Special Opinion to the Mirror by Charles Landis
Those wo believe Biden was legitimately elected, choose to ignore the widespread violation of Article 2 Sec 1 of Constitution which mandates that state legislatures are the sole authority on election process. They simply say there was no fraud and ignore the indisputable Constitutional issue.
During the 2020 election process, Democrat attorney/operatives persuaded governors, state attorney generals, and election officials in Democrat controlled battle ground states to change election rules by pretext that, because of Covid pandemic, emergency changes were necessary.
First, in violation of Art. 2 Sec 1, massive numbers of ballots were mailed out based on dirty voter registration lists; deceased persons, non- residents, and many others that were not legitimate voters. Multiple ballots were mailed to same address of persons not resident. Ballots were harvested. In-person identification was fiercely challenged as voter suppressions. Signatures were not verified on return of mailed in ballots ; envelopes were separated from ballots thus making recounts meaningless.
Assertion that there is no evidence of voter fraud is false. The indisputable violations of Art. 2 Sec 1 is ipso facto proof. This is what Sen Cruz wanted to prove by audit but Democrats denied in House vote.
Until such time as there is an audit of ballots where there was violation of Art. 2 Sec 1, Biden must be considered to have been elected on basis of illegitimate ballots and a bastard president. As also with Comrade Kamala. Res Publica.
MJM says
Yeah, we all know that. We also know that many millions of voters know that. All the complaining and asterisks in record books will not change the fact that Joe Biden was elected president and is now the president. Hopefully the state legislators that helped voting laws to change and voting regs to change due to the covid emergency, will now reverse and negate those ignorant decisions that decptively changed the results of the election. Republican legislators stupidly agreed to those legislative decisions and helped create the problem. Now they gotta live with the results and properly prepare for the future, which they did not do last time.
Paul Plante says
I know it is real stupid these days in America to talk about “laws,” especially where the “make it up as they go” Democrats are concerned, but there is actually a law of OURS that applied to the process on 6 January 2021, and it is that law that I believe the Democrats violated, to wit:
3 U.S. Code § 15 – Counting electoral votes in Congress
Congress shall be in session on the sixth day of January succeeding every meeting of the electors.
The Senate and House of Representatives shall meet in the Hall of the House of Representatives at the hour of 1 o’clock in the afternoon on that day, and the President of the Senate shall be their presiding officer.
Two tellers shall be previously appointed on the part of the Senate and two on the part of the House of Representatives, to whom shall be handed, as they are opened by the President of the Senate, all the certificates and papers purporting to be certificates of the electoral votes, which certificates and papers shall be opened, presented, and acted upon in the alphabetical order of the States, beginning with the letter A; and said tellers, having then read the same in the presence and hearing of the two Houses, shall make a list of the votes as they shall appear from the said certificates; and the votes having been ascertained and counted according to the rules in this subchapter provided, the result of the same shall be delivered to the President of the Senate, who shall thereupon announce the state of the vote, which announcement shall be deemed a sufficient declaration of the persons, if any, elected President and Vice President of the United States, and, together with a list of the votes, be entered on the Journals of the two Houses.
Upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.
end quotes
And stop right there for a moment – upon such reading of any such certificate or paper, the President of the Senate shall call for objections, if any.
So, based on the law as written, OUR law, not the Democrat’s law to do with as they choose, the Republicans were well withing their rights to object to votes for Joe Biden on 6 January 2021.
Getting back to the law as written, it continues as follows:
Every objection shall be made in writing, and shall state clearly and concisely, and without argument, the ground thereof, and shall be signed by at least one Senator and one Member of the House of Representatives before the same shall be received.
When all objections so made to any vote or paper from a State shall have been received and read, the Senate shall thereupon withdraw, and such objections shall be submitted to the Senate for its decision; and the Speaker of the House of Representatives shall, in like manner, submit such objections to the House of Representatives for its decision; and no electoral vote or votes from any State which shall have been regularly given by electors whose appointment has been lawfully certified to according to section 6 of this title from which but one return has been received shall be rejected, but the two Houses concurrently may reject the vote or votes when they agree that such vote or votes have not been so regularly given by electors whose appointment has been so certified.
If more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State shall have been received by the President of the Senate, those votes, and those only, shall be counted which shall have been regularly given by the electors who are shown by the determination mentioned in section 5 of this title to have been appointed, if the determination in said section provided for shall have been made, or by such successors or substitutes, in case of a vacancy in the board of electors so ascertained, as have been appointed to fill such vacancy in the mode provided by the laws of the State; but in case there shall arise the question which of two or more of such State authorities determining what electors have been appointed, as mentioned in section 5 of this title, is the lawful tribunal of such State, the votes regularly given of those electors, and those only, of such State shall be counted whose title as electors the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide is supported by the decision of such State so authorized by its law; and in such case of more than one return or paper purporting to be a return from a State, if there shall have been no such determination of the question in the State aforesaid, then those votes, and those only, shall be counted which the two Houses shall concurrently decide were cast by lawful electors appointed in accordance with the laws of the State, unless the two Houses, acting separately, shall concurrently decide such votes not to be the lawful votes of the legally appointed electors of such State.
But if the two Houses shall disagree in respect of the counting of such votes, then, and in that case, the votes of the electors whose appointment shall have been certified by the executive of the State, under the seal thereof, shall be counted.
When the two Houses have voted, they shall immediately again meet, and the presiding officer shall then announce the decision of the questions submitted.
No votes or papers from any other State shall be acted upon until the objections previously made to the votes or papers from any State shall have been finally disposed of.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 644, 62 Stat. 675.)
Did any of that happen?
I don’t believe so!