“Those who are determined to be ‘offended’ will discover a provocation somewhere. We cannot possibly adjust enough to please the fanatics, and it is degrading to make the attempt.” – Christopher Hitchens.
What do you call a Government that runs up $31 Trillion in debt, then borrows another $140 Billion to send to a foreign country – all while 550,000 of its own citizens are homeless? We’ve seen a lot of cringe in my life but German protestors protesting their way into World War 3 just might take the cake
Status: The Pentagon is asking U.S. forces in South Korea to give military equipment to Ukraine. The Strategic Petroleum Reserve is at its lowest level since 1984. Our ammunition reserves are significantly depleted.
The Secret Service does background checks on everyone who meets with the president, but the White House wants you to believe there’s no visitor log at Biden’s Wilmington home. Reminder, Biden has spent 1/4 of his entire presidency in Delaware.
Update: The Secret Service now acknowledges that it has records on who visited President Joe Biden’s home in Wilmington, Delaware, when classified documents were kept there.
The White House confirms that there are NO VISITOR LOGS at Joe Biden’s Delaware home where he stored classified documents & spent OVER 192 DAYS vacationing during his presidency. What’s he trying to hide?
“Why was President Trump’s home raided but not President Biden’s? Why did the FBI take pictures of President Trump’s so-called classified documents but not President Biden’s?
They want you to believe that seven years after Biden illegally took classified documents and stored them in a Delaware garage, that someone miraculously stumbled upon them and made proper notifications. Seven years. Nope, they are a distraction for much bigger crimes. What prompted them to look for Joe Biden’s classified documents?
The leftist media are insisting that Joe Biden’s GarageGate scandals are not only different to Trump’s classified documents, but they’re a “distraction” from his “success.” These aren’t journalists. They’re Biden’s PR team.
Biden on documents scandal: “Here’s the deal. What quite frankly bugs me is that we have a serious problem here we’re talking about. We’re talking about what’s going on and American people don’t quite understand why you don’t ask me questions about that.”
Energy: The cancelation of the Keystone XL pipeline has already cost the United States thousands of jobs and billions in economic growth while families suffer under the weight of record high energy prices.
Paul Plante says
Q: What do you call a Government that runs up $31 Trillion in debt, then borrows another $140 Billion to send to a foreign country – all while 550,000 of its own citizens are homeless?
A: That’s a no-brainer – pretty ****** up or ****** up royally, or SNABU – situation normal, all Bidened up.
Paul Plante says
There are, of course, those (they know damn well who they are) who say it was positively brilliant for Joe Biden to hide his stolen top-secret government records right in plain sight with his Corvette, on the grounds that any thief or foreign spy or even one of Hunter’s alleged prostitutes were in there snooping around for hidden US government records, they would be so utterly gob·smacked and totally stunned, as was I, truthfully (I once drove a 67 Corvette from NY to Oregon, although it was only a blue one), when I saw the pictures, by the sight of Joe’s rare 67 model with a 327 cubic inch, L79 V8 engine rated at 350 horsepower with a 4-speed manual transmission that can go from 0 to 60 mph in 5.8 seconds, that they would completely overlook a box marked secret stolen US records, right next to the Corvette.
Paul Plante says
The New York Post Editorial Board had a great dissection of this BIDEN CORVETTE-GATE STOLEN US GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS SCANDAL AND MAJOR LEAGUE IMBROGLIO that has now embroiled the Biden regime in the same kind of deep doo-doo the Democrats liked to embroil their hated and feared political enemy Trump in, titled appropriately
“Biden and Justice Department both bungling the classified-docs scandal” on 22 January 2023, which dissection started out as follows, to wit:
How about that: The day after President Joe Biden insisted of his classified-documents mess, “there is no there there,” yet more “there” popped up at his Wilmington home, including docs that he seems to have grabbed before leaving the Senate in 2009.
end quotes
Seriously, does anyone out there believe a single word Joe Biden is saying about this mess, given he has already admitted that he is doing exactly what his lawyers are telling him to do, which is to keep his mouth shut before the goofball buries himself even further?
Going back to the dissection, which shows us just how stupid the federal government really is now that Joe Biden has his people in there, we have as follows:
But it’s not just the prez proving clueless.
It’s also the Justice Department (which sat on the news of the first doc-finding for two months).
It was an FBI search (at last) that found the stuff, after Justice had earlier said it was fine with the president’s own folks doing the digging.
Who changed their minds, and why?
(For that matter, what’s with the Secret Service’s changing line about whether it keeps track of visitors to Biden’s Delaware homes?)
end quotes
All serious questions we are all but assured and guaranteed we will never hear the answers to, which takes us back for more, to wit:
Biden not only says he has “no regrets,” he claims to have no idea how any of it got there, as if somebody else did it or the docs just walked themselves all over the region.
That at least dovetails with the White House line that was all “inadvertent mishandling” — as if it could know that, what with the prez claiming to have no clue.
end quotes
The latest rumors, or evasions, or excuses, seem to be along the lines of it was really the fault of Joe’s dogs who didn’t eat Joe’s secret records. just carried them off as dogs will do and squirreled them here and there, against, as dogs will do, and now people are unfairly trying to blame it on Joe, instead, which again takes us back to the article, to wit:
And anyway neither he nor any staff should’ve been handling (let alone storing) any of this stuff in the unsecured locations where it’s been found.
Will ‘no regrets’ be Biden’s epitaph as the classified docs pile up?
The available evidence now suggests he was carting off government secrets at least since he was a spry 68.
To us, that looks more like “incredibly reckless.”
By the way, we also still don’t know why Biden sent lawyers to go through his old office late last year, the move that produced the initial discovery.
Did he perhaps have some memory that maybe something was there that shouldn’t be?
At a minimum, the FBI plainly needs to go through all his old offices and all his homes, as well as the hundreds of boxes he’s stored at the University of Delaware — plus, we guess, anywhere he’s vacationed since 2008, given his “inadvertent mishandling” track record.
And the Justice Department should issue a public policy on how it’s supposed to handle all these discoveries before another one pops up, probably including a public admission that it utterly bungled Hillary Clinton’s insecure storing of secrets (and destruction of potential evidence) during her email mess.
What a clown show.
end quotes
Can anybody in America argue against that last statement?
If so, we would love to hear from you!
Paul Plante says
And speaking of double standards here, where one standard applies only to Joe Biden and the other applies to everybody who isn’t Joe Biden, here we have a glaring example on display in the Fox News story “Biden tanked Jimmy Carter’s nominee for CIA over mishandled classified docs” by Brooke Singman on January 20, 2023, to wit:
As a senator in the 1970s, Joe Biden tanked then-President Jimmy Carter’s pick to lead the Central Intelligence Agency over the nominee’s illegal possession of classified documents.
end quote
But see, that was then, and uh, well, c’mon, man, this is today and it is Joe Biden as president we are talking about, so a different standard should apply, which takes us back for more detail as follows:
Carter chose Ted Sorenson to serve as his CIA director in 1977.
Sorenson had admitted to taking boxes of classified records home with him after leaving the White House in 1964, and using the materials for his work in writing a biography of former President John F. Kennedy.
Sorenson’s admission to this came in affidavits used in cases involving the Pentagon Papers.
At the time, Biden considered the affidavit and joined with Republicans to block Sorenson from being confirmed by the Senate.
Biden also suggested Sorenson may have violated the Espionage Act.
end quotes
And speaking of the Espionage Act, if we actually take a look at it, it is clear Joe himself is also in violation of it, to wit:
Chapter 37 of the US Code § 793(f), Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information:
“Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer — Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.”
Going back to the Fox News article, it continues as follows:
During Sorenson’s confirmation hearing, Biden said the “real issue” was “whether Mr. Sorensen intentionally took advantage of ambiguities in the law, or carelessly ignored the law.”
end quotes
And if there is equal justice in America, or if there is to be, because there isn’t right now, those same questions apply to Joe Biden.
WHEN CAN WE EXPECT THE ANSWERS?
Paul Plante says
And while we are talking about a glaring double standard with regard to Joe Biden having top secret US documents in his possession despite the clear statutory language of Chapter 37 of the US Code § 793(f), Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information, which makes it incandescently clear that whoever, in this case Joe Biden, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody is guilty of a federal crime, let’s go to the CNN article titled “Opinion: We’re seeing the first major blow to Biden’s ‘regular Joe’ image” by Julian Zelizer on 25 January 2023 to see how they are twisting and spinning this story to make Joe look innocent, instead, to wit:
More than eight out of 10 Americans approve of the appointment of a special counsel to investigate the handling of classified documents found at Biden’s home and office.
However, according to the same CNN poll, it seems Americans understand the differences between the two cases involving Biden and Trump.
While a majority of Americans disapprove of the way Biden has handled the issue and consider it a serious or “somewhat serious” problem, it’s telling that only 37% of Americans believe he has done something illegal.
Yet, when it comes to Trump’s case, 52% of Americans believe he has done something illegal.
end quotes
So there we have it, people – and it’s about democracy in action, and people’s feeling, what makes them feel good about themselves and all warm and squishy inside, not what the law as written actually says.
Do despite the law as written making it incandescently clear that Joe Biden was in clear violation of the law by being in possession of those records, people don’t really think there is anything wrong with that, which means in the case of Joe Biden people don’t think the law applies to him, because unlike what CNN is trying to peddle here, there is NO difference whatsoever between the two cases involving Biden and Trump.
The law as written says “any” document!
It doesn’t give Joe Biden a free ride because he is alleged to not have as many documents as did Trump, although we have no proof of that, given more documents Joe had stashed around keep popping up, nor does the law give Joe Biden a pass because when caught red-handed, he turned the documents in.
The single question here is this:
DID JOE BIDEN UNLAWFULLY HAVE IN HIS POSSESSION TOP SECRET U.S. GOVERNMENT DOCUMENTS?
That question can only be answered in the affirmative.
SO WHEN CAN WE EXPECT TO SEE JOE BIDEN PROSECUTED FOR BLATANTLY VIOLATING THE ESPIONAGE LAW?
Never?
Paul Plante says
We now live in a time in America where in the name of “equity,” intelligent people are being silenced so that stupid people won’t be offended.