…even throw a speed-ball in her veins for good measure.
But what she can not do, is anything she wants with is the human being she in incubating in her womb.
Thou Shalt Not Kill is pretty basic.
You can not have half the population with a right to kill 11 or 12 human beings each year, while the other half goes to jail for the same thing.
Some woman are Serial Killers…plain and simple.
As to rape, incest or a baby with 5 heads, 7 feet and no brain….your doctor will help you work that out.
There is nothing on Earth more disgusting than a woman killing her own babies, except for a woman defending her right to kill them.
Sick People. Sick Women. Sick Society. Dead Babies.
Oh Yeah, for the record….You people do not ‘Own’ your babies/children.
Strange to hear liberal trash say they own their babies but want coddle colored folks because their ancestors were ‘Owned’ by their ancestors.
Sick People. Sick Women. Sick Society. Dead Babies.
Here is this out-of-control, mentally unstable, Joe Stalin wannabee Joe Biden again flexing his dictatorial muscles, this time acting as if it were he, the Stalin-esque dictator of America, who gets to interpret the Constitution, not the Supreme Court, whose recent ruling on abortion the Stalin-esque autocrat Biden is going to overturn with an executive order, because in a dictatorship like America has become under Biden and the Democrats, that is what dictators get to do, to wit:
REUTERS
“Biden signs executive order on abortion, declares Supreme Court ‘out of control'”
By Jeff Mason and Nandita Bose
July 8, 2022
WASHINGTON, July 8 (Reuters) – U.S. President Joe Biden said the Supreme Court decision overturning the right to an abortion was an exercise in “raw political power” and signed an executive order on Friday to ease access to services to terminate pregnancies.
“What we’re witnessing wasn’t a constitutional judgment, it was an exercise in raw political power,” Biden told reporters at the White House.
“We cannot allow an out of control Supreme Court, working in conjunction with extremist elements of the Republican party, to take away freedoms and our personal autonomy.”
end quotes
“We cannot allow?”
That is sedition Joe is talking and inciting there, people, where sedition is conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state.
This is incredible to hear this **** in OUR SACRED DEMOCRACY – an autocratical dictator calling for violence against the Supreme Court, and not a single peep of protest from any kind from the main stream and legacy media who are cheering this rug-chewing madman Biden on.
If that were Trump saying those words, oh, how they would have howled!
But not when it is their dictator of choice, Joe Biden.
What a pitifully sick nation we have become since 6 January 2021 when the Democrats threw OUR Constitution into the toilet to put a Joe Stalin wannabee in the Washington white house.
So, to begin at the beginning of this bizarre saga Bennie Thompson, Liz Cheney and Virginia’s very own Elaine Luria who is representing the interests of the Eastern Shore residents here in this FARCICA ABSURDIST DRAMA built around a KANAGAROO COURT that stars Liz Cheney as the CHIEF PROSECUTING ATTORNEY and THE WOMAN SCORNED, Cassidy Hutchinson as a stage prop, this all courtesy of the patriotism of the Cape Charles Mirror, let us go back to June 28, 2022 @ 6:23 PM ET and the full transcript from the June 28 hearing of the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, where we have Bennie Thompson, the CHIEF INQUISITOR coming on the record to introduce the stage prop Cassidy Hutchinson as somebody not only important, but heroic, as well, and as the house lights dim, the show begins as follows:
BENNIE THOMPSON: The Select Committee to investigate the January 6th attack on the United States Capitol will be in order.
In our hearings over the previous weeks, the Select Committee has laid out the details of a multi-part pressure campaign driven by the former president aimed at overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election and blocking the transfer of power.
We’ve shown that this effort was based on a lie, a lie that the election was stolen, tainted by widespread fraud, Donald Trump’s big lie.
end quotes
And now Bennie and his band are going to out-trump Trump with even bigger lies, known a BENNIE THOMPSON’S GREAT BIG LIES, so enter Cassidy Hutchinson from stage right to thunderous applause from the at-home audience glued to the edge of their seats in anticipation of some really good drama that is easy to follow in this week’s episode of BENNIE THOMPSON’S WITCH HUNTERS IN ACTION staring the well-loved and much revered Naval heroine Elaine Luria of the East Shore of Virginia, which takes us back to the spinning of the web that the fairy dust and pixie dust and cobwebs that comprise the totality of BENNIE THOMPSON’S GREAT BIG LIE will be layered and festooned, to wit:
In the weeks ahead, the committee will hold additional hearings about how Donald Trump summoned a mob of his supporters to Washington, spurred them to march on the Capitol, and failed to take meaningful action to quell the violence as it was unfolding on January 6th.
However, in recent days the Select Committee has obtained new information dealing with what was going on in the White House on January 6th and in the days prior, specific detailed information about what the former president and his top aides were doing and saying in those critical hours, firsthand details of what transpired in the office of the White House chief of staff just steps from the Oval Office as the threats of violence became clear, and indeed violence ultimately descended on the Capitol in the attack on American democracy.
end quotes
Now, I don’t know about you people out there, but our film critics up here are rating that as some very good suspenseful drama dialogue coming from Bennie there, which is seen as a testament to the very high caliber of the Hollywood screenwriters they have writing the script, which takes us back to Bennie as follows:
It’s an important — it’s important that the American people hear that information immediately.
end quotes
And I agree, which is why I am taking this trouble through the good offices of the Cape Charles Mirror to make sure the American people do hear thar information immediately, which again takes us back to Bennie and his BULL****, to wit:
That’s why, in consultation with the vice chair, I’ve recalled the committee for today’s hearing.
end quotes
Actually, he called them together to make this a real prime-time TV event aggrandizing Bennie and Liz where Bennie and Liz could get some good press and the all important TV ratings while disparaging Trump from a really safe distance, which again takes us back to Bennie, to wit:
It hasn’t always been easy to get that information because the same people who drove the former president’s pressure campaign to overturn the election are now trying to cover up the truth about January 6th.
But thanks to the courage of certain individuals, the truth won’t be buried.
The American people won’t be left in the dark.
Our witness today, Ms. Cassidy Hutchinson, has embodied that courage.
I won’t get into a lot of detail about Ms. Hutchinson’s testimony we’ll show.
I’ll allow her words to speak for themselves, and I hope everyone at home will listen very closely.
end quotes
And I too will allow her words to speak for themselves, and I too hope everyone out there at home will listen very, very carefully, and to aid that process, I will go to the trouble of printing her words to listen to, and believe me, it won’t be any trouble at all.
Speaking as a disabled veteran and LOYAL AMERICAN standing up to Joe Biden’s authoritarian tendencies, according to the news, this Joe Stalin clone Biden has ordered OUR American flags to be flown at half staff in honor of a Japanese citizen, that being Shinzo Abe, a Japanese politician.
According to OUR flag code, which Joe Biden is either unaware of, or does not care about, both of which are indeed plausible, the United States flag flies at half-staff (or half-mast) when the nation is in mourning.
Why is the United States of America in mourning over the death of Shinzo Abe in Japan?
What is he to us, besides nothing at all?
That is all about Joe Biden spitting on us, our values, and our customs while taking more and more dictatorial power unto himself.
As we see from the following from an article in The Hill titled “Campaign Report — Dems vent frustrations with Biden before midterms” by Julia Manchester on 7 July 2022, LOYAL AMERICANS are getting really tired of this AUTOCRAT Biden throwing our values and customs into the toilet and replacing them unilaterally with his own dictatorial views which obviously are not acceptable to EIGHTY-EIGHT PERCENT of the American people who do not like the direction the AUTOCRAT Biden is trying to take this nation as he makes himself into another Joe Stalin, to wit:
Democrats always knew that the 2022 midterms would be an uphill climb.
But many say they didn’t know they would be facing the dire straits they are today — and frustration with the Biden administration is coming to the forefront.
Americans in general also seem fed up with the administration at this point.
A Monmouth University poll released Tuesday found 88 percent of Americans believe the country is headed in the wrong direction, with just 10 percent saying it’s on the right track.
end quotes
I think that is encouraging, myself, as this DICTATOR Biden continues to cement our opposition to him and his autocratical policies, and his UN-AMERICAN policies such as flying the American flag at half staff to honor a Japanese politician.
To understand this sick game Virginia’s Elaine Luria is playing on us as a member of NANCY PELOSI’S SELECVT WITCH HUNTER’S COMMITTEE, along with her henchmen Bennie Thompson, and Lizzie Cheney, who took an axe and gave OUR Constitution forty whacks and when the job was nicely done, she gave OUR Bill of Rights forty-one, given that we are going to be hearing Lizzie Cheney testifying about how powerful his Cassidy Hutchinson was alleged to be as the secretary (call it whatever name you want, that is what she was) to Trump’s chief of staff, itself the office of a glorified clerk or head eunuch, let’s take a hard look at the role of the chief of staff in a modern American presidential office, and believe me, this is high school stuff, if not grade school stuff, which gives you an idea of the insults Ellaine and Bennie and Lizzie are heaping on us as they try to pass off this bull**** they are peddling as a legitimate governmental inquiry, to wit:
White House Chief of Staff
The White House chief of staff leads the staff of the Executive Office of the President (EOP) and advises the president on policy issues.
Duties
The role of the president’s chief of staff varies by presidency but generally includes both managerial and advisory duties, including:
* Selecting and hiring staff members
* Structuring the office’s system of reporting information
* Monitoring and maintaining the office’s information flow to the president
* Maintaining the president’s schedule
* Advising the president on politics and policy
Managerial
The managerial duties of the chief of staff include forming the White House staff, maintaining the president’s calendar and managing the information that the president receives.
Staff formation
Chiefs of staff who are appointed at the beginning of an administration typically have much more control over the initial hires of the White House staff, but those who are appointed mid-term may need to re-organize the staff to suit their needs.
Office structure
The chief of staff is typically responsible for creating a structure of reporting and decision-making for White House staff.
The structure is largely based on the president’s style of operation.
Chiefs of staff have been labeled “strong” and “weak” based on the structure of the White House.
A “strong” chief of staff requires all information intended for the president go past their desk in order to maintain a very hands-on management style, while a “weak” chief of staff does not require such a reporting method before information gets to the president.
In order to maintain the structure of the White House, a chief of staff usually has between one and three assistants.
The assistants help oversee political issues, White House staff and, during election season, the added information from the president’s campaign.
Regular meetings with key White House staff help the chief of staff manage the different aspects of the job.
Maintaining the flow of information
The chief of staff must maintain the flow of information to assure the president receives all the necessary information and points of view.
The chief needs to monitor the information provided by staff on important policy issues to make sure it is in the interest of the president, not the producers of the information.
However, it is also important that the chief of staff involve the White House staff in the decision-making process in order to ensure the chief is not the sole person directing the policies presented to the president.
Presidents using an open door policy in regards to information have typically turned to a “strong” chief of staff in order to prevent becoming overwhelmed.
The chief of staff is also responsible for providing background information on issues important to the president.
Another crucial aspect of having a chief of staff is to prevent the president from getting information from key contributors and close friends.
Keeping a layer of insulation between the president and those supporters and friends limits the president’s willingness to afford favors that may be detrimental to the office.
Similarly, the chief of staff provides insulation from quick, uninformed decisions.
Scheduling
The chief of staff is also involved in the scheduled appearances of a president.
Chiefs of staff or a deputy travel to meetings and appearances outside of the White House in order to keep informed of topics and provide information if necessary.
Speeches and briefings are previewed by the chief of staff in order to understand what attention may be attracted by the statements.
Chiefs of staff often meet with the president and other staff prior to important appearances to help shape the intended impact.
Advisory
The chief of staff serves in an advisory role in both policy and politics.
The chief must understand the political landscape of the country in order to give the president honest advice on policy.
The chief of staff needs to be able to negotiate with Congress and the executive cabinet as well as donors and supporters.
end quotes
Hmmmmmm.
Nothing in there about being able to restrain the president in any way, nor is there anything in there about the chief of staff having the power and ability to control and direct events happening outside the white house in the city of Washington.
I wonder why Elaine Luria, Bennie Thompson and Lizzie Cheney are trying to make us think he did.
Stay tuned and we will go back to the transcript to delve that answer as we are told this week in this week’s episode of the Cape Charles Mirror that by being a WITCH HUNTER and by being a part of this ABSURDIST SCAM the Bennie Bunch are running on us here, Virginia’s own Elaine Luria is continuing to live up to her oath every day in Congress by faithfully executing the laws of the United States, preserving and protecting our democracy.
So, before we go back to the transcript of the testimony of Lizzie Cheney as to the outsize role this WOMAN SCORNED Cassidy Hutchinson was alleged to have played in the events of 6 January 2021, when the Democrats under Nancy Pelosi perverted OUR Constitution to make Joe Biden the president of the United States, to our detriment and that of the world as well, we need to go back in time to something that has never before happened here in the United States of America to my knowledge, and that is what is known as a Stalinist show trial, which is a public trial in which the judicial authorities have already determined the guilt or innocence of the defendant.
In this specific case, the “judicial authorities” who have already decided the guilt of the defendant, Donald Trump, who is not present and is not able to confront his accusers despite the Sixth Amendment to OUR Constitution, a Constitution these WITCH HUNTERS including Virginia’s Elaine Luria are ignoring, provides that a person accused of a crime has the right to confront a witness against him or her in a criminal action, including the right to be present at the trial, are Virginia’s Elaine Luria, Bennie Thompson, Lizzie Cheney, Adam “MR. SHIFTY HIMSELF” Schiff, Jamie Raskin, who is a scholar of the Democrat constitution, Zoe Lofgren, Pete Aguilar, Stephanie Murphy, and Adam Kinzinger.
In a Stalinist Show Trial, which is exactly what this is, for the first time in American history that I am aware of, the actual trial has as its only goal the presentation of both the accusation and the verdict to the public so they will serve as both an impressive example and a warning to other would-be dissidents or transgressors.
As is most definitely the case here, show trials such as occurred on June 28, 2022 @ 6:23 PM ET with the Cassidy Hutchinson Show starring Lizzie Cheney tend to be retributive rather than corrective and they are also conducted for propagandistic purposes, in this case to create a falsified version of the truth about January 6th in order to destroy not only Donald Trump, but the Republican party, so as to make the Democrat party the only legal political party in America, which will usher in the age of one party rule in America, reminiscent of the Moscow trials, which were a series of show trials held by the Soviet Union between 1936 and 1938 at the instigation of Joseph Stalin which were nominally directed against “Trotskyists” and members of “Right Opposition” of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union.
And with that necessary background established, so people can appreciate just how foreign this is to America, having Stalinist Show Trials in America, and how UN-AMERICAN it is, let us go to the transcript of the SHOW TRIAL on June 28, 2022, where we have Bennie Thompson, the HEAD INQUISITOR, propping up the credentials of his STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson, to make her seem all important in the political affairs of Washington, D.C., a center of raw political power unto herself who was relied on by all the other power brokers in Washington for her sage and learned advice, as follows:
BENNIE THOMPSON: Our witness today is Ms. Cassidy Hutchinson, who served in the Trump administration in the White House Office of Legislative Affairs from 2019 to 2020 and as a special assistant to the president in the White House chief of staff’s office from March 2020 through January 2021.
Ms. Hutchinson, I’d like to start with a few questions about your background.
The — these are some photographs we’ve obtained highlighting your career.
These show you with members of Congress, including Steve Scalise, as well as the White House with leader Kevin McCarthy and Jim Jordan.
Others show you with the –president and members of Congress aboard Air Force One.
end quotes
And if you want to be not only famous in Washington, D.C., but very, very famous as is Cassidy Hutchinson, that’s the way you do it right there – get a lot of pictures of yourself taken with famous people and LE VOILA, you are now famous to.
That’s it, that’s the way you do it, and here we should mention that Cassidy was also the subject of a nationally-syndicated AP photograph in which she was shown dancing to the Village People song “Y.M.C.A.” alongside White House press secretary Kayleigh McEnany at the end of Trump’s September 21, 2020, campaign rally in Swanton, Ohio.
So she has credentials, people, which is why she is Bennie Thompson’s star witness here, which takes us back to Bennie for more pumping up of his star witness, to wit:
BENNIE THOMPSON: When you started at the White House, you served at — in the Office of Legislative Affairs.
We understand that you were initially hired as a staff assistant, but were soon promoted to a position of greater responsibility.
Can you explain your role for the committee?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: When I moved over to the White House chief of staff’s office with Mr. Meadows when he became the fourth chief of staff, it’s difficult to describe a typical day.
I was a special assistant to the president and an adviser to — advisor to the chief of staff.
end quotes
According to her published bio on Wikipedia, she took notes at meetings and traveled with Meadows, monitoring his phone and relaying his orders.
Getting back to Cassidy hyping her role here, we have more, to wit:
The days depended on what the president was doing that day, and that’s kind of how my portfolio was reflected.
I had a lot of outreach with members of Congress, senior cabinet — cabinet officials.
You would work on — I would work on policy issues with relevant internal components and members on the Hill, as well as security protocol at the White House complex for Mr. Meadows and the president.
BENNIE THOMPSON: And then you received another promotion in March 2020.
At that time, you became the principal aide to the new White House Chief of staff Mark Meadows.
Is that right?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct sir.
BENNIE THOMPSON: What did a typical day look like for you in your work with Mr. Meadows?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: It varied with what was going on.
We spent a lot of time on the Hill.
I spent time on the Hill independently, too, as I was his liaison for Capitol Hill.
We did a lot of Presidential travel engagements, but mostly I was there to serve what the Chief of Staff needed.
And a lot of times what the Chief of staff needed was a reflection of what the President’s schedule was detailed to do that day.
BENNIE THOMPSON: So is it fair to say that you spoke regularly in your position, both with members of Congress and with senior members of the Trump administration?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
That’s a fair assessment sir.
BENNIE THOMPSON: And would you say that in your work with Mr. Meadows, you were typically in contact with him and others in the White House throughout the day?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct sir.
Mr. Meadows and I were in contact almost — pretty much throughout every day consistently.
end quotes
And given that she was his secretary, and he was her boss, doesn’t it logically follow that she and Mark Meadows would be in contact every day?
When you are somebody’s secretary, isn’t that the way it would normally work, that you would be in contact with your boss throughout the work day?
And while people cogitate on that, let’s take a short break, but don’t go away, because after a pause for station identification, we will be right back with more of the BENNIE SHOW live from Washington. D.C.
And before we go to the testimony of Lizzie Cheney on June 28, 2022, using as her stage prop this WOMAN SCORNED Cassidy Hutchinson, the most important woman in Washington. D.C. to hear Lizzie and Benny and yes, Cassidy herself, tell about it, for a look at how a very important, in-the-know person in Washington, D.C. like Cassidy Hutchinson dances to the song “YMCA” by the Village People, here is the link to the AP photo of how it’s done by people in Washington who are the trend setters for those of us out here in the provinces who wouldn’t know anything about how to properly dance to the song “Y.M.C.A.” but for the people in Washington like Cassidy Hutchinson who are there to show us the way:
https://web.archive.org/web/20220630041342/https://mynbc15.com/news/nation-world/gallery/trump-the-dancer-his-moves-to-ymca-at-rallies-are-a-hit?photo=3
And with that important background detail taken care of, let’s cut right to the testimony of Lizzie Cheney as it happened, as follows, with the warning to the meek and mild to make sure you are sitting down because this is some real BLOCKBUSTER stuff that might knock you right out of your socks otherwise, if you were not well grounded so hang on tight and off we go, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Mr. Chairman, we will begin today with an exchange that first provided Ms. Hutchinson a tangible sense of the ongoing planning for the events of January 6th.
end quotes
Now, note the use of suspense there with the use of the words “tangible sense of the on-going planning,” which puts Cassidy Hutchinson right smack dab in the middle of a budding conspiracy to take over America by Donald Trump, right at the onset, which our critics up this way attribute to the use of some very accomplished Daytime Soaps script writers writing Lizzie’s dialogue for maximum impact, which takes us back to Lizzie’s testimony, as follows:
On January 2nd, four days before the attack on our Capitol, President Trump’s lead lawyer Mr. Giuliani was meeting with White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows and others.
end quotes
And yes, I did warn you that this testimony would be viscerally gripping which is why it is necessary to be seated when reading it which takes us back to Lizzie and Cassidy, to wit:
Ms. Hutchinson, do you remember Mr. Giuliani meeting with Mr. Meadows on January 2, 2021?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I do.
He met with Mr. Meadows in the evening of January 2, 2021.
LIZ CHENEY: And we understand that you walked Mr. Giuliani out of the White House that night, and he talked to you about January 6th.
end quotes
And right off the bat, and this is the essence of good screen writing for dramatic effect, we have Cassidy being brought right into the center of the conspiracy to take over America by one of the key conspirators himself, which takes us back to the play action, to wit:
What do you remember him saying?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: As Mr. Giuliani and I were walking to his vehicles that evening, he looked at me and said something to the effect of, Cass, are you excited for the 6th?
It’s going to be a great day.
I remember looking at him saying, Rudy, could you explain what’s happening on the 6th?
He had responded something to the effect of, we’re going to the Capitol.
It’s going to be great.
The President’s going to be there.
He’s going to look powerful.
He’s — he’s going to be with the members.
He’s going to be with the Senators.
Talk to the chief about it, talk to the chief about it.
He knows about it.
end quotes
Presumably, the “Chief” he refers to is Donald Trump, and it is only natural that a very, very important person like Cassidy would have access to Trump to ask him face-to-face about January 6th, which takes as back to Lizzie, as follows, keeping in mind that Virginia’s Elaine Luria is in the audience watching this show happen:
LIZ CHENEY: And did you go back then up to the West Wing and tell Mr. Meadows about your conversation with Mr. Giuliani?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I did.
After Mr. Giuliani had left the campus that evening, I went back up to our office and I found Mr. Meadows in his office on the couch.
He was scrolling through his phone.
I remember leaning against the doorway and saying, I just had an interesting conversation with Rudy, Mark.
It sounds like we’re going to go to the Capitol.
He didn’t look up from his phone and said something to the effect of, there’s a lot going on, Cass, but I don’t know.
Things might get real, real bad on January 6th.
end quotes
Now, people, talk about masterful script writing as only an experienced Daytime Soaps writer can produce to achieve maximum dramatic effect, here it comes as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson.
Mr. Meadows is engaged in litigation with the committee to try to avoid testifying here.
What — what was your reaction when he said to you things might get real, real bad?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: In the days before January 2nd, I was apprehensive about the 6th.
end quotes
This is some great stuff, isn’t it?
I have read through it many times already, and I still get a chill up and down my spine when I hear Cassidy, who in the movie should be played by someone important in Hollywood like Angelina Jolie, talking about her apprehensions about January 6, as if with her vision she saw the impending end of our sacred democracy, which takes us back for more of her gripping testimony, to wit:
I had heard general plans for a rally.
I had heard tentative movements to potentially go to the Capitol.
But when hearing Rudy’s take on January 6th and then Marc’s response, that was the first — that evening was the first moment that I remember feeling scared and nervous for what could happen on January 6th.
end quotes
OMG, people – scared and nervous!
Talk about setting the stage early on in the dialogue to hold the audience spell-bound in their seats, here we are seeing how the masters do it, and do it well, which takes us back to Cassidy for more, as follows:
And I had a deeper concern for what was happening with the planning aspects of it.
LIZ CHENEY: Thank you, Ms. Hutchinson.
Today, we’re going to be focusing primarily on the events of January 5th and 6th at the White House.
But to begin and to frame the discussion, I want to talk about a conversation that you had with Mr. John Ratcliffe, the Director of National Intelligence.
end quotes
Here is an indication of just how very important Cassidy Hutchinson was in Washington, that the Director of National Intelligence for the whole United States government would come to con fide in her and seek her advice, which takes us back to the script, as follows, with Lizzie talking:
And you had this conversation in December of 2020.
Mr. Ratcliffe was nominated by President Trump to oversee US intelligence — our US intelligence community.
And before his appointment, Mr. Ratcliffe was a Republican member of Congress.
As you will see on this clip, Director Ratcliffe’s comments in December of 2020 were prescient.
And here is where we see one of the many games being played on us here by the WITCH HUNTERS – this use of snippets of prior videotape snippets, where we do not know whether or not Cassidy is under oath, as opposed to having her answer live in that hearing:
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: My understanding was Mr. — Director Ratcliffe didn’t want much to do with the post-election period.
Director Ratcliffe felt that it wasn’t something that the White House should be pursuing.
It felt it was dangerous for the President’s legacy.
He had expressed to me that he was concerned that it could spiral out of control and potentially be dangerous, either for our democracy or the way that things were going for the 6th.
UNKNOWN: When you say it wasn’t something the White House should be pursuing, what’s the it?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Trying to fight the results of the election, finding missing ballots, pressuring — filing lawsuits in certain states where there didn’t seem to be significant evidence, and reaching out to state legislatures about that.
So pretty much the way that the White House was handling the postelection period, he felt that there could be dangerous repercussions, in terms of precedent set for elections, for our democracy, for the 6th.
You know, he was hoping that we would concede.
[End videotape]
And that people, is a STALINIST SHOW TRIAL taking place here in the United States of America for the first time in my memory, and I believe in our entire history as a nation, because as low as Joe McCarthy sunk with his hearings, these WITCH HUNTERS have sunk even lower, and stay tuned as we take a pause for station identification and an unbroken half and hour of your favorite commercials, and then we will be back for more of the BENNIE AND LIZZIE SHOW starring Cassidy Hutchinson as a stage prop, so don’t touch that dial.
Anyone who doesn’t think this blatant use of “HEAR SAY” evidence we have just seen above here being shamelessly used by Lizzie Cheney to hang Donald Trump in absentia in the first-ever Stalinist Show Trial here in the United States of America is obscene (offensive to moral principles; repugnant) and UN-AMERICAN has to hate America, its Constitution and Sixth Amendment which provides that a person accused of a crime, in this case, the very serious crime of inciting an insurrection, has the right to confront a witness against him or her in a criminal action, including the right to be present at the trial, Rule of Law and Due Process of Law, plain and simple.
And let me make it very clear here that quite frankly, I do not like Donald Trump, and never have, and never voted for him, and wouldn’t, nor am I a Republican, nor do I vote Republican, nor do I give a damn about the Republican Party, itself.
So are those all good reasons to say **** due process for Donald Trump because nobody likes him, and therefore, because the majority rules, and the majority does not like Donald Trump, then for that reason alone Donald Trump is not deserving of a fair trial, because a Democrat mob does not want him to have a fair trial?
This LOYAL AMERICAN does not believe that for an instant.
Even if Donald Trump were the most disgusting human being among us, the most despicable, he would still retain his rights pursuant to the Sixth Amendment to confront his accusers, and be present at his trial, which this most certainly is, and his rights to DUE PROCESS OF LAW pursuant to the Fifth Amendment to OUR Constitution, which Amendment says to the federal government that no one shall be “deprived of life, liberty or property without due process of law,” even Donald Trump, which most basic rights to our liberty these Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS including Virginia’s Elaine Luria are stripping from Donald Trump, simply because of ANIMNUS, i.e., their unbridled hatred of the man.
And the fact that it is indeed a trial is made quite clear and apparent in a Reuters article titled “Trump incited Jan. 6 attack after ‘unhinged’ White House meeting, panel told” by Patricia Zengerle, Richard Cowan and Doina Chiacu on July 12, 2022, where we have the proof and evidence as follows:
WASHINGTON, July 12 (Reuters) – U.S. lawmakers on Tuesday accused Donald Trump of inciting a mob of followers to attack the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in a last-ditch bid to remain in power fueled by a chaotic meeting with some of his most ardent supporters.
The panel’s seven Democrats and two Republicans have used the hearings to build a case that Trump’s efforts to overturn his defeat in the 2020 election constitute illegal conduct, far beyond normal politics.
end quotes
So, even though it is UN-CONSTITUTIONAL and UNLAWFUL for the House of Representatives to act as an accusatory body like a GRAND JURY, that is exactly what Lizzie Cheney is doing here with her summation to the jury of public opinion, which is to say, Lizzie Cheney is using her position as a WITCH HUNTER to appeal to the passions of the MOB, based on HOODOO, BULL**** and HEAR SAY evidence.
As to the purpose of the GRAND JURY being to protect OUR RIGHTS, including those of Donald Trump, as reviled in America as he might be, let’s go to a public document from the United States Department of Justice on Grand Juries where we have in Section 9-11.010, INTRODUCTION, as follows:
The prosecutor must recognize that the grand jury is an independent body, whose functions include not only the investigation of crime and the initiation of criminal prosecution but also the protection of the citizenry from unfounded criminal charges.
end quotes
THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES IS NOT A GRAND JURY, AND CANNOT SUPPLANT THE FUNCTIONS OF A GRAND JURY BY ARROGATING (take or claim something without justification) THEM UNTO THEMSELVES AS IS THE CASE HERE!
Nor can the United States House of Representatives act in a judicial capacity, as they clearly are doing here, as we see by going to the matter of United States v. Icardi, 140 F. Supp. 383 (D.D.C. 1956), U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (D.D.C. 1956), April 19, 1956, where we have as follows:
There is a question as to the propriety of the report’s Conclusions, which state there is “probable cause” for charging Icardi and LoDolce with murder and embezzlement, but that they are not subject to prosecution under existing civil law or under the Uniform Code of Military Justice.
The use of this language indicates the functioning of the subcommittee as a committing magistrate.
end quotes
Re-read the Reuters article and it is clear the WITCH HUNTERS are doing the same thing here, which takes us back to Icardi, to wit:
As to the report’s final Recommendations, which suggest that legislative amendments to the Federal Criminal Code be recommended to the Judiciary Committee, the court finds this portion of the subcommittee’s report was an exercise of a bona fide legislative function.
The validity of this latter recommendation, however, cannot cure the invalidity of the subcommittee’s adjudication of crime contained in the report’s Statement of Facts.
end quotes
The Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS, however, as we can clearly see from the Reuters article, are in fact serving in the capacity of committing magistrates to adjudicate the serious federal crime of insurrection, and according to the Supreme Court, as if that matters anymore, by doing so, they are way off the reservation and firmly over into UNCONSTITUTIONAL TERRITORY, which takes us back to Icardi as follows:
Although the subcommittee’s report was made after Icardi’s testimony, its contents are relevant to show that body’s conception and exercise of its authority and functions.
Chairman Cole testified that the subcommittee already had in its possession sufficient information on which to base its report to the Congress, including Icardi’s prior statements on many occasions, and that the purpose of asking Icardi’s appearance before the subcommittee was to give him an opportunity to tell his side of the story.
Chairman Cole further testified that, to the best of his recollection, before asking Icardi to testify, he discussed with his colleague and counsel for the subcommittee the calling of Icardi, putting him under oath, and the possibility of a perjury indictment as the result of Icardi’s testimony.
It is unnecessary for the court to determine for which purpose Icardi’s testimony was sought or obtained, since neither affording an individual a forum in which to protest his innocence nor extracting testimony with a view to a perjury prosecution, is a valid legislative purpose.
end quotes
Does the WITCH HUNTERS special committee have a valid legislative purpose as it must to be held to be a CONSTITUTIONAL EXERCISE OF CONGRESSIONAL AUTHORITY?
According to the Supreme Court, again, if that matters any more now that the DEMOCRATS have tossed RULE OF LAW into the toilet, no they clearly do not, since they have been UNCONSTUTIONALLY CONSTITUTED to investigate crimes, which is not their function, given they are not a court of law, which again takes us back to Icardi:
While a committee or subcommittee of the Congress has the right to inquire whether there is a likelihood that a crime has been committed touching upon a field within its general jurisdiction and also to ascertain whether an executive department charged with the prosecution of such crime has acted properly, this authority cannot be extended to sanction a legislative trial and conviction of the individual toward whom the evidence points the finger of suspicion.
On the basis of all the evidence before it, the court therefore finds, as a matter of law, that at the time the subcommittee questioned the defendant Icardi it was not functioning as a competent tribunal.
There are, however, limitations upon the investigative power of the legislature which must be considered in any determination of materiality.
The investigation must be to aid in legislation. McGrain v. Daugherty, supra, 273 U.S. at *389 page 178, 47 S. Ct. 319.
“Similarly, the power to investigate must not be confused with any of the powers of law enforcement; those powers are assigned under our Constitution to the Executive and the Judiciary.” Quinn v. United States, 349 U.S. 155, 161, 75 S. Ct. 668, 672, 99 L. Ed. 964.
end quotes
Well, they used to be anyway.
But please, stay tuned, for this FARCE has legs and plenty of room left to run, and to close, this link is to the official WITCH HUNTERS site, where pictures of each WITCH HUNTER are shown:
https://january6th.house.gov/about/membership
Look at the pictures of each WITCH HUNTER, and then ask yourself why it is that Elaine Luria, Jamie Raskin, Lizzie Cheney and Adam Kinzinger are all wearing what are known as “****-eating grins.”
And since the Cape Charles Mirror is continually evolving, like the living thing it is, in real time, as the news cycle continues to evolve itself, turning up new grist for the mill, so to speak, information relevant to the topics and subjects under discussion, like this Stalinist Show Trial under discussion in here where Donald Trump, an American citizen supposedly endowed with the same Constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of law enjoyed by his persecutors, the Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS including Virginia’s Elaine Luria, is being tried in absentia by the use of HEAR SAY evidence and the technique known as LEADING THE WITNESS (asking questions in a form in which the questioner puts words in the mouth of the witness or suggests the answer), which technique we see being masterfully employed above here by WITCH HUNTER Lizzie Cheney, where the witness being led is Cassidy Hutchinson, who barely out of a college nobody has ever heard of with a bachelor’s degree in political science which is essentially worthless, especially in Washington, D.C. which degree entitles the holder to work the cash register at McDonald’s, as opposed to sweeping the floor and picking up trash in the parking lot, became overnight one of the most important and powerful people in that city full of powerful people, with this BLOCKBUSTER testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson in hand, let’s jump ahead to see where this matter now has to go, and pronto, for the good of the nation, after asking ourselves this important question, to wit:
HOW DO WE KNOW FOR SURE THAT CASSIDY HUTCHINSON’S TESTIMONY IS THE REAL DEAL WHEN IT COMES TO BEING RATED “BLOCKBUSTER?”
And for the answer to that question, all we need do is go back to the Reuters article titled “Trump incited Jan. 6 attack after ‘unhinged’ White House meeting, panel told” by Patricia Zengerle, Richard Cowan and Doina Chiacu on July 12, 2022, where we have the proof and evidence as follows:
Representative Jamie Raskin, a Democratic committee member, displayed a text from White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, who gave explosive testimony last month, saying of the meeting, “The West Wing is unhinged.”
end quote
EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY, people, being brought to you right in your home courtesy of the Cape Charles Mirror.
So how about that?
How often is one presented with EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY in one lifetime, and that answer is not very often, at all!
Which bring us to where we have to go, as we can clearly see from this Raw Story article titled “Mueller prosecutor slams Merrick Garland’s ‘myopic’ investigation of Trump’s coup plot” by Matthew Chapman on 12 Jully 2022, where we have the necessary path forward now that we have this EXPLOSIVE CASSIDY HUTCHINSON TESTIMONY in hand, as follows:
On Tuesday, POLITICO analyzed how Andrew Weissman, a key prosecutor who worked under former special counsel Robert Mueller, is publicly criticizing the way Attorney General Merrick Garland is investigating the attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.
“After the Mueller investigation wrapped up, Weissmann reentered private practice and has kept a relatively low profile in the media since Joe Biden’s inauguration,” reported Ankush Khardori.
“That changed on Monday, when Weissmann penned an op-ed for the New York Times that sharply criticized the Justice Department’s investigation into the siege of the U.S. Capitol.”
“It was an essay that captured the frustrations of some legal observers and former Justice Department prosecutors, but it drew immediate attention because it came from one of the most prominent and well-respected prosecutors in the country.”
“In particular, Weissmann took issue with the department’s ‘bottom up’ criminal investigation and its apparent preference to focus on the Jan. 6 rioters over the former president himself,” continued the report.
“Drawing on his own experience, Weissmann wrote that this ‘is actually the wrong approach for investigating the Jan. 6 insurrection’ and that the public hearings of the Jan. 6 select committee ‘should inspire the Justice Department to rethink its approach.'”
end quotes
And look at that, people, there we have a real lawyer giving credence to these WITCH HUNTER Hearings, which because of the troubled nature of the times we are now in, are taking the place of Grand Jury proceedings to indict Trump, because let’s face it, people, this is far to important to trust a Grand Jury of mere citizens with, as we see from the following:
“We’re in a very unusual situation where you see Congress doing a really, really good job and being out in front of, by all accounts, the federal government in many ways in terms of understanding and investigating what happened in terms of trying to undermine the last presidential election.”
end quotes
To boil it down and simplify it, Merrick Garland HAS to indict Trump right now, and get him before a jury, or risk losing all his credibility.
Afterall, what more does he need, now that he has got a STAR WITNESS in the person of Cassidy Hutchinson who can hang Trump out to dry with that EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of hers.
Time’s a’wasting here, Merrick?
What are you waiting on, dude?
The stars to be in their proper alignment?
You’ve got what you need to put Trump behind bars for the rest of his life, so he won’t be a threat to the Democrats and Joe Biden, anymore, so let’s stop the feet-dragging and get it done for the good of America and our SACRED DEMOCRACY!
And as we consider this EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of the WOMAN SCORNED Cassidy Hutchinson in this made-for-TV drama called the JANUARY SIXTH COMMITTEE HEARINGS starring Virginia’s Elaine Luria as a WITCH HUNTER EXRAORDINAIRE, which EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY is going to allow Biden pet poodle Merrick Garland to put Trump behind bars for the rest of his natural-born days, thus removing him as a threat to Joe Biden’s chances of being re-elected in 2024, there is some interesting stuff out there on the internet if one but looks for it, and what it looks like is that BEFORE Cassidy Hutchinson was against Trump, she was actually for Trump, before she got scorned by Trump and turned against him, a clear message to those out there who think it is alright to scorn women, thinking you can get away with it, and after turning against Trump, so that she could change her testimony to be against Trump and not for Trump as she was before the switch, she switched lawyers, which is how you do that and get away with it, to wit:
Trump PAC paid nearly half a million to law firms representing …https://abcnews.go.com › story
Jul 1, 2022 — Separately, former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson was initially represented by former Trump White House lawyer Stefan Passantino, …
Trump group pays for Jan. 6 lawyers, raising concernhttps://buffalonews.com › trump-group-pays-for-jan-6-la…
Jul 3, 2022 — Jody Hunt, left, is Cassidy Hutchinson’s new lawyer after she fired a lawyer who had been recommended to her by two of Donald Trump’s former …
Trump Paid Multiple Jan. 6 Panel Witnesses’ Legal Fees: NYThttps://www.businessinsider.com › Politics
Jul 1, 2022 — Trump allies paid legal fees for multiple Jan. 6 witnesses, including Cassidy Hutchinson, sparking witness-influencing concerns, report says.
Cassidy Hutchinson Testimony Followed Switch … – YouTubehttps://www.youtube.com › watch
Jun 30, 2022 — Cassidy Hutchinson Testimony Followed Switch From Lawyer Being Paid By Trump: Records. 270,059 views Jun 30, 2022 SPECIAL REPORT: Ali Velshi …
Trump paid legal fees for Cassidy Hutchinson before she …https://www.independent.co.uk › … › US politics
Jul 1, 2022 — Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s bombshell testimony before the House January 6 select committee came after she ditched a lawyer …
Trump Group pays for Jan. 6 lawyers … – The Boston Globehttps://www.bostonglobe.com › 2022/07/01 › nation › tru…
Jul 1, 2022 — The arrangement drew new scrutiny this week after Cassidy Hutchinson, a former aide in his White House, made an explosive appearance before the …
Cassidy Hutchinson realized her Trump-paid attorney was …https://www.rawstory.com › cassidy-hutchinson-trump-…
5 days ago — In the New York Times, reporter Robert Draper cited pro-Donald Trump lawyer Stefan Passantino, who was being paid for by Trump’s Save America …
And before WE, THE AMERICAN People, courtesy of the patriotism of the Cape Charles Mirror, perhaps the last grand palladium of freedom there is left in the United States of America, go back to this “EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY” of the CLASSIC WOMAN SCORNED character in this made-for-TV drama called the JANUARY SIXTH COMMITTEE HEARINGS, that being Cassidy Hutchinson, who before she was against Trump, was instead for Trump, until she apparently got a better offer from the WITCH HUNTERS, an offer for some reason she couldn’t refuse, to turn “state’s evidence” against Trump, we need to consider a couple of relevant legal terms such as PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT and COACHING WITNESSES, and before we do that, there is an even more basic term we have to consider, as we see these DEMOCRATS plus Lizzie Cheney and Adam Kinzinger, literally acting in the capacity of a citizen grand jury, and that is the matter of a CRIMINAL REFERRAL from the House of Representatives to the Attorney General, in this case, the compliant Merrick Garland who is Joe Biden’s pet poodle.
I think we are seeing an end run around the GRAND JURY process here with this Cassidy Hutchinson testimony, which for a moment takes us to a Raw Story article by Sarah K. Burris on 13 July 2022 titled “Exclusive: Jan. 6 committee heard more evidence from earlier witnesses after Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony,” where we have as follows concerning the high likelihood of a criminal referral based on the EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of Cassidy Hutchinson, which is bringing out from the woodwork more witnesses ready to bury Trump, as follows:
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-CA), a member of the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on the Capitol, revealed that since former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson appeared in a public hearing, more evidence has been gathered by witnesses willing to come forward.
end quotes
That, people, is what you call a “watershed moment,” “an “event marking a unique or important historical change of course or one on which important developments depend!”
Cassidy Hutchinson, a total unknown before this, a trivial figure in the grand scheme of things in Washington, D.C. whose main claim to fame was carrying Mark Meadows phones for him, turn’s “state’s witness” for the WITCH HUNTERS, testifying against Trump, and spews a torrent of absolutely unbelievable horse**** on prime time TV, and suddenly is catapaulted from being a GREAT BIG NOTHINGBURGER into a NATIONAL HEROINE and TV SENSATION with maybe a book deal now out ahead, plus a mini-series, and a full-length feature flick starring Angelina Jolie as Cassidy Hutchinson and Brad Pitt as Mark Meadows, and no we have a torrent of other would-be witnesses pouring out of the woodwork, all wanting to strike it big on prime-time national TV the way did, which takes us back to the Raw Story article as follows:
Speaking to Raw Story, Aguilar explained that not only have they had more people willing to come forward, but “people who we had previously heard form have shared more.”
end quotes
And my goodness, people, of course they would come forward and share more “stuff,” after seeing what it did for Cassidy Hutchinson’s budding career as a celebrity here, which again takes us back to Raw Story, as follows:
He explained that they’re continuing to gather evidence, adding kudos to the committee staff members working diligently to collect this additional information.
end quote
Which, when properly translated, means they are out recruiting witnesses, the way they recruited Cassidy Hutchinson, which again takes us back to Raw Story, to wit:
“We intend to share more,” said Aguilar.
“The scale and the scope, we’re still working through.”
“But, we want it to be something that people can digest and understand and find value in helping us protect democracy.”
end quotes
What he is saying there is that their writers in Hollywood are still working on the script, but it promises to be a doozy!
So stay tuned, keeping in mind that they want the Hollywood screen writers wring this script for them to have it be something that people just like you and me can digest and understand and find value in helping them “protect democracy,” which thought is ludicrous in the extreme, that they are doing anything to “protect democracy,” which brings us to PROSECUTORAL MISCONDUCT, as follows:
One type of prosecutorial misconduct is the introduction of false evidence, such as the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson, which is so obviously contrived.
As we are seeing here with Cassidy Hutchinson, with the right kind of lawyers involved, and here we have two of the smarmiest in the persons of Adam “SHIFTY” Schiff and Jamie Raskin, who is even more SHIFTY, and good script writers, false evidence can be fabricated, forged, or otherwise tainted evidence, and has the power to derail a criminal proceeding, EXCEPT when the criminal proceeding is taking place in the House of Representatives in the lead-up to a criminal referral.
PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT also includes Improper Arguments.
Prosecutors who make certain types of arguments in their opening and closing statements could be accused of making improper arguments, seen as the leading cause of unfairness in capital trials, examples of which are as follows:
* Asserting facts that are not in evidence;
* Misstating laws;
* Vouching for the credibility of a witness;
* Mischaracterizing evidence; and
* Improperly using the media.
Now, Lizzie Cheney is guilty of all of those, I would say, in connection with her questioning of STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson, BUT, when Lizzie Cheney does it as a WITCH HUNTER, is it PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT?
And that answer would have to be NO, because while she clearly is prosecuting (bringing legal action against Trump for punishment of an alleged crime or violation of law) Trump, she is NOT per se a prosecutor, where a prosecutor is a government lawyer who handles investigations and/or prosecutions of criminal offenses, their goal being to protect the public and adhere to their government duties by working to put criminals behind bars.
In Berger v. United States, 1953, the court held that the prosecutor “is in a peculiar and very definite sense the servant of the law, the twofold aim of which is that guilt shall not escape, nor innocence suffer. ”
On the other hand, Lizzie Cheney is in no way a “servant of the law.”
She is a servant of PARTISAN POLITICS, plain and simple!
So by making a criminal referral based on nothing but BULL****, and by avoiding a GRAND JURY, charges of prosecutorial misconduct cannot be brought against Lizzie Cheney, which makes here free to commit prosecutorial misconduct in this matter with impunity, and stay tuned, because we will have more on that when we rerun from a break for station identification!
So thanks to the Cape Charles Mirror and its coverage of this Made-For-Prime-time TV show called the JANUARY SIXTH COMMITTEE HEARINGS starring Virginia’s own Elaine Luria, we common folks here in America are having an opportunity to get treated to every SLIMY LAWYER TRICK there is in the book, and it is fat one, the book of SLIMY LAWYER TRICKS, that were employed by Bennie Thompson and Lizzie Cheney on June 28, 2022 in their continuing effort to hang Donald Trump out to dry, and get him indicted for the serious crime of insurrection to remove him as a threat to Joe Biden and the Democrat party when we had on PRIME-TIME TV the EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of Cassidy Hutchinson, a true “watershed moment” in both American politics and American history, as we can see from the Washington Post story titled “Jan. 6 committee subpoenas Secret Service for missing records” by Jacqueline Alemany and Maria Sacchetti on 15 July 2022, where we had as follows concerning the continuing ripples spreading out from the EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of Cassidy Hutchinson on June 28, 2022, as follows, to wit:
The text messages could provide insight into the actions of the agency and potentially those of President Donald Trump on the day of the insurrection.
Former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testified during a hearing last month that Trump wanted to lead the mob from the Ellipse to the Capitol, despite knowing they were armed, and said that she was told by an agent that Trump physically assailed the Secret Service agent who informed him he could not go to the Capitol.
end quotes
And that is it, people – Cassidy Hutchinson, who GRAND IN QUISITOR Bennie Thompson, the chief WITCH HUNTER has already told us is “heroic,” which means we have to believe every single word she has uttered without question, to wit:
It hasn’t always been easy to get that information because the same people who drove the former president’s pressure campaign to overturn the election are now trying to cover up the truth about January 6th.
But thanks to the courage of certain individuals, the truth won’t be buried.
The American people won’t be left in the dark.
Our witness today, Ms. Cassidy Hutchinson, has embodied that courage.
end quotes
Now, one could argue conclusively that were Bennie Thompson a real prosecutor, rather than a political hack serving the needs of the Democrat party and Nancy Pelosi, by vouching for the credibility of a Cassidy Hutchinson as a witness, which Bennie is clearly doing, that he would be engaging in PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT.
But since he is not a real prosecutor, and thus has no fetters nor bounds within which he must stay, Bennie is free to engage in every SLIMY and DESPICABLE DIRTY LAWYER’S TRICKS he chooses to with impunity, because no laws bind Bennie Thompson or any of the other WITCH HUNTERS.
So, it is enough for Cassidy Hutchinson to say something happened, like she was told by somebody “that Trump physically assailed the Secret Service agent who informed him he could not go to the Capitol.”
WHAT ******* HORSE****, people!
And this is the steaming pile of horsecrap that WITCH HUNTER Pete Aguilar of California wants us to believe is “helping us protect democracy.”
No, people, and Pete, it is not!
You DO NOT protect democracy by burying it under a mountain of bull****, fabricated testimony and outright lies!
That is how you defend the DEMOCRAT PARTY, but the DEMOCRAT PARTY has absolutely nothing to do with democracy, at all!
So this is all a political joke and the American people are the victims of the joke being played on us by these WITCH HUNTERS with this cintrived testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson, along with TRUTH, and JUSTICE and RULE OF LAW in America.
So, following up on this Washington Post story titled “Jan. 6 committee subpoenas Secret Service for missing records” by Jacqueline Alemany and Maria Sacchetti on 15 July 2022, where we had former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson testifying during a hearing on June 28, 2022 that Trump wanted to lead the mob from the Ellipse to the Capitol, despite knowing they were armed, and said that she was told by an agent that Trump physically assailed the Secret Service agent who informed him he could not go to the Capitol, when last we visited the transcript of her EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY, in an indication of just how very, very important Cassidy Hutchinson really was in Washington, D.C., we had the Director of National Intelligence for the whole United States government confiding in her and seeking her advice, as if she were an oracle and font of political wisdom, and that takes us back to the script, as follows, with Lizzie talking, to see where this saga of her EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY goes next, which is what leads us back to the REVELATIONS in the Washington Post story on 15 July 2022, as follows, as Lizzie and Cassidy set Trump up for “THE KILL,” to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: So, Ms. Hutchinson, now we’re going to turn to certain information that was available before January 4th and what the Trump administration and the President knew about the potential for violence before January 6th.
end quotes
And here are yet more SLIMY LAWYER’S TRICKS being employed by the WITCH HUNTERS to bury Trump, with Lizzie having Cassidy tell the candid world what it was that Trump really knew, as if Cassidy were imbued with the power to read Trump’s mind and know his thoughts, which testimony would not be allowed in a real court of law, as well as introducing “evidence” with no foundation established, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: On the screen, you will see an email received by Acting Deputy Attorney General Donoghue on January 4th from the National Security Division of the Department of Justice.
Mr. Donoghue testified in our hearings last week.
The email identifies apparent planning by those coming to Washington on January 6th to, quote, occupy federal buildings and discussions of, quote, invading the Capitol building.
Here’s what Mr. Donoghue said to us.
end quotes
And here we are back to that crap of inserting video clips from some prior occasion which of course cannot be cross-examined, as follows:
[Begin videotape]
RICHARD DONOGHUE: And we knew that if you have tens of thousands of very obsessive people showing up in Washington DC that there was potential for violence.
[End videotape]
end quotes
And what exactly is the dude referring to there, when he talks about having tens of thousands of very obsessive people showing up in Washington DC that there was potential for violence?
BLACK LIVES MATTER?
Sounds like it to me, anyway, which takes us back to the BENNIE & LIZZIE SHOW starring Virginia’s very own Elaine Luria, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: The US Secret Service was looking at similar information and watching the planned demonstrations.
In fact, their intelligence division sent several emails to White House personnel like Deputy Chief of Staff Tony Ornato and the head of the President’s protective detail Robert Engel, including certain materials listing events like those on the screen.
The White House continued to receive updates about planned demonstrations, including information regarding the Proud Boys organizing and planning to attend events on January 6th.
Although Ms. Hutchinson has no detailed knowledge of any planning involving the Proud Boys for January 6th, she did note this.
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I recall hearing the word Oath Keeper and hearing the word Proud Boys closer to the planning of the January 6th rally when Mr. Giuliani would be around.
[End videotape]
end quote
And like the media told us, that is EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY to a very high degree – Cassidy heard gossip, and the WITCH HUNTERS in turn concocted that gossip into EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY, right after telling us that STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson had no detailed knowledge of any planning involving the Proud Boys for January 6th, but hey, people, this is a STALIN-ESQUE SHOW TRIAL, so let’s all pretend that Cassidy really knew more than she really did know, which is BULL****, and back to the trasnscript we go, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: On January 3rd, the Capitol Police issued a special event assessment.
In that document, the Capitol Police noted that the Proud Boys and other groups planned to be in Washington, DC on January 6th and indicated that, quote, unlike previous post-election protests, the targets of the pro-Trump supporters are not necessarily the counter-protesters as they were previously, but rather Congress itself is the target on the 6th.
end quotes
Which brings us back to the unanswered question of why wasn’t the Capital better defended, and why were all those people, invited into the Capital, as AOC, who knows these things, has recently informed us really happened – the Capital wasn’t “stormed” in her words, the people were invited in, which takes us back to the testimony of Lizzie Cheney, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: Of course, we all know now that the Proud Boys showed up on January 6th, marched from the Washington Monument to the Capitol that day, and led the riotous mob to invade and occupy our Capitol.
end quotes
And with that testimony from WITCH HUNTER Lizzie Cheney about what “we all know” about the Proud Boys showing up on January 6th and marching from the Washington Monument to the Capitol that day, and leading the riotous mob to invade and occupy our Capitol, even though AOC says that didn’t really happen, let us stop here for a moment to let that EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY from Lizzie Cheney sink in, and after an hour of your favorite commercials as we take a pause for station identification, we will be right back with the rest of the show, so stay tuned and don’t touch that dial!
And that is PURE BULL**** Lizzie Cheney is spewing above here when she testifies that, “Of course, we all know now that the Proud Boys showed up on January 6th, marched from the Washington Monument to the Capitol that day, and led the riotous mob to invade and occupy our Capitol.”
In fact “we all” know no such, not having evidence to support our knowing it, and not only do we all not know that, nor does Lizzie Cheney!
That is INFLAMMATORY RHETORIC on the part of WITCH HUNTER Lizzie Cheney, which would be PROSECUTORIAL MISCONDUCT, i.e., asserting facts that are not in evidence; mischaracterizing evidence; and improperly using the media, IF Lizzie were a real prosecutor, instead of a political hack bent on the destruction of a political rival at all costs, which is “TOILETBOWL” politics, plain and simple.
Lizzie Cheney, Bennie Thompson, Virginia’s Elaine Luria, Disneyland’s smarmy pencil-neck Adam “SHIFTY” Schiff, Democrat Constitutional Scholar Jamie Raskin, and the rest of the Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS are SLIMING Trump, using the cover of the House of Representatives to legitimize the SLIMING as a valid exercise of governmental power by the Democrats to destroy a hated political rival, and a certain percentage of the American population who hate America, themselves, and the thought of anybody have liberty are cheering on that SLIMING, despite how UN-AMERICAN it actually is, because people who hate America don’t really care if what they are doing un-American, because it is intended to be so.
And as to the reason why these WITCH HUNTERS are plastering this crap all over PRIME-TIME TV, let’s do like Tony Fauci tells us to do, which is to FOLLOW THE SCIENCE, and when we do that, it takes us to these following relevant scientific findings, to wit:
Does watching TV affect your brain?
Together, the researchers’ findings suggest that people who self-report moderate or excessive (high) amounts of TV watching experience greater cognitive decline and reduced gray matter in their brains later in life.
Gray matter is involved in decision-making, hearing and vision, and muscle control.
*****
What part of the brain activates watching TV?
When you watch TV, brain activity switches from the left side of your brain (responsible for logical thought and critical analysis) to the right side.
This is significant because the right side of the brain tends not to critically analyze incoming information.
*****
end quotes
And there we have it – a TV audience full of people with rotted brains from watching TV eat this **** right up, because they are unable to do otherwise, which takes us to some further EXPLOSIVE BLOCKBUSTER DYNAMITE TESTIMONY concerning the Capital Police, except this EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY is that of AOC, who seems to know a lot more than Lizzie Cheney or Cassidy Hutchinson, who we all know knows nothing at all, just gossip, about what really did happen on 6 January 2021 with regard to the Capital Police letting in the so-called rioters, as we see from the Washington Examiner story “AOC says Capitol Police were ‘opening the doors’ for Jan. 6 rioters” by Ryan King, Breaking News Reporter, on July 14, 2022, as follo9ws, and please, for the sake of your own safety, before you read it, be sure to be seated with a firm grasp on your chair, to wit, keeping in mind that according to the FBI, some 2,000 people out possibly as much as 80,000 people Trump’s rally according to then-Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy. may have been involved in the attack that day, each and every one of them, we are to believe according to Lizzie Cheney, being led by Proud Boys to invade and occupy our Capitol, which AOC says didn’t happen, to wit:
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) tore into U.S. Capitol Police for failing to forestall the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, alleging some officers were sympathetic to the event.
end quotes
Now, consider that EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY, people, and ask yourselves this important question, to wit:
WHY DON’T LIZZIE CHENEY AND BENNIE THOMPSON AND ELAINE LURIA HAVE AOC ON THE STATND AND UNDER OATH TO TELL HER STORY ON PRIME-TIME TV LIKE CASSIDY HYITCHINSON GOT TO DO?
WHAT ARE THEY AFRAID OF?
WHY ARE THEY TRYING TO BURY THE TRUTH HERE?
And that takes us back to AOC being a voice crying out in the wilderness here because she is peddling the wrong narrative, and the Washington Examiner, as follows:
Ocasio-Cortez stressed that authorities never “got to the bottom” of whether officers aided and were “opening the doors” to rioters who stormed the Capitol while warning fellow lawmakers, “We’re not safe” at the Capitol.
end quotes
And they never got to the bottom of it, people, for the simple reason that they do not want to get to the bottom of it, as it goes against the fake narrative if events they are concocting on the WITCH HUNTERS SHOW on PRIME TIME TV starring Cassidy Hutchinson in the Absurdist Drama they are presenting us as the classic WOMAN SCORNED who is going to score some justice for herself while saving our democracy at the same time by bringing down Donald Trump for once and for all, which takes us back to the AOC side of the story, to wit:
“There were actual officers working with this, and we never got to the bottom of that, and we never got any answers about that,” Ocasio-Cortez said Wednesday.
“I have no idea what happened to the people on the inside, who were very clearly sympathetic with what was going on and opening the doors wide open for that.”
end quotes
Did I tell you this stuff was PURE DYNAMITE?
And yes, I did, because it is, as follows:
Dozens arrested in the riot argued in court documents that officers had either not stopped them from entering the building or never told them they weren’t allowed inside.
end quotes
So how come we are not hearing about any of that from Lizzie Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson?
WHAT ARE THEY TRYING TO HIDE?
Stay tuned!
And with the EXPLOSIVE BLOCKBUSTER DYNAMITE TESTIMONY of AOC now in the record concerning the Capitol Police on 6 January 2021 letting people into the Capitol, because in the words of AOC, who knows a whole lot about these things, being important in Washington as she is, the U.S. Capitol Police failed to forestall the Jan. 6 Capitol riot because some officers were sympathetic to the event, which AOC says is something Lizzie Cheney and the other WITCH HUNTERS never “got to the bottom” of, whether officers aided and were “opening the doors” to rioters who stormed the Capitol, with AOC testifying “There were actual officers working with this, and we never got to the bottom of that, and we never got any answers about that,” and “I have no idea what happened to the people on the inside, who were very clearly sympathetic with what was going on and opening the doors wide open for that,” which is a vastly different story than what Lizzie Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson appear to be trying to sell us, let’s get back to the transcript of Cassidy and Lizzie on June 28, 2022, where we have even more EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY from Lizzie Cheney about 6 January 2021 using Cassidy Hutchinson as a stage prop or ventriloquist’s dummy, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson, I want to play you a clip of one of our meetings when you described a call on January 4th that you received from National Security Advisor Robert O’Brien on the same topic, potential violence on January 6th.
end quote
And here we are, back at that BULL**** of Cassidy Hutchinson, supposedly sworn in to testify at this hearing, being instead shown in a video clip from some other time, in some other place where it looks very much like Cassidy was in a studio being coached as to what to say in a tightly-controlled setting which takes us to the videotape of Cassidy, as opposed to the Cassidy who is supposedly giving EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY at this sham of a hearing, to wit:
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I received a call from Robert O’Brien, the National Security Advisor.
He had asked if he could speak with Mr. Meadows about potential violent — words of violence that he was hearing that were potentially going to happen on the Hill on January 6th.
end quotes
And the gossip does flow, and it is interesting word salad to boot – potential words of violence that potentially were going to happen on the Hill on January 6th !
And as we can clearly see here, in the days leading up to January 6, 2021, when the Democrats in Nancy Pelosi’s House of Representatives en masse threw OUR Constitution into the toilet and flushed it down, saddling us and the world with the bumbling, bungling Joe Biden in the process, it was Cassidy Hutchinson who was the real NERVE CENTER in the white house, with all kinds of very important people, in this case, Robert O’Brien, the National Security Advisor, calling her to share with her some juicy gossip they picked up from somewhere, maybe overheard in a men’s room or a newspaper stand, in this case gossip about “potential violent — words of violence” that he was hearing that were potentially going to happen on the Hill on January 6th, which takes us back to the transcript for more EXPLOSIVE GOSSIP, er, TESTIMONY from Lizzie and Cassidy, to wit:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I had asked if he had connected with Tony Ornato, because Tony Ornato had a conversation with him, with Mark, about that topic.
Robert had said, I’ll talk to Tony, and then I don’t know if Robert ever connected with Mark about the issue.
[End videotape]
And talk about EXPLOSIVE, people – what is EXPLOSIVE about that is Cassidy’s admission that she personally was totally clueless as to whether or not Robert O’Brien, the National Security Advisor to the President of the United States of America ever talked to Mark Meadows, the Chief of Staff of the same president, about “potential violent — words of violence” that he was hearing that were potentially going to happen on the Hill on January 6th, and with that unsolved mystery hanging over our collective heads, back we go for more Lizzie Cheney and her EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson, can you describe for us Mr. Ornato’s responsibilities as Deputy Chief of Staff?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: The Deputy Chief of Staff position at the White House for operations is arguably one of the most important positions that somebody can hold.
They’re in charge of all security protocol for the campus and all Presidential protectees, primarily the President and the first family.
But anything that requires security for any individual that has presidential protection, so the Chief of Staff or the National Security Advisor, as well as the Vice President’s team, too, Tony would oversee all of that.
And he was the conduit for security protocol between White House staff and the United States Secret Service.
end quotes
And people, we are not done with Tony Ornato yet, he is a player, so take note of what Cassidy tells us his role in this absurdist drama is going to be, which takes us back to Lizzie, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: Thank you.
And you also described a brief meeting between Mr. Ornato and Mr. Meadows on the potential for violence.
The meeting was on January 4th.
They were talking about the potential for violence on January 6th.
Let’s listen to a clip of that testimony.
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I remember Mr. Ornato had talked to him about intelligence reports.
I just remember Mr. Ornato coming in and saying that we had intel reports saying that there could potentially be violence on the 6th.
[End videotape]
And more BULL****, people, posing there as EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY when the only thing remotely EXPLOSIVE about it is how transparently stupid it is with all this talk about “there could potentially be violence on the 6th,” as if there never going to be violence on any other day or any other occasion.
It’s Washington, People, it’s a violent city, to wit:
Police and protesters scuffle in Washington DC’s Black Lives Matter Plaza – Nov 4, 2020
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S75qFIu7xJo
Black Lives Matter protesters confront white diners outside DC cafe
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSnTTND0UcM
And with that said, here is a good place to take a break for station identification and a full uninterrupted hour of your favorite commercials that you can’t live without, and we will be back with more EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY from Lizzie Cheney about just how very dangerous Washington was going to be on 6 January 2021, when highly trained Democrat party paramilitary commandos were going to lead an assault on the Capitol to distract the nation’s attention away from the travesty playing itself behind closed doors and off the record inside the Capitol, so leave your channel setting right where it is, and don’t touch that dial.
And before we go back to this absolute rank BULL**** these Pelosi-ite WITCH HUNTERS are feeding to the ignorant and cognitively impaired in America who eat this crap up with a spoon, being titillated (stimulate or excite, as in “these WITCH HUNTERS are paid to titillate the public”) as they are by this horse****, to see how this BULL**** spew above here from Lizzie Cheney using Cassidy Hutchinson as her ventriloquist’s dummy is the gift that keeps on giving for these WITCH HUNTERS and their lackeys in the media, let’s go to a Guardian article titled “Secret Service turned over just one text message to January 6 panel, sources say” by Hugo Lowell in Washington on 19 July 2022, where we have as follows:
The Secret Service turned over just one text message to the House January 6 committee on Tuesday, in response to a subpoena compelling the production of all communications from the day before and the day of the US Capitol attack, according to two sources familiar with the matter.
The circumstances surrounding the erasure of the Secret Service texts have become central to the January 6 committee’s work as it investigates how agents and leaders planned to move Donald Trump and Mike Pence as violence unfolded at the Capitol.
The fallout from the missing text messages episode, as well as testimony from former Trump aide Cassidy Hutchinson describing a fracas inside the presidential vehicle on January 6 as Trump tried to reach for the steering wheel, has renewed questions over credibility.
end quotes
AS there is yet more BULL****, as we will soon see, because all Cassidy did in reality, according to the transcript, was to describe some gossip she heard about an event she personally did not witness, but based on her repetition of that gossip on June 28, 2022, the WITCH HUNTERS are no accusing the Secret Service of witholding information about the alleged PRESIDENTIAL LUNGE of 6 January 2021, where we have Trump fighting to gain control of the steering wheel of the presidential limosine so he could drive to the Capitol to personally lead the rampaging rioters in their asssault on our democracy, which is gaining the WITCH HUNTERS more press coverage plus an opportunity to have another PRIME TIME HEARING where the alleged PRESIDENTIAL LUNGE is sure to be a topic, and with that background, let’s go back to June 28, 2022 and the Lizzie and Cassidy hour, where we have, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: You also told us about reports of violence and weapons that the Secret Service were receiving on the night of January 5th and throughout the day on January 6th.
Is that correct?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
end quotes
And here, if we are sane and rational as opposed to “brain-rotted” from watching too much BULL**** on television, which lowers one’s IQ, we have to wonder just how it is that Cassidy Hutchinson would be important enough as Mark Meadows secretary to be receiving “reports of violence and weapons” that the Secret Service itself was alleged to be receiving on the night of January 5th, and then throughout the day on January 6th.
But that foundation was never laid, and instead, Lizzie went skating off to this inflammatory testimony, instead, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: There are reports that police in Washington, DC had arrested several people with firearms or ammunition following a separate pro-Trump rally in Freedom Plaza on the evening of January 5th.
Are those some of the reports that you recall hearing about?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: They are.
end quotes
From whom, people?
From whom was Cassidy hearing those reports?
How about from FOX 5 in Washington, D.C. which published a news story titled “Several arrested on gun charges as pro-Trump rallies begin in DC” by Stephanie Ramirez and Lindsay Watts on January 5, 2021, where we learned the pertinent details, as follows:
WASHINGTON (FOX 5 DC) – On Tuesday, as thousands packed Freedom Plaza for multiple pro-Trump rallies planned in the District this week, members of the mayor’s office confirmed police already arrested six individuals on charges that include bringing illegal guns to the city.
end quotes
HUH?
Six people arrested?
That’s it?
Out of thousands?
Do tell, which takes us back to FOX 5, as follows:
As of 10 p.m. Tuesday, District leaders say the six arrested were charged for offenses that include: carrying a pistol and carrying a rifle without a license, possessing a high capacity feeding device, carrying unregistered ammunition, an unregistered firearm, driving an unauthorized van without a permit, simple assault, possession of a prohibited weapon (taser) and possessing illegal fireworks.
end quotes
So is that what Cassidy hearing?
Or was Cassidy hearing something else?
And of course, we will never know, unless Cassidy is put on a real witness stand under oath so she can be rigorously cross-examined by a good defense attorney, which takes us back to the horse**** Lizzie Cheney and Cassidy Hutchinson were feeding to the brain-dead in America on June 28, 2022, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: Of course, the world now knows that the people who attacked the Capitol on January 6th had many different types of weapons.
end quotes
And of course, the world DOES NOT know that, nor does Lizzie Cheney, but since she is not under oath, she can spew whatever BULL***** on the record she wants to spew, no matter how inflammatory or false, which takes us back to the transcript and this SHOCKING TESTIMONY from Lizzie Cheney, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: When a President speaks, the Secret Service typically requires those attending to pass through metal detectors known as magnetometers, or mags for short.
The Select Committee has learned that people who willingly entered the enclosed area for President Trump’s speech were screened so they could attend the rally at the Ellipse.
They had weapons and other items that were confiscated: pepper spray, knives, brass knuckles, tasers, body armor, gas masks, batons, blunt weapons.
And those were just from the people who chose to go through the security for the President’s event on the Ellipse, not the several thousand members of the crowd who refused to go through the mags and watched from the lawn near the Washington Monument.
end quotes
Oh, how the BULL**** does flow freely from out the lips and mouth of our Lizzie Cheney with that horse**** about people who “refused” to go through the mags, as of Lizzie Cheney could read the thoughts of each and every one of those people, which thought itself is absurd, and if we go by FACTS, not hysteria like Lizzie is spreading, and we go to a Newsweek article titled “Exclusive: Classified Documents Reveal the Number of January 6 Protestors” by William M. Arkin on 12/23/21, we learn as follows, to wit:
By the time January 6 arrived, after another amendment had been submitted by the Ellipse organizers, the permit was issued for an estimated 30,000 participants.
Approximately 25,000 participants were screened by Secret Service Uniformed Division officers to get into the restricted area where Donald Trump was speaking on January 6.
An additional 15,000 positioned themselves between the Ellipse and the Washington Monument, outside the restricted area, according to still-classified Secret Service data.
The Federal Protective Service made its own internal estimates, pointing out that there were actually three major rallies with permits for January 6.
The first was the Ellipse, permitted for 30,000 but swamped by “much more,” according to FPS documents released under the Freedom of Information Act.
Rosen testified that on January 6, he spoke to acting U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Michael Sherwin, who was present on the Ellipse, “to inquire if the crowd size there was consistent with or larger than the forecasts.”
Sherwin told him that “the size of the crowd was on the lower side of the forecast and conceivably might have been below the lower end of the range.”
end quotes
So did people really “refuse” to go through the mags in order to get into an restricted area?
WE DO NOT KNOW, NOR DOES LIZZIE CHENEY?
Getting back to Lizzie, her EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY goes on as follows, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: The Select Committee has learned about reports from outside the magnetometers, and has obtained police radio transmissions identifying individuals with firearms, including AR-15s, near the Ellipse on the morning of January 6th.
Let’s listen.
[Begin videotape]
UNKNOWN: There’s an individual who is in a tree.
It’s gonna be a white male, about six feet tall, thin build, brown cowboy boots.
He’s got jeans and a blue jean jacket, and underneath the hoodie jacket the complainants both saw stock of an AR-15.
He’s going to be with a group of individuals, about 5 to 8 — 5 to 8 other individuals.
Two of the individuals in that group at the base of the tree near the porta-pottys were wearing green fatigues, green olive dress house fatigues.
About 5’8″, 5’9″, skinny — skinny white males, brown cowboy boots.
UNKNOWN: They had Glock style pistols in their waistband.
8736–
That subject’s weapon on his right hip.
That’s a negative, he’s in the tree.
Motor one, make sure PPD knows they have an elevated threat in the tree south side of Constitution Avenue.
Look for the Don’t Tread on Me flag, American flag facemask, cowboy boots, weapon on the right — right side hip.
I got three men walking down the street in fatigues.
One’s carrying a AR-15.
Copy at 14th and Independence.
[End Videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: AR-15s at 14th and Independence.
As you saw in those emails, the first report that we showed we now know was sent in the 8:00 hour on January 6th.
This talked about people in the crowd wearing ballistic helmets and body armor, carrying radio equipment and military grade backpacks.
The second report we showed you on the screen was sent by the Secret Service in the 11 a.m. hour and it addressed reports of a man with a rifle near the ellipse.
Ms. Hutchinson, in prior testimony you described for us a meeting in the White House around 10 a.m. in the morning of January 6th involving Chief of Staff Meadows and Tony Ornato.
Were you in that meeting?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I was.
LIZ CHENEY: Let’s listen to your testimony about that meeting and then we’ll have some questions.
[Begin Videotape]
UNKNOWN: I think the last time we talked you mentioned that some of the weapons that people had at the rally included flagpoles, oversized sticks or flagpoles, bear spray.
Is there anything else that you recall hearing about that the — the people who had gathered on the ellipse had?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I recall Tony and I having a conversation with Mark probably around 10 a.m., 10:15 a.m. where I remember Tony mentioning knives, guns in the form of pistols and rifles, bear spray, body armor, spears, and flagpoles.
Spears were one item, flagpoles were one item.
But then Tony had related to me something to the effect of and these effing people are fastening spears onto the ends of flagpoles.
[End Videotape]
And with that EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY now on the record in here, let’s take another break for station identification and a solid uninterrupted hour and a half of your favorite commercials that you can’t live without, and once again we will be back with more EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY from Lizzie Cheney about 6 January 2021, when highly trained Democrat party paramilitary commandos led a successful assault on the Capitol to distract the nation’s attention away from the travesty playing itself behind closed doors and off the record inside the Capitol, so leave your channel setting right where it is, and don’t touch that dial.
And since the barrage of pure horse manure from this WITCH HUNTERS’ STALINIST SHOW TRIAL is now flowing fast and thick with this EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of WITCH HUNTER Lizzie Cheney on June 28, 2022, using Cassidy Hutchinson as a willing and useful stage prop, so that Lizzie isn’t just talking to herself, which torrent of BULL**** has triggered yet another PRIMETIME TV WITCH HUNTERS HEARING on 21 July 2021 starring Virginia’s own Elaine Luria, D-Va., a former Naval officer who makes a mockery of her oath to defend the Constitution, and who led the session, telling the candid world in an Associated Press article titled “Jan. 6 panel probes Trump’s 187 minutes as Capitol attacked” by Lisa Mascaro, Mary Clare Jalonick and Farnoush Amiri on 21 July 2022 that she expected testimony from White House aides would “just be really compelling,” even though it is scripted BULL**** intended to be highly inflammatory, which is the essence of a STALINIST SHOW TRIAL where the victim, in this case, the hated Donald Trump is tried in absentia with no due process of law afforded, another prime requisite of a STALINIST SHOW TRIAL, for which hearing there is as of yet no posted transcript, let’s get back to the play action on June 28, 2022, starring Lizzie Cheney as the woman in the know, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson, here’s a clip of your testimony regarding Mr. Meadows’ response to learning that the rally attendees were armed that day.
[Begin Videotape]
What was Mark’s reaction — Mr. Meadows’ reaction to this list of weapons that people had in the crowd?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: When Tony and I went in to talk to Mark that morning, Mark was sitting on his couch and on his phone which was something typical.
And I remember Tony just got right into it.
He was like, sorry, I just want to let you know and informed him, like, this is how many people we have outside the mags right now.
These are the weapons that we’re going to have.
It’s possible he listed more weapons off that I just don’t recall.
And gave him a brief but — and concise explanation, but also fairly — fairly thorough.
And I remember distinctly Mark not looking up from his phone, right?
I remember Tony finishing his explanation and it taking a few seconds for Mark to say his name.
Because I almost said, Mark, did you hear him?
And then Mark chimed in.
It was like, Alright, anything else?
Still looking down at his phone.
And Tony looked at me and I looked at Tony and he — Tony said no, Sir.
Do you have any questions?
He’s like, what are you hearing?
And I looked at Tony and I was like, Sir he just told you about what was happening down at the rallies.
And he was like yeah, yeah.
I know.
And then he looked up and said have you talked to the President?
And Tony said yes, Sir.
He’s aware.
And he said Alright.
Good.
LIZ CHENEY: He asked Tony if Tony had informed the President —
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: — Yes —
LIZ CHENEY: — And Tony said yes, he had.
[End Videotape]
So Miss Hutchinson, is it your understanding that Mr. Ornato told the President about weapons at the rally on the morning of January 6th?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s what Mr. Ornato relayed to me.
LIZ CHENEY: And here’s how you characterized Mr. Meadows’ general response when people raised concerns about what could happen on January 6th.
[Begin Videotape]
UNKNOWN: So at the time in the days leading up to the 6th, there were lots of public reports about how things might go bad on the 6th, even the potential for violence.
If I’m hearing you correctly, what stands out to you is that Mr. Meadows did not share those concerns or at least did not act on those concerns.
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Did not act on those concerns would be accurate.
end quotes
Oh, cut the ******* BULL****, Cassidy!
There were, according to the estimates, several thousand people out there on 6 January 2021, and according to the Associated Press article titled “Jan. 6 panel probes Trump’s 187 minutes as Capitol attacked” by Lisa Mascaro, Mary Clare Jalonick and Farnoush Amiri on 21 July 2022, we have as follows concerning those present, to wit:
So far, more than 840 people have been charged with federal crimes related to the Capitol riot.
Over 330 of them have pleaded guilty, mostly to misdemeanors.
Of the more than 200 defendants to be sentenced, approximately 100 received terms of imprisonment.
end quotes
So are Lizzie and Cassidy HYPING things here, people, to make them more dramatic, given this is a STALINIST SHOW TRIAL where such tactics are expected?
And of course they are – because that is what is expected of them, which takes us to the relevant and important question of what exactly was it that Mark Meadows, who was a powerless political hack serving Donald Trump as his chief of staff, whose duties were limited to selecting and hiring staff members like Cassidy Hutchinson, structuring the office’s system of reporting information, monitoring and maintaining the office’s information flow to the president, maintaining the president’s schedule, and advising the president on politics and policy, going to do to stop anybody outside of his office from doing anything, given that in Washington, D.C., as we clearly see from a FOX 5 DC article titled “Several arrested on gun charges as pro-Trump rallies begin in DC” by Stephanie Ramirez and Lindsay Watts on January 5, 2021, it is the mayor of Washington, D.C., not the president, and certainly not a political weakling like Mark Meadows, who is responsible for enforcing law and order in the Capital city, to wit:
Also on Tuesday, Mayor Bowser penned a stern letter to the United States Attorney General, Acting Secretary of Defense and Acting Secretary of the Army.
“The District of Columbia Government has not requested personnel from any other federal law enforcement agencies,” she wrote, calling on the federal leaders to coordinate with and contact D.C. Police immediately if they plan to do so.
This is in response to events that happened in June, as the Mayor and President publicly battled over who has the authority to mobilize law enforcement in the District.
end quotes
So besides all those in America without a brain in their head who are unable to think, a number upwards of 20 million souls, who are these WITCH HUNTERS trying to fool with this horse**** about Mark Meadows failing to take any action in 6 January 2021, the day the Democrats in the House of Representatives struck our Constitution a DEATH BLOW behind closed doors while their paramilitaries were leading a riot outside to distract the American people from what was going on inside the Capitol?
Going back to the transcript of this STALINSIST SHOW TRIAL, which would make Joe Stalin quite proud that his legacy lives on here in what used to be the United States of America, it continues as follows:
UNKNOWN: But other people raised them to — to him like in this exchange you mentioned that Mr. Ornato pulled him aside.
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
[End Videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson, we’re going to show now an exchange of texts between you and Deputy Chief of Staff Ornato.
And these text messages were exchanged while you were at the ellipse.
In one text you write: But the crowd looks good from this vantage point.
As long as we get the shot.
He was effing furious.
And the text messages also stress that President Trump kept mentioning the OTR, an off the record movement.
We’re going to come back and ask you about that in a minute.
But could you tell us, first of all, who it is in the text who was furious?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: The he in that text that I was referring to was the President.
LIZ CHENEY: And why was he furious, Miss Hutchinson?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: He was furious because he wanted the arena that we had on the ellipse to be maxed out at capacity for all attendees.
end quotes
And as we saw above, the permitted capacity was 30,000 people and approximately 25,000 participants were screened by Secret Service Uniformed Division officers to get into the restricted area where Donald Trump was speaking on January 6, 2021.
Getting back to the transcript, the BULL**** from Lizzie and Cassidy continues to flow forth freely, as follows:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: The advanced team had relayed to him that the mags were free flowing.
Everybody who wanted to come in had already come in.
But he still was angry about the extra space and wanted more people to come in.
LIZ CHENEY: And did you go to the rally in the Presidential motorcade?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I — I was there, yes, in the motorcade.
LIZ CHENEY: And were you backstage with the President and other members of his staff and family?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I was.
LIZ CHENEY: And you told us, Ms. Hutchinson, about particular comments that you heard while you were in the tent area.
[Begin Videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: When we were in the offstage announce area tent behind the stage he was very concerned about the shot, meaning the photograph that we would get, because the rally space wasn’t full.
One of the reasons which I’ve previously stated was because he wanted it to be full and for people to not feel excluded because they had come far to watch him at the rally.
And he felt the mags were at fault for not letting everybody in.
But another leading reason and likely the primary reason is because he wanted it full and he was angry that we weren’t letting people through the mags with weapons, what the Secret Service deemed as weapons and are — are weapons.
But when we were in the offstage announce tent, I was part of a conversation — I was in — I was in the vicinity of a conversation where I overheard the President say something to the effect of, you know, I – – I don’t effing care that they have weapons.
end quotes
And WHOA there, Cassidy – you say in one breath that you were “part of a conversation,” and almost before those words are out of your mouth, you correct that obvious falsehood by stating “I was in the vicinity of a conversation.”
The “vicinity of a conversation?”
Do tell, Cassidy.
So what exactly was the “vicinity of a conversation” where you say you “overheard the President say something to the effect of, you know, I – – I don’t effing care that they have weapons?”
Were you eavesdropping, Cassidy?
And “something to the effect of?”
What kind of horse**** is that?
Getting back to this unbelievable flow of bull**** from Cassidy, who before she turned against Trump, was for him, it continues thusly:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: They’re not here to hurt me.
Take that effing mags away.
Let my people in.
They can march to the Capitol from here.
Let the people in.
Take the effing mags away.
[End Videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: Just to be clear, Ms. Hutchinson, is it your understanding that the President wanted to take the mags away and said that the armed individuals were not there to hurt him?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s a fair assessment.
LIZ CHENEY: The issue wasn’t with the amount of space available in the official rally area only, but instead that people did not want to have to go through the mags.
Let’s listen to a portion of what you told us about that.
[Begin Videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: In this particular instance, it wasn’t the capacity of our space.
It was the mags and the people that didn’t want to come through.
And that’s what Tony had been trying to relay to him that morning.
You know, it’s not the issues that we encounter on the campaign.
We have enough space, Sir.
They don’t want to come in right now.
They — they have weapons that they don’t want confiscated by the Secret Service.
And they’re fine on the mall.
They can see you on the mall and they’re — they want to march straight to the Capitol from the mall.
[End Videotape]
So, Tony Ornato, another political hack who according to his bio is the Assistant Director of the United States Secret Service Office of Training and was the Service’s Deputy Assistant Director who headed the security detail of president Donald Trump until taking a leave of absence when the president named him White House Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations in December 2019, and after his tenure as a political appointee in the Trump administration, he returned to the Secret Service where he currently serves as the Assistant Director in the Office of Training, knew that people on the mall had weapons and they didn’t want those weapons confiscated?
That’s far out, people, so far out as to be totally unbelievable.
And let’s go back to his bio where we have this:
After having served on the Trump presidential detail for three years, Ornato received the unprecedented permission to temporarily take a leave of absence to become a White House political advisor.
In December 2019, Trump announced that Ornato would be changing roles: “The United States Secret Service Deputy Assistant Director, Anthony Ornato, will become my new Deputy Chief of Staff for Operations.”
With this shift Ornato left his role as protective agent to become a manager responsible for all aspects of security, travel, information technology, military operations, scheduling and operational logistics required in support of the President, managing a budget of approximately $800 million and leading a workforce of over 5,000 persons.
He and his team provided management and administration services, human resources support, financial oversight, and medical support.
He managed the Residence staff assigned to the president and the Executive Office of the President complex.
Ornato also had responsibility for a variety of offices related to the White House, including Camp David, the Presidential Airlift Group, the Presidential Marine Helicopter Squadron, the White House Communications Agency.
He was also responsible for the “Presidential Continuity Policy, Plans and Requirements.”
During his tenure on Trump’s staff he helped to organize the Donald Trump photo op at St. John’s Church, an event that generated controversy.
Ornato had participated in coordinating the logistics of the event.
The Project on Government Oversight noted that “it remains unclear whether Ornato’s role in the events of Lafayette Square ever came under scrutiny.”
In mid December, during a meeting Trump was holding with Rudy Giuliani, Sidney Powell, Michael Flynn and former Overstock.com CEO Patrick M. Byrne, Cassidy Hutchinson texted Ornato saying, “the west wing is UNHINGED.”
Ornato responded to her, saying, “oh holy hell.”
In late December 2020, Trump aides consulted with Ornato regarding the president’s desire to ride in a motorcade accompanying January 6 marchers protesting the election of Joe Biden as the next President of the United States.
Trump later said he wanted to accompany the marchers but that he was prevented from doing so.
In an interview in April with The Washington Post, Trump expressed regret over not marching to the U.S. Capitol the day his supporters stormed the building.
He said he pressed to join the march that day but was stopped by his security detail.
“Secret Service wouldn’t let me,” Trump said.
“I wanted to go.”
“I wanted to go so badly.”
“Secret Service says you can’t go.”
“I would have gone there in a minute.”
During her June 2022 testimony before the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack, former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson said she had been told by Ornato that after Trump got into the presidential SUV following his January 6 Ellipse rally, hoping to drive to the Capitol as his supporters marched there, his lead Secret Service agent Robert Engel told him it was too dangerous and informed him they were returning to the White House.
Hutchinson said Ornato told her Trump became irate and attempted to grab the steering wheel of the vehicle, and lunged at Engel’s clavicles.
She testified Engel was present with Ornato as he related the incident but never contradicted the account.
CNN reported three days after Hutchinson’s testimony that it had spoken with two Secret Service agents who had heard accounts of the incident from multiple other agents since February 2021, including Trump’s driver.
Although details differed, agents confirmed there was an angry confrontation, with one agent relating that Trump “tried to lunge over the seat — for what reason, nobody had any idea,” but no one asserted Trump attacked Engel.
A separate Secret Service official told CNN that Engel denied that Trump grabbed at the steering wheel or lunged toward an agent on his detail, and that Ornato denied telling Hutchinson such.
Politico reported the same day that Engel told the committee during an early 2022 deposition that he had kept his full account of the incident from his Secret Service colleagues for at least fourteen months.
Hutchinson testified that on the morning of January 6, Ornato told White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows that participants in Trump’s rally had weapons, and that Ornato told her he had also informed Trump.
Keith Kellogg, an advisor to Pence, reportedly told Ornato that Pence refused with good reason to be evacuated from the Capitol by the Secret Serve as the rioting was proceeding.
But Politico’s Kyle Cheney reported that Ornato testified to the Jan. 6 committee that he incorrectly told Mark Meadows that Pence had already been evacuated when Trump sent a tweet attacking Pence at 2:24 p.m.
Washington Post reporter Carol Leonnig, author of a 2021 book on the Secret Service, characterized Engel and Ornato as “very, very close to President Trump.”
During an MSNBC interview she stated: “some people accused them of at times being enablers and ‘yes men’ of the president — particularly Tony Ornato — and very much people who wanted to … see him pleased.”
Leonnig said there was a large contingent of Trump’s Secret Service detail that wanted Biden to fail and some “took to their personal media accounts to cheer on the insurrection and the individuals riding up to the Capitol as patriots.”1]
Ornato has been interviewed twice by the United States House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack, and the Secret Service announced that Ornato will be made available to testify under oath to the committee.
end quotes
And once again, with all of that to digest, if it is possible to digest so much pure bull**** as we are getting barraged with here, let’s take another break for station identification and a solid uninterrupted two hours of your favorite commercials that you can’t live without, and after that, we will be back with more EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY from Lizzie Cheney about 6 January 2021, when highly trained Democrat party paramilitary commandos led a successful assault on the Capitol to distract the nation’s attention away from the travesty playing itself behind closed doors and off the record inside the Capitol, so leave your channel setting right where it is, and don’t touch that dial.
HEARSAY, GOSSIP and pure horse****, people, is what we are being dosed with here as this STALINIST SHOW TRIAL where Donald Trump is being tried in absentia, which is an UN-AMERICAN as it gets, continues to unfold and make its way to the American people courtesy of NETWORK PRIMETIME TV serving as an organ for the dissemination of PURE POLITICAL PROPAGANDA by these UN-AMERICAN STALINIST WITCH HUNTERS, who are carrying on Joe Stalin’s tradition of political repression that he used to rid himself of those he considered his political enemies, which brings us to July 21, 2021 and the opening statement of GRAND INQUISITOR Bennie Thompson in that episode of the WITCH HUNTERS OF WASHINGTON, D.C., PRESENT EVEN MORE HYPE AND HYSTERIA, where we have the following, to wit:
BENNIE THOMPSON: Over the last month and a half, the Select Committee has told the story of a president who did everything in his power to overturn an election.
end quotes
And yes, people, that is exactly right – they have told “a story,” a story they have created by piecing together odds and ends of gossip, and innuendo, and outright lies put on the record by the WITCH HUNTERS themselves, as we have been seeing above here in this EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of Lizzie Cheney, using the GOSSIP GIRL Cassidy Hutchinson, as a stage prop to aid Lizzie Cheney in putting forth her inflammatory testimony, which takes us back to Bennie on 21 July, to wit:
BENNIE THOMPSON: He lied.
He bullied.
He betrayed his oath.
He tried to destroy our democratic institutions.
He summoned a mob to Washington.
Afterward, on January 6th when he knew that the assembled mob was heavily armed and angry, he commanded the mob to go to the Capitol, and he emphatically commanded the heavily armed mob to fight like hell.
end quotes
A heavily armed mob?
What rank and toxic bull**** that is pouring forth from the mouth of Bennie the WITCH HUNTER.
According to the data and facts, only NINE people out of several thousands were arrested on weapons charges, and they were hardly “heavily armed,” but again, people, it is NOT the intent of these WITCH HUNTERS to present us with facts, because facts and truth do not serve their ends, which ends are total political control, which takes us back to the GRAND INQUISITOR Bennie Thompson on 21 July 2022, as follows:
BENNIE THOMPSON: For the weeks between the November election and January 6th, Donald Trump was a force to be reckoned with.
end quotes
HYPE, people, but it is a STALNIST SHOW TRIAL, so HYPE is the name of the game and GRAND INQUISITOR Bennie, who Joe Stalin would call one of his own, is a master at the game which is why Nany Pelosi pout him in charge, which takes us back for more Bennie, to wit:
BENNIE THOMPSON: He shrugged off the factuality and legality correct sober advice of his knowledgeable and sensible advisers.
Instead, he recklessly blazed a path of lawlessness and corruption, the cost of which democracy be damned.
end quotes
And here with that inflammatory rhetoric and verbiage we clearly see the influence of the top-notch Hollywood Soap Opera screenwriters writing the script for this SHOW TRIAL, which again takes us back to Bennie reading his scripted lines, as follows:
BENNIE THOMPSON: And then he stopped.
For 187 minutes on January 6th, this man of unbridled destructive energy could not be moved, not by his aides, not by his allies, not by the violent chants of rioters, or the desperate pleas of those facing down the riot.
And more tellingly, Donald Trump ignored and disregarded the desperate pleas of his own family, including Ivanka and Don Junior.
Even though he was the only person in the world who could call off the mob he sent to the Capitol, he could not be moved to rise from his dining room table and walk the few steps down the White House hallway into the press briefing room, where cameras were anxiously and desperately waiting to carry his message to the armed and violent mob savagely beating and killing law enforcement officers ravaging the Capitol and hunting down the vice president and various members of Congress.
end quotes
KILLING LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS?
FACT CHECK: THAT IS COMPLETE BULL**** BECAUSE NO POLICE OFFICERS WERE KILLED ON 6 JANUARY 2021!
Getting back to Bennie, we have:
BENNIE THOMPSON: He could not be moved.
This evening, my colleagues, Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois and Ms. Luria of Virginia, will take you inside the White House during those 187 minutes.
We also remind you of what was happening at the Capitol minute by minute, as the final violent, tragic part of Donald Trump’s scheme to cling to power unraveled while he ignored his advisers, stood by, and watched it unfold on television.
Let me offer a final thought about the Select Committee’s work so far.
As we’ve made clear throughout these hearings, our investigation goes forward.
We continue to receive new information every day.
We continue to hear from witnesses.
We will reconvene in September to continue laying out our findings to the American people.
But as that work goes forward, a number of facts are clear.
There can be no doubt that there was a coordinated, multistep effort to overturn an election overseen and directed by Donald Trump.
There can be no doubt that he commanded a mob, a mob he knew was heavily armed, violent, and angry, to march on the Capitol to try to stop the peaceful transfer of power.
end quotes
So there we see Viginia’s own Elaine Luria being raised to not only national, but international stardom, as well, which should work wonders for her re-election campaign as the mid-terms approach, and from there, let us go back in time for a moment, given that hardly anyone in America today, where the majority are functionally illiterate and unable to think for themselves, which is how Bennie and the WITCH HUNTERS are able to get away with this crap, knows who Joe Stalin is, probably thinking he was a baseball player, or maybe a pro wrestler to the Nikita Khrushchev Reference Archive and his Speech to 20th Congress of the C.P.S.U. (Communist Party of the Soviet Union) on February 24-25, 1956 to get a glimpse of who Joe Stalin was, to wit:
An entirely different relationship with people characterized Stalin.
Lenin’s traits – patient work with people, stubborn and painstaking education of them, the ability to induce people to follow him without using compulsion, but rather through the ideological influence on them of the whole collective – were entirely foreign to Stalin.
He discarded the Leninist method of convincing and educating, he abandoned the method of ideological struggle for that of administrative violence, mass repressions and terror.
He acted on an increasingly larger scale and more stubbornly through punitive organs, at the same time often violating all existing norms of morality and of Soviet laws.
Arbitrary behavior by one person encouraged and permitted arbitrariness in others.
Mass arrests and deportations of many thousands of people, execution without trial and without normal investigation created conditions of insecurity, fear and even desperation.
This, of course, did not contribute toward unity of the Party ranks and of all strata of working people, but, on the contrary, brought about annihilation and the expulsion from the Party of workers who were loyal but inconvenient to Stalin.
end quotes
Execution without trial and without normal investigation, people, is exactly what we are seeing here with this obvious railroading of Donald Trump by these WITCH HUNTERS, which again takes us back to June 28, 2022 and the Lizzie and Cassidy Show, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson, what we saw when those clips were playing were photos provided by the National Archives showing the President in the offstage tent before his speech on the ellipse.
You were in some of those photos as well.
And I just want to confirm that that is when you heard the President say the people with weapons weren’t there to hurt him and that he wanted the Secret Service to remove the magnetometers.
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
In the photos that you displayed we were standing towards the front of the tent with the TVs really close to where he would walk out to go on to the stage.
The — these conversations happened two to three minutes before he took the stage that morning.
LIZ CHENEY: Let’s reflect on that for a moment.
President Trump was aware that a number of the individuals in the crowd had weapons and were wearing body armor.
And here’s what President Trump instructed the crowd to do.
[Begin Videotape]
DONALD TRUMP: We’re going to walk down, and I’ll be there with you.
We’re going to walk down — [Applause] — We’re going to walk down any one you want.
But I think right here.
We’re going to walk down to the Capitol.
[Applause]
[End Videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: And the crowd as we know did proceed to the Capitol.
It soon became apparent to the Secret Service including the Secret Service teams in the crowd along with White House staff that security at the Capitol would not be sufficient.
end quotes
And here, with that EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY from Lizzie Cheney, to do some more fact-checking here on that matter of whether or not security at the Capitol would be sufficient, let us go to a Newsweek article titled “Exclusive: Classified Documents Reveal the Number of January 6 Protestors” by William M. Arkin on 12/23/21, to wit:
“The protests/rallies [are] expected to be similar to the previous Million MAGA March rallies in November and December 2020,” the U.S. Capitol Police agreed in their December 23 “Special Assessment” (21-A-0468 V.2).
The Secret Service added: “There are approximately fifty nine (59) groups identified as potentially participating in First Amendment activities on January 6, 2021 at or around the White House Complex (WHC) … Expected attendance is around 20,000 participants.”
Six times as many protestors—as many as 120,000—would show up on the Mall on January 6, according to classified numbers still not released by the Secret Service and the FBI but seen by Newsweek.
But there is still not an official estimate, nor have any of the Congressional committees or task forces offered a number.
Nor is there a clear number of how many people actually entered the Capitol, or tried to get in.
These numbers, and a specific number who climbed Capitol Hill, or assaulted the building, how many forced there way in, and how many merely walked in, is all the more important in assessing the percentage of those who were violent, how many were associated with extremist groups, and indeed how many were there: that is, was it just a routine event dominated by insurrectionists, or was it a grass roots movement?
Getting the numbers right is essential.
Acting Secretary of Defense Christopher Miller told the Congress that some 8,000 “local and Federal law enforcement officers were on duty in the District of Columbia” on January 6.
“I was told during planning sessions leading up to January 6 that such a force routinely manages demonstrations well north of 100,000 demonstrators.”
end quotes
So is Lizzie feeding us yet more bull****?
And of course she was, which takes us back to the script, as follows:
[Begin Videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I had two or three phone conversations with Mr. Ornato when we were at the ellipse.
And then I had four men on Mr. Meadows’ detail with me in between those individuals and a few other bodies on the ground just secret service doing advance.
They’re getting notifications through their radios and Mr. Ornato on one phone conversation had called me and said make sure the Chief knows that they’re — they’re getting close to the Capitol.
It’s — they’re having trouble stacking bodies.
[End Videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: And Ms. Hutchinson, when you — you said they were having trouble stacking bodies, did you mean that law enforcement at the Capitol needed more people to defend the Capitol from the rioters?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: It was becoming clear to us and to the Secret Service that Capitol Police officers were getting overrun at the security barricades outside of the Capitol building.
And they were having short — they were short people to defend the building against the rioters.
LIZ CHENEY: And you mentioned that Mr. Ornato was conveying this to you because he wanted you to tell Mr. Meadows.
So did you — did you tell Mr. Meadows that people were getting closer to the Capitol and that Capitol Police was having challen — difficulty?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: After I had the conversation with Mr. Meadows, Mr. — after I had the conversation with Mr. Ornato I went to have the discussion with Mr. Meadows.
He was in a secure vehicle at the time making a call.
So when I had gone over to the car, I went to open the door to let him know and he had immediately shut it.
I don’t know who he was speaking with.
It wasn’t something that he regularly did, especially when I would go over to give him information.
So I was a bit taken aback, but I didn’t think much of it and thinking that I was — would be able to have the conversation with him a few moments later.
LIZ CHENEY: And were you able to have that conversation a few moments later?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Probably about 20 to 25 minutes later.
There was another period of between where he shut the door again and then when he finally got out of the vehicle we had the conversation.
But at that point there was a backlog of information that he should have been made aware of.
LIZ CHENEY: And so you opened the door to the control car and Mr. Meadows pulled it shut?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
LIZ CHENEY: And he did that two times?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
LIZ CHENEY: And when you finally were able to give Mr. Meadows the information about the violence at the Capitol, what was his reaction?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: He almost had a lack of reaction.
I remember him saying Alright, something to the effect of how much longer does the President have left in this speech?
LIZ CHENEY: Again, much of this information about the potential for violence was known or learned before the onset of the violence, early enough for President Trump to take steps to prevent it.
He could, for example, have urged the crowd at the ellipse not to march to the Capitol.
end quotes
And here we see Lizzie getting caught out in the dissemination of outright lies, because the protestors at the Capitol DID NOT come from the ellipse, they were already at the Capitol, according to OFFICIAL PUBLISHED TIMELINES, to wit:
1 p.m.: An initial wave of protesters storms the outer police barrier around the Capitol.
1:05 p.m.: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi bangs the gavel to call the joint session of Congress to order.
Shortly after that, Trump ends his speech.
“We’re going to the Capitol,” he says.
“We’re going to try and give them [Republicans] the kind of pride and boldness that they need to take back our country.”
Trump returns to the White House.
He does not go to the Capitol.
end quotes
Which takes us back to Lizzie’s EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: He could have condemned the violence immediately once it began.
Or he could have taken multiple other steps.
But as we will see today and in later hearings, President Trump had something else in mind.
One other question at this point Miss Hutchinson.
Were you aware of concerns that White House counsel Pat Cipollone or Eric Herschmann had about the language President Trump used in his ellipse speech?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: There were many discussions the morning of the six about the rhetoric of the speech that day.
In my conversations with Mr. Herschmann, he had relayed that we would be foolish to include language that had been included at the President’s request, which had lines along — to the effect of fight for Trump.
We’re going to march the Capitol.
I’ll be there with you.
Fight for me.
Fight for what we’re doing.
Fight for the movement.
Things about the Vice President at the time too.
Both Mr. Herschmann and White House counsel’s office were urging the speechwriters to not include that language for legal concerns, and also for the optics of what it could portray the president wanting to do that day.
end quotes
And what did Trump say about Pence?
Here’s what the official record on that subject has to say:
“Mike Pence, I hope you’re going to stand up for the good of our Constitution and for the good of our country,” Trump says.
“And if you’re not, I’m going to be very disappointed in you.”
end quotes
And with all of that to digest as this STALINIST SHOW TRIALK TRAIN rolls down the tracks, let’s again pause for station identification, and then we will be right back with more of the show, so stay tuned and don’t touch that dial!
And before we get back to the EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of WITCH HUNTER Lizzie Cheney here, courtesy of the Cape Charles Mirror, using the GOSSIP GIRL Cassidy Hutchinson as her ventriloquist’s dummy, to explore Lizzie’s motivations, let us go to a Newsweek story titled “Liz Cheney Not Ruling Out 2024 Presidential Run” by Andrew Stanton on 7/3/22, where we have as follows:
Representative Liz Cheney left the door open on the possibility of a 2024 presidential run on Sunday.
Following last year’s attack on the U.S. Capitol, the Wyoming Republican emerged as one of the most vocal critics of former President Donald Trump within the Republican Party.
She also sits on the House select committee that is investigating the January 6 attack, and has warned against what she views as Trump’s negative influence on both the country and GOP.
During an interview on ABC News’ This Week, journalist Jonathan Karl asked Cheney if she plans to run for president in 2024 “as a way to prevent what you say would be destruction to the party.”
“I haven’t made a decision about that yet.”
“I’m obviously very focused on my reelection.”
“I’m very focused on the January 6 committee,” she said.
“I’m very focused on my obligations to do the job that I have now.”
She added that she would make a decision about whether or not to run for president “down the road.”
“I think about it less in terms of a decision about running for office and more in terms of, as an American and as somebody who is in a position of public trust now, how do I make sure that I’m doing everything I can do the right thing — to do what I know is right for the country and to protect our constitution,” the congresswoman said.
end quotes
Ah, yes, people – a position of “public trust” as a WITCH HUNTER on PRIMETIME TV where there is nobody to refute or gainsay a word she is saying, as she manipulates the minds and thoughts of tens of millions of TV viewers, which gives her every incentive to use her position of “public trust,” not to protect our Constitution, which she is subverting and making a mockery of , but to destroy someone she views as a serious political rival while aggrandizing herself on PRIMETIME TV to advance her own political agenda that in her mind has her sitting in the oval office come 20 January 2025, which takes us back to the CHEAP POLITICAL THEATER starring her as a WITCH HUNTER on June 28, 2022, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: And we just heard the president say that he would be with his supporters as they marched to the Capitol.
Even though he did not end up going, he certainly wanted to.
end quotes
Here we have Lizzie extolling her ability to actually be able to read people’s minds, and know their most intimate personal thoughts, supernatural powers she apparently was blessed to be born with, which takes us back to the show on June 28, 2022, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: Some have questioned whether President Trump genuinely planned to come here to the Capitol on January 6th.
In his book, Mark Meadows falsely wrote that after President Trump gave his speech on January 6th, he told Mr. Meadows that he was, quote, speeding — speaking metaphorically about the walk to the Capitol.
As you will see, Donald Trump was not speaking metaphorically.
As we heard earlier, Rudy Giuliani told Ms. Hutchinson that Mr. Trump planed to travel to the Capitol on January 6th.
I want to pause for just a moment to ask you, Ms. Hutchinson, to explain some of the terminology you will hear today.
We’ve heard you use two different terms to describe plans for the president’s movement to the Capitol or anywhere else.
One of those is a scheduled movement and another one is OTR.
Could you describe for us what each of those means?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: A scheduled presidential movement is on his official schedule.
It’s notified to the press and to a wide range of staff that will be traveling with him.
It’s known to the public, known as the Secret Service, and they’re able to coordinate the movement days in advance.
An off the record movement is confined to the knowledge of a very, very small group of advisers and staff.
Typically a very small group of staff would travel with him, mostly that are just included in the national security package.
You can pull an off to — off the record movement together in less than an hour.
It’s a way to kind of circumvent having to release it to the press, if that’s the goal of it, or to not have to have as many security parameters put in place ahead of time to make a movement happen.
LIZ CHENEY: Thank you.
And let’s turn back now to the president’s plans to travel to the Capitol on January 6th.
We know that White House Counsel Pat Cipollone was concerned about the legal implications of such a trip, and he agreed with the Secret Service that it shouldn’t happen.
Ms. Hutchinson, did you have any conversations with Pat Cipollone about his concerns about the president going to the Capitol on January 6th?
end quotes
And here we have to remember that in January of 2021, Cassidy Hutchinson was a secretary to Mark Meadows, which makes us have to wonder why it is that all these high-powered people in Washington. D.C. like White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, the president’s personal lawyer, were seeking her, of all people, out to have private conversations with her about gossip they heard while sharing state secrets with her, which takes us back to the transcript, to wit:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: On January 3rd, Mr. Cipollone had approached me knowing that Mark had raised the prospect of going up to the Capitol on January 6th.
Mr. Cipollone and I had a brief private conversation where he said to me we need to make sure that this doesn’t happen.
This would be a legally a terrible idea for us.
We’re — we have serious legal concerns if we go up to the Capitol that day.
And he then urged me to continue relaying that to Mr. Meadows, because it’s my understanding that Mr. Cipollone thought that Mr. Meadows was indeed pushing this, along with the president.
end quotes
Now, on 3 January 2021, Cassidy Hutchinson was not a lawyer, had never been to law school, possessed what in essence was a worthless bachelor’s from a college nobody really had ever heard of, so why was the president’s legal counsel seeking any type of legal advice from her, or sharing what should have been confidential information protected by lawyer’s privilege?
But again, people, this is a scripted PRIMETIME TELEVISION SHOW intended to destroy Donald Trump while advancing Lizzie Cheney’s political aspirations, so let’s return to the transcript, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: And we understand, Ms. Hutchinson, that you also spoke to Mr. Cipollone on the morning of the 6th as you were about to go to the rally on the Ellipse, and Mr. Cipollone said something to you like make sure the movement to the Capitol does not happen.
Is that correct?
end quotes
HUH?
The president’s lawyer picked out Cassidy Hutchinson as the sole person in Washington, D.C. who could control what the president of the United States could or could not do on that day?
That is downright bizarre, but let’s see how Cassidy responds to that query, as follows:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
I saw Mr. Cipollone right before I walked out onto West Exec that morning, and Mr. Cipollone said something to the effect of please make sure we don’t go up to the Capitol, Cassidy.
Keep in touch with me.
We’re going to get charged with every crime imaginable if we make that movement happen.
end quotes
EVERY CRIME IMAGINABLE?
Like rape, murder, armed robbery, extortion, fencing stolen jewelry, sodomy, white slavery, and on and on and on, because people, every crime imaginable spans an awful lot of territory, but again, people, it is POLITICAL THEATER scripted by some of the very best soap opera script writers Hollywood has to offer, and it is starting to get really interesting here, as the suspense and drama continue to build, so without further ado, let’s get back to it, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: And do you remember which crimes Mr. Cipollone was concerned with?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: In the days leading up to the 6th, we had conversations about potentially obstructing justice or defrauding the electoral count.
LIZ CHENEY: Let’s hear about some of those concerns that you mentioned earlier in one of your interviews with us.
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Having a private conversation with Pat late in the afternoon of the 3rd or 4th that Pat was concerned it would look like we were obstructing justice or obstructing the Electoral College count.
And I apologize for probably not being so very clear with my legal terms here, but that it would look like we were obstructing what was happening on Capitol Hill.
And he was also worried that it would look like we were inciting a riot or encouraging a riot to erupt on the Capitol — at the Capitol.
[End videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: In fact, in the days before January 6th and on January 6th itself, President Trump expressed to multiple White House aides that he wanted to go to the Capitol after his speech.
Here’s what various White House aides have told the committee about the president’s desire to go to the Capitol.
[Begin videotape]
UNKNOWN: Did the president tell you this, that he wanted to speak at the Capitol.
MAX MILLER: Correct.
Yes.
UNKNOWN: During the meeting in the dining room, did the — the idea of the president proceeding or walking to the Capitol on the 6th after his speech come up?
MAX MILLER: Walking to the Capitol?
No.
UNKNOWN: Driving to the Capitol?
MAX MILLER: It came up.
UNKNOWN: Ok.
How did it come up and what was discussed?
MAX MILLER: He brought it up.
He said I want to go down to the Capitol.
UNKNOWN: What about him marching to the Capitol on the 6th?
NICK LUNA: Yes.
end quotes
And WHOA, stop the presses here a moment while we go to his Linked In page
https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicholas-luna-115b071b?original_referer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F to see who exactly this Nick Luna is, and this is what we find, to wit:
Professional Actor
Actor / SAG, AFTRA
May 2010 – Present 12 years 3 months
NYC, LA
Film/TV, commercial and stage credits in NYC, LA and across the south.
Assisted Casting at ABC studios with Marci Phillips
nicholasluna.com
end quotes
And the headline of an ABC news story by Benjamin Siegel and Katherine Faulders on March 21, 2022 sheds this insight into who professional actor Nick Luna was on 6 January 2021, to wit:,
“Former Trump personal assistant appears before Jan. 6 committee – Nick Luna served as Trump’s body man in the West Wing.”
So what on earth is a “body man?”
For that answer, let’s go to a Business Insider article titled “7 unusual jobs people have in the White House — and what they pay” by Frank Olito on December 4, 2020, where we learn as follows:
The special assistant and personal aide to the president is typically referred to as the “body man.”
In many ways, this person is like an assistant, organizing the president’s daily life.
Oftentimes, the body man is one of the first people to greet the president in the morning, and he walks the POTUS to the residence at night.
The body man often travels with the president, and is also his go-to person if he needs newspapers, briefings, and even pens, Politico reported.
end quotes
Ah, yes, people, THEATER OF THE ABSURD here from straight out of National Lampoon, which takes us back to “UNKNOWN” and professional actor and “body man” Nick Luna, to wit:
UNKNOWN: Tell us about that.
NICK LUNA: So, it’s kind of a general thing.
I mean, to get into the specifics of it, I — I was aware of the desire of the president to potentially march to the — or — or accompany the rally attendees to the Capitol.
UNKNOWN: When did you first hear about this idea of the president accompanying rally attendees to the Capitol on the 6th?
NICK LUNA: Well, this was at the 6th.
This was during the — and after he finished his remarks.
[End videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: When the president said that he would be going to the Capitol during his speech on the Ellipse, the Secret Service scrambled to find a way for him to go.
We know this from witnesses and the Secret Service, also from messages among staff on the president’s National Security Council.
The NSC staff were monitoring the situation in real time, and you can see how the situation evolved in the following chat log that the committee has obtained.
As you can see, NSC staff believed that MOGUL, the president, was “going to the Capitol,” and “they are finding the best route now.”
From these chats, we also know the staff learned of the attack on the Capitol in real time.
When President Trump left the Ellipse stage at 1:10, the staff knew that rioters had invaded the inaugural stage and Capitol Police were calling for all available officers to respond.
When Republican leader Kevin McCarthy heard the president say he was going to the Capitol, he called you, Ms. Hutchinson, isn’t that right?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
LIZ CHENEY: And in this text message, you told Tony Ornato, “McCarthy just called me too.”
“And do you guys think you’re coming to my office?”
Tell us about the call that day with Leader McCarthy during the president’s speech on the Ellipse.
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I was still in the tent behind the stage.
And when you’re behind the stage, you can’t really hear what’s going on in front of you.
So, when Mr. McCarthy called me with this information, I answered the call.
And he sounded rushed, but also frustrated and angry at me.
I — I was confused because I — I didn’t know what the president had just said.
He then explained the president just said he’s marching to the Capitol.
You told me this whole week you aren’t coming up here.
Why would you lie to me?
I said I’m — I’m not lying.
I wasn’t lying to you, sir.
I — we’re not going to the Capitol.
And he said, well, he just said it on stage, Cassidy.
Figure it out.
Don’t come up here.
I said I’ll — I’ll — I’ll run the traps on this and I’ll shoot you a text.
I can assure you we’re not coming up to the Capitol.
We’ve already made that decision.
He pressed a little bit more, believing me but I think frustrated that the president had said that.
And we ended the phone conversation after that.
I called Mr. Ornato to reconfirm that we weren’t going to the Capitol, and which was also in our text messages.
I sent Mr. McCarthy another text telling him the affirmative, that we were not going up to the Capitol, and he didn’t respond after that.
end quotes
And once again, with all of that to digest as this STALINIST SHOW TRIAL TRAIN to promote the political aspirations of Lizzie Cheney to be in the white house come 2025 continues to roll down the tracks, let’s again pause for station identification, and then we will be right back with more of the show, so stay tuned and don’t touch that dial!
And as this STALINIST SHOW TRIAL TRAIN to promote the political aspirations of Lizzie Cheney to be in the white house come 2025 now gains speed and the EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of GOSSIP GIRL Cassidy Hutchinson, the most important person in Washington, D.C. on 6 January 2021 promises to get even more EXPLOSIVE with the famous PRESIDENTAL LUNGE by Donald Trump, let’s return to 28 June 2022 for more of the Lizzie and Cassidy Show, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: And we understand, Ms. Hutchinson, that the plans for the president to come up to the Capitol had included discussions at some point about what the president would do when he came up to the Capitol on January 6th.
Let’s look at a clip of one of your interviews discussing that issue with the committee.
[Begin videotape]
UNKNOWN: When you were talking about a scheduled movement, did anyone say what the president wanted to do when he got here?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: No, not that I can specifically remember.
I remember — I remember hearing a few different ideas discussed with — between Mark and Scott Perry, Mark and Rudy Giuliani.
I don’t know which conversations were elevated to the president.
I don’t know what he personally wanted to do when he went up to the Capitol that day.
You know, I — I know that there were discussions about him having another speech outside of the Capitol before going in.
I know that there was a conversation about him going into the House chamber at one point.
[End videotape]
And for your own good, brace yourselves people, lest this EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY about the PRESIDENTIAL LUNGE blow you clear out of your socks, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: As we’ve all just heard, in the days leading up to January 6th, on the day of the speech, both before and during and after the rally speech, President Trump was pushing his staff to arrange for him to come up here to the Capitol during the electoral vote count.
Let’s turn now to what happened in the president’s vehicle when the Secret Service told him he would not be going to the Capitol after his speech.
First, here is the president’s motorcade leaving the Ellipse after his speech on January 6th.
Ms. Hutchinson, when you returned to the White House in the motorcade after the president’s speech, where did you go?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: When I returned to the White House, I walked upstairs towards the chief of staff’s office, and I noticed Mr. Ornato lingering outside of the office.
Once we had made eye contact, he quickly waved me to go into his office, which was just across the hall from mine.
When I went in, he shut the door, and I noticed Bobby Engel, who was the head of Mr. Trump’s security detail, sitting in a chair, just looking somewhat discombobulated and a little lost.
I looked at Tony and he had said, did you f’ing hear what happened in the beast?
I said, no, Tony, I — I just got back.
What happened?
Tony proceeded to tell me that when the president got in the beast, he was under the impression from Mr. Meadows that the off the record movement to the Capitol was still possible and likely to happen, but that Bobby had more information.
So, once the president had gotten into the vehicle with Bobby, he thought that they were going up to the Capitol.
And when Bobby had relayed to him we’re not, we don’t have the assets to do it, it’s not secure, we’re going back to the West Wing, the president had a very strong, a very angry response to that.
Tony described him as being irate.
The president said something to the effect of I’m the f’ing president, take me up to the Capitol now, to which Bobby responded, sir, we have to go back to the West Wing.
The president reached up towards the front of the vehicle to grab at the steering wheel.
Mr. Engel grabbed his arm, said, sir, you need to take your hand off the steering wheel.
We’re going back to the West Wing.
We’re not going to the Capitol.
Mr. Trump then used his free hand to lunge towards Bobby Engel.
And Mr. — when Mr. Ornato had recounted this story to me, he had motioned towards his clavicles.
end quotes
For the record, for those unfamiliar with the term, the clavicle, or collarbone, is a slender, S-shaped long bone approximately 6 inches (15 cm) long that serves as a strut between the shoulder blade and the sternum (breastbone), and there are two clavicles, one on the left and one on the right.
So try to picture this now – we have Trump in the back seat of the “Beast,” leaning over the back of the front seat with his one hand on the steering wheel, fighting with Bobby Engel for control of the vehicle, while with his other hand, his free hand, he is lunging for Bobby Engel’s clavicles, which paints an interesting picture for us to have to contemplate, and as we do, let’s go to Wikipedia and the bio of Tony Ornato, where we have this take or version of that same story, to wit:
During her June 2022 testimony before the House Select Committee on the January 6 Attack, former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson said she had been told by Ornato that after Trump got into the presidential SUV following his January 6 Ellipse rally, hoping to drive to the Capitol as his supporters marched there, his lead Secret Service agent Robert Engel told him it was too dangerous and informed him they were returning to the White House.
Hutchinson said Ornato told her Trump became irate and attempted to grab the steering wheel of the vehicle, and lunged at Engel’s clavicles.
She testified Engel was present with Ornato as he related the incident but never contradicted the account.
CNN reported three days after Hutchinson’s testimony that it had spoken with two Secret Service agents who had heard accounts of the incident from multiple other agents since February 2021, including Trump’s driver.
Although details differed, agents confirmed there was an angry confrontation, with one agent relating that Trump “tried to lunge over the seat — for what reason, nobody had any idea,” but no one asserted Trump attacked Engel.
A separate Secret Service official told CNN that Engel denied that Trump grabbed at the steering wheel or lunged toward an agent on his detail, and that Ornato denied telling Hutchinson such.
end quotes
So where does the truth really lie here, people?
And it would have to be with Cassidy Hutchinson, would it not, given that she is the STAR WITNESS for the prosecution?
And who has to be lying, then, if STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson is to be believed?
It would have to be the Secret Service, because if Cassidy is the one telling the truth, the only other conclusion that can he drawn is that the Secret Service is a liar.
And with that conclusion drawn, that the Secret Service is a liar, let’s go back to the transcript for more, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: And was Mr. Engel in the room as Mr. Ornato told you this story?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: He was.
LIZ CHENEY: Did Mr. Engel correct or disagree with any part of this story from Mr. Ornato?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Mr. Engel did not correct or disagree with any part of the story.
LIZ CHENEY: Did Mr. Engel or Mr. Ornato ever after that tell you that what Mr. Ornato had just said was untrue?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Neither Mr. Ornato nor Mr. Engel told me ever that it was untrue.
end quotes
So there we have it, people – the Secret Service is not to be trusted!
And with that revelation, let’s get back to the show, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: And despite this altercation, this physical altercation during the ride back to the White House, President Trump still demanded to go to the Capitol.
Here’s what Kayleigh McEnany, the White House press secretary at the time, wrote in her personal notes and told the committee about President Trump’s desire to go to the Capitol after returning to the White House.
[Begin videotape]
UNKNOWN: When you wrote POUTS wanted to walk to the Capitol, was that based solely on what the president said during his speech or anything that he or anybody else said afterwards?
KAYLEIGH MCENANY: So, to the best of my recollection, I believe when we got back to the White House he said he wanted to physically walk with the marchers.
end quotes
And wait a minute here, people – one minute, we have Trump engaged in what Lizzie Cheney has testified was a physical altercation during the ride back to the White House because his lead Secret Service agent Robert Engel told him it was too dangerous to go to the Capitol, and now, we have Trump somehow back in the white house, and now we have Kayleigh McEnany telling us that he wanted to physically walk with the marchers.
But could that be?
We know from the timeline that Trump finished his speech at 1:10 p.m. on 6 January 2021.
We know from a timeline published by NPR in an article titled “A timeline of how the Jan. 6 attack unfolded — including who said what and when” on June 9, 2022, that at 2:38 p.m., Trump tweeted, calling for support of the Capitol Police and law enforcement urging people to “stay peaceful.”
What we do not know is when exactly this “physical altercation during the ride back to the White House” that WITCH HUNTER Lizzie Cheney testified to actually took place, but it would have had to be after 1:10 p.m.
And we know from a Washington Post article titled “When did the Jan. 6 rally become a march to the Capitol?” by Philip Bump, National correspondent, on February 10, 2021, that by 1 p.m. on Jan. 6, before Trump got done speaking,
thousands of people were at or on their way to the Capitol.
So how was Trump going to march with them when he was at the white house and the marchers were already at the capitol?
What doesn’t make sense here, besides everything?
But let’s see what else is coming along, to wit:
KAYLEIGH MCENANY: And according to my notes, he then said, you’d be fine with just writing the piece, but — so that’s my recollection.
He wanted to be a part of the March in some fashion.
UNKNOWN: Alright.
And just for the record, the piece refers to the Presidential limousine?
KAYLEIGH MCENANY: Yes.
[End videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: President Trump did not go to the Capitol that day.
We understand that he blamed Mark Meadows for that.
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: So prior to leaving the rally site when he got off the stage and everybody was making the movement back to the motorcade, I had overheard Mr. Meadows say to him then, as I had prior to Mr. Trump taking the stage that morning, that he was still working on getting an off-the-record movement to the Capitol.
So when Mr. Trump took the stage, he was under the impression by Mr. Meadows that it was still possible.
So when he got off the stage, I had relayed to Mr. Meadows that I had another conversation with Tony.
The movement was still not possible.
Mr. Meadows said, Ok.
And then as they proceeded to go to the motorcade and Mr. Meadows had reiterated, we’re going to work on it, sir.
Talk to Bobby.
Bobby has more information.
Mark got into his vehicle, to my understanding.
Trump got into the [Inaudible].
And after we had all arrived back at the White House later in the day, it had been relayed to me via Mark that the President wasn’t happy that Bobby didn’t pull it off for him, and that Mark didn’t work hard enough to get the movement on the books.
[End videotape]
WHAT BULL****!
None of this hangs together.
But it is a STALINIST SHOW TRIAL, not a real trial, so nothing needs to hang together, because who is going to take the time to read these transcripts and figure this all out as to these discrepancies?
Not the mainstream media or the legacy media, or the people broadcasting this crap on PRIMETIME TV, anyway.
For them, it is just MORE SHOW BUSINESS!
And while we are on the subject of the Secret Servive being untrustworthy because their account of what happened in “THE BEAST” on 6 January 2021 with regard to the alleged PRESIDENTIAL LUNGE which GOSSIP GIRL Cassidy Hutchinson gave EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY about in the 28 June 2022 PRIMETIME TV episode of the PELOSI WITCH HUNTERS PRESENT does not agree with the EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of Cassidy Hutchinson, who was not there in “THE BEAST” when the alleged LUNGE was said to have happened, and for that reason is considered the expert by the WITCH HUNTERS, as opposed to the Secret Service agents who were actually there, to see the trouble they are getting into because they DARE to refute the testimony of STAR WITNESS Cassidy, let us go to a Salon article with the inflammatory title of “Secret Service agents who tried to torpedo Hutchinson testimony lawyer up, refuse to testify: panel” by Igor Derysh 0n 25 July 2022, where we have as follows on that subject, to wit:
Top Secret Service agents who tried to undermine former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony to the Jan. 6 committee have hired private lawyers and are refusing to cooperate with the investigation, members of the panel said over the weekend.
end quote
Serious stuff, indeed!
By trying to undermine former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson’s HEARSAY TESTIMONY to the Jan. 6 committee on 28 June 2022 concerning the PRESIDENTIAL LUNGE she says she heard about, but did not witness, these Secret Service agents are risking being held in contempt of congress for not telling the WITCH HUNTERS what it is they want to hear, and people, that is a serious criminal matter for which they could go to jail, which takes us back to Salon, to wit:
Hutchinson, who worked as a top aide to former White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, testified last month that she was told by deputy chief of staff Tony Ornato that former President Donald Trump was so irate that his security detail would not take him to the Capitol with his supporters on Jan. 6 that he lunged at Secret Service agent Bobby Engel, the head of his detail.
end quote
Which would be double hearsay, because Tony Ornato himself did not witness the alleged PRESIDENTIAL LUNGE which forms a huge part of the criminal case these WITCH HUNTERS are building against Trump to permanently remove him as a political threat to Joe Biden and the Democrat party using the SHOW TRIAL tactics of Joe Stalin of the Soviet Union.
Getting back to Salon, it continues as follows:
Hutchinson said Ornato, who made the unusual leap from working at the Secret Service to working for Trump before returning as a senior Secret Service official, described the incident with Engel present and he did not dispute it.
end quote
And here, once again, for your safety, we advise that you not only be seated, but have a good grip on your seat as well so as to avoid being blown away by what is coming next, to wit:
After her testimony, journalists citing anonymous sources reported that Engel and the driver of Trump’s vehicle were “prepared to testify under oath” to dispute Hutchinson’s account and that Ornato denied telling Hutchinson that Trump “grabbed the steering wheel or an agent.”
end quotes
There it is, people, right before our eyes – these Secret Servive agents were actually going to dare to imply that Cassidy Hutchinson, the WOMAN SCORNED and WITCH HUNTER’S STAR WITNESS who is going to put Trump down for the count were is a LIAR, which is contempt of congress, a criminal matter, for not going along with the “story” the WITCH HUNTERS are telling the people of America unable to reason or think for themselves or engage in critical thinking, lacking the skill set to do so, with their carefully constructed story line and carefully coached witnesses like Cassidy who know to do the “right thing” by finding out what the WITCH HUNTERS want and need for their narrative, and then giving it to them as EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY which the people watching this show on PRIME TIME TV as a spectacle love to hear, the more juicy and inflammatory and bizarre, the better, because let’s face it, people, it’s ENTERTAINMENT, which takes us back to Salon, to wit:
Hutchinson’s lawyer, Jody Hunt, a former aide to Trump Attorney General Jeff Sessions, said that she stood by her account and urged the Secret Service agents to testify under oath.
end quote
And of course STAR WITNESS and GOSSIP GIRL Cassidy Hutchinson is standing by her HEARSAY account lest she make herself out to be a LIAR, which again takes us back to SALON, to wit:
Several witnesses, including a D.C. police officer assigned to Trump’s motorcade, testified that Trump got into a “heated” confrontation with his security detail when he was told he could not go to the Capitol.
Ornato, Engel, and the unidentified driver of Trump’s vehicle have since hired private counsel, Rep. Zoe Lofgren, D-Calif., told reporters last week.
“Some of the officers said that they would be coming and talking under oath,” said Lofgren, a member of the committee.
“They have not come in, and they recently retained private counsel, which is unusual but they have a right to do that.”
Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., one of the two Republicans on the panel, told ABC News on Sunday that “it is not our decision that they have not [testified] so far.”
Asked if the Secret Service is refusing to cooperate, Kinzinger replied, “that’s a question you have to ask the Secret Service, you have to ask those particular people.”
Rep. Liz Cheney, R-Wyo., the committee’s vice-chair, told Fox News Sunday that “we have not had the kind of cooperation that we really need to have” from the Secret Service.
end quotes
And here we are going to see the WITCH HUNTERS and the mainstream media turning quite venomous here, as they set out to destroy the credibility of these Secret Service agents who are calling their STAR WITNESS Cassidy a liar, to wit:
Questions have swirled about Ornato and Engel’s credibility since Hutchinson’s testimony.
end quote
And my goodness, people, of course they have because these WITCH HUNTERS will stop at nothing to protect their contrived narrative that they are concocting to destroy Trump and make him out as a criminal in the eyes of the American people gullible enough to believe these WITCH HUNTERS are giving us facts and truth as opposed to a bunch of pure BULL**** labeled as EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY, which again takes us back to Salon, to wit:
Washington Post reporter Carol Leonnig, who wrote the book “Zero Fail: The Rise and Fall of the Secret Service” during the Trump administration, told MSNBC that both men were “very, very close to President Trump.”
“Some people accused them of at times being enablers and ‘yes men’ of the president — particularly Tony Ornato — and very much people who wanted to do what he wanted and see him pleased,” she said, adding that “both of these individuals lose a little credibility because of how closely they have been seen as aligned to Donald Trump.”
Ornato made an unusual transition from working for the Secret Service to working directly for Trump at the White House, serving as deputy chief of staff for operations.
Former White House spokeswoman Alyssa Farah accused Ornato, who helped coordinate Trump’s infamous clearing of protesters at Lafayette Square for a photo-op at a nearby church, of lying about the incident.
“There seems to be a major thread here… Tony Ornato likes to lie,” Kinzinger tweeted last month.
end quotes
And just like that, BANG, WITCH HUNTER Adam Kinzinger has destroyed Tony Ornato as a witness against Cassidy, thereby keeping the WITCH HUNTER’S NARRATIVE sacrosanct, but stay tuned, because there is more juicy dirt from GOSSIP GIRL Cassidy Hutchinson yet to come, so stay tuned, and don’t touch that dial!
Keeping in mind here that this is a SCRIPTED STALINIST SHOW TRIAL where everyone’s lines have been previously written for them beforehand, and rehearsed just like they would be during a regular television production of a soap opera to make sure all the actors, and this would start with people like Lizzie Cheney, have their lines in the script well memorized, as well as their facial expressions to show their disgust, because on PRINMETIME TV, it is facial expressions and tone of voice that carry more weight than what was actually said, before we go back to the script, let us go to this question we hear so often associated with Hollywood celebrities on late-night talk shows, to wit:
Q: What does dishing someone mean?
A: To tell people what you know about someone, especially things that could damage their reputation.
end quote
And keeping in mind that that is the sole intent of this 28 June 2022 PRIMETIME TV EXTRAVAGANZA starring presidential aspirant Lizzie Cheney and GOSSIP GIRL Cassidy Hutchinson, let’s go back to Lizzie and Cassidy “dishing dirt” on Trump to destroy his reputation, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: The physical altercation that Ms. Hutchinson described in the Presidential vehicle was not the first time that the President had become very angry about issues relating to the election.
end quotes
The physical altercation that Ms. Hutchinson described in the Presidential vehicle was not something that Cassidy Hutchinson witnessed and so is HEARSAY, but this is SHOW BUSINESS, not a real legitimate exercise of our government, so HEARSAY, the more juicy the better, stands, which takes us back to the script prepared by the best soap opera screen writers Hollywood has to offer, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: On December 1, 2020, Attorney General Barr said in an interview that the Department of Justice had not found evidence of widespread election fraud sufficient to change the outcome of the election.
Ms. Hutchinson, how did the President react to hearing that news?
end quote
And here we have to remember that Cassidy Hutchinson knew EVERYTHING there was to know about everyone in Washington, D.C. in January 2021, because she was the GOSSIP GIRL to whom everyone confided as she went about her day collecting gossip that she could then trade for other gossip, which is how it is done in Washington if you want to accumulate RAW POLITICAL POWER as did Cassidy Hutchinson, which takes us back to the scripted performance of Cassidy on 28 June 2022, to wit:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Around the time that I understand the AP article went live, I remember hearing noise coming from down the hallway.
So I poked my head out of the office.
end quotes
And of course, like the little ferret she was, always on the prowl for yet more gossip and dirt on somebody with which to trade for other “secrets,” a gatherer of gossip and carrier of tales, listening at keyholes, and maybe even slipping into the executive men’s room to hide in a stall with her feet in the air to hear what she can hear, she would be the one to “poke her head” out of her office to see what was up, and let’s go back to the show to see what happens next, to wit:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I saw the valet walking towards our office.
He had said, get the Chief down to the dining room.
The President wants him.
So Mark went down to the dining room, came back to the office a few minutes later.
After Mark had returned, I left the office and went down to the dining room and I noticed that the door was propped open and the valet was inside the dining room changing the tablecloth off of the dining room table.
He motioned for me to come in and then pointed towards the front of the room near the fireplace mantel and the TV, where I first noticed there was catsup dripping down the wall and there was a shattered porcelain plate on the floor.
The valet had articulated that the President was extremely angry at the Attorney General’s AP interview and had thrown his lunch against the wall, which was causing him to have to clean up.
So I grabbed a towel and started wiping the catsup off of the wall to help the valet out.
end quotes
And my goodness, people, isn’t she something – a VERY IMPORTANT PERSON in Washington taking the time to be humble by grabbing a towel from somewhere to help wipe catsup off the wall of the presidential dining room?
But let’s not linger there, because the STALIN SHOW TRIAL TRAIN is running down the tracks, so back to Cassidy we go, as she wipes catsup off the wall with a towel, even though she really was very important and didn’t have to do such menial labor, to wit:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: And he said something to the effect of, he’s really ticked off about this.
I would stay clear of him for right now.
He’s really, really ticked off about this right now.
LIZ CHENEY: And Ms. Hutchinson, was this the only instance that you are aware of where the President threw dishes?
end quotes
Mileage, people!
What good is salacious gossip if you can’t milk it for all it is worth, and this throwing of dishes makes for some great television, so Lizzie is going to do that, get all the mileage out of it that she can as she buries her political opponent while getting valuable free advertising for her 2024 presidential bid, to wit:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: It’s not.
LIZ CHENEY: And are there other instances in the dining room that you recall where he expressed his anger?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: There were — there were several times throughout my tenure with the Chief of Staff that I was aware of him either throwing dishes or flipping the tablecloth to let all the contents of the table go onto the floor and likely break or go everywhere.
end quotes
And with that great visual imagery from Cassidy in the record before us where we have Trump apparently practicing a magic act where an accomplished magician is able to smoothly whisk a tablecloth, let us again take a pause for station identification, but again, there is much more salacious gossip from GOSSIP GIRL Cassidy Hutchinson yet to come, so don’t change that dial!
And with that great visual imagery from GOSSIP GIRL and WOMAN SCORNED Cassidy in the record before us where we have Trump throwing a dish of something with catsup on it at the wall of the presidential dining room, let’s get back to the transcript to see where it is that Lizzie Cheney and her stage prop Cassidy are going to take us next as the MADE-FOR-PRIMETIME TV DRAMA takes us next:
LIZ CHENEY: And Ms. Hutchinson, Attorney General Barr described to the Committee the President’s angry reaction when he finally met with President Trump.
Let’s listen.
[Begin videotape]
WILLIAM BARR: And I said, look, I — I know that you’re dissatisfied with me and I’m glad to offer my resignation.
And he pounded the table very hard and everyone sort of jumped in, and he said, accepted.
[End videotape]
HUH?
What’s up with that?
But again, there does not have to be a rhyme or reason to any of this, so long as the at-home audience is getting entertained, so what happens next?
Let’s see:
LIZ CHENEY: Mr. Chairman, I reserve.
BENNIE THOMPSON:
The gentlewoman reserves.
The Chair requests those in the hearing room to remain seated until the Capitol Police have escorted our witness from the room.
Pursuant to the order of the Committee of today, the Chair declares the Committee in recess for a period of approximately 10 minutes.
[Recess]
The Committee will be in order.
The Chair recognizes the gentlewoman from Wyoming, Vice Chair Cheney.
LIZ CHENEY: Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Before we turn to what Ms. Hutchinson saw and heard in the White House during the violent attack on the Capitol on January 6th, let’s discuss certain communications White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows had on January 5th.
President Trump’s associate, Roger Stone, attended rallies during the afternoon and the evening of January 5th in Washington, DC.
On January 5th and 6th, Mr. Stone was photographed with multiple members of the Oath Keepers who were allegedly serving as his security detail.
As we now know, multiple members of that organization have been charged with or pled guilty to crimes associated with January 6th.
Mr. Stone has invoked his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination before this committee.
General Michael Flynn has also taken the Fifth before this committee.
Mr. Stone previously had been convicted of other federal crimes unrelated to January 6th.
General Flynn had pleaded guilty to a felony charge, also predating and unrelated to January 6th.
President Trump pardoned General Flynn just weeks after the Presidential election, and in July of 2020, he commuted the sentence Roger Stone was to serve.
end quotes
Now, guilt by association, people!
Get that into the minds of the jury because the purpose here is to inflame passions, not present any real facts about January 6, 2021, which takes is back to Lizzie’s EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY as she acts as her own witness here, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: The night before January 6th, President Trump instructed his Chief of Staff Mark Meadows to contact both Roger Stone and Michael Flynn regarding what would play out the next day.
Ms. Hutchinson, Is it your understanding that President Trump asked Mark Meadows to speak with Roger Stone and General Flynn on January 5th?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
That is my understanding.
LIZ CHENEY: And Ms. Hutchinson, is it your understanding that Mr. Meadows called Mr. Stone on the 5th?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I’m under the impression that Mr. Meadows did complete both a call to Mr. Stone and General Flynn the evening of the 5th.
end quotes
“Under the impression?”
What kind of answer is that to what should have been a yes-or-no answer?
“Under the impression” is another sneaky and underhanded way for Cassidy to tell the people watching she really doesn’t know without actually making the admission that she doesn’t know, which would spoil the narrative Lizzie is creating here, so let’s go back to the script to see where Lizzie is going to take Cassidy next on that issue, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: And do you know what they talked about that evening, Ms. Hutchinson?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I’m not sure.
end quotes
Boy, you got to love this stuff, people – Cassidy isn’t sure of what they talked about because she actually doesn’t know if they talked at all, but that exchange was so skillfully scripted by the TOP NOTCH HOLLYWOOD SCREEN WRITERS writing the script for this ABSURDIST DRAMA that the at-home viewing audience is left with the impression that they really did talk, even though Lizzie and Cassidy have no proof they did, an unimportant detail, having proof of anything, and again we go back to the show for more, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Is it your understanding that Mr. Giuliani, Mr. Eastman, and others had set up what has been called, quote, a war room at the Willard Hotel on the night of the 5th?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I was aware of that the night of the 5th.
LIZ CHENEY: And do you know if Mr. Meadows ever intended to go to the Willard Hotel on the night of the 5th?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Mr. Meadows had a conversation with me where he wanted me to work with Secret Service on a movement from the White House to the Willard Hotel so he could attend the meeting or meetings with Mr. Giuliani and his associates in the war room.
LIZ CHENEY: And what was your view as to whether or not Mr. Meadows should go to the Willard that night?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I had made it clear to Mr. Meadows that I didn’t believe it was a smart idea for him to go to the Willard Hotel that night.
I wasn’t sure everything that was going on at the Willard Hotel, although I knew enough about what Mr. Giuliani and his associates were pushing during this period.
I didn’t think that it was something appropriate for the White House Chief of Staff to attend or to consider involvement in, and made that clear to Mr. Meadows.
end quotes
It is important to note here that in addition to being the secretary to Mark meadows, Cassidy also served as a “MOTHER” figure to him, telling him how to keep to the straight and narrow, lest he stray over into perdition (a state of eternal punishment and damnation into which a sinful and unpenitent person passes after death) which again takes us back to the drama which is really beginning to build to a crescendo here, as follows:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Throughout the afternoon, he mentioned a few more times going up to the Willard Hotel that evening, and then eventually dropped the subject the night of the 5th and said that he would dial in instead.
end quotes
And here we are going to have Lizzie doing an abrupt right turn, or maybe a left turn, take your pick, to get some more guilt by association on the record as she skillfully casts aspersions (to say harsh critical things about someone or someone’s character), to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: So General Flynn has appeared before this committee.
And when he appeared before our committee, he took the Fifth.
end quotes
BOO HISS, that must make him guilty of something, anyway, because EVERYBODY knows it is only criminals who take the fifth amendment, which takes us back to the building drama, as follows, and what this has to do with Cassidy Hutchinson is anybody’s guess, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Let’s briefly view a clip of General Mike Flynn taking the Fifth Amendment.
[Begin videotape]
General Flynn, do you believe the violence on January 6th was justified?
UNKNOWN: Can we have a minute?
LIZ CHENEY: Yes.
UNKNOWN: Alright, we’re back.
Congressman Cheney, could you repeat the question please?
LIZ CHENEY: Yes.
General Flynn, do you believe the violence on January 6th was justified?
UNKNOWN: Is that — can I get a clarification?
Is that a moral question or are you asking a legal question?
LIZ CHENEY: I’m asking both.
MICHAEL FLYNN: I said — I said the Fifth.
LIZ CHENEY: Do you believe the violence on January 6th was justified morally?
MICHAEL FLYNN: Take the Fifth.
LIZ CHENEY: Do you believe the violence on January 6th was justified legally?
MICHAEL FLYNN: Fifth.
LIZ CHENEY: General Flynn, do you believe in the peaceful transition of power in the United States of America?
MICHAEL FLYNN: The Fifth.
[End videotape]
And with that, let’s again pause for station identification to let everyone’s nerves get settled, but as always, stay tuned, because there are yet more dramatic thrills to come, so don’t touch that dial!
Ah, yes, people, GUILT BY ASSOCIATION, which takes us to this, to wit:
Q: Is guilt by association unconstitutional?
A: The Supreme Court has declared guilt by association “alien to the traditions of a free society and the First Amendment itself.”
It violates both the Fifth Amendment, which requires that guilt must be personal, and the First Amendment, which guarantees the right of association.
end quotes
But we are dealing with Democrats, here, so who gives a damn about what the Supreme Court or OUR Constitution might have to say about it, because Democrats don’t care about either, which takes us back to this WITCH HUNTER’S HEARING on 28 June 2021, starring Lizzie Cheney and “MOTHER FIGURE” Cassidy Hutchinson, which hearing itself is alien to the traditions of a free society, where we have the continuation of the drama, and once again, you are cautioned to be seated with your seat belt firmly cinched lest you get blown clean away as the play action continues, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: That’s the — Let’s move on now to January 6th and the conduct of Donald Trump and Mark Meadows during the attack on the Capitol.
Ms. Hutchinson, I’d like now for us to listen to a description — your description of what transpired in the West Wing during the attack.
For context in this clip, you describe the time frame starting at about 2:00 p.m.
end quotes
And here, for context, we need to jump ahead to the 21 July episode of NANCY PELOSI’S WITCH HUNTERS PRESENT, where we have Viginia’s Elaine Luria laying out the timeline for us of what she is saying happened in the white house on 6 January 2022, so we can compare it to what Cassidy is going to be telling us on 28 June 2022, because I believe we might have some missing time here, as follows:
ELAINE LURIA: After the Secret Service refused to take President Trump to the Capitol, he returned to the White House.
What you see on the screen is a photo of him inside the Oval Office immediately after he returned from the rally still wearing his overcoat.
A White House employee informed the President as soon as he returned to the Oval about the riot at the Capitol.
Let me repeat that.
Within 15 minutes of leaving the stage, President Trump knew that the Capitol was besieged and under attack.
end quotes
And we know from earlier information that Trump finished speaking at 1:10 p.m. on 6 January 2021, which takes us back to 20-year naval veteran Elaine Luria on 21 July 2022, as follows:
ELAINE LURIA: At 1:25, President Trump went to the private dining room off the Oval Office.
From 1:25 until 4:00, the President stayed in his dining room.
Witnesses told us that on January 6th President Trump sat in his usual spot at the head of the table facing a television hanging on the wall.
We know from the employee that the TV was tuned to Fox News all afternoon.
Here you can see Fox News on the TV showing coverage of the joint session that was airing that day at 1:25.
Other witnesses confirm that President Trump was in the dining room with the TV on for more than two and a half hours.
There was no official record of what President Trump did while in the dining room.
On the screen is the Presidential call log from January 6th.
As you can see, there’s no official record of President Trump receiving or placing a call between 11:06 and 6:54 pm.
end quotes
There is probably no record of Trump receiving or placing a call from 11:06 a.m. on January 6, 2021 to 1:25 p.m. on January 6, 2021 for the simple reason that Trump was at the ellipse speaking to his “mob,” as the Democrats call them, which takes us back to Elai8ne on 21 July 2022, as follows:
ELAINE LURIA: As to what the President was doing that afternoon, the Presidential Daily Diary is also silent.
It contains no information from the period between 1:21 pm. and 4:03 pm.
There are also no photos of President Trump during this critical period between 1:21 in the Oval Office and when he went outside to the Rose Garden after 4:00.
The chief White House photographer wanted to take pictures because it was in her words, very important for his archives and for history, but she was told quote, “no photographs”.
end quotes
And that brings us back to 28 June 2022 and more Cassidy Hutchinson, as follows
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: So I remember Mark being alone in his office for quite some time.
And, you know, I know we’ve spoken about Ben Williamson going in at one point, and I don’t personally remember Ben going in.
I don’t doubt that he had gone in.
But I remember him being alone in his office for most of the afternoon.
Around 2:00 to 2:05 — around 2:00 to 2:05, you know, we were watching the TV and I could see that the rioters were getting closer and closer to the Capitol.
end quotes
HUH?
Wait a minute here, people!
“Around 2:00 to 2:05 — around 2:00 to 2:05, you know, we were watching the TV and I could see that the rioters were getting closer and closer to the Capitol?”
That sounds like more BULL**** from Cassidy because according to a BBC article titled “Capitol riots timeline: What happened on 6 January 2021?” this is what they say happened:
10:58 Members of the Proud Boy movement, a right-wing militia, are seen heading towards the Capitol.
12:53 As the president speaks, a crowd outside the Capitol is swelling. They begin marching towards the police barrier and get past officers. The police, outnumbered, try to contain them.
13:45 Protesters surge past Capitol police protecting the west steps, the side facing the White House.
Minutes later, an officer declares there is a riot at the Capitol.
“We’re going to give riot warnings,” he says.
“We’re going to try to get compliance but this is now effectively a riot.”
14:13 Secret Service quickly and suddenly evacuate Mr Pence from the Senate floor.
The protesters break through the windows.
They push inside, hopping through the broken glass.
They then kick open the doors to let others in.
end quotes
And if we go to a USA TODAY article entitled “Timeline: How a Trump mob stormed the US Capitol, forcing Washington into lockdown” by George Petras, Janet Loehrke, Ramon Padilla, Javier Zarracina and Jennifer Borresen on Jan. 15, 2021, we find this following entry, to wit:
1:46 p.m.
Rep. Elaine Luria, D-Va., tweets she is being evacuated after reports of a pipe bomb outside.
“Supporters of the President are trying to force their way into the Capitol and I can hear what sounds like multiple gunshots.”
end quotes
So if the protesters or rioters were already at the capitol long before 2:00 p.m., how can we make any sense out of what Cassidy is saying here about “Around 2:00 to 2:05 — around 2:00 to 2:05, you know, we were watching the TV and I could see that the rioters were getting closer and closer to the Capitol?”
And the answer is we can’t make any sense of it, at all, but again, it is SHOW BUSINESS, so it doesn’t need to make sense, which takes us back for more Cassidy and more drama, to wit:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Mark still hadn’t popped out of his office or said anything about it.
So that’s when I went into his office.
I saw that he was sitting on his couch on his cell phone, same as the morning where he was just kind of scrolling and typing.
I said, hey, are you watching the TV, Chief?
Because his TV was small and I — you can see it, but I didn’t know if he was really paying attention.
I said, you watching the TV, Chief?
He was like, yeah.
I said, the rioters are getting really close.
end quotes
“I said, the rioters are getting really close?”
How about they were already inside by then, Cassidy, but hey, maybe her watch was broken, or she was just confused, which again takes us back to the transcript, to wit:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Have you talked to the President?
And he said, no, he wants to be alone right now; still looking at his phone.
So I start to get frustrated because, you know, I sort of felt like I was watching a — this is not a great comparison, but a bad car accident that was about to happen where you can’t stop it, but you want to be able to do something.
end quotes
What great lines the Hollywood soap opera script writers have given to this DRAMA QUEEN Cassidy!
“A bad car accident that was about to happen where you can’t stop it, but you want to be able to do something.”
That is a classic, but truth be told, the “bad car accident” wasn’t about to happen – it already had, which takes us back to the transcript and DRAMA QUEEN Cassidy making the most of her moment in the national spotlight as a STAR WITNESS delivering EXPLOSIVE BLOCKBUSTER TESTIMONY guaranteed to put Trump, who scorned her, down for the count, to wit:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I just remember — I remember thinking in that moment, Mark needs to snap out of this and I don’t know how to snap him out of this, but he needs to care.
And I just remember I blurted out and I said, Mark, do you know where Jim’s at right now?
And he looked up at me at that point and said, Jim?
And I said, Mark, Is — he was on the floor a little while ago giving a floor speech.
Did you listen?
He said, yeah, it was real good.
Did you like it?
And I said, yeah.
Do you know where he’s at right now?
He said, no, I haven’t heard from him.
And I said, you might want to check in with him, Mark.
And I remember pointing at the TV and I said, the rioters are getting close.
They might get in.
end quotes
“They might get in?”
Cassidy, they already were in!
See what I was saying above about some missing time here?
Getting back to it:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: And he looked at me and said something to the effect of, Alright, I’ll give him a call.
[End videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: Not long after the rioters broke into the Capitol, you described what happened with White House Counsel Pat Cipollone.
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: No more than a minute, minute and a half later, I see Pat Cipollone barreling down the hallway towards our office; and rush right in, looked at me, said, is Mark in his office?
And I said, yes.
He just looked at me and started shaking his head and went over — opened Mark’s office door, stood there with the door propped open and said something to — Mark is still sitting on his phone.
I remember like glancing and he’s still sitting on his phone.
And I remember Pat saying to him something to the effect of, the rioters have gotten to the Capitol, Mark.
We need to go down and see the President now.
And Mark looked up at him and said, he doesn’t want to do anything, Pat.
And Pat said something to the effect of — and very clearly had said this to Mark — something to the effect of, Mark, something needs to be done or people are going to die and the blood is going to be on your f’ing hands.
This is getting out of control.
I’m going down there.
And at that point, Mark set up from his couch, both of his phones in his hand.
He had his glasses on still.
He walked out with Pat.
He put both of this phones on my desk and said, let me know if Jim calls.
And they walked out and went down to the dining room.
[End videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: A few minutes later, Representative Jordan called back.
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: A couple minutes later, so likely around between 2:15. 2:25 — I know the tweet went out at 2:24.
I don’t remember if I was there when the tweet went out or if it happened right afterwards, but Jim had called.
I answered the phone, said, one second.
He knew it was — I guess he knew it was — and I introduced myself, but I — I don’t remember if he called my cell phone or if he had called one of Mark’s.
But I answered the phone and said, one sec, Mark’s on the hall.
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I’m going to go hand the phone to him and he said, Ok.
So I went down.
I asked the valet if Mark was in the dining room.
The valet said, yes.
I opened the door — The dining room, briefly stepped in to get Mark’s attention.
I showed him the phone, like flipped the phone his way so he could see it said Jim Jordan.
He had stepped to where I was standing there holding the door open, took the phone, talking to Jim with the door still propped open, so I took a few steps back.
So, I probably was two feet from Mark.
He was standing in the doorway going into the Oval Office dining room.
They had a brief conversation.
And in the crossfires — you know, I heard briefly, like, what they were talking about, but in the background I had heard conversations in the Oval Dining Room with the — at that point talking about the hang Mike Pence chants.
[End videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: That clip ended, Ms. Hutchinson, with you recalling that you heard the president, Mr. Meadows, and the White House counsel discussing the hang Mike Pence chants, and then you described for us what happened next.
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: It wasn’t until Mark hung up the phone, handed it back to me.
I went back to my desk a couple of minutes later.
Him and Pat came back, possibly Eric Herschmann too.
I’m pretty sure Eric Herschmann was there, but I’m — I’m confident it was Pat that was there.
I remember Pat saying something to the effect of, Mark, we need to do something more.
They’re literally calling for the vice president to be f’ing hung.
And Mark had responded something to the effect of, you heard him, Pat.
He thinks Mike deserves it.
He doesn’t think they’re doing anything wrong, to which Pat said something, this is f’ing crazy, we need to be doing something more.
Briefly stepped into Mark’s office, and when Mark had said something — when Mark had said something to the effect of he doesn’t think they’re doing anything wrong.
Knowing what I had heard briefly in the dining room coupled with Pat discussing the hanging Mike Pence chants in the lobby of our office and then Mark’s response, I understood “they’re” to be the rioters in the Capitol that were chanting for the vice president to be hung.
[End videotape]
And whew, people, my heart is now beating so fast I think I need to stop and take a break, but once again, this is just starting to get really exciting, so we’ll be right back when my heart rate cools down some, so don’t go away and don’t touch that dial!
And before we go back to the transcript of this Cassidy Hutchinson and the pure BULL**** she is spewing, we need to go back to the timeline and do some fact-checking, since this venue, thanks to the Cape Charles Mirror, is the only place in America where that seems to be happening.
Above here, we have Cassidy telling us that “around 2:00 to 2:05 — around 2:00 to 2:05, you know, we were watching the TV and I could see that the rioters were getting closer and closer to the Capitol,” even though by then, they were already in the capitol.
And then we have her telling us that “Mark still hadn’t popped out of his office or said anything about it, so that’s when I went into his office.”
Now, that has to be AFTER 2:05 p.m. that that could have happened, if indeed it happened at all, because Cassidy’s credibility by now is in the toilet, which is why she is a STAR WITNESS for the WITCH HUNTERS, who themselves have no credibility.
She then tells us this:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I saw that he was sitting on his couch on his cell phone, same as the morning where he was just kind of scrolling and typing.
I said, hey, are you watching the TV, Chief?
Because his TV was small and I — you can see it, but I didn’t know if he was really paying attention.
I said, you watching the TV, Chief?
He was like, yeah.
I said, the rioters are getting really close.
end quotes
And of course that is BULL**** because by then, the rioters were already in.
And then we go to here for some much needed drama from DRAMA QUEEN
Cassidy as follows:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Have you talked to the President?
And he said, no, he wants to be alone right now; still looking at his phone.
So I start to get frustrated because, you know, I sort of felt like I was watching a — this is not a great comparison, but a bad car accident that was about to happen where you can’t stop it, but you want to be able to do something.
I just remember — I remember thinking in that moment, Mark needs to snap out of this and I don’t know how to snap him out of this, but he needs to care.
And I just remember I blurted out and I said, Mark, do you know where Jim’s at right now?
And he looked up at me at that point and said, Jim?
And I said, Mark, Is — he was on the floor a little while ago giving a floor speech.
Did you listen?
He said, yeah, it was real good.
Did you like it?
And I said, yeah.
Do you know where he’s at right now?
He said, no, I haven’t heard from him.
And I said, you might want to check in with him, Mark.
And I remember pointing at the TV and I said, the rioters are getting close.
They might get in.
end quotes
So, the “Jim” she is talking about is Jim Jordan, who did indeed give a floor speech in the House of Representatives on 6 January 2021, and this is where things get really murky with respect to the timeline because we already know that Cassidy was at the ellipse that same day with Trump, and then some time after that, she was back in the white house where she was watching on television the marchers and rioters getting close, and Mark Meadows was sitting on his couch on his cell phone, same as the morning where he was just kind of scrolling and typing, and at the same time watching the rioters on his small TV, which is some pretty good muti-tasking, and then we have Cassidy talking about a floor speech that Jim Jordan gave that day that supposedly she and Mark Meadows both listened to, which raises the question of exactly how did they do that – listen to Jim Jordan’s floor speech?
For the timeline, let’s go to the Congressional Record – United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167, WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2021 No. 4, where we have as follows:
The SPEAKER pro tempore.
Pursuant to clause 12(a) of rule I, the Chair declares the House in recess until approximately 12:55 p.m. today.
Accordingly (at 12 o’clock and 6 minutes p.m.), the House stood in recess.
AFTER RECESS
The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the Speaker at 12 o’clock and 55 minutes p.m.
end quotes
At that time, Cassidy and Mark are at the ellipse and according to Cassidy, Mark was in his car while Cassidy was in the tent.
Going back to the Congressional Record, we have this, as well:
RECESS
The SPEAKER pro tempore (Mr. MCGOVERN).
Without objection, pursuant to clause 12(b) of rule I, the Chair declares the House in recess subject to the call of the Chair.
There was no objection.
Accordingly (at 2 o’clock and 18 minutes p.m.), the House stood in recess.
AFTER RECESS
The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the Speaker pro tempore (Mr. MCGOVERN) at 2 o’clock and 29 minutes p.m.
RECESS
The SPEAKER pro tempore.
Without objection, pursuant to clause 12(b) of rule I, the Chair declares the House in recess subject to the call of the Chair.
There was no objection.
Accordingly (at 2 o’clock and 29 minutes p.m.), the House stood in recess.
AFTER RECESS
The recess having expired, the House was called to order by the Speaker at 9 o’clock and 2 minutes p.m.
ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER
The SPEAKER.
The Chair will address the Chamber.
Today, a shameful assault was made on our democracy.
It cannot, however, deter us from our responsibility to validate the election of Joe Biden and KAMALA HARRIS.
For that reason, Congress has returned to the Capitol.
We always knew that this responsibility would take us into the night, and we will stay as long as it takes.
Our purpose will be accomplished.
We must, and we will, show to the country, and indeed to the world, that we will not be diverted from our duty, that we will respect our responsibility to the Constitution and to the American people.
On Sunday, it was my great honor to be sworn in as Speaker and to preside over a sacred ritual of renewal as we gathered under the stone of the temple of democracy to open the 117th Congress.
I said, as we were sworn in then, we accept a responsibility as daunting and demanding as any previous generation of leadership has ever faced.
We know that we are in difficult times, but little could we have imagined the assault that was made on our democracy today.
To those who stoked deterrence from our responsibility, you have failed.
To those who engaged in the gleeful desecration of this, our temple of democracy, American democracy, justice will be done.
Today, January 6, is the Feast of the Epiphany.
On this day of revelation, let us pray that this instigation to violence will provide an epiphany for our country to heal.
In that spirit of healing, I invoke the song of Saint Francis.
I usually do.
Saint Francis is the patron saint of my city of San Francisco, and the ‘‘Song of Saint Francis’’ is our anthem.
Lord, make me a channel of thy peace.
Where there is darkness, may I bring light.
Where there is hatred, let us bring love.
Where there is despair, let us bring hope.
We know that we would be part of history in a positive way today, every 4 years when we demonstrate again the peaceful transfer of power from one President to the next, and despite the shameful actions of today, we still will do so.
We will be part of a history that shows the world what America is made of, that this assault, this assault is just that.
It shows the weakness of those who have had to show through violence what their message was.
My colleagues, it is time to move on.
I wear this pin quite frequently.
Actually, I gave it to our beloved JOHN LEWIS just the weekend or so before he left us.
It is the flag of our country, a flag of the United States of America.
On it, it says, ‘‘One country, one destiny.’’
‘‘One country, one destiny’’ is written on the flag.
That was also what was embroidered in Abraham Lincoln’s coat that he had on that fateful night — Lincoln’s party, Lincoln’s message: One country, one destiny.
So on this holy day of Epiphany, let us pray.
I am a big believer in prayer.
Let us pray that there will be peace on Earth and that it will begin with us.
Let us pray that God will continue to bless America.
With that, let us proceed with our responsibilities to the Constitution to which we have just, within 72 hours, taken the oath to uphold.
end quotes
Now, I have been searching for any record of those proceedings in the house of representatives being broadcast, and cannot find any, so how did Cassidy and Mark Meadows listen to Jim Jordan’s floor speech?
More to the point, in that window of time on 6 January 2021, between 12 o’clock and 55 minutes p.m. and 2 o’clock and 29 minutes p.m., while the riot was going on outside, and Cassidy and Mark were doing whatever it is they were really doing, when did Jim Jordan give his floor speech?
So here is the sequence of events subsequent to 12 o’clock and 55 minutes p.m., to wit:
ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER
At 12:59 p.m., the Sergeant at Arms, Paul D. Irving, announced the Vice President and the Senate of the United States.
The Senate entered the Hall of the House of Representatives, headed by the Vice President and the Secretary of the Senate, the Members and officers of the House rising to receive them.
The Vice President took his seat as the Presiding Officer of the joint convention of the two Houses, the Speaker of the House occupying the chair on his left.
Senators took seats to the right of the rostrum as prescribed by law.
The joint session was called to order by the Vice President.
PARLIAMENTARY INQUIRIES
OBJECTION TO COUNTING THE ELECTORAL VOTES OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA
The VICE PRESIDENT.
The two Houses will withdraw from joint session.
Each House will deliberate separately on the pending objection and report its decision back to the joint session.
The Senate will now retire to its Chamber.
The Senate retired to its Chamber.
ANNOUNCEMENT BY THE SPEAKER
The SPEAKER.
The Chair will remind Members of the need to adhere to the decorum requirements of the Chamber as laid out in the Speaker’s announced policies of January 4, 2021, in accordance with the guidance of the Attending Physician.
Members are advised to remain in the Chamber only if they are participating in debate and must wear a mask at all times, even when under recognition for debate.
Members must also practice proper social distancing while present in the Chamber.
Please, in the interests of your own health and as an example to the American people, abide by the numbers, now up to 25 on each side of the aisle, to participate in this stage of the debate.
Pursuant to Senate Concurrent Resolution 1 and 3 U.S.C. 17 governing the procedure for counting the electoral votes, when the two Houses withdraw from the joint session to count the electoral vote for separate consideration of objection, a Representative may speak to the objection for 5 minutes, and not more than once.
Debate shall not exceed 2 hours, after which the Chair will put the question, Shall the objection be agreed to?
The SPEAKER.
The Chair will endeavor to alternate recognition between Members speaking in support of the objection and Members speaking in opposition to the objection.
The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. SCALISE) for 5 minutes.
The SPEAKER.
For what purpose does the gentlewoman from California (Ms. LOFGREN) seek recognition?
Ms. LOFGREN.
Madam Speaker, I rise to strike the last word.
The SPEAKER.
The gentlewoman from California (Ms. LOFGREN) is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. JORDAN.
Madam Speaker, I rise to support the objection.
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from Ohio is recognized for 5 minutes.
end quotes
So we do not know the exact time of Jim Jordan’s floor speech but we do know it was early on in the proceedings.
But we can work our way backwards from the first recess having expired at 2 o’clock and 29 minutes p.m., when the SPEAKER pro tempore stated “The gentleman from Arizona (Mr. GOSAR) has 2 3⁄4 minutes remaining,” which takes us to here:
Mr. GOSAR.
Madam Speaker, I rise in support of my objection.
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 minutes.
end quotes
And knowing that the recess was called at 2 o’clock and 18 minutes p.m., at which time the gentleman from Arizona had 2 3⁄4 minutes left, that math would take us back to 2 o’clock and 15 1/4 minutes p.m.
Then going backwards, we have:
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 minutes.
That would have us at about 2 o’clock and 10 minutes p.m.
Still going backwards, we have:
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from Louisiana is recognized for 5 minutes.
So now we are at roughly 2 o’clock and 5 minutes p.m.
And going back from there:
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from Colorado is recognized for 5 minutes.
So, now we are at 2 o’clock p.m. and Cassidy is watching television.
Going back again, we have:
Mr. MAST.
Madam Speaker, I rise as well to support the objection, and I rise with the simple question: Can the Chair honestly tell Americans, with a pending Supreme Court case over legal observers not being allowed to observe and inspect signatures, that the laws and the Constitution of that State were not violated to change voting outcomes?
Madam Speaker, I will wait for a response.
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from Florida (Mr. MAST) has 25 seconds remaining.
Mr. MAST.
Madam Speaker, I will repeat my question.
Can you honestly tell Americans, with a pending Supreme Court case over legal observers not being able to observe and inspect signatures, that the laws and Constitution of Arizona were not violated to change voting outcomes?
And I will wait for a response.
The SPEAKER.
The time of the gentleman has expired.
end quotes
And moving back from there we come to here:
The SPEAKER.
The gentlewoman from Colorado is recognized for 5 minutes.
That would be at 1:55 p.m. and she yielded the remainder of her time to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. MAST).
Going back again, we have:
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from Maryland is recognized for 5 minutes.
So we are at 1:50 p.m. roughly.
Keeping on going back we come to this:
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from Arizona is recognized for 5 minutes.
So, 1:45 p.m.
Moving back from there, we next come to this:
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 minutes.
Which would make it around 1:40 p.m.
And then we come to Jim Jordan, as follows:
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from Ohio is recognized for 5 minutes.
So that is roughly 1:35 p.m.
So how did Cassidy and Mark listen to his floor speech?
The answer is, we don’t have a clue, and that is something the transcript never gets into, leaving us with a lot of blanks in the record, and knowing when the recess was called we come back to Cassidy, as follows:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: A couple minutes later, so likely around between 2:15. 2:25 — I know the tweet went out at 2:24.
I don’t remember if I was there when the tweet went out or if it happened right afterwards, but Jim had called.
end quotes
But the recess was called 2 o’clock and 18 minutes p.m., so where was Jim Jordan in that time frame?
We do not know.
And why would he be calling Cassidy Hutchinson on her cell phone?
Again we do not know, and truthfully, we never will know.
But does it make a difference?
Of course not, because the purpose of these hearings is not to establish facts.
These hearings have one purpose and one purpose only, and that is to serve as a distraction at to what was really going on behind closed doors in the house of representatives on 6 January 2021 when Nancy Pelosi and her pack of Democrats flushed OUR Constitution down the toilet and appointed Joe Biden president of the United States, which purpose they are serving admirably, but once again, this is not the end of the story, so please, stay tuned.
As before we go back to the transcript, we need to pause for a moment to consider just how very important this Cassidy Hutchinson really is in Washington, D.C. today, the girl who was everywhere and knew everything and is now spilling the beans and taking down other really important people right and left like ten pins even though nobody had a clue as to who she was or if she even existed in January of 2021, according to a Politico article on May 12, 2022 titled “Jan. 6 investigation subpoenas McCarthy, Jordan, 3 other House Republicans – The select panel’s moves target some of former President Donald Trump’s closest allies, demanding testimony within days” by Kyle Cheney and Nicholas Wu, we have this revelation of her importance to the WITCH HUNTERS COMMITTEE, to wit:
Jordan, a close Trump ally, had drawn the attention of investigators over his calls and communications with Trump on and before Jan. 6.
Cassidy Hutchinson, a close aide to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, told the select committee that Jordan was regularly in contact with the White House amid strategizing efforts centered on keeping Trump in office.
He was present in meetings, Hutchinson said, when the White House counsel pushed back on certain proposed tactics.
end quotes
That of course is the same Jim Jordan she was giving EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY about on 28 June 2022, telling the world how much she liked his floor speech on 6 January 2021.
And in an Esquire article titled “How the Secret Service Handling of Jan. 6 Looks to a Former Agent” by Jack Holmes on 28 July 2022, we have this to consider:
Since the most recent hearing of the January 6 Committee, a lot of talk has focused on new revelations about Vice President Mike Pence’s Secret Service detail — namely, that they were concerned enough while holed up with him inside a Capitol under mob attack that they tried to get in contact with their families to say goodbye.
But the role of the Secret Service more generally through those fateful days came under the microscope last week with revelations that the agency has failed to produce text records from January 5 and 6, telling the committee that they were lost in a reset of agency systems.
There’s also been renewed focus on an agent named Anthony Ornato, who in an unprecedented development transitioned from Trump’s security detail to a political role in the White House as deputy chief of staff for operations.
Jim Helminski was with the Secret Service for the better part of three decades, including as special agent in charge of then-Vice President Joe Biden’s protective detail and as deputy assistant director, where he oversaw all 42 domestic field offices.
We asked him what exactly he thought was going on here.
In a conversation edited below for length and clarity, Helminski offered his view on how Ornato’s elevation could have affected how the Service navigated situations like January 6, the delicate balance agents must strike between the personal relationships they have with protectees and their professional duty, and the prospect that at a key juncture in American history, the service had become politically compromised.
Q: I was going to ask you about that car ride on January 6.
Are you surprised by anything you’ve heard about the Secret Service’s activities that day?
A: My understanding of that whole scenario is that after his speech at the Ellipse, [Trump] wanted them to go to the Capitol.
There was never an official movement to the Capitol.
The police assets were never in place, the assets at the Capitol were never in place, and it would’ve become an off-the-record movement.
We’re able to put up a very robust presence very quickly, but it’s not the full bubble.
And the whole scenario, the way it was created, that wasn’t plausible.
The president announced that he wanted to go up there, and you had a riot going on right then and there.
They had to put Pence in a secure location.
You had Vice President-elect Harris, who’d just driven past a pipe bomb, standing by at the DNC.
It would’ve been insane.
Q: This seems to line up with the January 6 Committee’s account, where Trump planned in advance to tell people to march on the Capitol but mostly kept it under wraps until he did it “off-the-cuff” himself in the speech.
A: You could look at this multiple ways.
I think Secret Service had an idea [of what was going to happen].
I’m sure they had an idea.
But everybody’s intent at that point — except for Trump — was to keep Trump away from the Capitol.
And probably one way of doing that was just not to plan for it.
Now, Trump, on the other hand, goes, “Well, I don’t have to worry about this because I already co-opted the Secret Service.”
“I’ve got my New York field office guys in place, I’ve got Ornato, I’ve got Murray.”
“I just tell them what I want to do.”
Obviously, I ‘m putting thoughts into his head.
But it seems extremely plausible that it’s a scenario where, “I’ve co-opted the Secret Service, I marginalized their management.”
“I could just tell them what I want and they’ll do it.”
Of course, then you’ve got the head of the Secret Service presidential detail, Bobby Engel, who’s sitting in that right front seat, who turned around and said, “No, we’re not going there.”
And that was his duty that day, that’s what he needed to do.
Then after that scenario, he meets with Tony Ornato to say, “Hey, let me tell you what just happened in the limo.”
Q: But now they deny that account, right?
Or they at least said that they would deny it.
A: They said they deny it, but there’s too much out there now.
You got Cassidy Hutchinson who goes up there and testifies that, “Hey, I see Tony Ornato in the West Wing…”
I used to be a polygraph examiner.
She describes this thing in such detail that you would have to be a Meryl Streep to be able to pretend the way she did.
Q: And she’s under oath, and they aren’t.
A: And she’s under oath.
end quote
And with that compliment paid to her, comparing Cassidy to Meryl Streep with regard to being able to pretend the way she did on 28 June 2021, let’s go back to the transcript because she is about to take down some real high rollers here, as follows, keeping in mind that she is “under oath,” to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Let me pause here on this point.
As rioters chanted hang Mike Pence, the president of the United States, Donald Trump, said that “Mike deserves it,” and that those rioters were not doing anything wrong.
This is a sentiment that he has expressed at other times as well.
In an interview with ABC News correspondent Jonathan Karl, President Trump was asked about the supporters chanting hang Mike Pence last year.
Instead of condemning them, the former president defended them.
[Begin videotape]
JONATHAN KARL: Saying hang Mike Pence.
DONALD TRUMP: Because it’s — it’s common sense, Jon.
It’s common sense that you’re supposed to protect — how can you — if you know a vote is fraudulent, right, how can you pass on a fraudulent vote to Congress?
[End videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: President Trump’s view that the rioters were not doing anything wrong and that “Mike deserved it” helps us to understand why the president did not ask the rioters to leave the Capitol for multiple hours.
In fact, he put this tweet out at 2:24 PM.
Ms. Hutchinson, do you recall seeing this tweet, in which the president said the vice president did not have the courage to do what needed to be done?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I do.
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson, what was your reaction when you saw this tweet?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: As a staffer that worked to always represent the administration to the best of my ability and to showcase the good things that he had done for the country, I remember feeling frustrated and disappointed, and really it felt personal.
I — I was really sad.
As an American, I was disgusted.
It was unpatriotic.
It was un-American.
We were watching the Capitol building get defaced over a lie, and it was something that was really hard in that moment to digest, knowing what I’ve been hearing down the hall and the conversations that were happening.
Seeing that tweet come up and knowing what was happening on the Hill, and it’s something that I — it’s still — I still struggle to work through the emotions of that.
end quotes
See what I mean about some powerful script writing here – getting in the patriotism, and things being UN-AMERICAN, even as Cassidy herself willingly participates in STALINIST SHOW TRIAL where Trump is very publicly being vilified and tried in absentia on PRIMETIME TV where Cassidy is a STAR WITNESS that itself is very UN-AMERICAN and disgusts me who am a twice-wounded combat veteran who took and never forsook an oath to defend the Constitution the Democrats tossed in the trash by the Democrats and Lizzie Cheney on 6 January 2021, then her having to deal with her emotions, which is a tear jerker statement that tugs at the heartstrings of the at-home viewing audience, which takes us back to the show, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson, we have also spoken to multiple other White House staff about their reaction to Donald Trump’s 2:24 tweet condemning Mike Pence for not having the courage to refuse to count electoral votes, an act that would have been illegal.
Matthew Pottinger, a former Marine intelligence officer who served in the White House for four years, including — including as deputy national security adviser, was in the vicinity of the Oval Office at various points throughout the day.
When he saw that tweet, he immediately decided to resign his position.
Let’s watch him describe his reaction to the president’s tweet.
[Begin videotape]
MATTHEW POTTINGER: One of my staff brought me a printout of a tweet by the president, and the tweet said something to the effect that Mike Pence, the vice president, didn’t have the courage to do what he — what should have been done.
I — I read that tweet and made a decision at that moment to resign.
That’s where I knew that I was leaving that day once I read that tweet.
[End videotape]
Noting that with Trump having been defeated, his job was over anyway, so he would have had to resign before 20 January 2021, which takes us back to the show, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Ultimately, members of the White House staff, Sarah Matthews, Cabinet members Secretary Chao and Secretary DeVos resigned as well.
Here is Secretary DeVos’s resignation letter.
As you can see, in resigning on January 6th, Secretary DeVos said to the president, “There’s no mistaking the impact your rhetoric had on the situation, and it is the inflection point for me.”
Let’s also look at Secretary Chao’s resignation statement.
When Secretary Chao resigned, she spoke of the January 6th attack and she said, “As I am sure is the case with many of you, this is deeply troubled me in a way I simply cannot set aside.”
Ms. Hutchinson, in our prior interviews, we’ve asked you about what the president’s advisers were urging him to do during the attack.
You’ve described roughly three different camps of thought inside the White House that day.
Can you tell us about those?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: There was a group of individuals that were strongly urging him to take immediate and swift action.
I would classify the White House Counsel’s Office, Mr. Herschmann, Ms. Ivanka Trump in that category of really working to get him to take action and pleading with him to take action.
There was a more neutral group where advisors were trying to toe the line, knowing that Mr. Trump didn’t necessarily want to take immediate action and condemn the riots, but knowing something needed to be done.
And then there was the last group, which was deflect and blame.
Let’s blame Antifa.
These aren’t our people.
It’s my understanding that Mr. Meadows was in the deflect and blame category, but he did end up taking a more neutral route, knowing that there were several advisors in the president’s circle urging him to take more action, which I think was reflected in the rhetoric released later that day in the videos.
end quotes
See what I was saying about her being everywhere and knowing everything!
She was a bad person to get on the wrong side of as a lot of powerful people she is taking off the board are now finding out, which again takes us back to the show, and a powerful drama it is, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: You told us that the White House Counsel’s Office was in the camp encouraging the president to tell the rioters to stop the attack and to leave the Capitol.
Let’s listen.
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: White House counsel’s office wanted there to be a strong statement out to condemn the rioters.
I’m confident in that.
[End videotape]
Now, what they are leaving out of the record is a TWEET Trump made on 6 January 2021, wherein was stated as follows:
NPR
“A timeline of how the Jan. 6 attack unfolded — including who said what and when”
Updated June 9, 2022
2:38 p.m. Trump tweets again, calling for support of the Capitol Police and law enforcement.
He urges people to “stay peaceful.”
end quotes
That, of course, is very unhelpful to the narrative the WITCH HUNTERS are creating so that was left out of the record with intent, because it would spoil the sense of drama the Hollywood script writers have created here, which takes us back to Lizzie, who voted with the Democrats on 6 January 2o021, which is why Nancy Pelosi chose her as a LOYAL WITCH HUNTER, and Cassidy, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: Now let’s look at just one example of what some senior advisers to the president were urging.
Ms. Hutchinson, could you look at the exhibit that we’re showing on the screen now?
Have you seen this note before?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s a note that I wrote at the direction of the chief of staff on January 6th, likely around 3:00.
LIZ CHENEY: And it’s written on a chief of staff note card, but that’s your handwriting, Ms. Hutchinson?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s my handwriting.
LIZ CHENEY: And why did you write this note?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: The chief of staff was in a meeting with Eric Hirschman and potentially Mr. Philbin, and they had rushed out of the office fairly quickly.
Mark had handed me the note card with one of his pens, and sort of dictating a statement for the president to potentially put out.
LIZ CHENEY: And — no, I’m sorry.
Go ahead.
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s Ok.
There are two phrases on there, one illegal and then one without proper authority.
The illegal phrase was the one that Mr. Meadows had dictated to me.
Mr. Herschmann had chimed in and said also put without legal authority.
There should have been a slash between the two phrases.
It was an — an or if the president had opted to put one of those statements out.
Evidently he didn’t.
Later that afternoon, Mark came back from the Oval Dining Room and put the palm card on my desk with illegally crossed out, but said we didn’t need to take further action on that statement.
LIZ CHENEY: So, to your knowledge, this statement was never issued.
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: It was — to my knowledge, it was never issued.
end quotes
And make what sense you can out of that, people, as once again, we pause for station identification, but there are more thrills and chills yet to come as Cassidy tells all, and important heads roll as a result, so be sure to stay tuned and don’t touch that dial.
Before we go back to the transcript of the Lizzie and Cassidy Show on 28 June 2022, I would like to go back in time to November 8, 1787, and the Cato IV political essay by Cato, wherein was stated as follows about Washington, D.C., called by him the “ten miles square,” where we had this prescient vision of him looking forward across the gulf of time to where we are right now in this nation with these WITCH HUNTERS HEARINGS going on in Washington, to wit:
“The ten miles square, which is to become the seat of government, will of course be the place of residence for the president and the great officers of state — the same observation of a great man will apply to the court of a president possessing the powers of a monarch, that is observed of that of a monarch — ambition with idleness — baseness with pride — the thirst of riches without labour — aversion to truth — flattery — treason — perfidy — violation of engagements — contempt of civil duties — hope from the magistrate’s weakness; but above all, the perpetual ridicule of virtue.”
And let me say as an American citizen who is not a Democrat, nor a Republican, and who is quite disgusted by these troubled times we now find ourselves in, in what seems to be a very sick nation at war with itself, that I am in complete agreement with Cato with regard to Washington. D.C. as to the class of people who now occupy that place and call themselves, quite mockingly, our “government,” and I think these WITCH HUNTERS HEARINGS where Trump, who I never liked and thought was an arrogant, egotistical, loud-mouthed idiot, is being vilified IN ABSENTIA (while not present, as in He was tried and convicted in absentia) are scurvy, low-down, UN-AMERICAN proceedings, as if the word “un-American” means anything any more, and even Joe McCarthy never stooped this low with his famous hearings.
And that condemnation of these proceedings by myself as an American citizen old enough to remember Joe McCarthy takes us back to this segment of the transcript, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: When Republican leader Kevin McCarthy heard the president say he was going to the Capitol, he called you, Ms. Hutchinson, isn’t that right?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
LIZ CHENEY: And in this text message, you told Tony Ornato, “McCarthy just called me too.”
“And do you guys think you’re coming to my office?”
Tell us about the call that day with Leader McCarthy during the president’s speech on the Ellipse.
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I was still in the tent behind the stage.
And when you’re behind the stage, you can’t really hear what’s going on in front of you.
So, when Mr. McCarthy called me with this information, I answered the call.
And he sounded rushed, but also frustrated and angry at me.
I — I was confused because I — I didn’t know what the president had just said.
He then explained the president just said he’s marching to the Capitol.
You told me this whole week you aren’t coming up here.
Why would you lie to me?
I said I’m — I’m not lying.
I wasn’t lying to you, sir.
I — we’re not going to the Capitol.
And he said, well, he just said it on stage, Cassidy.
Figure it out.
Don’t come up here.
I said I’ll — I’ll — I’ll run the traps on this and I’ll shoot you a text.
I can assure you we’re not coming up to the Capitol.
We’ve already made that decision.
He pressed a little bit more, believing me but I think frustrated that the president had said that.
And we ended the phone conversation after that.
I called Mr. Ornato to reconfirm that we weren’t going to the Capitol, and which was also in our text messages.
I sent Mr. McCarthy another text telling him the affirmative, that we were not going up to the Capitol, and he didn’t respond after that.
end quotes
Which in turn takes us to a Reuters article titled “Top House Republican McCarthy doesn’t recall Jan. 6 talk with Hutchinson” on July 29, 2022, where we have as follows:
WASHINGTON, July 29 (Reuters) – U.S. House of Representatives Republican leader Kevin McCarthy said on Friday he does not remember urging then-White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson to prevent Donald Trump from coming to the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, despite her sworn testimony to the contrary.
end quotes
“Sworn testimony?”
This is Washington, D.C., so that term “sworn testimony” means nothing at all which brings in a term called “subornation of perjury,” which is a fancy legal name for inducing someone else to lie under oath, and then that person, when called as a witness, goes through with the lie, because somebody has to be lying here, and given this is happening in Washington, D.C., that very well may be everybody, because no member of this WITCH HUNTERS COMMITTEE can be considered above reproach (such that no criticism can be made; perfect), but right now the question of who is lying is between Cassidy Hutchinson, whose testimony to date seems outlandish (sounding bizarre), and coached, and Kevin McCarthy.
IS LIZZIE CHENEY SUBORNING PERJURY HERE?
OR IS KEVIN MCCARTHY LYING?
Going back to Reuters, we have further as follows:
Hutchinson – the star witness in a televised hearing before the House committee investigating the Jan. 6 assault on Congress by Trump supporters – testified under oath that a “frustrated and angry” McCarthy called her that day after President Trump announced at a nearby rally that he would join in a march to the Capitol.
end quotes
And notice that Cassidy Hutchinson is getting “STAR WITNESS” billing here, which is like Cassidy being the queen of the prom on PRIMETIME TV, which takes us back for more from Reuters, to wit:
“Mr. McCarthy called me with this information,” Hutchinson told the panel on June 28.
“I was confused, because I didn’t know what the president had just said.”
“… He (McCarthy) said, ‘Well, he just said it on stage, Cassidy.'”
“‘Figure it out.'”
“‘Don’t come up here’.”
She also said McCarthy had been in touch with her about Trump’s plans in the days leading up to the attack.
But McCarthy insisted on Friday that he had no recollection of talking to Hutchinson, at the time an aide to White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows.
“I don’t recall talking to her that day,” McCarthy said at a news conference.
“I don’t remember having any conversations with her about the president coming to the Capitol.”
McCarthy said he did not watch Trump’s speech ahead of the attack on the Capitol and that he did not know Trump said he would join his supporters in marching there.
A committee spokesman declined to comment.
The panel is investigating Trump’s role in the attack, which occurred as the House and Senate worked to certify Democrat Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential election victory.
Trump did not join his supporters in the end, saying the Secret Service prevented him from accompanying them.
But the committee has presented evidence that the mob was animated by his repeated false claims that the election was stolen through massive voter fraud.
end quotes
And that is a patently false statement because the committee HAS NOT presented evidence that the mob was animated by Trump’s repeated false claims that the election was stolen through massive voter fraud, precisely because the committee has no idea what “animated” anybody in Washington, D.C. that day when there were several thousand people milling around the capitol, but this is a SHOW TRIAL, so facts DO NOT MATTER, which takes us back to Reuters once more, to wit:
Days after the June hearing, McCarthy dismissed Hutchinson’s testimony as “hearsay.”
He maintains the panel is conducting a partisan investigation.
end quotes
And of course it is a partisan investigation.
And back to Reuters for the conclusion:
McCarthy said he instead called then-Deputy Chief of Staff Dan Scavino and White House senior adviser Jared Kushner in an effort to locate the president on Jan. 6.
end quotes
So once again, what really is going on here, people, besides a televised FARCE?
Consider that on March 3, 2021, in her “Remarks Introducing President Biden at 2021 House Democratic Issues Conference,” Nancy Pelosi said thusly of Joe Biden who the Democrats along with Lizzie Cheney and Adam Kinzinger APPOINTED as president on 6 January 2021, to wit:
Speaker Pelosi: This is a very special evening for me, my colleagues, to be introducing for the very first time Joe Biden as President of the United States.
And I could – my heart could not be filled with more joy to have that occasion marked by introducing him to our House Democratic Caucus.
A special evening.
First time, Mr. President, that I’m introducing you as President of the United States to my great House Democratic Caucus.
That makes it even better.
My colleagues, as you know, our nation is blessed with Joe Biden as President of the United States.
He is an extraordinary President.
He knows how to get the job done.
end quotes
Now, having said those words, does Nancy Pelosi have to defend them?
And of course she does, especially that bit about “our nation is blessed with Joe Biden as President of the United States,” as if God him or herself were for Joe.
And to make Joe seem big, she needs to make Trump look small.
Which takes us to July 21, 2021, ONE HUNDRED FORTY (140) days later, and a Politico article titled “Pelosi vetoes Banks, Jordan for Jan. 6 select committee” by Olivia Beavers, Heather Caygle and Nicholas Wu, where we had as follows:
Speaker Nancy Pelosi stunned the GOP on Wednesday by vetoing two of House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy’s choices for a select panel investigating the Jan. 6 Capitol attack, a move all but guaranteed to spark a Republican boycott of the probe.
“I must reject the recommendations of Representatives Banks and Jordan to the Select Committee,” Pelosi said in a statement.
“The unprecedented nature of January 6th demands this unprecedented decision.”
end quotes
Considering the phrase “this unprecedented decision” means “never done or known before,” not at any time previously in our history as a nation, even in the days of Joe McCarthy, what does that mean for the veracity (conformity with truth or fact; accuracy; devotion to the truth; truthfulness) of these WITCH HUNTER HEARINGS that are so obviously scripted and presented on PRIMETIME TV?
And speaking of Joe McCarthy, let us go to the U.S. Senate website and an article titled “McCarthy and Army-McCarthy Hearings,” where we have the following American history that I clearly recall, having been alive back then, and not being senile like Joe Biden, who Nancy Pelosi says we are “blessed” to have as president, to wit:
The investigations by the Committee on Government Operations’ Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations involving Senator Joseph McCarthy in 1953 and 1954 can be divided into two distinct phases.
The first consisted of a series of hearings conducted by McCarthy, as the subcommittee’s chairman, throughout 1953 and early 1954 in which McCarthy alleged Communist influence within the press and the federal government, including the State Department, the U.S. Army, and the Government Printing Office.
McCarthy had first made those accusations in February 1950 during a speech in Wheeling, West Virginia.
The second phase involved the subcommittee’s investigation of McCarthy’s attacks on the U.S. Army.
As early as 1950, some senators felt deeply troubled by what they considered McCarthy’s reckless accusations.
After the army alleged that McCarthy had sought special treatment for one of his former staff members, McCarthy himself became a subject of the investigation — the Special Senate Investigation on Charges and Countercharges Involving: Secretary of the Army Robert T. Stevens, John G. Adams, H. Struve Hensel and Senator Joe McCarthy, Roy M. Cohn, and Francis P. Carr.
McCarthy temporarily stepped down as chairman and member of the committee.
Karl Mundt presided over the hearings as acting chairman and Henry Dworshak was temporarily seated as a member in McCarthy’s place.
Known as the “Army-McCarthy hearings,” they were broadcast on national television and they contributed to McCarthy’s declining national popularity.
Five months later, on December 2, 1954, the Senate censured McCarthy.
end quotes
So think very carefully about where we now are, people, as the November mid-terms approach and the Democrats are getting more and more desperate as Joe Biden’s approval ratings continues to plummet, promising to take down the Democrats with him!
WOULD NANCY PELOSI USE PRIMETIME TV AND THESE WITCH HUNTER HEARINGS TO LIE TO US TO RIG THE MIDTERMS?
Because somebody is lying here and if it isn’t Kevin McCarthy, then it has to be STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson!
But once again, don’t touch that dial because thanks to the Cape Charles Mirror, the only media venue in America, where these important questions are being raised, there is more Cassidy yet to come, so please stay tuned.
And once again, before we go back to the transcript of the obviously scripted Lizzie and Cassidy Show on PRIMETIME TV where they are taking turns condemning and vilifying Trump in absentia, which would make Joe Stalin very proud of them, we just had a new development in this story that may well be as a result of the Cape Charles Mirror, the only news media that I know of in this country that had the guts to question just who the hell Cassidy Hutchinson really is, and what hold she had on people in Washington, D.C. that landed her STAR BILLING in this televised FARCE being put on by Nancy Pelosi’s WITCH HUNTERS in an effort to influence the November mid-terms in favor of Pelosi’s Democrats by demonizing their opponents, the Republicans, this while all the other media were praising her as a brave hero and fawning on every word she uttered, as if she were a paragon of virtue in a den of thieves, which takes us to a Business Insider article titled “EXCLUSIVE: Cassidy Hutchinson kept working for Donald Trump for nine weeks after he left the White House, government records show” by Dave Levinthal and C. Ryan Barber on 1 August 2022, where we have Cassidy, the alleged quintessential patriotic American hero disgusted with Trump and out to save our sacred democracy from Trump, who wants to steal it from us, beginning to look like Cassidy the fraud, to wit:
Cassidy Hutchinson, the former Trump White House aide who emerged as a star witness for the US House committee investigating the January 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, continued working on the former president’s behalf for nine weeks after he left office, according to government records exclusively obtained by Insider.
Hutchinson served as a “coordinator” for Trump’s official, taxpayer-funded post-presidential office from about January 20, 2021, to April 1, 2021, earning an annualized salary of $90,000, the General Services Administration documents state.
end quotes
And my goodness, people, how about that!
And just above here, again thanks to the good offices of the Cape Charles Mirror, the only publication in America that has seen through this scripted horse**** right from the beginning, we had this same Cassidy telling us as follows:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: As a staffer that worked to always represent the administration to the best of my ability and to showcase the good things that he had done for the country, I remember feeling frustrated and disappointed, and really it felt personal.
I — I was really sad.
As an American, I was disgusted.
It was unpatriotic.
It was un-American.
We were watching the Capitol building get defaced over a lie, and it was something that was really hard in that moment to digest, knowing what I’ve been hearing down the hall and the conversations that were happening.
Seeing that tweet come up and knowing what was happening on the Hill, and it’s something that I — it’s still — I still struggle to work through the emotions of that.
end quotes
So what was she doing with her emotions and her sadness and her disgust between 7 January 2021 and April 1, 2021, while she was earning an annualized salary of $90,000?
And if she was so disgusted, instead of continuing to collect her paycheck, a handsome sum for a young woman just out of a college nobody has heard about with a bachelor’s degree in political science, why didn’t she resign like Matthew Pottinger and Sarah Matthews along with Cabinet members Secretary Chao and Secretary DeVos?
Because the money was too good?
Because where else was she going to make $90,000 per year with a worthless college degree in poly sci, and hey, a girl does have to look out for her future, afterall, even if it means compromising values you don’t really have to begin with, which takes us back to the story, to wit:
Hutchinson’s whereabouts immediately after January 6 have been the subject of considerable scrutiny and uncertainty.
Bloomberg reported days after the attack that Hutchinson might join Trump in Florida, but Trump has stated he hardly knew her and turned her down.
The Washington Post in June reported that Hutchinson did not have a full-time job after her White House tenure ended.
Hutchinson’s testimony included vivid descriptions of Trump’s efforts on January 6 to rally protestors — including those he knew were armed — and efforts to personally join the mob that attacked the Capitol.
Trump argued with Secret Service agents who refused to drive him there from the Ellipse near the National Mall, and then, enraged, threw his lunch at a White House wall upon returning to the presidential residence, Hutchinson testified.
Hutchinson is now cooperating with the parallel investigation by the Justice Department, which contacted her following her June appearance before the House January 6 committee.
Hutchinson and her lawyers did not respond to Insider’s requests for comment.
Insider obtained the documents disclosing Hutchinson’s identity as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed against the US General Services Administration in October 2021.
The news organization, which initially filed its FOIA requests in early 2021, said the Biden administration-led GSA was in violation of federal law by failing to publicly release a full accounting of staff members for the post-presidency offices of both Trump and former Vice President Mike Pence.
While the GSA has since released some staffers’ names, it continues to withhold others.
Until now, Hutchinson’s identity was among those withheld.
Releasing the withheld names risked “exposing the staffers to unwanted intrusions and potential harassment,” according to a July 29 statement filed in US District Court for the District of Columbia on the GSA’s behalf by Department of Justice attorneys.
The signatories included US Attorney Matthew Graves, who Biden nominated.
GSA Associate General Counsel Daniel F. Hall likewise wrote that, “on balance, each staffer’s privacy interest in non-disclosure outweighed the public’s interest in disclosure.”
But “in light of media coverage” involving Hutchinson, “voluntary release of [her] name is appropriate at this particular time,” Hall wrote in a letter to Insider.
The letter, included in the Biden administration’s July 29 court filing, identified Hutchinson as a one-time Trump post-presidential transition team staff member.
“Cassidy Hutchinson’s name was released because of media coverage following her testimony before Congress — not because of her role (“coordinator”) on the transition,” Graves and two colleagues separately wrote to the court.
The government documents do not specify what kind of work Hutchinson performed while serving as a member of Trump’s post-presidency office, formally known as the “Presidential Transition Support Team, 2021 Outgoing Transition.”
The documents do indicate that Hutchinson did her work from Arlington, Virginia, across the Potomac River from Washington, DC, and not Palm Beach, Florida.
A handful of other post-presidency staffers worked from Florida while Trump resided at his Mar-a-Lago resort after leaving the White House.
During this period between January 20, 2021, and April 1, 2021, Trump’s post-presidency period had already hit extreme turbulence.
The US House impeached him for a second time in two years, with the Senate voting to acquit him — and quashing Democrats’ hope of denying him the right to ever again run for federal office.
But Democrats, and a few Republicans, too, had already initiated efforts at the local, state, and federal levels to investigate Trump’s role in the January 6 attacks specifically, and attempts to undermine the 2020 presidential election, broadly.
In all, Trump’s post-presidency office featured 17 staff members who earned publicly funded salaries, including two of Trump’s top White House aides: Stephen Miller and Dan Scavino.
But as recently as early June, the Biden administration argued in federal court that there was “no discernible public interest” in disclosing the identities of three of these staffers — including the one now known to be Hutchinson — who earned taxpayer-funded paychecks working for Trump after he left office.
end quotes
So how about that, people!
And once again, we owe the Cape Charles Mirror a debt of gratitude for having the courage to keep this murky story alive as the main-stream and legacy media have been striving to make this Cassidy out as a true American hero
What a crock!
But the story does not end here, so stay tuned!
So now, as we continue to digest this EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson in the 28 June episode of NANCY PELOSI’S WITCH HUNTERS PRESENT SCRIPTED POLITICAL BULL**** on PRIMETIME TV to an audience of millions, thanks to the Cape Charles Mirror, we now know that despite her “sworn testimony” on 28 June 2022, which term translates in Washington, D.C. SPEAK as “most likely is lying,” about her “feeling frustrated and disappointed” on 6 January 2021 and “really it felt personal,” and her being “really sad,” and “as an American,” she “was disgusted,” because “it was unpatriotic and it was un-American,” because she was watching the Capitol building get defaced over a lie, and it was something for her that was really hard in that moment to digest, and it’s something that she still “struggles to work through the emotions of that,” nonetheless, instead of resigning, she continued to work for Trump for 85 more days until April 1, 2021,
And now we further know from a Politico article above dated May 12, 2022 and titled “Jan. 6 investigation subpoenas McCarthy, Jordan, 3 other House Republicans – The select panel’s moves target some of former President Donald Trump’s closest allies, demanding testimony within days” by Kyle Cheney and Nicholas Wu, that before her 28 June 2022 appearance on PRIMETIME TV giving EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY as the WITCH HUNTER’S STAR WITNESS that Cassidy had been in regular contact with the WITCH HUNTERS to get her story straight and her lines down pat, as follows:
Cassidy Hutchinson, a close aide to then-White House chief of staff Mark Meadows, told the select committee that Jordan was regularly in contact with the White House amid strategizing efforts centered on keeping Trump in office.
end quotes
But, of course, from all these clips and soundbites of her that Lizzie Cheney keeps presenting, that prior to her appearance on 28 June 2022, she had been participating in what appear to be rehearsals or coaching sessions, which takes us back to the DRAMA on 28 June 2022, where Cassidy is going to make more heads roll with her EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY, and once again, you are warned that this is going to be some very heavy duty drama coming up here, so please make sure that you are firmly seated, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: And Ms. Hutchinson, did you understand that Ivanka Trump wanted her father to send people home?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s my understanding, yes.
end quotes
And seriously, people, what on earth does Ivanka Trump, the first daughter of Donald Trump, have to do with anything here?
And from this testimony and line of questioning by Lizzie Cheney, can we infer that it is Hunter Biden who is controlling what Joe Biden does as president, because Hunter is his son, as Ivanka was Trump’s daughter?
And while we ponder the implications of that in the case of Joe and Hunter Biden, let’s go back to the show on 28 June 2022, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: Let’s play a clip of you addressing that issue.
[Begin videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I remember her saying at various points, you know, she wants him — she wanted her dad to send them home.
She wanted her dad to tell them to go home peacefully, and she wanted to include language that he necessarily wasn’t on board with at the time.
[End videotape]
Now, I don’t know if any of you out there in the listening audience have ever confronted a mob of several thousand people and tried to make them all go home, but exactly how was Trump going to control this mob at the capitol when he was sitting in the white house, and even if he was at the capitol how then was he going to control the mob?
And if Trump was supposed to control this mob, then why didn’t Nancy Pelosi control the BLACK LIVES MATTERS mob when they were rampaging in Washington, D.C.?
And again, while we ponder that, let us go back for more of this drama, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: You will hear more about this at our later hearings, but we have evidence of many others imploring Donald Trump and Mark Meadows to take action.
Here is some of that evidence, text messages sent to Mark Meadows during the attack.
This is a text message at 2:32 from Laura Ingraham, hey, Mark, the president needs to tell people in the Capitol to go home.
In the next message, this is hurting all of us.
And then, he’s destroying his legacy and playing into every stereotype.
We lose all credibility against the BLM/Antifa crowd if things go south.
end quotes
Now, let me say here that I am old enough to remember many mobs rampaging in Washington, D.C., especially during the VEET NAM times, and the mobs rampaging in Chicago in 1968 during the Democrat national convention, and the so-called Dow riots in 1967, an anti-war protest on the University of Wisconsin’s Madison campus, Oct. 18, 1967, when hundreds of students protesting recruiters from Dow Chemical, the makers of napalm, blocked access to the University’s Commerce Building and Madison police removed them by force where dozens of students were beaten bloody, tear gas was used for the first time in an anti-war demonstration, and 19 police officers were treated at local hospitals, which violence of the event was credited with politicizing thousands of previously apathetic students and helping to transform the Madison campus into one of the nation’s leading anti-war communities, and the Rodney King riots, and on and on and on, and to date, I have never seen anyone, including American presidents, being able to make them “go home peacefully,” so exactly how was Trump to do that on 6 January 2021 once the mob was assembled and set in motion?
But WHOA, we are not to think logically and rationally here, we are supposed to use our passions and emotions because the goal is to LYNCH Trump, so let’s go back to the show for more, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: The president’s son, Don Jr., also urgently contacted Mark Meadows at 2:53.
He wrote, he’s got to condemn this shit ASAP.
The Capitol Police tweet is not enough.
end quotes
And the “Capitol Police TWEET” just referenced there is as follows, as if a TWEET or a hundred TWEETS or a thousand TWEETS on 6 January 2021 were going to matter to a mob that most likely was not tuned into TWITTER while they were rampaging, as follows:
2:38 p.m. Trump tweets again, calling for support of the Capitol Police and law enforcement.
He urges people to “stay peaceful.”
end quotes
But again, people, we are supposed to be emotional here, not rational, so back to Lizzie and her EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY we go, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: As you will see, these are just two of the numerous examples of Trump supporters and allies urging the president to tell his supporters to leave, the Capitol.
It would not have been hard for the president to simply walk down to the briefing room a few feet down the hall from the Oval Office, as Norah O’Donnell noted during an interview with House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy, where Leader McCarthy said he believed the attack was un-American.
[Begin videotape]
NORAH O’DONNELL: I want to quickly bring in Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader.
Leader McCarthy, do you condemn this violence?
KEVIN MCCARTHY: I completely condemn the violence in the Capitol.
What we’re currently watching unfold is un-American.
I am — I’m disappointed.
I’m sad.
This is not what our country should look like.
This is not who we are.
This is not the First Amendment.
This has to stop and this has to stop now.
end quotes
And for the record, if we go to the Congressional Record – United States of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 117th CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 167, WASHINGTON, WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 6, 2021 No. 4, we find that this same Kevin McCarthy, the House minority leader, made a lengthy floor speech to that effect just after 9 p.m. when the vote count was beginning as follows:
Mr. MCCARTHY.
Madam Speaker, I rise for a point of personal privilege to address the House for 5 minutes.
The SPEAKER.
The gentleman from California is recognized for 5 minutes.
Mr. MCCARTHY.
Madam Speaker, I rise to address what happened in this Chamber today and where do we go from here.
The violence, destruction, and chaos we saw earlier was unacceptable, undemocratic, and un-American.
It was the saddest day I have ever had serving as a Member of this institution.
end quotes
Going back to the show on 28 June 2022, it continues as follows:
NORAH O’DONNELL: Leader McCarthy, the president of the United States has a briefing room steps from the Oval Office.
It is — the cameras are hot 24/7, as you know.
Why hasn’t he walked down and said that now?
KEVIN MCCARTHY: I — I conveyed to the president what I think is best to do, and I’m hopeful the president will do it.
[End videotape]
So now we are to believe that these several thousand rioters, while rioting, are also watching TV to see if Trump is going to say something to them while they are rioting, which premise is absolutely absurd, as is this whole proceeding, but it is SHOW BUSINESS, people, so it is not supposed to make sense, just stir emotions, and with that said, let’s go get mour emotions stirred some more, as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: Republican House member Mike Gallagher also implored the president to call off the attack.
[Begin videotape]
MIKE GALLAGHER: Mr. President, you have got to stop this.
You are the only person who can call this off.
Call it off.
The election is over.
Call it off.
This is bigger than you.
It’s bigger than any member of Congress.
It is about the United States of America, which is more important than any politician.
Call it off.
It’s over.
[End videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: Despite the fact that many people close to Donald Trump were urging him to send people home, he did not do so until later, much later.
At 4:17 PM, Donald Trump finally told the rioters to go home and that he loved them.
Here’s a portion of the video President Trump recorded from the White House.
[Begin videotape]
DONALD TRUMP: We have to have peace, so go home.
We love you.
You’re very special.
You’ve seen what happens.
You see the way others are treated that are so bad and so evil.
I know how you feel, but go home and go home in peace.
[End videotape]
And wow, people, with all of that before us, and our emotions stirred to the melting point, let’s once more pause for station identification and two-and-a-half uninterrupted hours of your favorite commercials, and once again, we will be back with more of this thrilling show, so again, don’t change that dial.
And as this so-called EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY in the 28 June episode of NANCY PELOSI’S WITCH HUNTERS PRESENT SCRIPTED POLITICAL BULL**** on PRIMETIME TV of STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson, whose bio says she was born c. 1996, as if she wasn’t truly certain what year she was born, but which would make her 25 years of age in 2021 if she was born in 1996, gets more and more bizarre, with Cassidy knowing the innermost thoughts of Donald Trump on 6 January 2021 because of a rare ability of Cassidy to be able to actually read, a valuable skill to possess in Washington, D.C., where knowledge is power, let’s once again trudge back to the transcript for this vivid example of Cassidy knowing all of what was going on in Trump’s head that day as the mob was rampaging at the capitol, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: But as we will show in even greater detail in future hearings, Donald Trump was reluctant to put this message out and he still could not bring himself to condemn the attack.
Ms. Hutchinson has told us that, too.
end quotes
People, if you need to know anything at all about what really took place on the inside of Trump’s head on 6 January 2021, you need go no further than Cassidy Hutchinson for the answer on a minute by minute basis, as we clearly see in the following colloquy, to wit:
[Begin Videotape]
The one that he put out at 4:17?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I’m sure you’ve discussed it.
And just to elaborate if I hadn’t already, at that point I recall him being reluctant to film the video on the 6th.
I was not involved in any of the logistics or the planning for that video.
I just remember seeing the video go out and feeling a little shocked after it went out.
[End Videotape]
So, okay, people, there we have it, and sometime down the road, if your children or grandchildren ever ask you if you have ever heard real EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY in your lifetime, just point them to that, because there it is, right in plain sight, which takes us back for more DYNAMITE REVELATIONS from Cassidy about what the inside of Donald Trump’s head really looked like on 6 January 2021, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: On the evening of January 6th and the day after the President’s family and his senior staff and others tried to encourage the President to condemn the violence and commit to the peaceful transition of power.
At 3:31 p.m. on January 6th, Sean Hannity of Fox News texted Mark Meadows.
Mr. Hannity said quote, “Can he make a statement.”
“I saw the tweet.”
“Ask people to leave the [Capitol].”
Later that evening Mr. Hannity sent another text message to Mark Meadows.
This time he shared a link to a tweet.
That tweet reported that President Trump’s cabinet secretaries were considering invoking the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office.
As you can see on the screen, the 25th Amendment to the Constitution creates a process for the transition of power if a President is unfit or unable to serve.
The 25th Amendment has never been used to remove a President.
But the committee has learned that after the attack on the US Capitol this was being discussed by members of President Trump’s cabinet as a way of stripping the full power of the presidency from Donald Trump.
end quotes
And with this talk about members of Trump’s cabinet using the 25th Amendment on 6 January 2021 as a way of stripping the full power of the presidency from Trump, and Lizzie Cheney testifying that the 25th Amendment has never been used to remove a President, to clarify the record with respect to Trump and the 25th Amendment, we need to drop back in time to September 5, 2018, long before 6 January 2021, and a Marketwatch article titled “New York Times publishes anti-Trump op-ed from what it says is senior administration official” by Steve Goldstein, where we learn as follows concerning Trump and the 25th Amendment, to wit:
The New York Times on Wednesday took what it said was a “rare step” of publishing an anonymous opinion article from what the newspaper called “a senior official in the Trump administration.”
There’s no independent way of corroborating the article, short of a textual analysis that this author is incapable of producing.
But taken at its word, the op-ed is notable in a few ways.
The author says “we want the administration to succeed and think that many of its policies have already made America safer and more prosperous.”
“But we believe our first duty is to this country, and the president continues to act in a manner that is detrimental to the health of our republic.”
The author claims to be an appointee who is “working diligently from within to frustrate parts of his agenda and his worst inclinations.”
The author calls President Donald Trump “amoral” as well as “generally anti-trade and anti-democratic.”
“Meetings with him veer off topic and off the rails, he engages in repetitive rants, and his impulsiveness results in half-baked, ill-informed and occasionally reckless decisions that have to be walked back,” says the author, who counts him or herself as one of the “adults in the room.”
One revelation is that there were “early whispers” of invoking the 25th Amendment but that “no one wanted to precipitate a constitutional crisis.”
end quotes
So long before 6 January 2021, the 25th Amendment train with regard to Trump, according to this anonymous person who happens to be “one of the adults in the room,” was already rolling down the tracks which in turn brings us to a CBS News article titled “McCabe: Possible ‘inappropriate relationship’ between Trump, Russia prompted probe” by Emily Tillett on 17 February 2019, for more talk about the 25th Amendment as a means to remove Trump from office, to wit:
Former Acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe said the possibility of an “inappropriate relationship” between President Trump and the government of Russia prompted his decision to launch obstruction of justice and counterintelligence investigations into the president.
end quotes
McCabe, as we will recall, was fired in March 2018 by then-Attorney General Jeff Sessions after the Justice Department’s inspector general determined he had misled internal investigators about his involvement in a news media leak, which firing was the subject of a Politico article by Myah Ward on 10/14/2021 titled “‘I don’t feel free’: McCabe expects to remain Trump target after winning back pension,” where we have even more political drama and intrigue from the bowels of Washington, D.C., as follows:
McCabe sued in 2019, saying his firing was an effort by Trump to purge the FBI of officials he saw as disloyal.
McCabe became acting director of the FBI after Trump fired James Comey, who was leading an investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
McCabe has repeatedly denied deception.
He has not faced criminal charges and has said his firing was politically motivated.
In an interview with CNN Thursday night, he again said “never at any time did I mislead anyone.”
“This was clearly an act of vindication against a perceived political enemy,” McCabe said, adding that the current DOJ is “standing up for fairness and standing up for the rule of law.”
“In the settlement agreement itself, they agree that members of the executive branch should not interfere in internal personnel matters because it creates the appearance of political influence,” he said.
McCabe didn’t mince his words when it came to talking about the toll the process has taken on his family.
“I can’t tell you what this has been like going through.”
“What this whole vindictive campaign has put my wife through.”
“My children.”
“My parents,” he said.
“I mean, to know that you essentially have a target on your back from the most powerful person in the world.”
“… It was like upside-down world.”
And McCabe doesn’t think he’s seen the end of it.
“I don’t feel free.”
“I don’t kid myself to think that the president is going to put aside his horrific judgment, his constant lying and his tormenting of me and my family,” he said.
“I’m sure this will just add another log to the fire.”
“He’ll probably be saying all kinds of things about it tomorrow.”
“But you know what?”
“I’m just to the point where I don’t care.”
“I don’t care what that guy has to say.”
end quotes
And talk about a drama queen, I would say Andy McCabe runs a close second to Cassidy Hutchinson, which takes us back to the CBS story and the 25th Amendment in 2019, to wit:
In a clip that aired on “Face the Nation” from McCabe’s “60 Minutes” interview, McCabe told correspondent Scott Pelley he launched the investigations shortly after speaking with Mr. Trump on details surrounding the dramatic 2017 firing of McCabe’s own boss, former FBI Director James Comey.
“It’s many of those same concerns that caused us to be concerned about a national security threat.”
“And the idea is, if the president committed obstruction of justice, fired the director of the FBI to negatively impact or to shut down our investigation of Russia’s malign activity and possibly in support of his campaign, as a counterintelligence investigator you have to ask yourself, ‘Why would a president of the United States do that?'” McCabe said.
He added, “So all those same sorts of facts cause us to wonder, is there an inappropriate relationship, a connection between this president and our most fearsome enemy, the government of Russia?”
In the interview, which will air on “60 Minutes” on Sunday, McCabe told Pelley he briefly discussed the 25th Amendment with then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein.
McCabe said Rosenstein “raised the issue and discussed it with me in the context of thinking about how many other cabinet officials might support such an effort.”
McCabe’s spokesperson, Melissa Schwartz, said in a statement to CBS News’ Paula Reid on Friday that “at no time did Mr. McCabe participate in any extended discussions about the use of the 25th Amendment, nor is he aware of any such discussions.”
end quotes
HUH?
McCabe tells the world on “60 Minutes” that he briefly discussed the 25th Amendment with then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, and then McCabe’s spokesperson, Melissa Schwartz, tells CBS News’ Paula Reid that “at no time did Mr. McCabe participate in any extended discussions about the use of the 25th Amendment, nor is he aware of any such discussions?”
Uh, okay, people, and if you are confused by that, just consider that we are not talking about the rational world here, we are talking about Washington. D.C., where we should not expect anything that emanates from down there in what used to be a perfectly good and productive swamp before Washington. D.C. came along and ruined it, to make a lick of sense, because it doesn’t, and that takes us to an Associated Press article titled “Ex-FBI official: ‘Crime may have been committed’ by Trump” by Eric Tucker on 18 February 2019, for more 25th Amendment talk, to wit:
WASHINGTON — Former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe said in an interview that aired Sunday that a “crime may have been committed” when President Donald Trump fired the head of the FBI and tried to publicly undermine an investigation into his campaign’s ties to Russia.
McCabe also said in the interview with “60 Minutes” that the FBI had good reason to open a counterintelligence investigation into whether Trump was in league with Russia, and therefore a possible national security threat, following the May 2017 firing of then-FBI Director James Comey.
Asked whether Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein was onboard with the obstruction and counterintelligence investigations, McCabe replied, “Absolutely.”
In the interview Sunday, McCabe also said Rosenstein in the days after Comey’s firing had proposed wearing a wire to secretly record the president.
McCabe said he took the remark seriously, though the Justice Department last September — responding last September to a New York Times report that first revealed the conversation — issued a statement from an unnamed official who was in the room and interpreted the remark as sarcastic.
McCabe said the remark was made during a conversation about why Trump had fired Comey.
“And in the context of that conversation, the deputy attorney general offered to wear a wire into the White House.”
“He said, ‘I never get searched when I go into the White House.'”
“‘I could easily wear a recording device.'”
“‘They wouldn’t know it was there,'” McCabe said.
In excerpts released last week by CBS News, McCabe also described a conversation in which Rosenstein had broached the idea of invoking the Constitution’s 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office.
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, a Massachusetts Democrat who is seeking her party’s nomination for president, told reporters after a campaign event Sunday in Las Vegas that if the people around Trump believe he cannot fulfill the obligations of his office, then they have a duty to invoke the 25th Amendment.
A favorite target of Trump’s ire, Warren said she has no special knowledge on whether there are grounds to remove Trump from office but said that “there are a whole lot of people who do see him every day who evidently were talking about invoking the 25th Amendment.”
end quotes
And from there we go to a NBC News story titled “McCabe says he told Congress ‘Gang of 8’ leaders about FBI probe into Trump, and they had no objection” by Allan Smith on 19 February 2019, where more 25th Amendment talk will surface, as follows:
Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe told NBC’s “Today” show on Tuesday that he briefed congressional leaders about the counterintelligence investigation he had opened into President Donald Trump and that “no one objected.”
“That’s the important part here,” McCabe told Savannah Guthrie, who had asked if he had informed the “Gang of 8” bipartisan group of leaders on the Hill.
“No one objected.”
“Not on legal grounds, not on constitutional grounds and not based on the facts.”
The purpose of the briefing in 2017 was to let the congressional leadership, including Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, then-House Speaker Paul Ryan and their Democratic counterparts, know what the FBI was doing in the probe into Russian election interference and possible collusion by the Trump campaign, McCabe said.
“Opening a case of this nature (is) not something that an FBI director, not something that an acting FBI director would do by yourself, right?” McCabe said on “Today.”
“This was a recommendation that came to me from my team.”
“I reviewed it with our lawyers.”
“I discussed it at length with the deputy attorney general, and I told Congress what we had done.”
In that CBS interview, which aired in full on Sunday, McCabe said he ordered obstruction of justice and counterintelligence investigations into Trump after he fired Comey and said Rosenstein had discussed the possibility of removing Trump through the 25th Amendment in addition to wearing a wire during a future conversation with the president.
In a statement Thursday, the Justice Department disputed McCabe’s assertions in the interview, calling his recollections “inaccurate and factually incorrect.”
McCabe disputed the DOJ pushback in his Tuesday interview with NBC.
end quotes
Isn’t Washington, D.C. so fun, people?
And that takes us to a CNN article titled “McCabe: ‘I think it’s possible’ Trump is a Russian asset” by Kate Sullivan and Laura Jarrett on February 20, 2019, where the full court press to remove Trump from office continued, as follows:
(CNN) — Former acting FBI Director Andrew McCabe said Tuesday it is possible President Donald Trump is a Russian asset.
“Do you still believe the President could be a Russian asset?” asked CNN’s Anderson Cooper during an interview with McCabe on “Anderson Cooper 360.”
“I think it’s possible.:
“I think that’s why we started our investigation, and I’m really anxious to see where (special counsel Robert) Mueller concludes that,” McCabe said.
McCabe is promoting his new book, “The Threat,” which paints a stark portrait of his time at the bureau under Trump, describing in vivid detail his version of interactions with top officials at the White House and Justice Department.
The book was released Tuesday and became an instant best-seller.
The former acting FBI director went on the record in that “60 Minutes” interview confirming some previous reports about Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein: That he raised the idea of wiring himself to surreptitiously record interactions with the President, and mused about which Cabinet officials might support an effort to invoke the 25th Amendment to oust Trump from office.
Rosenstein has previously said that comment was mischaracterized.
end quotes
And back on February 8, 2018, WAMC had an article titled “‘The Unmaking Of The President 2016’ by Lanny Davis,” a very famous high-powered Democrat lawyer, by Joe Donahue, where Lanny puts in his two cents about the 25th Amendment, to wit:
Lanny J. Davis is a lawyer who served as special counsel to President Bill Clinton and was a spokesperson for the president and the White House on matters concerning campaign finance and other legal issues.
In his new book, “The Unmaking Of The President 2016: How FBI Director James Comey Cost Hillary Clinton The Presidency,” Davis puts forth his case for Donald Trump’s impeachment by showing how the actions of the FBI and Director James Comey in the months leading up to the 2016 election interfered with a fair, uncorrupt election.
Lanny Davis says his abuse of power since becoming president justifies initiating a serious investigation to impeach him or remove him for mental impairment under the 25th Amendment.
end quotes
And that takes us to a New York Times article titled “Trump and Pelosi Trade Barbs, Both Questioning the Other’s Fitness” by Glenn Thrush and Michael Tackett on 24 May 2019, where talk of the 25th Amendment will again surface, as follows:
WASHINGTON — The war of words between President Trump and Speaker Nancy Pelosi escalated in dramatic fashion on Thursday, with each leader questioning the other’s temperament and mental fitness in an extraordinary exchange of personal insults.
The president, who has largely avoided direct personal attacks on the speaker, finally gave her a derogatory nickname — calling her “Crazy Nancy,” after Ms. Pelosi had suggested Mr. Trump’s behavior was so erratic it required an “intervention” from his family and staff.
Ms. Pelosi set out Thursday morning to pick a fight with Mr. Trump, three people close to her said, part of a strategy to unnerve a president who has defied the efforts of House Democrats to subpoena documents and summon witnesses to testify about his conduct.
But her decision to dramatize the fight also represented an embrace of Mr. Trump’s own signature political tactic: an attempt to divert attention from a divisive internal debate — in this case a drive by two dozen of her caucus members to push ahead with impeachment — with a headline-grabbing attack, in hopes of uniting her own political base.
For her part, Ms. Pelosi was intent on playing a two-pronged game: bashing Mr. Trump publicly while toiling in the Capitol to dissuade House Democrats from impeaching him.
Ms. Pelosi said on Thursday that House Democrats were “not on a path to impeachment,” even as she accused Mr. Trump of trying to whip her caucus into a distracting political battle by stonewalling congressional oversight.
Buoyed by two recent victories in court over the White House, Ms. Pelosi suggested that Mr. Trump was too unstable to govern.
The president’s theatrical scrapping of Wednesday’s infrastructure meeting at the White House raised questions about his temperament and behavior, she said.
Mr. Trump had “another temper tantrum,” she told reporters at her weekly news conference at the Capitol.
“Again, I pray for the president of the United States.”
“I wish that his family or his administration or his staff would have an intervention for the good of the country.”
On Wednesday, during a caucus meeting, she faced down calls from about 25 House Democrats who wanted her to move immediately on impeachment.
Earlier Thursday, during a closed-door session with her caucus, Ms. Pelosi made the case more explicitly, arguing that the president hoped to provoke impeachment in order to achieve public exoneration by the Republican-controlled Senate, which acts as the final arbiter on impeachment hearings.
For the moment, Ms. Pelosi seems to have stopped a mass defection of Democrats to the pro-impeachment cause.
But to do so, allies said, she must avoid the appearance that she is being soft on Mr. Trump.
That appears to mean amplifying her criticism of him, and giving public voice to opinions about the president that she has kept private until now.
On Thursday, she jokingly referenced the Constitution’s 25th Amendment, which allows for a president to be removed from office if it is determined that he is “unable to discharge the duties of the office.”
“Article 25,” Ms. Pelosi said, “that’s a good idea.”
An aide later said she was referring to the 25th Amendment.
end quotes
And that brings us to 8 January 2021 and a Philadelphia Inquirer article titled “Biden slams Capitol mob as ‘domestic terrorists’; Trump acknowledges new administration day after inciting riot and as calls grow for his removal” where the 25th Amendment is again discussed, to wit:
Members of Congress from the Philadelphia region joined a growing Democratic chorus Thursday urging President Donald Trump’s cabinet and Vice President Mike Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment and remove Trump from power.
If that long-shot effort doesn’t gain traction, many of them said they would support impeaching Trump a second time before he leaves office on Jan. 20.
President-elect Joe Biden called the participants in the mob “domestic terrorists.”
“Don’t dare call them protesters,” Biden said.
“They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists.”
President-elect Joe Biden called the violent, Trump-inspired insurrectionists who broke into the Capitol on Wednesday, “domestic terrorists.”
“Don’t dare call them protesters,” Biden said on Thursday, before announcing his nominees for key positions in his Department of Justice, including Merrick Garland for Attorney General.
“They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists.”
Biden did not answer questions about calls for the 25th Amendment to be activated to remove Trump from office.
Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.) joined a growing chorus of Democrats Thursday urging members of the Trump administration to invoke the 25th Amendment remove the president from office.
”President Trump is a threat to our domestic and national security.”
“It is self-evident that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.”
“I call on Vice President [Mike] Pence to invoke the 25th Amendment and begin the process of removing the powers of the presidency from Donald Trump,” Casey said in a statement.
“This is the quickest way to protect our domestic and national security.”
Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.), Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D., Pa.), and Rep. Mike Doyle (D., Pa.) also joined the call, though any such action faces steep odds with just 13 days left in Trump’s term.
The amendment, which has never been invoked, allows for removing the president if the vice president and a majority of the cabinet votes that the president “is unable to discharge the powers and duties” of the office.
In that event, Pence would become president.
Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D., N.Y.) has called for President Donald Trump to be immediately removed from office, calling Wednesday’s riot at the Capitol “an insurrection against the United States.”
“The quickest and most effective way — it can be done today — to remove this president from office would be for the vice president to immediately invoke the 25th amendment,” Schumer said in a statement.
“If the vice president and cabinet refuse to stand up Congress should reconvene to impeach the president.”
Schumer’s call to remove Trump garnered support from at least one Republican: Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R., Ill.), who called Trump “unfit” and “unwell” in remarks shared on Twitter Thursday morning.
end quotes
And with all of that to digest, let us again take a pause for station identification, and once again we will be back with more on the 25th Amendment, so stay tuned and don’t touch that dial.
And talk about the plotting of COUPS and INSURRECTIONS, people, and outright SEDITION a la the Catiline Conspiracy to take over Rome coupled with Brutus and Cassius and Dolabella conspiring with members of the Roman Senate to butcher Julius Caesar all joined together in a farcical, absurdist drama scripted by Mel Brooks as a sequel to “Blazing Saddles,” there we have it above here, not in my words, but as it was openly discussed in the MAIN-STREAM and LEGACY MEDIA, and thus, was never a secret, as Andy McCabe, the former acting FBI director, and Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein openly and brazenly plotted with the leaders of the so-called “Gang of 8 Conspiracy” in Washington, D.C., to subvert OUR government by having Trump’s cabinet ministers and Mike Pence invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Trump from office so Mike Pence could take over as president, instead, and this goes back to 2016 and thus is anything new today, nor was it anything new on 6 January 2021, and in fact, it is my belief that it was the open plotting of this coup in the media by Andy McCabe, who told NBC’s “Today” show that he briefed congressional leaders and the “Gang of 8” bipartisan group of leaders on the Hill, who did not object to the COUP on legal grounds and nor on constitutional grounds, the LEADERS of the GANG OF EIGHT CONSPIRATORS involved in the COUP PLOTTING with Andy McCabe included Nancy Pelosi, of course, and Charley “Chuck” Schumer, and Addison “Mitch” McConnell, and Paul Ryan, and they brought into the COUP PLOTTING Pence, of course, who was to be the beneficiary of the COUP, along with Joe Biden, Lizzie Warren, and Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R., Ill.), who called Trump “unfit” and “unwell” in remarks on Twitter, and who is now a PELOSI WITCH HUNTER, and Sen. Cory Booker (D., N.J.), Rep. Chrissy Houlahan (D., Pa.), and Rep. Mike Doyle (D., Pa.), and Sen. Bob Casey (D., Pa.), that caused the outpouring of anger towards the capitol that resulted in the riots on 6 Janu7ary 2021, just as the assassination of Caesar by the plotters resulted in riots in Rome.
For at least two years before the 2020 election, including Hillary Clinton denouncing American citizens as a “BASKET OF DEPLORABLES” if they did not cleave to her standard, and Joe Biden calling American citizens “DREGS OF SOCIETY” if they didn’t cleave to his standard, these COUP PLOTTERS were making it patently clear to the AMERICAN PEOPLE that they were doing everything in their power to remove Trump from office, including and starting with HEAPING DIRT on him to influence the 2020 election against him, which purpose they clearly accomplished.
And now, to help finish the task we are beijnhg presented this SCRIPTED FALSE NARRATIVE which is rewriti8ng history as it happened, which is to say, making Trump the coup plotter, instead, which is VERY SLICK POLITICS when you think about it.
And given the Cape Charles Mirror, unlike the MAIN-STREAM and LEGACY MEDIA is aware of history, and further aware that nothing happens in a vacuum, especially in Washington, D.C. today, which so resembles Rome just before its civil war caused by the death of Caesar that we should take a moment to study that event for similarities as to what is going on today in America as these WITCH HUNTERS seek to INCITE A LYNCH MOB to go after Trump the way the Roman senators went after Caesar to butcher him with their daggers back then, where today, the daggers are the MAIN-STREAM and LEGACY MEDIA.
Going back to Rome just before its civil war, the conspiracy to assassinate Julius Caesar began with a meeting between Cassius Longinus and his brother-in-law Marcus Brutus in the evening of 22 February 44 BC, when after some discussion the two agreed that something had to be done to prevent Caesar from becoming king of the Romans, regarding Mark Antony offering a Caesar a crown on the Feast of the Lupercale.
The two men then began to recruit others, just as McCabe and the GANG OF EIGHT CONSPIRATORS recruited others, and in the case of Caesar, while it took only one man to murder another, Brutus believed that for the assassination of Caesar to be considered a legitimate removal of a tyrant, done for the sake of their country, it must include a large number of Rome’s leading men, and that is the same rationale being employed here today with the on-going WITCH HUNTER HEARINGS on PRIMETIME TV.
As is the case today with the GANG OF EIGHT CONSPIRATORS, the conspirators to kill Caesar attempted to strike a balance, aiming to recruit enough men to surround Caesar and fight his supporters, but not so many that they would risk being discovered, although these conspirators today didn’t have to worry about being discovered, because they were always out in the open with the MAIN-STREAM and LEGACY MEDIA cheering them on and supporting them, except for the Cape Charles Mirror alone which saw through this cheap political horse**** from DAY ONE, it has been so obvious.
Like the GANG OF EIGHT CONSPIRATORS today, the conspirators to kill Caesar preferred friends to acquaintances and recruited neither reckless youths nor feeble elders, in the end, recruiting senators near the age of forty, as were they, and ancient sources report that in the end, around sixty to eighty conspirators joined the plot, with notable conspirators including Pacuvius Labeo, who answered affirmatively on 2 March when Brutus asked him whether it was wise for a man to put himself into danger if it meant overcoming evil or foolish men; Decimus Brutus, who joined on 7 March after being approached by Labeo and Cassius; Gaius Trebonius, Tillius Cimber, Minucius Basilus, and the brothers Casca (Publius and another whose name is unknown), all men from Caesar’s own ranks; and Pontius Aquila, who had been personally humiliated by Caesar, and according to Nicolaus of Damascus, the conspirators included Caesar’s soldiers, officers, and civilian associates, and while some joined the conspiracy due to concerns over Caesar’s authoritarianism, many had self-interested motives such as jealousy: feeling that Caesar had not rewarded them enough or that he had given too much money towards Pompey’s former supporters.
So, how is this CONSPIRACY in Washington today to kill off Trump, at least politically, if not figuratively as was the case with McKinley, which conspiracy was openly reported on in the MAIN-STREAM and LEGACY MEDIA beginning back in 2018 any different from the conspiracy to kill Caesar?
Answer: IT’S NOT!
But don’t go away and change that dial, because there is more of this PURE POLITICAL HORSE**** intended to inflame passions and emotions in order to influence the up-coming mid-terms in favor of the Democrats, so stay tuned.
What we are seeing above here, people, with this WITCH HUNTER HEARING on PRIMETIME TV on 28 June, 2022, as this transcript of the EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of STAR WITNESS and WITCH HUNTER Lizzie Cheney on 28 June 2022 continues to flow forth in here, word for word for word, line by line, as it happened in Lizzie Cheney’s OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT that I quote from, thanks to the Cape Charles Mirror, and keeping well in mind that Lizzie is a candidate for president in 2024, and Trump is her sworn political enemy, and what this clearly is, is a slick scripted replay starring Lizzie Cheney as a modern-day Cicero of “Pro Tito Annio Milone ad iudicem oratio,” the speech made by Marcus Tullius Cicero in 52 BC on behalf of his friend Titus Annius Milo, who was accused of murdering his political enemy Publius Clodius Pulcher on the Via Appia.
Of interest in that case is the fact that throughout the duration of his speech, Cicero does not even attempt to convince the judges that Milo did not kill Clodius.
Cicero claims that the killing of Clodius was lawful and in self-defense.
Cicero even goes as far as to suggest that the death of Clodius was in the best interests of the republic, as the tribune was a popularis leader of the restless plebeian mobs who had plagued the political scene of the late Roman Republic.
end quotes
And that is exactly what Lizzie Cheney is doing not only in this 28 June 2022 WITCH HUNTERS HEARING TRANSCRIPT we are quoting from, but more recently and more importantly, in a CNN article with the inflammatory title of “Cheney says DOJ not prosecuting Trump if there’s evidence could call into question the US as ‘nation of laws'” by Eric Bradner on 4 August 2022, which article cites an interview Lizzie had with CNN’s Kasie Hunt, where presidential candidate Cheney, also the GOP vice chair of the House select committee investigating the events surrounding the January 6, 2021, insurrection, even though there was NO INSURRECTION, said Trump is “guilty of the most serious dereliction of duty of any president in our nation’s history” and pointed to a judge who’s said he likely committed crimes, to wit:
SHE IS DOING A SUMMATION AS TO WHY, FOR THE SAKE OF OUR FRAGILE AND SACRED DEMOCRACY, IT IS NECESSARY TO TAKE TRUMP OFF THE BOARD, PERMANENTLY, BY ANY MEANS, like Cicero having the Catiline Conspirators murdered in the night with no due process of Roman law, for the good of the “state,” as we see by going back to that CNN article, as follows:
“We’re in a situation where former President Trump has betrayed the patriotism of millions and millions of people across our country, and many people here in Wyoming, and he’s lied to them,” she said.
“And what I know to do is to tell the truth, and to make sure that people understand the truth about what happened and why it matters so much.”
Asked why she thinks voters believe Trump, Cheney added: “It’s just consistent lying about what happened about the election, playing on people’s patriotism.”
“And he’s so dangerous that, you know, my view is that at the end of the day, if defending the Constitution against the threat that he poses means losing a House seat, then that’s a sacrifice that I’m willing to make.”
“I don’t intend to lose.”
“But some things are more important than any individual office or political campaign.”
Cheney would not discuss her political plans after this month’s primary.
But she said she will do “whatever is necessary” to keep Trump from becoming the GOP presidential nominee for a third consecutive election in 2024.
She said she intends to be “a big part of making sure that we protect the nation” from Trump, whether she wins reelection or not.
end quotes
Lizzie has top-notch screen writers working for her who are well experienced in writing scripts for soap opera dramas for television audiences, writing her lines, above here, which takes us from Lizzie’s excoriation (censure or criticize severely) of Trump courtesy of CNN, back to Cicero defending Milo, to wit:
Clodius is made out repeatedly in the Pro Milone to be a malevolent, invidious, effeminate character who craves power and organises the ambush on Milo.
Cicero gives Clodius a motive for setting a trap: the realisation that Milo would easily secure the consulship and so stand in the way of Clodius’ scheme to attain greater power and influence as a praetor.
Fortunately, there was plentiful material for Cicero to build that profile, such as the Bona Dea incident in 62 BC; involving Clodius stealing into the abode of the Pontifex Maximus of the time, Julius Caesar, during the ritual festival of the Bona Dea to which only women were allowed.
It is said that he dressed up as a woman to gain access and pursue an illicit affair with Pompeia, the wife of Caesar.
Clodius was taken to the law courts for this act of great impiety but escaped the punishment of death by bribing the judges, most of whom had been poor, according to Cicero, who was the prosecutor during the case.
Earlier in his career, Lucullus had accused Clodius of committing incest with his sister Claudia and then Lucullus’s wife; this allegation is mentioned several times to blacken Clodius’ reputation.
Milo, on the other hand, is perpetually depicted as a “saviour of Rome” by his virtuous actions and political career up until then.
end quotes
And such is Lizzie Cheney treating Trump in the 4 August 2022 CNN article where she and the WITCH HUNTERS and Cassidy Hutchinson are depicted as “SAVIORS OF OUR SACRED DEMOCRACY, while Trump is made out repeatedly in the “Pro Milone Revisited” of Lizzie Cheney on 28 June 2022 to be a malevolent, invidious, effeminate character with small hands who throws dishes at the wall of the presidential dining room and throws tantrums where he pulls all the dishes off the table by yanking on the tablecloth, which makes extra work for Cassidy Hutchinson, who has to clean the mess up, and who craves power and organized the ambush on Joe Biden and Mike Pence on 6 January 2021, in what is being called an insurrection, even though it wasn’t.
And here is where Catiline Revisited enters into the picture with regard to Lizzie Cheney taking Trump off the board by any means possible, justifying her actions in that regard by relying on a Hearst Journal editorial which declared, “If bad institutions and bad men can be got rid of only by killing, the killing must be done,” which justification arguably goes back to the trial of Milo and the early part of the refutation by Cicero of the opposition’s arguments (refutatio), wherein is contained the first known exposition of the phrase “silent enim leges inter arma” (“in times of war, the laws fall silent”), which since has been rephrased as “inter arma enim silent leges,” and was most recently used by the American media in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of 11 September 2001, and today, it is being used again to justify the removal of Trump from American politics by any means necessary.
So not only was the phrase integral to Cicero’s argument in defense of Milo, it is also integral to Lizzie Cheney’s efforts using these WITCH HUNTERS HEARINGS to remove her political enemy Trump from the board, permanently, precisely because “in times of war,” and let’s face it, we are in a time of political war right now leading us closer and closer to civil war, the laws fall silent, which is what this thread is all about, documenting that as it happens.
And let me make an important point here as we inch our way towards November of 2022, and the up-coming mid-terms where the Democrat grip on our national government is threatened, and that is this, to wit:
Support of Constitutional Due Process of Law for Donald Trump, as odious (extremely unpleasant; repulsive) a person as he might be, which like beauty is always in the eye of the beholder, IS NOT the same as support for Donald Trump.
Support of Constitutional due process of law for Donald Trump is support for RULE OF LAW, as opposed to RULE OF THE LYNCH MOB Lizzie Cheney, a presidential aspirant herself in 2024, the WITCH HUNTERS and their enabler in the MAIN-STREAM and LEGACY MEDIA are trying to incite with these TELEVISED WITCH HUNTER hearings on PRIMETIME TV, along with inflammatory press releases by WITCH HUNTERS like Lizzie Cheney, to promote their own toxic political agenda, which takes us back to that CNN article with the inflammatory title of “Cheney says DOJ not prosecuting Trump if there’s evidence could call into question the US as ‘nation of laws'” by Eric Bradner on 4 August 2022, and in turn raises this important question, to wit:
IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OF WHAT DOES DUE PROCESS OF LAW CONSIST OF?
And for that answer, let’s go to the Cornell Law School Legal Information Institute, where we have as follows on that subject, to wit:
Procedural due process refers to the constitutional requirement that when the federal government acts in such a way that denies a citizen of a life, liberty, or property interest, the person must be given notice, the opportunity to be heard, and a decision by a neutral decision-maker.
Procedural due process is one of two of the components of due process, with the other being substantive due process.
Due Process Clause
In the U.S. Constitution, the phrase “due process” appears twice: in the Fifth Amendment and in the Fourteenth Amendment.
Both Amendments guarantee due process when someone is denied “life, liberty, or property.”
A list of procedures that due process requires, at least in theory, because as we are seeing with these WITCH HUNTER HEARINGS and the history of COUP PLOTTING by Trump’s many enemies in Washington. D.C. in the years prior to 6 January 2021, when politics are involved, legal theory and RULE OF LAW and CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS all go out the window, includes as follows:
* An unbiased tribunal.
* Notice of the proposed action and the grounds asserted for it.
* Opportunity to present reasons why the proposed action should not be taken.
* The right to present evidence, including the right to call witnesses.
* The right to know opposing evidence.
* The right to cross-examine adverse witnesses.
* A decision based exclusively on the evidence presented.
* Opportunity to be represented by counsel.
* Requirement that the tribunal prepare a record of the evidence presented.
* Requirement that the tribunal prepare written findings of fact and reasons for its decision.
end quotes
And from the CNN article with the inflammatory title of “Cheney says DOJ not prosecuting Trump if there’s evidence could call into question the US as ‘nation of laws'” by Eric Bradner on 4 August 2022, and all of what has preceded in this thread, the very first thing we see Trump being deprived of by Lizzie Cheney and the WITCH HUNTERS is the “unbiased tribunal,” because we have heard Lizzie say it with her own mouth in the CNN article quoted above that Trump is guilty plain and simple and it is now time for Joe Biden’s attorney general Merrick Garland to put the noose around Trump’s neck and hang him high, because Lizzie knows he is guilty, which takes us to the indisputable fact that it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNLAWFUL for the house of representatives and Lizzie Cheney and the WITCH HUNTERS to usurp the duties of a grand jury and arrogate unto themselves that power, it being known as ATTAINDER in violation Article I, Section 9, Clause 3, “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed,” so when Lizzie makes it clear in the 4 August 2022 CNN article that the WITCH HUNTERS COMMITTEE is indeed acting just like any Grand Jury in our legal system,” what that clearly tells us is that Lizzie condones UNCONSTITUTIONAL ACTS by these WITCH HUNTERS, and with that said, let us close this out with a teaching moment, as follows:
“Bills of attainder . . . are such special acts of the legislature, as inflict capital punishments upon persons supposed to be guilty of high offences, such as treason and felony, without any conviction in the ordinary course of judicial proceedings.”
“If an act inflicts a milder degree of punishment than death, it is called a bill of pains and penalties.”
“In such cases, the legislature assumes judicial magistracy, pronouncing upon the guilt of the party without any of the common forms and guards of trial, and satisfying itself with proofs, when such proofs are within its reach, whether they are conformable to the rules of evidence, or not.”
“In short, in all such cases, the legislature exercises the highest power of sovereignty, and what may be properly deemed an irresponsible despotic discretion, being governed solely by what it deems political necessity or expediency, and too often under the influence of unreasonable fears, or unfounded suspicions.”
The phrase “bill of attainder,” as used in this clause and in clause 1 of § 10, applies to bills of pains and penalties as well as to the traditional bills of attainder.
The prohibition embodied in this clause is not to be narrowly construed in the context of traditional forms but is to be interpreted in accordance with the designs of the framers so as to preclude trial by legislature, which would violate the separation of powers.
The clause thus prohibits all legislative acts, “no matter what their form, that apply either to named individuals or to easily ascertainable members of a group in such a way as to inflict punishment on them without a judicial trial.”
end quotes
And with that in the record, let’s take a pause for station identification so you can get to the fridge for some munchies and get comfortably settled again, at which time we will be back with more of the show coming to us live from Washington, D.C., the famous “Ten Miles Square” which is the seat of Joe Biden’s government, and the place of residence for Joe and the great officers of state including Nancy Pelosi and Charley “Chuck” Schumer and Lizzie Cheney, where the court of Joe Biden, who possesses the powers of a monarch, is observed of that of a monarch — ambition with idleness — baseness with pride — the thirst of riches without labour — aversion to truth — flattery — treason — perfidy — violation of engagements — contempt of civil duties — hope from the magistrate’s weakness; but above all, the perpetual ridicule of virtue.
So please, stay tuned!
And before we go back to the transcript, where WITCH HUNTER and presidential aspirant Lizzie Cheney is giving EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY on PRIMETIME TV on 28 June 2022 about Trump and the 25th Amendment, to see this ATTAINDER TRAIN the WITCH HUNTERS are riding on with Lizzie Cheney as their Casey Jones as they stir up a LYNCH MOB MENTALITY with respect to Trump, as well as to see the grip STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson now has on our collective futures, we need to go to an article in The Guardian, a Brit publication, titled “Time is running out. The Department of Justice must indict and convict Trump” by Laurence H Tribe on 4 August 2022, wherein Larry, who teaches law, you know, at Harvard, I think it is, argues eloquently that Trump is a special case who does not deserve due process of law, as follows:
The attorney general, Merrick Garland, knows that the fish always rots from the head.
On 26 July, the Washington Post broke news that the justice department’s investigation is focused on Donald Trump himself.
Time is of the essence in bringing his case to indictment.
Indeed, a moving target who gives every indication that he plans to strike again must trigger a different cost-benefit calculus in the inevitable debates both within and outside the justice department about when enough proof has been gathered to indict responsibly – and when it would be a dereliction of duty to delay further.
end quotes
And what Larry is doing there is channeling Nancy Pelosi as quoted in a Politico article titled “Pelosi vetoes Banks, Jordan for Jan. 6 select committee” by Olivia Beavers, Heather Caygle and Nicholas Wu, as follows:
“The unprecedented nature of January 6th demands this unprecedented decision.”
end quote
As Lizzie Cheney clearly stated in that CNN article with the inflammatory title of “Cheney says DOJ not prosecuting Trump if there’s evidence could call into question the US as ‘nation of laws’” by Eric Bradner on 4 August 2022, “And he’s (Trump) so dangerous that, you know, my view is that at the end of the day, if defending the Constitution against the threat that he poses means losing a House seat, then that’s a sacrifice that I’m willing to make,” which makes it patently clear that trump is not entitled to due process of law and should be made a special case, as Larry Tribe is so eloquently arguing to the Brits in The Guardian.
And credit where credit is due, when it comes to trying to knock Trump, a popularis leader of the restless plebeian mobs who plagued the political scene of Washington. D.C., out of the saddle as a political threat to the Democrats, Larry Tribe is no Johnny-Come-Lately to the game.
Far to the contrary, we first come across the name of Larry Tribe in an NBC News article tiled “Democrats’ investigative dreams to meet cold, hard congressional reality – Democrats conducting presidential oversight will soon have legal authority to demand answers from the Trump administration. That doesn’t mean they’ll get them” by Rebecca Shabad on Nov. 12, 2018, where we learned as follows about the political war the Democrats intended to wage against Trump, wasting our tax dollars in the process, to wit:
WASHINGTON — When Democrats take control of the House next year, they will find themselves with new powers to investigate and embarrass the Trump administration.
SUBPOENA POWER
Democrats will also have the subpoena power in their arsenal — and, based on their efforts in this congressional term, they’re itching to use it.
During Trump’s presidency so far, congressional Republicans have blocked more than 52 subpoena requests by Democrats on the House Oversight Committee, including requests for documents related to everything from alleged housing abuses by the company run by presidential son-in-law and adviser Jared Kushner’s family to the Justice Department’s refusal to defend Obamacare in court.
But just because they can now issue subpoenas doesn’t mean they will necessarily issue as many as some voters may expect — or that they can count on getting the information they’re looking for anytime soon.
“Subpoena power is interesting,” Pelosi said at a recent CNN event.
“To use it, or not to use it?”
“It’s a great arrow to have in your quiver in terms of negotiating on other subjects.”
“But getting back to what we will do, what we will do is exercise oversight, which is the responsibility of the Congress of the United States, exercise oversight over the agencies of government, which this administration has completely walked away from.”
Laurence Tribe, constitutional law professor at Harvard, cautioned this week that the subpoena power wasn’t a magical one.
“Hate to say it, but counting on a Democratic House’s subpoenas to unlock all the secrets of this corrupt administration could prove naïve,” he tweeted.
“A Trumpified judiciary, expanded further with the Senate’s acquiescence, might let the Trumpsters stonewall.”
“So democracy remains endangered.”
end quotes
So to his credit, Larry Tribe’s visceral hatred of Trump is not anything new, which means Larry is not jumping on the ATTAINDER TRAIN now just to get some cheap publicity, which takes us to THE CAPE CHARLES MIRROR December 6, 2018 at 8:31 pm (Opinion: Making it Up as they Go
NOVEMBER 11, 2018 http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/opinion-making-it-up-as-they-go/#comment-103077 ) where we have more Larry Tribe, as follows:
“My view, which represents the decisive majority opinion, is that President Trump can be impeached for conduct before he took office if there is an exceptionally close connection between that conduct and his acquisition of the office,” Joshua Matz, an author of To End a Presidency: The Power of Impeachment, told the Washington Examiner.
end quotes
The “decisive majority opinion?”
Of what?
His bowling buddies?
And who exactly is this Joshua Matz, besides an author of a To End a Presidency: The Power of Impeachment?
And actually, for the sake of veracity all around, I checked out the book on Amazon and it was really written by Laurence Tribe, with Matz as a co-author, and the review of the book is quite informative, as follows, starting with this very line, to wit:.
The definitive book on presidential impeachment and how it should be used today.
end quotes
So we can safely say that Larry Tribe has been one of the conspirators to remove Trump as a political opponent by any and every means possible for many years so, so that his editorial in The Guardian calling for a different standard of justice is just what we would expect to hear from Larry, which takes us back to The Guardian, as follows:
The former president’s insistence that he has nothing to be remorseful about (other than not marching to the Capitol) makes that debate seem academic.
And the steps being taken at his behest even now in battleground states to replace 2020’s failure with 2024’s success redouble the urgency.
Shakespeare’s Brutus had it right when he said, in Julius Caesar: “We must take the current when it serves, or lose our ventures.”
end quotes
And how apt it was there for Larry to quote from Brutus, one of the conspirators who murdered Julius Caesar by butchering him with a dagger.
Afterall, as a Hearst Journal editorial once declared, “If bad institutions and bad men can be got rid of only by killing, the killing must be done,” and “in times of war, the laws fall silent,” which takes us back to Larry tribe in The Guardian, to wit:
In these circumstances, prudence counsels running the clock backwards to set clear benchmarks for moving forward.
Any calculation of how to proceed must start with two pessimistic premises.
First, that Trump will run in 2024 and could win.
Second, that if any of the likely Republican nominees wins, the next administration will be one that is eager to scrap any prosecution of the last.
Hence, the goal must be to secure a conviction before November 2024, and in any event, no later than 20 January 2025, when the next presidential term begins.
end quotes
Political expediency governs here, people!
Trump isn’t really human, he is more of an animal, so he should not get the same equal protection a real human being would be entitled to, especially sine Trump could beat Joe Biden or any other Democrat in 2024, which is why Trump needs to be taken off the board today, period, which takes us back to Larry Tribe in The Guardian, to wit:
If Trump is not formally charged until January 2023, that would imply a multi-month trial starting in September or October.
Should he run for president and win in November, we would have a president-elect in the middle of a criminal trial.
Part of why a lengthy post-indictment/pre-verdict period is foreseeable is that federal district courts are bound to protect an accused’s rights to full airing of pre-trial claims and the time needed to file and argue them.
Trump will have many pre-trial claims, setting out his serial and inexhaustible list of grievances, the imagined violation of his rights, his purported immunity from prosecution as a former president and the overriding unfairness of it all.
Some district court judges more than others will balance protections for the accused with accountability’s pragmatic need for speed.
Importantly, even the four Trump-appointed district court judges in DC have often shown little sympathy for those charged with perpetrating the events of January 6 or resisting their investigation.
The point is that if Trump were to be indicted, the Department of Justice cannot count on a favorable judge putting it on a jet stream to an actual trial.
So what does that mean for precisely when Trump must be formally indicted?
Thankfully, it doesn’t imply the impossible.
The Department of Justice could pull an experienced prosecutor or two from every US attorney’s office and put them together on the case.
With all stops pulled, prosecutors still have time to do what is needed before year end.
The tasks include talking to key witnesses that the January 6 House committee interviewed and deposed, which is well under way.
Cassidy Hutchinson, principal aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadow, and Vice-President Mike Pence’s top aides, Marc Short and Greg Jacobs, are now working with the Department of Justice or appearing before its grand jury.
Cooperation is already reported to have begun among the lawyer-enablers of Trump’s coup plotting.
With the investigation’s accelerating aim at Trump, every potential target’s defense counsel has surely discussed with the target the advantages of an early offer to plead guilty and cooperate.
Early birds get better worms.
The task ahead is massive, but if attacked with supreme urgency, it can get done.
The building blocks for a trial of Donald Trump must be put into place with alacrity.
In no case more than this one, the perfect cannot be the enemy of the good.
The clock is ticking.
end quotes
And there we have it, people!
Cassidy Hutchinson is not a person to get on the bad side of, as Trump is now finding out.
And when we return from station identification, it will be to find Lizzie Cheney and her STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson testifying as follows, so don’t touch that dial, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: On the evening of January 6th and the day after the President’s family and his senior staff and others tried to encourage the President to condemn the violence and commit to the peaceful transition of power.
At 3:31 p.m. on January 6th, Sean Hannity of Fox News texted Mark Meadows.
Mr. Hannity said quote, “Can he make a statement.”
“I saw the tweet.”
“Ask people to leave the [Capitol].”
Later that evening Mr. Hannity sent another text message to Mark Meadows.
This time he shared a link to a tweet.
That tweet reported that President Trump’s cabinet secretaries were considering invoking the 25th Amendment to remove President Trump from office.
As you can see on the screen, the 25th Amendment to the Constitution creates a process for the transition of power if a President is unfit or unable to serve.
The 25th Amendment has never been used to remove a President.
But the committee has learned that after the attack on the US Capitol this was being discussed by members of President Trump’s cabinet as a way of stripping the full power of the presidency from Donald Trump.
President Trump’s supporters were worried.
In addition to the tweet that he sent Mark Meadows after the attack, Sean Hannity apparently spoke with President Trump and warned him about what could happen.
We understand that this text message that Sean Hannity sent to Kayleigh McEnany on January 7th shows what Mr. Hannity said to the President.
First, no more stolen election talk.
Second, impeachment and 25th amendment are real.
Many people will quit.
Ms. Hutchinson, you told us that you were hearing about discussions related to the 25th amendment.
Here’s part of what you said.
[Begin Videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Mr. Trump had every chance to have the conversation with Mr. Meadows in case he hadn’t heard the discussions amongst cabinet secretaries.
And from what I understand, it was more of a — this is what I’m hearing.
I want you to be aware of it, but I also think it’s worth putting on your radar because you are the Chief of Staff.
You’re technically the boss of all the cabinet secretaries.
And, you know, if the conversations progressed you should be ready to take action on this.
I — I’m concerned for you and your positioning with this.
Reach out to me if you have any questions or, like, if I can be helpful with you at all.
[End Videotape]
And before we go back to the OFFICIAL TRANSCRIPT of the 28 June 2022 episode of NANCY PELOSI’S WITCH HUNTERS PRESENT A STALINIST SHOW TRIAL IN AMERICA starring presidential candidate Lizzie Cheney as a STAR WITNESS giving BLISTERING EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY as to why Trump is pretty much guilty of every crime in the book, as Cassidy herself testified earlier some political lawyer had told her Trump was going to be, to see the trouble Trump’s ego coupled with his lack of political acumen has landed him in with Cassidy Hutchinson now firmly on the side of the POLITICAL CONSPIRATORS who have been trying to take Trump down since 2016 when he beat Hillary Clinton, Hussein Obama’s chosen successor to carry on his legacy of weakness and incompetence, let’s go back to the article in The Guardian, a Brit publication, titled “Time is running out. The Department of Justice must indict and convict Trump” by Laurence H Tribe on 4 August 2022, where we have a follows, to wit:
Cassidy Hutchinson, principal aide to Trump’s chief of staff Mark Meadow, and Vice-President Mike Pence’s top aides, Marc Short and Greg Jacobs, are now working with the Department of Justice or appearing before its grand jury.
end quote
And that revelation takes us back to 8 January 2021 and a Philadelphia Inquirer article titled “Biden slams Capitol mob as ‘domestic terrorists’; Trump acknowledges new administration day after inciting riot and as calls grow for his removal” where we had as follows from Joe, as to how Trump should be treated by Merrick Garland, Joe’s hand-picked attorney general to do Joe’s bidding on who get to be guilty, that being Trump, and who doesn’t, that being Hunter Biden, to wit:
President-elect Joe Biden called the participants in the mob “domestic terrorists.”
“Don’t dare call them protesters,” Biden said.
“They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists.”
President-elect Joe Biden called the violent, Trump-inspired insurrectionists who broke into the Capitol on Wednesday, “domestic terrorists.”
“Don’t dare call them protesters,” Biden said on Thursday, before announcing his nominees for key positions in his Department of Justice, including Merrick Garland for Attorney General.
“They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists.”
end quotes
So with that admonition given to him by his boss Joe Biden on 8 January 2021 to “Don’t dare call them protesters,” and his insistence as Merrick Garland’s political boss that “They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists,” what direction does anyone see Cassidy Hutchinson’s secret testimony to a federal grand jury reporting to Merrick Garland going in, other than to “corroborate” the pre-arranged and agreed on narrative that has Trump as the conspirator to pull a coup against Joe Biden, all based on the 28 June 2022 BLOCKBUSTER TESTIMONY of Cassidy Hutchinson we have been reviewing word for word, line by line in this thread courtesy if the Cape Charles Mirror, which thought about the power Cassidy Hutchinson holds over our collective lives, takes us to a Business Insider article titled “Rep. Jamie Raskin says he’s become ‘impatient’ with the pace of the Justice Department’s probe of the January 6 Capitol riot” by John L. Dorman on 24 July 2022, where we have WITCH HUNTER Jamie, going on about depriving Trump of due process of law in the same vein as fellow lawyer Larry Tribe, to wit:
Raskin in a recent SiriusXM interview said he was “impatient” at the pace of the DOJ’s Jan. 6 probe.
“We don’t have a lot of time … at the end of this Congress, we’re over,” he told host Joe Madison.
Attorney General Merrick Garland last week remarked on the expansive scope of the DOJ investigation.
Rep. Jamie Raskin on Friday said has been “impatient” with the pace of the Justice Department’s Capitol riot probe.
During an interview with SiriusXM radio host Joe Madison, the Maryland Democrat and member of the January 6 committee said that the panel’s future will be in doubt after the midterm elections when Republicans — who were overwhelmingly opposed to the creation of the committee — could potentially regain a majority in the lower chamber.
Many Democrats have been cautious about letting the Justice Department perform its duties while also noting that US Attorney General Merrick Garland is deeply committed to a fair investigation.
But former President Donald Trump is poised to announce a 2024 presidential campaign in the coming months, which would add a distinctly political element to the probe.
The House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, riot has hosted six public hearings so far revealing their findings, which also included public damning testimony from former staffers in the Trump administration.
end quotes
And there, the reference is to our own STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson testifying on 28 June 2022, as we clearly see from the following, to wit:
During a surprise hearing on Tuesday, June 28, Cassidy Hutchinson, a former White House aide, also testified that former Trump lawyer Rudy Giuliani and former White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows were among those who asked the former president for a preemptive pardon after the pro-Trump mob descended upon the Capitol on January 6, 2021.
Hutchinson also previously testified that former Rep. Jim Jordan of Ohio had discussed pardons with the White House but never asked for one.
On Sunday, Jordan responded to his mention during the hearing, accusing the January 6 House panel of “misrepresenting” a video clip of him saying “the ultimate date of significance is Jan. 6 in a presidential election in determining the winner.”
“This committee, I think the country understands, is purely partisan,” Jordan said.
“And they’re frankly not paying much attention to what’s being said.”
“Obviously I’m impatient,” Raskin said of the pacing of the Justice Department’s investigation.
“We don’t have a lot of time certainly in Congress to do our work because, at the end of this Congress, we’re over.”
The congressman remarked that the panel was “in a hurry for America” because its members have to “deal with people who attack the constitutional order” ahead of the 2024 presidential election.
“We’re still in front of the 2022 election so I would like to see some motion there, but beyond that, I don’t really want to say much more because Merrick Garland is my constituent and I do not beat up on my constituent,” he added.
Garland said at a press conference last week that the scope of the department’s investigation was far-reaching and that he would seek to maintain its “integrity.”
“We have to get this right.”
“And for the people who are concerned, as I think every American should be, about protecting democracy, we have to do two things: we have to hold accountable every person who is criminally responsible for trying to overturn a legitimate election, and we must do it in a way filled with integrity and professionalism, the way the Justice Department conducts investigations,” he said.
“Both of these are necessary in order to achieve justice and to protect our democracy,” he added.
Earlier this month, Republican Rep. Liz Cheney of Wyoming — the vice chair of the January 6 committee — said that the panel could potentially make multiple criminal referrals, including one against Trump.
“Ultimately, the Justice Department will decide that,” she said at the time.
“If you just think about it from the perspective of what kind of man knows that a mob is armed and sends the mob to attack the Capitol and further incites that mob when his own vice president is under threat — when the Congress is under threat?”
“It’s just very chilling.”
A criminal referral made by the panel would have no concrete legal effect but would allow Congress to notify the Justice Department of the possibility of criminal conduct.
end quotes
And when we return after a break for station identification, it will be to hear WITCH HUNTER Lizzie Cheney saying as follows:
LIZ CHENEY: Inside the White House the President’s advisors, including members of his family, wanted him to deliver a speech to the country.
Deputy White House counsel Pat Philbin prepared the first draft of what would be the President’s remarks on national healing, delivered via pre-taped video on January 7th.
When he arrived at the White House on the 7th, Mr. Philbin believed that more needed to be said.
So he sat down and started writing.
He shared the draft with Pat Cipollone, who also believed the President needed to say more.
Mr. Cipollone agreed with the content as did Eric Herschmann, who reviewed the draft.
The committee has learned that the President did not agree with the substance as drafted and resisted giving a speech at all.
Ms. Hutchinson, do you recall discussions about the President’s speech on January 7th?
And STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson say:
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I do.
end quotes
So with that and more POLITICAL DRAMA yet out ahead, stay tuned, and don’t touch that dial!
And for evidence of just how effective this “LYNCH TRUMP AND HANG HIM HIGH” campaign of Nancy Pelosi and her WITCH HUNTERS has been, starring “WOMAN SCORNED” Cassidy Hutchinson as their STAR WITNESS to heap as much dirt on Trump as she possibly can, which she is quite skilled at, heaping dirt, I mean, all we need is to go to an article in The Hill titled “Merrick Garland’s complicated Trump prosecution calculus” by Keith Naughton, opinion contributor on 7 August 2022, where we have it laid out for us in black and white, as follows:
From Day One, Attorney General Merrick Garland has faced a dilemma: How to deal with Trump.
The pressure from within the Democratic Party to prosecute Trump has been enormous.
end quotes
And in a SACRED DEMOCRACY, people, such as ours is, where we are blessed to have Joe Biden as our autocrat, that is the way it is – the RULING PARTY, in this case, the Democrats, like the Baathists in Iraq when Saddam Hussein was in power, get to stay in power by LYNCHING their political enemies, in this case, Donald Trump, when that is what the members of the RULING PARTY want to have happen, because it is the right thing to do, because otherwise, democracy doesn’t work the way it is supposed to work, which takes us back to The Hill for more of the “LYNCH TRUMP TRAIN” rolling at high speed down the tracks to remove Trump and the Republicans as a political threat to the Democrats before the November mid-terms, to wit:
Navigating a Trump prosecution has become much more difficult of late.
After a year where Trump looked like he was too crippled to run, the collapse of President Biden’s approval ratings has made a Trump return to the White House a very real possibility.
At the same time, the Jan. 6 hearings have not just damaged Trump, they have turbocharged Democratic rage.
end quotes
Turbocharged Democratic RAGE, people!
That’s the way you do it when you want to LYNCH someone, and believe me, the Democrats wrote the book on LYNCHING people in America, so they are past masters at it – YOU WHIP UP A LYNCH MOB, AND THE LYNCHING FOLLOWS, which takes us back to The Hill for confirmation of that premise, as follows:
The sum and substance is that not prosecuting Trump is becoming practically impossible.
end quotes
Merrick Garland, who is Joe Biden’s pet poodle attorney general, is a public servant, and the people he is a servant to, the Democrats, want him to LYNCH Trump, and since Merrick is a public servant to those people demanding a LYNCHINJG, Merrick has no other choice but than to give them what they demand, which is Trump’s head on a platter, which again takes us back to The Hill for more confirmation, to wit:
It is no secret that Democratic voters despise Trump; in fact, they disapprove of Trump much more than Republicans approve of him.
Hating Trump is the superglue that holds together the rickety, squabbling Democratic coalition.
end quotes
And here our Cassidy should be very, very proud of herself, because it has been her BLOCKBUSTER DYNAMITE EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY as a STAR WITNESS for the WITCH HUNHTERS that has stoked that TRUMP HATE to the boiling point of where Merrik Garland now has no other choice but to LYNCH Trump for the Democrats, now that Cassidy has tainted the jury pool against Trump from one end of the country to the other to make sure that there is no place in America where Trump could get either a fair trail, or a fair grand jury hearing, which makes it a SLAM DUNK for Merrick, who can be guaranteed not to question whether any of Cassidy’s testimony might be false, and which makes Cassidy for the Democrats the gift that keeps on giving and giving and giving some more, for which service Cassidy should be well compensated by the Democrats as a token of their appreciation for the services she has in turn rendered them in the war against Trump they have been waging since 1996, which takes us back to The Hill, to wit:
Democrats overwhelmingly think Trump has responsibility for the Jan. 6 riot.
According to YouGov, 44 percent of those polled think Trump engaged in illegality, but that rises to 79 percent among Democrats and 80 percent among liberals.
end quotes
Engaged in illegality?
Oh, well hey, it’s close enough, and more than enough to LYNCH Trump on, which takes us back to The Hill and Merrick Garland’s dilemma, to wit:
Of course, convicting an individual in a court of law is much, much more difficult than convicting someone in the court of public opinion.
end quotes
Except not if you have already tainted the jury pool, which is what these WITCH HUNTER HERAINGS on PRIMETIME TV have been doing, as they were designed and intended to do.
Going back to The Hill for more of Merrick’s game plan going forward, we have more as follows on that score, to wit:
Prosecuting Trump is risky territory for Garland.
Not only is Trump going to fight any prosecution tooth and nail, he is also likely to go to any lengths to win.
Being a presidential candidate will call into question the propriety of any prosecution, although most Democratic voters are unlikely to care.
Any prosecution is going to be a circus in which any slip-up by Garland or his team would be disastrous.
Garland also needs to get Trump on a felony.
A misdemeanor or civil penalty would be viewed as a weak, anti-climactic result — Republicans would celebrate and ridicule Garland, while Democrats would rage at him.
But worst of all would be an acquittal.
If Trump were tried and acquitted, he could just coast off that victory right into the White House.
Not knowing the full extent of the evidence the Justice Department has or what else the Jan. 6 Committee will uncover, it is impossible to truly handicap a Trump trial — which leaves us with trying to consider what would be the best political strategy for Garland that recognizes there will always be uncertainty as to getting an actual conviction.
Any way you cut it, there will be a lot of risk.
Garland could just go for Trump right away, hoping that a prosecution will add to Trump fatigue among GOP voters.
After all, boosting the “enemies of democracy” is the main focus of the Democratic Party these days.
In the collision between demands for justice/getting Trump and the risk to the integrity of the American political system, getting even is likely to win out.
end quotes
And as we digest that latest, it is again time to settle our fevered minds by taking a break for station identification, and when we return it will be to hear WITCH HUNTER Lizzie Cheney saying:
LIZ CHENEY: Let’s listen, Ms. Hutchison, to what you told us about that and about the process of crafting those remarks.
[Begin Videotape]
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I learned from a conversation with Mark and overhearing between him and White House Counsel and Eric Herschmann as well that Trump didn’t necessarily think he needed to do anything more on the 7th than what he had already done on the 6th.
When he was convinced to put out a video on the 7th he — I understand that he had a lot of opinions about what the context of that announcement were to entail.
I had original drafts of the speech where, you know, there were — several lines didn’t make it in there about prosecuting the rioters or calling them violent.
He didn’t want that in there.
He wanted to put in there that he wanted to par — potentially pardon them.
And this is just with the increased emphasis of his mindset at the time which was he didn’t think that they did anything wrong.
He — the people who did something wrong that day or the person who did something wrong that day was Mike Pence by not standing with him.
[End Videotape]
So as you can see, there is much more EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY from STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson yet to come in this MADE-FOR-TV DRAMA, so stay tuned and don’t touch that dial!
And now that we know for certain and without a shadow of a doubt thanks to the Cape Charles Mirror and an article in The Hill titled “Merrick Garland’s complicated Trump prosecution calculus” by Keith Naughton, opinion contributor on 7 August 2022, that these WITCH HUNTER hearings on PRIMETIME TV have served their intended purpose of not just damaging Trump, but turbocharging Democratic rage to INCITE A LYNCH MOB, a Democrat specialty in America, and that it is TRUMP HATE that is the superglue that holds together the rickety, squabbling Democratic coalition, so that the game being played here by these WITCH HUNTERS is now out in the open, let’s clear up a couple of loose ends before we go back to the main show starring presidential aspirant Lizzie Cheney on 28 June 2022, starting with this hobble-gobble above about STAR WITNESS Cassidy Hutchinson learning from a conversation with Mark and overhearing between him and White House Counsel and Eric Herschmann as well that Trump didn’t necessarily think he needed to do anything more on the 7th than what he had already done on the 6th, let’s cut to the chase and get past that transparent, scripted BULL**** by going to the Philadelphia Inquirer article titled “Biden slams Capitol mob as ‘domestic terrorists’; Trump acknowledges new administration day after inciting riot and as calls grow for his removal” on 8 January 2021, where we have what really happened as follows:
With a temporary suspension lifted on his Twitter account, President Donald Trump posted a 2-minute, 41-second video acknowledging a new presidential administration and attempting to distance himself from his supporters who stormed the Capitol at his incitement.
Speaking from the White House, Trump called what happened on Wednesday at the Capitol a “heinous attack” and said he was “outraged by the violence, lawlessness, and mayhem.”
The siege happened after Trump encouraged supporters to march on the Capitol.
The mob then attacked the building, and the president was blocked from posting on social media after making false claims about the election and telling the insurrectionists, among other things, “We love you.”
To the people who engaged in violence and destruction — who had just attended a rally in which Trump vowed to march with them, but then didn’t — “you do not represent our country,” he said Thursday.
He claimed his challenge of Joe Biden’s election victory was his “fight to defend Democracy.”
Trump, who has not conceded the race and did not mention President-elect Joe Biden by name in the video, acknowledged the coming transition.
“A new administration will be inaugurated on Jan. 20th,” he said, promising a “smooth, orderly, and seamless transition.”
In a very brief statement, President Donald Trump’s Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany said the White House condemns the violence that occurred at the U.S. Capitol on Wednesday and insisted that “those who broke the law should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law.”
McEnany also said that “now is the time for America to unite.”
“We grieve for the loss of life and for those injured,” she said.
McEnany thanked the law-enforcement officers at the Capitol, calling them “true American heroes,” and did not take questions.
end quotes
DO NOT EXPECT TO HEAR ANY OF THAT, HOWEVER, FROM THE WITCH HUNTERS, BECAUSE IT DOES NOT SERVE THEIR PURPOSE OF WHIPPING UP A LYNCH MOB AGAINST TRUMP.
The other piece of business has to do with the claims of the WITCH HUNTERS, which claims were echoed in the Cape Charles Mirror thread titled “FIBBERY: A commentary on the conduct of the Democrat party and the January 6 Committee” on July 24, 2022 by Charles Landis
http://www.capecharlesmirror.com/news/fibbery-a-commentary-on-the-conduct-of-the-democrat-party-and-the-january-6-committee/
that on 6 January 2021, it was ONLY Donald Trump who could have called for National Guard reinforcements, which thought takes us to a Reuters article titled “White House frustrated as Washington mayor seeks troops to help handle migrants” by Ted Hesson on 3 August 2022, where we have this alternative scenario to ponder, to wit:
WASHINGTON (Reuters) – Thousands of migrants bused to Washington in recent months by Republican governors of states on the U.S.-Mexico border have caused tensions between the White House and the Democratic mayor of the U.S. capital city, four U.S. officials told Reuters.
Last week, Washington Mayor Muriel Bowser called on President Joe Biden, a fellow Democrat, to mobilize the National Guard to provide aid and shelter for migrants arriving after long trips from Texas and Arizona.
end quotes
Now, pay attention to that specific language, that Bowser “called on President Joe Biden, a fellow Democrat, to mobilize the National Guard,” because I think we are going to see a different standard applied to Joe Biden than is being applied to Trump, which should surprise no one, and which takes us back to Reuters for more on that subject of who can call out the Guard in Washington, D.C., keeping in mind that Joe Biden is COMMANDER-IN-CHIEF of the Washington, D.C. National Guard, to wit:
White House officials and Washington-area volunteers helping migrants are voicing frustration, saying the aid is unnecessary and the request, which became public last week, plays into the hands of Biden’s Republican critics.
“We have had constructive conversations with Mayor Bowser and her team,” a White House spokesperson told Reuters.
White House officials disagree with Bowser’s portrayal of the migrant arrivals as a “crisis,” which echoes Abbott’s language about the border, three officials and another source familiar with the matter said.
“The message and the optics aren’t what the White House wants to hear or see from a Democratic mayor,” said one U.S. officials who, along with others, requested anonymity to discuss the internal consensus.
Senior Biden adviser Julie Chavez Rodriguez had been working with Bowser, the person familiar with the matter said, which made the request for troops even more irksome.
Washington is not a U.S. state or part of one, so the authority to summon National Guard troops rests with the U.S. military.
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin is taking Bowser’s troop request “very seriously,” according to a spokesperson.
end quotes
HUH?
Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin is taking Bowser’s troop request “very seriously?”
What about Joe?
If only Trump could call out the Guard on 6 January n2021, then what is going on here with that duty being delegated to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, who is said to be taking Bowser’s troop request “very seriously?”
And don’t expect an answer to that, either, because there are different standards for Joe Biden than for Trump, because the Democrats HATE Trump.
And that brings us back to the play action on 28 June 2022, where the show resumes as follows with the conclusion of the EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY of STAR WITNESS and just plain AMERICAN HERO Cassidy Hutchinson, to wit:
LIZ CHENEY: But the President’s advisors urged him to give the speech.
[Begin Videotape]
UNKNOWN: Who convinced him to do the video on the 7th?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I’m not sure who convinced him or if it was a group of people that convinced him.
UNKNOWN: Who was in the group that you’re aware of?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That I’m aware of, Mark, Ivanka, Jared Kushner, Eric Herschmann, Pat Cipollone, Pat Philbin.
Those are the people that I’m aware of.
UNKNOWN: Do you know why that group of people thought it was necessary for him to release a statement?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I believe Kayleigh McEnany as well.
From what I understood at the time and from what the reports were coming in there was a large concern of the 25th amendment potentially being invoked and there were concerns about what would happen in the Senate if it was — if the 25th was invoked.
So the primary reason that I had heard other than, you know, we did not do enough on the 6th, we need to get a stronger message out there and condemn this is — otherwise this will be your legacy.
The secondary reasons to that was, you know, think about what might happen in the final 15 days of your presidency if we don’t do this.
There’s already talks about invoking the 25th amendment.
You need this as cover.
[End Videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: The President ultimately delivered the remarks.
Unlike many of his other speeches, he did not adlib much.
He recited them without significant alteration except one.
Even then on January 7th, 2021, the day after the attack on the US Capitol, the President still could not bring himself to say, quote, “But this election is now over.”
One other point about the speech, Ms. Hutchinson.
Did you hear that Mr. Trump at one point wanted to add language about pardoning those who took part in the January 6th riot?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I did hear that, and I understand that Mr. Mead — that Mr. Meadows was encouraging that language as well.
LIZ CHENEY: Thank you.
And here’s what you told us previously about that.
[Begin Videotape]
UNKNOWN: You said he was instructed not to include it.
Who was instructing him not to include language about the pardon in that January 7th speech?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: I understood from White House Counsel’s Office coming to our office that morning that they didn’t think that it was a good idea to include that in the speech.
UNKNOWN: That being Pat Cipollone?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: That’s correct.
And Eric Herschmann.
[End Videotape]
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson, did Rudy Giuliani ever suggest that he was interested in receiving a Presidential pardon related to January 6th?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: He did.
LIZ CHENEY: Ms. Hutchinson did White House Chief of Staff Mark Meadows ever indicate that he was interested in receiving a Presidential pardon related to January 6th?
CASSIDY HUTCHINSON: Mr. Meadows did seek that pardon.
Yes, ma’am.
LIZ CHENEY: Thank you, Ms. Hutchinson.
BENNIE THOMPSON: I want to thank our witness for joining us today.
Without objection the Chair recognizes the Vice Chair for a closing statement.
LIZ CHENEY: Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman.
I want to begin by thanking Ms. Hutchinson for her testimony today.
We are all in her debt.
Our nation is preserved by those who abide by their oaths to our Constitution.
Our nation is preserved by those who know the fundamental difference between right and wrong.
And I want all Americans to know that what Ms. Hutchinson has done today is not easy.
The easy course is to hide from the spotlight, to refuse to come forward, to attempt to downplay or deny what happened.
Mr. Chairman, thank you.
I yield back.
BENNIE THOMPSON: Gentlewoman yields back.
Ms. Hutchinson, thank you.
Thank you for doing your patriotic duty and helping the American people get a complete understanding of January 6th and its causes.
Thank you for your courage in testifying here today.
You have the gratitude of this committee and your country.
end quotes
And so ends the EXPLOSIVE, DYNAMITE, BLOCKBUSTER SWORN TESTIMONY of STAR WITNESS and AMERICAN HERO Cassidy Hutchinson, the gift that keeps on giving and giving for the Democrats, as the LYNCH TRUMP AND HANG HIM HIGH train rolls at high speed down the tracks thanks to Cassidy Hutchinson who has served the forces of TRUMP HATE in America, quite well.
So, here we are, people, at the aftermath, with the roadies breaking down the set as the Klieg lights cool, and the stage hands, the producers, directors, screen writers, the sound techs and video techs and actors all go off to the cast party, congratulating each other for a job well done, which aftermath now that we have gone through every word of her so-called and alleged EXPLOSIVE TESTIMONY, which was really poorly-written political BULL****, which reality then raises these serious question, to wit:
By spewing out a bunch of unbelievable scripted BULL**** on 28 June 2022, did Cassidy Hutchinson really do her patriotic duty on June 28, 2022?
By spewing out a bunch of unbelievable scripted BULL**** on 28 June 2022, did Cassidy Hutchinson help the American people get a complete understanding of January 6th and its causes?
By spewing out a bunch of unbelievable scripted BULL**** on 28 June 2022, did Cassidy Hutchinson show us courage in testifying before the WITCH HUNTERS that day?
For spewing out a bunch of unbelievable scripted BULL**** on 28 June 2022, Casidy Hutchinson truly has the gratitude of the WITCH HUNTER’S COMMITTEE.
But does she have the gratitude of the country?
And of course, only you can answer these questions for yourself in your mind, according to your own personal belief system.
But suffice to say that as a combat veteran who took an oath to the Constitution I have never forsaken, I have found the exercise of reviewing her transcripts to be quite disgusting, and to think that this is the level to which we have sunk as a nation, and as a people, although the Democrats have been HATERS for well over a hundred years, is even more disgusting.
Which brings me to this final BLOCKBUSTER EXPLOSIVE DYNAMITE SWORN TESTIMONY of Cassidy’s about Mark Meadows and Rudolpho Giuliani asking Trump on January 7 , 2021 for pardons for 6 January 2021, which sworn testimony is frankly bizarre and absurd, given that neither Meadows nor Giuliani had been indicted and convicted of anything that they could be pardoned for, and whether Giuliani knew it or not, Meadows know that come 20 January 2021, Trump would no longer be president, so why would meadows be asking Trump for a pardon he would know Trump could not deliver?
But again, people, as we have said all along, this is NOT a legitimate governmental undertaking here – IT IS SHOW BIDNESS!
SHOW BIDNESS OF THE SICKEST KIND BECAUSE IT IS MALICIOUS AND INTENDED TO BE SO!
And it is decidedly UN-AMERICAN, as well, but so are the WITCH HUNTERS, so that should come as no surprise.
And once again, our thanks go out to the Cape Charles Mirror for hosting this expose – it is that which makes the Cape Charles Mirror a grand palladium of our liberties!
And there is one last piece of business that has got to be dealt with here, and dealt with expeditiously, and that is Merrick Garland’s so-called dilemma with respect to Trump, which in reality is no dilemma at all given Merrick Garland could walk into any grand jury in America and in his well-known stentorian voice that made him famous as a world class orator in Washington. D.C. announce that he was there before them as Joe Biden’s attorney general, which means he is a good guy, and then tell them about the duty they had to perform that day, because the nation needed that duty to be done, and our sacred democracy needed that duty to be done, and by God, their president, Joe Biden, himself, needed that duty to be done, which was to get Donald Trump indicted that day, to save America itself from Donald Trump and that duty is clear, and there, Merrick holds up in his one hand a copy of the Philadelphia Inquirer for 8 January 2021, while with his other hand, pointing to an article therein titled “Biden slams Capitol mob as ‘domestic terrorists’; Trump acknowledges new administration day after inciting riot and as calls grow for his removal,” and in his stentorian voice reads to the members of the Grand Jury as follows:
President-elect Joe Biden called the participants in the mob “domestic terrorists.”
“Don’t dare call them protesters,” Biden said.
“They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists.”
President-elect Joe Biden called the violent, Trump-inspired insurrectionists who broke into the Capitol on Wednesday, “domestic terrorists.”
“Don’t dare call them protesters,” Biden said on Thursday, before announcing his nominees for key positions in his Department of Justice, including Merrick Garland for Attorney General.
“They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists.”
end quotes
And with that admonition given to the members of the grand jury, all God-fearing, flag saluting, church-going, loyal American citizens, by their president Joe Biden on 8 January 2021 to “Don’t dare call them protesters,” and his insistence as their president that “They were a riotous mob, insurrectionists, domestic terrorists,” Merrick Garland would have his multiple indictments against Trump for insurrection and domestic terrorism in a New York minute, with Joe Biden as the complainant and main witness for the prosecution, so let’s get it done, Merrick!
What are you waiting on, a special invitation?
Or are you afraid of losing to Trump in a courtroom battle with Joe Biden as your main witness?