Op-Ed: Compare George Orwell’s 1984 to Society Today
Special to the Mirror, submitted by Michael Jordan.
Art imitates life and vice versa. Some of the greatest works in literature turned out to predict major events throughout the history. It is important not to forget that well known authors decide to write their novels after being inspired by the society of some era.
When discussing the relationship between society and art, it is impossible to neglect the connection between George Orwell’s most famous work “1984” and society today. In fact, the book and our environment nowadays can be compared in more ways than one, which is the primary purpose of this essay. George Orwell successfully played the role of Nostradamus and wrote a book that perfectly depicts the world we live in today.
In George Orwell’s famous novel, almost all private and public places feature large TV screens that only broadcast government propaganda, news, and of course, the approved entertainment. At the same time, these large screens are two-way monitors which spy on people’s private lives. Nowadays, we have easy access to media which, also, aims to display government propaganda, news, and entertainment.
Although we try to convince ourselves thinking entertainment today is largely “free”, that is not the case. Social media websites such as Facebook track our likes, dislikes, even messages.
The surveillance spreads to other websites we use daily. We may not have a two-way screen that tracks our every move, but there are multiple ways to get spied on and it is impossible to escape.
The similarities between George Orwell’s book and modern society also stretch to the endless global war. The novel describes a global war that has been going on since forever and shows no signs of slowing down. Moreover, the main hero, Winston Smith, realizes that enemy keeps changing. Things are not much different war-wise.
The United States fight wars for decades, with differing minor nations, along with Russia, Turkey, The United Kingdom, France, and many others. The so-called war on terror has no end in sight and its only “accomplishment” is spreading fear among the American public.
Furthermore, the key way Big Brother gained the tremendous power was through mind manipulation of the people. Big Brother erased history, changed facts, and rewrote past in a bid to favor a communist agenda.
Winston Churchill said: “History is written by the victors.” The quote perfectly describes the past, present, and the future. Those in power, i.e. victors, have the ability to not only rule in present but to “rewrite” what happened before. If we were to ask any historian or even students, whose major is history, they would instantly name all those times certain historical facts were rewritten just to conform someone’s political agenda.
Orwell’s 1984 is more than a brilliant work of art and one of the most important works in the literature. One can easily compare the book with reality, today’s modern society in numerous ways and this essay just outlined some of them. This just goes to show that art and life do go together hand in hand and there is plenty to learn from Mr. Orwell.
History Notes Special: How Cap’N Crunch Hacked the AT&T Nationwide Phone Network
Before there were computer hackers, hackers of the 1960s and ‘70s, called phone phreaks, were intrigued by the structure of the new nationwide telephone network put together by AT&T.
The network’s machines communicated with each other by emitting tones of particular frequencies and in particular sequences, mainly 2600 hertz tones. Once the phreaks figured out the patterns of these tones, they could insinuate themselves into the system.
Around 1971 a Vietnam vet named John Draper discovered that the “Boson” whistle in Cap’n Crunch cereal boxes perfectly reproduced a 2600 Hertz tone. Simply blow the whistle into a telephone receiver to make free calls.
According to Apple Inc. co-founder Steve Wozniak’s words, with the ‘Cap’n Crunch “BO’SUN Whistle”, a phreaker could “seize a phone line.” Though many phreakers used instruments for the same purpose, the mass-produced whistle became iconic. Draper became known for using it, and gave himself the nickname “Captain Crunch.”
Opinion: Re-Education during the Great Reset
Special Opinion by Charles Landis.
On Thanksgiving eve, I received a notice from FaceBook that their independent fact-checker, Politifact, has determined that I posted a quotation of Patrick Henry that was partly false as to his position on limited government. Specifically, I posted a picture of Patrick Henry upon which was written the famous quote “give me liberty or give me death.” Also was written. “Not give me free college, free healthcare, free housing, and make my neighbors pay for it.” My crime, apparently, was thinking Patrick Henry would not be supportive of giving a lot of free stuff or, worse, was not a Socialist Democrat.
The famous quote of Henry was reported as given in a speech he gave at the Second Virginia Convention in 1775 . Historians have said there is no record of Henry actually saying “Give me liberty give me death.” However, there has never been any dispute that Henry spoke about the tyranny of England and that he would fight and die for freedom. A distinction without a difference.
All of this is only an assumption because Face Book did not tell me what was false or partly false, or why. It is a kind of Mao Tse-Tung thing when he ruled Communist China and said “let a thousand thoughts contend as a thousand flowers bloom”; he then established re-education camps to ensure correct thinking. A refugee from one of these camps explained it to me this way: In the dead of night she was arrested and taken from her home in Beijing and confined in a “re-education” camp in a remote rural area. She was not charged with a crime other than she had been reported as having false thoughts. That is, thinking as one would as in the old cultural norms of China; not in accordance with the truthful and correct thinking of the cultural revolution.
In the camp, with others, she was re- educated in how to think correctly. There was no sentence for a certain period of time. To be released, you had to convince your leader that you understood what your false thinking was and what the correct thinking was. Eventually she was released, escaped to Hong Kong, and became an exchange student at a university in Washington.. Another day, the rest of the story.
Being educated in politically correct thinking is not only in communist/socialist countries; we have, for example the NY Times 1619 Project which rewrites all of our history since the founding. Also, schools from elementary to college level teach revisionist history with abandon. Even here on the Eastern Shore there are those who think my book “An Introduction to the History of Virginia’s Eastern Shore. A collection of Essays on Important Persons and Events”, was “fake” history. (As opined by a social justice warrior).[CL1] . They do not say what was fake or false, but I have otherwise learned that they believe the “real” history of the Shore was of social injustice and economic oppression of Black people. Here again I was left to figure out what crime of false or incorrect thinking I was guilty of.
In the final banality and commonality of it all, Face Book, Mao, and the social justice warriors on the Shore assert I am guilty of false or incorrect thinking, I must figure out what my crime is, confess, and do penance for redemption.
Note. In links provided by FB fact checkers, I am informed both “mechanical and human” means are used to determine whether a post is true or false. It appears that both are programmed to identify and link certain words to flag as untrue or false. In my case, Patrick Henry (patriot) linked with free stuff (limited government) alarmed/alerted the fact t checker people/thing and thus decided false or not true. Insidious. Perfidious.
History Notes Special: 70 years ago, the Battle of Changjin Korea
70 years ago, on a snowy hillside in Northern Korea, 25,000 Marines were trying to stay warm when the gongs and horns of Chinese troops went off signaling an attack by more than 150,000.
The Chosin Reservoir Campaign would be the coldest battle ever fought with temps around -47°.
Marines who took gunshot wounds would walk into the aid tents at Yudam-ni and then bleed out on the tables as their wounds thawed out. Dead Marines and Chinese were piled high as windbreaks for the living.
Hector Cafferata was a PFC reservist from Jersey. He snuck aboard a train with the reserves called to duty and went to Pendleton to train with them. He never went to boot camp and wasn’t getting paid while he was in Korea. He just wanted to be a Marine. He was in a fighting position at the very outer edge of the line when the Chinese mounted a heavy attack. He is credited with killing 80 Chinese communist soldiers that night. When his hand was disabled permanently by a grenade, he used an e-tool and hit the grenades back.
Hudner’s wingman, Ensign Jesse Brown was the first Black Naval Aviator. When Brown’s F4U was shot down, Hudner flew close air support for him, hoping he’d get out of his plane. But Hudner could see Brown was alive but stuck in the plane.
Captain Bill Barber enlisted in WWII and fought on Iwo Jima. As company commander of Company F (Hector’s Company) he led the holding position at the end of the line against the onslaught of Chinese troops. If he and his Company had failed the battle could’ve ended very differently.
Barber took a round in the hip from a ricochet and fashioned a crutch from a stick and proceeded to lead his company. At times he had troops carry him on a stretcher so he could check the lines and respond quicker during the fight.
Barber was ordered to fight his company back to the regiment so they wouldn’t be lost to Chinese forces. But he refused. Choosing instead to draw more Chinese troops to his position and give the regiment a chance to withdraw. The time Fox Company bought the regiment was huge.
While Fox company 1/7, led by Ray Davis worked their way over 3 ridges that were crawling with Chinese troops to link up with Fox Company. Davis who already had a Navy Cross from Palau in WWII, was always at the front in the thick of the fighting.
At the very point of 1/7, was Chew En Lee. The first Marine Officer of Asian descent. During the Inchon campaign, Lee shouted orders in Mandarin at the enemy and confused them as his Marines advanced.
Lee was wounded twice and sent to a MASH unit and slated to be sent to Japan. He and another Marine from his unit escaped the medical tent and stole a jeep and rejoined their unit.
As Lee led the Marines, he many times came face to face with Chinese troops and he’d count the enemy forces and then tell Ray Davis whether they should attack. When the unit reached the Chinese surrounding Fox Company, Lee led the assaulting Company up the hill.
The Marines linked up with Fox Company by radio on December 2nd and, after artillery and close air support, the company was relieved and the battalion began the long March back.
Chosin could’ve been one of the greatest losses in the history of the Marine Corps. But the actions of guys like Hector, Barber, Davis, and Lee make it one of the great stories of the Corps fighting for one another selflessly and surviving the battle.
Though the Chinese forced a withdrawal of the Marines, the Chinese forces were reduced from 30 divisions to 18 divisions because of the Chosin Campaign.
VA Certifies Presidential Vote
RICHMOND, Va. – Virginia’s State Board of Elections has voted to certify the state’s election results, two days later than expected because of a COVID-19 outbreak in the city of Richmond’s voter registration office.
The Richmond Times-Dispatch reports that by a 3-0 vote on Wednesday, the state-certified its votes for president, U.S. Senate, U.S. House elections, and state constitutional amendments, in a 10-minute meeting with no comment from board members or the public.
Reminder: Governor Northam’s New Statewide Covid Measures are in effect
Governor Northam Announces New Statewide Measures to Contain COVID-19Includes limit of 25 individuals for in-person gatherings, expanded mask mandate, on-site alcohol curfew, and increased enforcement
Governor Ralph Northam today announced new actions to mitigate the spread of the virus in Virginia. While the Commonwealth’s case count per capita and positivity rate remain comparatively low, all five health regions are experiencing increases in new COVID-19 cases, positive tests, and hospitalizations.
“COVID-19 is surging across the country, and while cases are not rising in Virginia as rapidly as in some other states, I do not intend to wait until they are. We are acting now to prevent this health crisis from getting worse,” said Governor Northam. “Everyone is tired of this pandemic and restrictions on our lives. I’m tired, and I know you are tired too. But as we saw earlier this year, these mitigation measures work. I am confident that we can come together as one Commonwealth to get this virus under control and save lives.”
The following measures will take effect:
- Reduction in public and private gatherings: All public and private in-person gatherings must be limited to 25 individuals, down from the current cap of 250 people. This includes outdoor and indoor settings.
- Expansion of mask mandate: All Virginians aged five and over are required to wear face coverings in indoor public spaces. This expands the current mask mandate, which has been in place in Virginia since May 29 and requires all individuals aged 10 and over to wear face coverings in indoor public settings.
- Strengthened enforcement within essential retail businesses: All essential retail businesses, including grocery stores and pharmacies, must adhere to statewide guidelines for physical distancing, wearing face coverings, and enhanced cleaning. While certain essential retail businesses have been required to adhere to these regulations as a best practice, violations will now be enforceable through the Virginia Department of Health as a Class One misdemeanor.
- On-site alcohol curfew: The on-site sale, consumption, and possession of alcohol is prohibited after 10:00 p.m. in any restaurant, dining establishment, food court, brewery, microbrewery, distillery, winery, or tasting room. All restaurants, dining establishments, food courts, breweries, microbreweries, distilleries, wineries, and tasting rooms must close by midnight. Virginia law does not distinguish between restaurants and bars, however, under current restrictions, individuals that choose to consume alcohol prior to 10:00 p.m. must be served as in a restaurant and remain seated at tables six feet apart.
Virginia is averaging 1,500 newly-reported COVID-19 cases per day, up from a statewide peak of approximately 1,200 in May. While Southwest Virginia has experienced a spike in the number of diagnosed COVID-19 cases, all five of the Commonwealth’s health regions are currently reporting a positivity rate over five percent. Although hospital capacity remains stable, hospitalizations have increased statewide by more than 35 percent in the last four weeks.
Governor Northam announced new contracts with three laboratories as part of the Commonwealth’s OneLabNetwork, which will significantly increase Virginia’s public health testing capacity. Contracts with Virginia Tech in Blacksburg, University of Virginia Medical Center in Charlottesville, and Sentara Healthcare in Norfolk will directly support high-priority outbreak investigations, community testing events, and testing in congregate settings, with a goal of being able to perform 7,000 per day by the end of the year.
Pennsylvania state court judge halts vote certification
A Pennsylvania state court judge has issued a preliminary injunction preventing Pennsylvania from taking any further steps to perfect its certification of the election, including but not limited to the appointment of electors and transmission of the necessary paperwork to the Electoral College, pending further court hearings and rulings.
The ruling upholds an injunction from earlier in the week and is significant because of the findings made in the Opinion released Nov. 27.
The issue in this case is whether legislative expansion of absentee balloting to broad mail-in balloting violated the Pennsylvania Constitution. It’s not clear what the relief would be; the petitioners seek to preclude the Secretary of State from transmitting the certification or otherwise perfecting the electoral college selections.
Earlier in the week, Judge Patricia McCollough issued a temporary halt to the certification process, and that now is on appeal to the PA Supreme Court. The Judge issued this Opinion to extend that halt pending futher hearings, and to set forth the basis for the injunction, which could be relevant to the appeal:
As this Court’s November 25, 2020, Order of an Emergency Preliminary Injunction has been appealed to the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, this opinion shall set forth the basis for said Order and shall also satisfy the requirements of Rule 1925 of the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure, Pa.R.A.P. 1925….
Here is the Judge’s description of the claim:
In the Petition, Petitioners allege that the Act of October 31, 2019, P.L. 552, No. 77 (Act 77), which added and amended various absentee and mail-in voting provisions in the Pennsylvania Election Code (Election Code),1 is unconstitutional and void ab initio because it purportedly contravenes the requirements of the Pennsylvania Constitution. Petitioners allege that Article VII, section 14 of the Pennsylvania Constitution provides two exclusive mechanisms by which a qualified elector may cast his or her vote in an election: (1) by submitting his or her vote in propria persona at the polling place on election day; and (2) by submitting an absentee ballot, but only if the qualified voter satisfies the conditions precedent to meet the requirements of one of the four, limited exclusive circumstances under which absentee voting is authorized under the Pennsylvania constitution. (Petition, ¶16.) Petitioners allege that mail-in voting in the form implemented through Act 77 is an attempt by the legislature to fundamentally overhaul the Pennsylvania voting system and permit universal, no-excuse, mail-in voting absent any constitutional authority. Id., ¶17. Petitioners argue that in order to amend the Constitution, mandatory procedural requirements must be strictly followed. Specifically, pursuant to Article XI, Section 1, a proposed constitutional amendment must be approved by a majority vote of the members of both the Pennsylvania House of Representatives and Senate in two consecutive legislative sessions, then the proposed amendment must be published for three months ahead of the next general election in two newspapers in each county, and finally it must be submitted to the qualified electors as a ballot question in the next general election and approved by a majority of those voting on the amendment. According to Petitioners, the legislature did not follow the necessary procedures for amending the Constitution before enacting Act 77 which created a new category of mail-in voting; therefore, the mail-in ballot scheme under Act 77 is unconstitutional on its face and must be struck down. Id., ¶¶27, 35-37. As relief, Petitioners seek, inter alia, a declaration and/or injunction that prohibits Respondents from certifying the November 2020 General Election results, which include mail-in ballots that are permitted on a statewide basis and are allegedlyimproper because Act 77 is unconstitutional.
The Judge found, among other things, that the plaintiffs were likely to prevail on their PA constitutional claims, and that the matter was not moot even though PA had “certified” the results, because there were more steps to be taken [emphasis added]:
Accordingly, in careful consideration [on November 25] of the exigencies and time constraints in this matter of statewide and national import, and the longstanding constitutional mandate that every citizen of this Commonwealth is entitled to no less than a fair and free election, it was necessary [on November 25] to preliminarily enjoin, on an emergency and temporary basis, Executive Respondents from undertaking any other actions with respect to the certification of the results of the presidential and vice presidential elections, if indeed anything else needs to be done, pending an evidentiary hearing to ascertain the facts of this matter and to determine if the dispute is moot….Based upon the record before it, this Court has sufficient grounds to enjoin Respondents from further certification activities on an emergency preliminary basis, pending the results of the evidentiary hearing it had scheduled for this date, after which the Court would have determined if a preliminary injunction should issue.4 Since the Court is sitting in equity it has the power to fashion such relief as it is vitally important that the status quo be preserved pending further judicial scrutiny….Additionally, Petitioners appear to have established a likelihood to succeed on the merits because Petitioners have asserted the Constitution does not provide a mechanism for the legislature to allow for expansion of absentee voting without a constitutional amendment. Petitioners appear to have a viable claim that the mail-in ballot procedures set forth in Act 77 contravene Pa. Const. Article VII Section 14 as the plain language of that constitutional provision is at odds with the mail-in provisions of Act 77. Since this presents an issue of law which has already been thoroughly briefed by the parties, this Court can state that Petitioners have a likelihood of success on the merits of its Pennsylvania Constitutional claim.
The Judge expressed grave concern as to what a remedy would be if she were to rule the mail-in balloting unconstitutional, so even if she ruled for the petitioners on the merits, it’s not clear if that would change the result:
That being said, this Court is mindful that one of the alternative reliefs noted by Petitioners would cause the disenfranchisement of the nearly seven million Pennsylvanians who voted in the 2020 General Election. Specifically, Respondents claim that a temporary stay would disenfranchise voters as the legislature would appoint the electors to the Election College. However, as noted, the legislature is not authorized to appoint the electors to the Electoral College until December 8, the “Federal Safe Harbor” date for certifying results for presidential electors. The Court agrees it would be untenable for the legislature to appoint the electors where an election has already occurred, if the majority of voters who did not vote by mail entered their votes in accord with a constitutionally recognized method, as such action would result in the disenfranchisement of every voter in the Commonwealth who voted in this election – not only those whose ballots are being challenged due to the constitutionality of Act 77. However, this is not the only equitable remedy available in a matter which hinges upon upholding a most basic constitutional right of the people to a fair and free election. Hence, Respondents have not established that greater harm will result in providing emergency relief, than the harm suffered by the public due to the results of a purportedly unconstitutional election.5
The Judge concluded:
For all of the above reasons, the Court respectfully submits that the emergency preliminary injunction was properly issued and should be upheld pending an expedited emergency evidentiary hearing
A Republican poll observer from Pennsylvania’s Delaware County told a Senate GOP Policy Committee hearing in Gettysburg on Nov. 25 that he witnessed a range of Election Day irregularities, including 47 USB cards that went missing.
Greg Stenstrom, also an expert in security fraud, told the hearing that he witnessed a number of chain-of-custody violations, including around mail-in ballots, the balance of votes from drop boxes, and the handling of USB card flash drives.
These are clear rule violaitons defined by the Delaware County Board of Elections and the election process review.
“They didn’t follow one,” Stenstrom said. “It shocked me that this could happen.”
He described witnessing a situation in which data on USB cards was uploaded to voting machines by a warehouse supervisor without being observed by a poll watcher, which he said he saw happen at least 24 times.
“He’s walking in with baggies, which we have pictures of and that were submitted in our affidavits,” Stenstrom said, adding that Democratic poll watchers also witnessed this occurrence.
Stenstrom said he was told by an attorney that it’s normal for several USB cards to be left in machines and then brought back by the warehouse manager for input into tally systems. He added that when he later raised the issue with U.S. Attorney William McSwain and some law enforcement officers, he was told it is unusual for more than two drives to be left in voting machines.
He said he was later told that “these 24 to 30 cards that were uploaded” were unaccounted for, adding that “as of today, 47 USB v-cards are missing.”
“People ask me all the time, how do people commit crimes? I know there’s a lot of theories here. And I always look for the simplest thing. People that stick USB sticks in, putting ballots in—a very simple thing. Only takes a couple of people, doesn’t take a big conspiracy,” he said.
“As a forensic computer scientist, my interest is in the data—where did it go? Where did the spoilage go? How did the data come in and go out of the system?” he said.
Stenstrom also said that it recently emerged that “virtually all chain of custody logs, records, yellow sheets, everything was gone” in Delaware County.
“They had a signing party where they sat down and coworkers were invited back to recreate those logs,” he said. “And our understanding as of today was that they were unsuccessful in getting them all.”
He said the situation is that there are up to 120,000 ballots that remain “in question.”
“There’s no cure for this, no remedy for this,” he said. “I don’t believe, as a citizen and an observer to this, that anybody could certify that vote in good conscience.”
At the same hearing, President Donald Trump’s attorney Rudy Giuliani said that the type of election irregularities that witnesses described in Pennsylvania also occurred in other battleground states.
“What we’re going to describe to you, with these witnesses, happened in roughly the same way in Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Georgia—the primary device was mail-in ballots,” Giuliani said, characterizing the election in Pennsylvania as a “sham.”
“We don’t want to disenfranchise anyone. We want to disqualify 672,000 votes so 72 million people are not disenfranchised,” Giuliani said. “Because that’s what happened by the cheating that went on here.”
Nuclear Option: Giuliani also suggested to Pennsylvania Republican state senators that they have the power to vote and choose their own electors, saying that in case of tainted results, the Constitution stipulates that state legislators have the authority to nullify a state’s electors and can send their own to the Electoral College.
Pennsylvania’s House and Senate are both controlled by Republicans. The Electoral College meets on Dec. 14.
On Nov 24, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf, a Democrat, announced that the results of the election were certified by the Secretary of State’s office. Georgia Gov. Brian Kemp and Michigan’s Board of Canvassers also certified their elections, although legal challenges are pending.
However, Pennsylvania Commonwealth Judge Patricia McCullough on Nov. 25 ordered the state to not take any further steps to complete the certification of the presidential race. She also blocked the certification of all the other election results.
Facebook changed its algorithm to prioritize specific news outlets
Not at all shocking. And perfectly predictable, given that the establishment media leveraged their pull in order to bully social media to re-establish their monopoly on informational distribution.
The social media bannings begin soon after Inauguration Day. Clear out the brush first with some lower level accounts then slowly moves up as no one says anything in hopes of protecting themselves. Hey we tried to warn people!
This is the game. And if social media — the place Americans turned if they were dissatisfied with the monolithic Left-wing legacy media — wish to act as bullhorns for the legacy media and to suppress legacy media competitors, social media deserve what they get.
It’s going to get worse. Think about web hosting/website builders, domain name registrars/registries, cloud providers, cell phone providers, Internet providers, etc. Imagine them all choosing not to provide service based on who the customer is. Regulators will have to step in.
Nevada Electors File Suit that could invalidate millions of votes
Nevada is not experiencing glitches. It’s called voter fraud. It’s called a heist. It’s called robbery. It’s called larceny. It’s called election hacking. It’s called felonies. It’s called computer crimes. It’s called stealing.
It’s called theft.
The election contest filed by the Trump Electors raised several claims.
First, the complaint alleges that Clark County used the “Agilis” signature matching machine to attempt to conduct the mandated “signature matching” requirement between the signature on the outside of the ballot envelope, and the electronic signature on file with the Secretary of State. The complaint alleges that the “Agilis” matching confirmed only 30% of the signatures as matches, and rejected 70% of more than 450,000 mail-in ballots received and processed by Clark County. The complaint alleges these figures establish the clear unreliability of the “Agilis” machine for any purpose.
The complaint further alleges that any reliance on machine matching was contrary to Nevada law which expressly requires the Election Clerk to match the signatures before accepting the mail-in ballot. Because 30% of the ballots processed by the Agilis machine were determined by the machine to be “matches”, those ballots were never subject to the “signature matching” requirements provided for in the statute.
The complaint further states that the signatures that did undergo verification by Election officials were subjected to objectively unreasonable standards in determining if the signatures “matched”.
The complaint also alleges that more than 15,000 votes were cast by persons known to have voted in other states.
The complaint also alleges that more than 1000 votes were cast by persons who no longer met the residency requirements to vote in Nevada.
The complaint also alleges that more than 500 votes were cast in the names of persons who were deceased on November 3, 2020.
The complaint also alleges that an undetermined number of voters arrived at their polling location to vote in person only to be told that a mail-in ballot had been cast in their name, but the voter had not asked for a mail-in ballot or cast a mail-in ballot.
The complaint alleges that more than 500 provisional ballots were cast and then counted without the Election Clerk of the County taking the steps necessary to address the reasons why a provisional ballot was used, such as confirming the voter’s identity or residency.
Finally, the complaint makes allegations regarding insufficient access to the mail-in vote-counting process by the general public as required by Nevada law.
- « Previous Page
- 1
- …
- 381
- 382
- 383
- 384
- 385
- …
- 861
- Next Page »