CAPE CHARLES MIRROR

Reflections on Cape Charles and the Eastern Shore

You are here: Home / Archives for Environmental Activism

Is it too late to save the Amazon

by Leave a Comment

Deforestation reduces the forest’s ability to generate rain clouds, which significantly raises the odds of drought. And the more fragmented the forest is, the harder it is to bounce back after a drought ends. Over-harvesting and passing the forest’s tipping point would be devastating for the forest’s biodiversity and for the Indigenous people that live there. The forests of the Amazon area are home to more than 3 million species of plants and animals. They also store large amounts of carbon dioxide that, if the forests die, would be released back into the atmosphere.

This week, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Colombian President Gustavo Petro formed a “pact” earlier this month to try to save the Amazon “for humanity.”

  • The first anti-deforestation raids on Lula’s watch took place last week to stop the illegal clearing of the forest.
  • Earlier this month, Lula signed a series of executive orders to address illegal deforestation in Brazil, which is home to 60% of the Amazon forest and reactivated the Amazon Fund that invests in efforts to stop deforestation.

An estimated 13 to 17% of the original Amazon rainforest has been deforested over the last half-century.

In a paper published in the journal Science, an international team of scientists report humans are causing changes to the Amazonian ecosystem in a matter of decades or centuries, as opposed to millions to tens of millions of years for natural processes. “Organisms can’t adapt in the period of decades or centuries,” Albert says.

Another analysis looked at the problem of land degradation in the Amazon due to logging, fires, extreme droughts, and changes at the edges of the forest caused by the habitat being fragmented.

  • Deforestation changes the land cover and can be spotted by satellites. Degradation stems from changes in how the land is used and can be hidden by the forest canopy — a forest continues to be a forest but is degraded and weakened.
  • Using data from earlier studies and new satellite images, the authors estimate about 2.5 million square kilometers of the Amazon — about 38% of the remaining forest — is considered degraded by one or more disturbances. That’s in addition to deforestation.
  • They also found the carbon lost from the forest due to degradation is on par with that due to deforestation — and degradation can lead to as much loss of the forest’s biodiversity as deforestation.

Their projections suggest “degradation will continue to be a major source of emissions in the region, regardless of what happens with deforestation,” says study co-author David Lapola, a research scientist at the University of Campinas (Unicamp) in Brazil. “We need specific policies to handle degradation. It’s not using the same policies and actions for deforestation,” he says.

Asses&Villains: Will Green Tech Destroy the Earth

by Leave a Comment

We all want a cleaner environment, but can we get there without mining ourselves into oblivion, without destroying open space? Can we reduce emissions without lithium batteries? Can we reduce emissions without raping the wilderness and deserts with millions of miles of heinous solar panels? Can we reduce emissions without windmills, that disrupt the patterns of migratory species like whales and birds?

In 2017, the World Bank released a report that took a first comprehensive look at the factors involved in a transition to ‘Green Energy’. It models the increase in material extraction that would be required to build enough solar and wind utilities to produce an annual output of about 7 terawatts of electricity by 2050. 7 terawatts are only enough to power half of the global economy. To get to zero emissions would take 34 million metric tons of copper, 40 million tons of lead, 50 million tons of zinc, 162 million tons of aluminum, and around 4.8 billion tons of iron.

Steve Jobs’ widow Lauren Powell owns a $66 million Gulfstream jet that burns 500 gallons of jet fuel per hour and sails on a $120 million yacht. But she’s funding activists to make sure you can’t own a gas stove.

For neodymium—an essential element in wind turbines—extraction will need to rise by nearly 35 percent over current levels. Higher-end estimates reported by the World Bank suggest it could double.

Silver extraction, needed for solar, will go up 38 percent and perhaps as much as 105 percent. Indium would rise by 920 percent.

Trying to power the grid with batteries will be insane, requiring at least 40 million tons of lithium—that’s 2,700 percent increase over current levels of extraction.

Windmills, solar panels, and electric batteries for cars and trucks are not biodegradable, creating a toxic waste storage nightmare.

Open Space will be gobbled up. Bloomberg reports that getting to zero carbon by 2050 would require a land area equal to five South Dakotas “to develop enough clean power to run all the electric vehicles, factories, and more.” A nuclear plant takes up at most 1 square mile of land. Wind and solar farms require hundreds of thousands of acres.

To power up just Manhattan would require paving over nearly the whole state of Connecticut with windmills and solar farms.

Stop the posing and lame rhetoric, and replace myth with solid engineering. Go Nuke, or Go Home.

NOAA FAQs: Whales and Wind Farms

by 1 Comment

What is the current status of the humpback whale population in the North Atlantic?
There are different populations of humpback whales around the world, some of which are listed as “threatened” or “endangered” under the Endangered Species Act. The population of humpback whales in the North Atlantic (also known as the West Indies Distinct Population Segment) is not listed as threatened or endangered. However, all humpback whales are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act. More information about the status of humpback whale stocks in U.S. waters can be found in NOAA Fisheries Marine Mammal Stock Assessment Reports.

What does NOAA Fisheries do to minimize the impact of offshore wind development on whales?
NOAA Fisheries is a science agency, and like our marine mammal stranding network partners, we value marine life and strive to conserve these species. We are dedicated to minimizing risks to protected resources, habitats, and managed fisheries throughout the life cycle of offshore wind energy projects. We are responsible for several regulatory processes that help reduce impacts to marine animals and their habitats from human activities, including during offshore wind development.

Is U.S. offshore wind development linked to any whale deaths?
No. At NOAA Fisheries, we work with our partners to analyze and understand the causes of death when we are able, following the science and data. At this point, there is no evidence to support speculation that noise resulting from wind development-related site characterization surveys could potentially cause mortality of whales. There are no specific links between recent large whale mortalities and currently ongoing surveys. We will continue to gather data to help us determine the cause of death for these mortality events. We will also continue to explore how sound, vessel, and other human activities in the marine environment impact whales and other marine mammals.

Does NOAA Fisheries authorize the injury of whales as it relates to offshore wind development?
No, NOAA Fisheries has not authorized—or proposed to authorize—mortality or serious injury of whales for any wind-related action. Offshore wind developers have not applied for, and NOAA Fisheries has not approved, authorization to kill any marine mammals incidental to any offshore wind activities.

What is NOAA Fisheries doing to minimize the effects of offshore wind development on endangered North Atlantic right whales?
NOAA Fisheries is heavily invested in the conservation and recovery of endangered North Atlantic right whales. NOAA Fisheries recently proposed a rule to modify existing vessel speed restrictions that would apply to many offshore wind-related vessels. In our permits and authorizations, we also require mitigation measures to avoid and minimize impacts from offshore wind development.

Finally, NOAA Fisheries and Bureau of Ocean Energy Management recently released a joint draft strategy to protect and promote the recovery of North Atlantic right whales while responsibly developing offshore wind energy. This strategy is part of NOAA Fisheries’ comprehensive Road to Recovery for North Atlantic right whales.

If offshore wind development isn’t the cause of recent whale deaths off New York and New Jersey, what is the cause?
Since January 2016, NOAA Fisheries has been monitoring an Unusual Mortality Event for humpback whales with elevated strandings along the entire East Coast. To date, there are 178 humpback whale mortalities included in the UME. Partial or full necropsy examinations were conducted on approximately half of the whales. Of the whales examined, about 40 percent had evidence of human interaction, either ship strike or entanglement. Vessel strikes and entanglement in fishing gear are the greatest human threats to large whales.

Why is there currently a high number of large whales in the waters off New Jersey? Is it related to offshore wind?
As the humpback whale population has grown, they have been seen more often in the Mid-Atlantic. Along the New Jersey shore, these whales may be following their prey (small fish) which are reportedly close to shore this winter. These prey also attract fish that are of interest to recreational and commercial fishermen. This increases the number of boats in these areas. More whales in the water in areas traveled by boats of all sizes increases the risk of vessel strikes. As such, we advise boaters to go slowly (less than 10 knots) and keep a lookout for whales.

There is currently a voluntary slow zone in effect for the waters off New York and New Jersey due to recent detections of endangered North Atlantic right whales. There are also active Seasonal Management Areas (where all vessels 65 feet or longer must travel at 10 knots or less) off the ports of New York/New Jersey and Delaware Bay due to known seasonal distribution of endangered North Atlantic right whales.

Is climate change a factor in the number of whales we’re seeing close to shore?
We know that our climate is changing, and one of those key changes is the warming of our oceans. In response to this, we are seeing populations of many marine species adapting by moving into new areas where conditions are more favorable.

Changing distributions of prey impact larger marine species that depend on them, and result in changing distribution of whales and other marine life. This can lead to increased interactions with humans as some whales move closer to near shore habitats. Work is ongoing to investigate the increase in humpback whale deaths beginning in 2016, and certainly this most recent string of devastating losses.

The impacts of changing species distributions reach far beyond the individual species experiencing the shift, to affect entire ecosystems, as well as fisheries interactions, and coastal economies.

What can I do to help whales in distress?
If you see a dead or injured marine mammal or sea turtle, please call the NOAA Greater Atlantic Marine Mammal and Sea Turtle Stranding Hotline at (866) 755-6622 to be directed to a trained responder. The best way to assist these animals, and keep them and yourself safe, is by calling trained responders and maintaining a distance of 150 feet.

Please remember that all marine mammals are protected by the Marine Mammal Protection Act, which makes touching, feeding, or otherwise harming these animals illegal. It is also illegal to take any marine mammal part from live or dead animals including bones and teeth.

If you are a boater, download the Whale Alert app for real time updates on management areas and whale sightings on digital nautical charts. When you are boating in these areas, slow down and keep a watchful eye on the water.

Additional Information on Harassment Authorizations
What does “harassment” mean under the Marine Mammal and Protection Act?
Under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, harassment is statutorily defined as:

Level A Harassment, which has the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild (i.e. non-serious injury)
Level B Harassment, which has the potential to disturb a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild by causing disruption of behavioral patterns, including migration, breathing, nursing, breeding, feeding, or sheltering but which does not have the potential to injure a marine mammal or marine mammal stock in the wild (i.e. behavioral disturbance).
How do I find more information about marine mammal incidental harassment authorizations?
We track all active and in-progress incidental take authorizations, including those related to offshore wind. There are 12 active IHAs authorizing the take, by Level B (i.e. behavioral) harassment only, of marine mammals incidental to offshore wind site characterization surveys in the Atlantic Ocean from southern New England to the Carolinas.

General information about the MMPA take authorization process

There are two active IHAs for offshore wind construction activities that authorize take of marine mammals by both Level A and Level B harassment. Level A harassment includes non-serious injury—in this case, in the form of auditory injury resulting from exposure to noise from pile driving. NOAA Fisheries carefully considers possible impacts to marine mammal species. These details and mitigations are included in the relevant documents for each active IHA.

Additional Information on Necropsies
What are NOAA Fisheries and its partners doing to determine the cause(s) of recent whale deaths?
The local stranding network partner is responsible for leading the examination, but large whale responses generally involve multiple agencies from across the network working together. These stranding network partners responded to each of the recent cases to document and examine the carcasses. At a minimum, each carcass was documented with photos, measurements, and an external examination. Since the cause of death is not always clear at first examination, biologists took samples from these whales, and will work with laboratory partners to review them in the coming months. Decomposition can limit our ability to determine a definitive cause of death.

Why aren’t all large whales necropsied?
Large whale necropsies are very complicated, requiring many people and typically heavy equipment (front loaders, etc.). Some whales are found dead floating offshore, and need to be towed to land for an examination. There can be limitations on the location where the whale stranded, including protected lands (parks or concerns for other endangered species) and accessibility (remote areas, tides that prevent access at times of day). Also, necropsies are the most informative when the animal died relatively recently. Some whales are not found until they are already decomposed, which limits the amount of information that can be obtained. Finally, funding is limited, and varies by location and stranding network partner.

Who are NOAA Fisheries’ marine mammal stranding network partners?
Our marine mammal stranding network partners in New England and the Mid Atlantic include:

Allied Whale (Maine)
Marine Mammals of Maine (Maine)
Seacoast Science Center (New Hampshire/North Shore Massachusetts)
International Fund for Animal Welfare (Cape Cod, Massachusetts)
Center for Coastal Studies (Cape Cod, Massachusetts)
Marine Mammal Alliance Nantucket (Nantucket, Massachusetts)
Wampanoag Tribe of Gay Head Aquinnah (Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts)
Whale and Dolphin Conservation (South Shore, Massachusetts)
Marine Mammal Stranding Center (New Jersey)
Atlantic Marine Conservation Society (New York)
New York Marine Rescue Center (New York)
Mystic Aquarium (Connecticut/Rhode Island)
MERR Institute (Delaware)
Maryland Department of Natural Resources (Maryland)
National Aquarium (Maryland)
Virginia Aquarium and Marine Science Center (Virginia)

8 Dead Whales: Time to Stop Windfarm Development

by 3 Comments

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) — Environmentalists and opponents of offshore wind stood on a beach where the marine mammal lay buried and called for a federal probe into a spate of whale deaths in New Jersey and New York. Groups from the two states wrote President Joe Biden requesting a probe of the deaths of six whales that washed ashore over the last 33 days in areas being prepared for large-scale offshore wind farms. They also are asking for a halt to site work until the causes are determined.

The death total has now reached 8, with another dead whale floating near Virginia Beach.

Last Thursday a 20- to 25-foot-long (6- to 7.6-meter-long) humpback whale washed up on the Jersey Shore. Its remains washed ashore in Brigantine, just north of Atlantic City, which itself has seen two dead whales on its beaches in recent weeks.

“We should suspend all work related to offshore wind development until we can determine the cause of death of these whales, some of which are endangered,” said New Jersey state Sen. Vince Polistina, a Republican who represents the area. “The work related to offshore wind projects is the primary difference in our waters, and it’s hard to believe that the death of (seven) whales on our beaches is just a coincidence.”

The Clean Ocean Action environmental group notes that wind farm site work typically involves exploring the ocean floor using focused pulses of low-frequency sound in the same frequency that whales hear and communicate, which could potentially harm or disorient the animals.

Brigantine’s mayor, Vince Sera, joined in the call for a temporary halt to offshore wind site prep, as did U.S. Rep. Jeff Van Drew, a Republican congressman representing southern New Jersey.

At a news conference Monday in Atlantic City, the groups calling on Biden to probe the deaths said offshore wind developers have applied for authorization to harass or harm as many as 157,000 marine mammals off the two states.

Of course, Climate Change grifters tried to use the fake ‘climate crisis’ to push for wind farm development, even as the work is killing off endangered species. For Clean Water Action, Environment New Jersey, the Sierra Club, New Jersey Audubon, NY/NJ Baykeeper, and others, the end (the money grift) always justifies the means.

“The climate crisis demands that we quickly develop renewable energy, and offshore wind is critically important for New Jersey to reach the state’s economic development and environmental justice goals,” the groups said in a statement.

Federal Appeals Court Yanks Conowingo Dam License

by Leave a Comment

This December, a federal appeals court has vacated a 50-year-license issued to Conowingo Dam last year after conservation groups challenged its approval in court. On Tuesday, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals said that the license, issued by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, was invalid because it did not include conditions related to reducing pollution in the Chesapeake.

The groups behind the lawsuit cheered the decision, saying it would not disrupt operations at the dam, 5 miles south of Lancaster County along the Susquehanna River in Maryland, and would help protect the Susquehanna River and Chesapeake Bay in the future.

The decision comes about a year after environmental groups represented by Earthjustice challenged FERC’s decision to renew the dam’s operation for another 50 years. Groups argued the agency unlawfully renewed Constellation’s license — formerly known as Exelon Corp — as it did not require the company to follow Maryland’s mitigation practices necessary to restore water quality downstream.

The conditions were laid out in 2018 by Maryland officials in a “water quality certification“ required by the regulatory commission licensing process. They included reducing the amount of sediment and debris that flows through the dam into the Chesapeake Bay and ensuring passage for fish and eels.

The dam’s former owner, Exelon, challenged the conditions in court in 2019. They argued that they cannot control pollution coming from sources upstream. The state of Maryland later settled, and Exelon agreed to pay it $225 million toward reducing pollution in the bay.

Earlier this year Exelon created a spinoff company, Constellation Energy, which now owns the dam.

A spokesperson for the dam owner said the decision was surprising and disappointing, adding that it could jeopardize the $225 million from the settlement with the state as well as another $475 million it has pledged toward reducing pollution in the bay.

Chesapeake Conservancy Applauds Conservation Outcomes in FY 23 Federal Spending Package

by Leave a Comment

Annapolis, MD – On Friday, December 23, Congress passed the Fiscal Year 2023 (FY 23) omnibus appropriations package to fund government agencies and programs for the next fiscal year. The annual funding package supported many programs related to conservation and environmental restoration in the Chesapeake Bay watershed and increased funding for several key programs.

Chesapeake Conservancy’s Manager of External Affairs Reed Perry applauded the federal FY 23 omnibus bill, stating,

“The federal omnibus appropriations package for FY 23 contains many big wins for the Chesapeake Bay and for conservation. The federal funding bill directly supports many vital agency partners and programs that advance environmental conservation in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

“The FY 23 omnibus will increase funding for the Chesapeake Bay Program by $4 million to a historic funding level of $92 million in FY 23. We are at a pivotal moment in the Chesapeake Bay restoration effort where all partners must work tirelessly and collaboratively to get as close as possible to the agreed-upon goals of the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Agreement. As the central partnership of the region’s watershed restoration effort, the Chesapeake Bay Program plays an essential role, and this funding will empower the Bay Program partnership to maximize the impact of its work.

“The FY 23 omnibus also increases funding by $2 million for USGS activities in the Chesapeake Bay, for a total of more than $17 million in FY 23. The USGS is a critical partner in science and monitoring efforts in our watershed, and when data drives so much of our decision-making about watershed restoration, this additional funding will help partners make more informed decisions to target conservation efforts and accelerate progress.

“This bill also provides $8 million to the Chesapeake WILD program, a new U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service program established by Congress in 2020. This represents a $4 million increase over FY 22 funding levels which will greatly boost the impact of this vital conservation program. Chesapeake WILD is a dedicated program for conservation in the Chesapeake Bay and supports on-the-ground efforts across the watershed such as species conservation and wetland restoration.

“The FY 23 omnibus increases funding for the Department of Defense’s Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) program by $25 million, for a total of $175 million. This national conservation program advances national security through conservation and has led to the conservation of around 32,000 or more acres in the Chesapeake Bay watershed. Increased REPI funding will allow the Bay watershed to continue to benefit from this program.

“Thank you to the senators and members of Congress who worked to advance and pass this important legislation, and we especially thank our congressional members from the Chesapeake Bay watershed for their strong support for conservation and the Chesapeake Bay.”

Highlights for Chesapeake Bay conservation and restoration in the FY 23 Omnibus Appropriations Bill include:

·        $92 million for the Chesapeake Bay Program, an increase of $4 million over FY 22 appropriations. The Chesapeake Bay Program is a regional partnership of federal agencies, states, local governments, universities and non-governmental organizations that work together to restore and to protect the Chesapeake Bay.

·        $8 million for Chesapeake WILD, a $4 million increase over FY 22 appropriations. Chesapeake WILD is a new U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service program focused specifically on habitat conservation and restoration in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

·        $3 million for the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails program. The Gateways Program is run by the National Park Service Chesapeake Bay Office and provides financial and technical support to communities and organizations throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed for public access, educational programming and interpretation of the Bay’s natural, cultural and historical resources.

·        $17.49 million for the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS) Chesapeake Bay activities, a $2 million increase over FY 22 appropriations. The USGS is a core federal partner of the Chesapeake Bay Program that contributes scientific research and monitoring to several aspects of watershed restoration, including land use and wildlife habitat.

·        $175 million for Department of Defense’s Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative (REPI) program. The REPI program supports partnerships between branches of the U.S. military, local conservation groups and local and state governments to conserve land near military installations in order to protect the continued and future operation of military installations. REPI has supported the conservation of more than 32,000 acres in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

Chesapeake Conservancy Announces 2022 “Champions of the Chesapeake”

by Leave a Comment

Rappahannock Tribe Chief Anne Richardson & Blacks of the Chesapeake President Vince Leggett Honored for Their Inclusive Leadership and Dedication to the Chesapeake Bay

Annapolis, Md. – Today, Chesapeake Conservancy announced the 2022 Champions of the Chesapeake, the organization’s highest honor recognizing extraordinary leaders from across the Chesapeake for their significant and exemplary accomplishments that protect and restore our natural systems and cultural resources. Rappahannock Tribe Chief Anne Richardson and Vince Leggett, founder and president of Blacks of the Chesapeake Foundation, were named Champions of the Chesapeake for demonstrating that tireless work leads to notable achievements in conservation.

In announcing the awards, Chesapeake Conservancy President and CEO Joel Dunn stated: “Chief Richardson and Vince Leggett were the driving forces and incredible partners behind two of the most significant conservation achievements in the Chesapeake this year.”

Chief Anne Richardson has been instrumental in the return to the Rappahannock Tribe of a 465-acre sacred site at Fones Cliffs on the eastern side of the Rappahannock River. The site, known as Pissacoack, will be permanently protected by a conservation easement and used for recreation and education. Fones Cliffs is also home to bald eagle nests and has been designated by the National Audubon Society as an Important Bird Area with global significance.

Vince Leggett is recognized for his efforts to preserve Black history and culture on the Chesapeake Bay. For 15 years, Leggett worked tirelessly to preserve Elktonia beach, a five-acre waterfront parcel on the Chesapeake Bay that is the last remnant of the original 180-acre property purchased by Fred Carr in 1902. Carr’s and Sparrow’s Beaches were privately owned and operated by Fred Carr’s daughters, Elizabeth Carr Smith and Florence Carr Sparrow. “The Beaches” (1930s-1970s), as they were called, represented the heart of entertainment throughout the mid-Atlantic region and welcomed Blacks during a time of segregation.

“Now, more than ever, we need leaders and officials who will stand up for conservation in the Chesapeake Bay region,” continued Dunn. “Chief Richardson and Vince Leggett both exemplify what it means to be a Champion of the Chesapeake through inclusivity, dedication, partnership and collaboration. They are both role models for today’s environmental leaders and for future conservation wins.”

Previous award winners include Jonathan Doherty, National Park Service Chesapeake Office; Jason Fellon, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection; Marcus Kohl, Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection; Dennis Chestnut, Mariah Davis, Choose Clean Water Coalition; Anna Killius, James River Association; River Rock Outfitter; Maryland Senator Guy Guzzone; Pennsylvania Senator Gene Yaw; Virginia Delegate David Bulova; Ann P. Swanson, Chesapeake Bay Commission; U.S. Senator Barbara S. Mikulski of Maryland; U.S. Senator Paul S. Sarbanes of Maryland; U.S. Senator John W. Warner of Virginia; Maryland Governor Larry Hogan; Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe; former National Park Service Director Jonathan B. Jarvis; Keith Campbell, The Keith Campbell Foundation; Esri; Mount Vernon Ladies’ Association; Microsoft Corporation; Mt. Cuba Center; Dr. Mamie Parker, US Fish & Wildlife Service; REI; Kim Hernandez, NOAA Fellow; and Skyline Technology Solutions, Inc.

Chesapeake Conservancy Applauds Youngkin Administration’s Proposed Amendments to Virginia Biennial Budget on Natural Resources and Clean Water

by Leave a Comment

Annapolis, MD – On Thursday, Governor Glenn Youngkin released his proposed amendments to the Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 and 2023 biennial budget for Virginia.

Governor Younkin’s proposed budget amendments would increase operations funding for the Department of Conservation and Recreation by $100 million in 2023 and nearly $240 million in 2024. The proposed amendments would also increase the capital budget for the department by $3 million in 2023.

The proposed budget amendments would provide $200 million across 2023 and 2024 for the Resilient Virginia Revolving Loan Fund, which supports local government resilience projects across the Commonwealth. This resilience funding is part of the $685 million proposed for accelerating Chesapeake Bay restoration efforts. The Governor’s proposed budget amendments would increase funding for the Department of Environmental Quality by $110 million in 2023 and $154 million in 2024.

Chesapeake Conservancy President and CEO Joel Dunn issued the following statement:

“I applaud Governor Youngkin’s proposed amendments to the biennial 2023 – 2024 budget as they pertain to conservation, natural resources and clean water. The proposed amendments would significantly increase Virginia’s budget for the Department of Conservation and Recreation and the Department of Environmental Quality. Virginia’s natural resources and the Chesapeake Bay are absolutely critical to the health of Virginia’s people, its wildlife and the economy. These proposed budget amendments reflect Governor Youngkin’s commitment to conservation and the natural resources of Virginia.”

Save the Whales, Stop Offshore Wind Projects

by Leave a Comment

Is Dominion Energy’s Offshore Wind Project a real threat to the viability of the endangered North Atlantic Right Whale?

The North Atlantic right whale is one of the world’s most endangered large whale species; the latest preliminary estimate suggests there are fewer than 350 remaining. Two other species of right whales exist: the North Pacific right whale, which is found in the North Pacific Ocean, and the Southern right whale, which is found in the southern hemisphere. Right whales are baleen whales, feeding on copepods (tiny crustaceans) by straining huge volumes of ocean water through their baleen plates, which act like a sieve.

The offshore wind (OSW) project proposed by Dominion Energy may pose a serious threat to the endangered North Atlantic Right Whale population. Many of the OSWs are directly in the migratory path of the whales, which generally stay within 30 miles of the coast.

Baby whale washed up after a ship strike (Chris Glennon Photo)

The east coast is already a super highway for shipping traffic. More whales are killed by ship strikes than by any other cause. The problem is that these OSWs are going to force whale to travel closer, and into these shipping lanes, which will lead to more strikes, and more deaths. The proposed Virginia/Dominion OSW project will be near 800 square miles, and will be a serious distraction to the whale’s migratory routes.

Right whales produce a variety of low frequency sounds, and the calling repertoires between the three species are considered to be similar. Moans, groans, belches, and pulses have most of their acoustic energy below 500 Hz. Some vocalizations will occasionally reach up to 4 kHz. One typical right whale vocalization used to communicate with other right whales is the “up call”. 

The noise created by these giant wind farms is also a concern. Will it interupt normal whale communications, and cause confusion as they migrate south? Will the noise and communication disruption be a problem the baby whales?

Whenever the topic of OSW comes up, the only thing that appears to matter is money. Given the giant push by the Biden Administration to build more wind farms, the money issue should not come as a surpise.

Litigation, and forcing agencies like NOAA to walk the walk when it comes to the Endangered Species Act is the best way forward.

Kayakers Needed to Help Diamondback Terrapins

by Leave a Comment

The Virginia Department of Wildlife Resources recently launched a new volunteer opportunity to directly help the imperiled diamondback terrapins (Malaclemys terrapin) of Virginia. These unique turtles inhabit brackish water habitats. They are considered keystone predators of herbivorous crabs and snails in salt marsh ecosystems, a key role in the maintenance of overall marsh health.

Sign Up Here

The project will launch in Spring 2023 using volunteers doing standardized ‘headcounts’ from canoes and kayaks in search of terrapins along Virginia tidal tributaries throughout the coastal region. The data collected will identify waterways that are of high value to terrapins. CCRM is providing suitable habitat range maps for this charismatic species, in addition to ongoing research about terrapins being harmed by derelict crab pots.