December 12, 2024

9 thoughts on “Council Candidate Dannielle Romeo talks Cheriton

  1. Romeo and many of the non-incumbent Town Council candidates have been a breath of fresh air helping to clear the miasma of petty infighting, character assassination, and good-ol’-boy governance that’s had a stranglehold on Cheriton for months. Council members Downing, Lewis, and Spencer seem to think they’re local royalty who are kind enough to let the rest of us live in their town. They do little actual work other than show up for monthly meetings and scheme to drive out town employees they personally don’t like. One of them who is on the budgeting committee declared, “I don’t do numbers.” Unreal.

    Rather than plan for Cheriton’s future, they reply on policing for profit via traffic violation fines. In the proposed fiscal year 2018-2019 budget, FIFTY-TWO PERCENT of town revenue is to be generated by ONE TOWN EMPLOYEE: the Chief of Police. I do not fault the Chief in any way; he serves at the leisure of the council. I presume that the Chief has informed the current council and the mayor of the risks and ethics of policing for profit and that his counsel has been ignored.

    This graphic illustrates how much Cheriton relies on traffic violation fines for revenue. http://bit.ly/cheritonneedsleadership

    Neighboring Cape Charles is growing by leaps and bounds. Cheriton is primed to take off as well, if only we had leadership with the will and vision to try. I encourage all Cheriton residents to vote on May 1 for council members who are willing to think big and work together.

  2. Any idea what this means?
    “A local police department of our own opens doors to our town in many ways, including the ability to expand our borders.”

        1. Annexation is not at all what Ms. Romeo is talking about. There was a lot of good discussion at the OPEN candidate forum yesterday. If this was a concern either of you have as Cheriton residents then coming to talk to her in person and the other candidates would have provided the information you are looking for. Making comments like the one you have falls right in line with the scare tactics of the taxes. Before making off hand remarks maybe you should take the time to educate yourself and get factual information.

          1. Anonymous,
            Aren’t we touchy? I can see why you won’t sign your name.
            I was at that open candidate meeting yesterday, but had to leave early to take my daughter to an event. I did not hear this discussed while I was there.
            The article above specifically states “A local police department of our own opens doors to our town in many ways, including the ability to expand our borders”, so I don’t think asking what is meant by that statement is in any way a scare tactic.
            It also implies policies that will have a direct impact on persons who are NOT residents of Cheriton, should they happen to live in an area being considered for a boundary expansion.
            Cheriton has considered this tactic in the not too distant past.

      1. This was in regards to annexation of more highway frontage and being able to collect the sales tax from the current businesses, as well as bringing more business in. It really would only affect a few residents, and not by much.

          1. I imagine that will eventually be incorporated into Cape Charles. That side of the highway was not on this candidate’s agenda. She was strictly speaking of the highway frontage between the traffic lights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *