US announces an additional $2,100,000,000.00 Billion to Ukraine today… This is why McCarthy wanted to raise the debt ceiling. Make sense now?
After reading the FBI FD-1023 form, the American people should know it also stipulates that according to the confidential human source, money was moved through several accounts to get to Joe Biden. To clarify, money was MOVED ON PURPOSE through multiple accounts to get to Biden.
Trump Prosecutor Jack Smith: “We have one set of laws in this country, and they apply to everyone.” No one believes this…so, the same FBI & DOJ that was caught illegally spying on President Trump in the Durham Report are now indicting him for possessing evidence of their crimes in his home?
Irony alert – The president who invaded a country and slaughtered millions of innocents in an unspeakable war crime will retire in peace and wealth on a ranch in Texas, while Trump faces prison time for stashing a box of papers in the wrong closet. Go figure.
Alert-CNN-After two years of surging prices, economists still can’t agree on what has caused the world’s worst inflation crisis in decades.
BREAKING: Elon Musk says the DOJ is losing public trust after Trump indictment. Jill Biden lies in interview that she didn’t know classified documents were in her home until media found out, but then says they were stored in her garage Which is more secure? Mar a Lago or the Biden garage?
BREAKING REPORT: FBI Official In Charge Of Mar-A-Lago Raid Said Feds Breached Protocol…This feels like a good time to remind everyone that Hillary Clinton deleted 33,000 emails after getting a subpoena and the FBI considered that cooperation…
Just in – Nearly 300 absentee ballots from 2020 election found in Michigan county storage unit???
PURJURY: Biden’s Energy Granholm has admitted she lied under oath to the United States Senate. In April she swore that she didn’t own a single individual stock. She lied. She owned multiple stocks and at least one that her office was investigating.
OIL SHOCK: As Biden continues his MasterClass on failure, we now learn, as a result of his behavior, Saudi Arabia threatened a “serious” economic blow to the US because of Biden’s remarks. The Saudi crown prince said he would “no longer deal with the US administration” and promised “serious economic consequences for Washington.”
A California bill AB957 was just amended to add “a parent’s affirmation of the child’s gender identity” as part of the “health, safety, and welfare of the child” in the state’s Family Code. If parents disapprove of their child’s gender transition, and say a teacher or lgbt activist reports them, a court would now have broad authority to take him or her away from them. They can also be charged with child abuse if they don’t agree to call their son a daughter.
Paul R. Plante says
What can possibly be said after all that has been said?
As to supposed “equal justice” for all in this country, that’s horsecrap and have been for a long, long time now, and the New York Post has a good take on it in the article “FBI’s Biden bias is on full display as Wray fences with Republicans over ‘bribe’ doc” by Michael Goodwin on 6 June 2023, as follows:
“Trust but verify” was how Ronald Reagan described his view of agreements with the Soviet Union.
The same mindset should apply to dealing with the FBI, though recent history suggests it’s wiser to drop the “trust” part and go straight to “verify.”
The organization previously known as the world’s premier law enforcement agency is increasingly seen by many Americans as the armed wing of the Democratic Party.
end quotes
It’s interesting that Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Pense can be innocent of doing exactly what Trump is said to have done, which illustrates the famous DOUBLE STANDARD in America, so that Joe is held innocent while Trump is held to be guilty, and beyond that, Joe Biden OWNS JUSTICE right now in America in his fist with his control of the DOJ and the FBI, which is seen by a majority of concerned Americans as the armed wing of Joe Biden’s Democrat party, the same way the Waffen SS was the armed wing of Hitler’s Nazi party, and for the same purposes, which are political repression of Joe’s perceived “enemies,” of whom Trump is clearly one, while protecting the crimes of the Biden regime, because like Stalin was with his secret police under Beria, Joe is their master and they do what he tells them to do, which takes us to a Daily Caller article on that very subject titled “The DOJ Just Opened Pandora’s Box” by Alan M. Dershowitz on 9 June 2023, as follows:
For the first time in American history, the leading candidate to defeat the incumbent president has been indicted by the incumbent’s Justice Department.
This is a momentous occasion, and not only for President Trump.
How do we know this is about political retribution, not the rule of law?
Look at the case.
One would expect that such an unprecedented criminal prosecution would be the strongest one in political history.
And yet, what information we do have suggests a weak case that would never have been brought if it wasn’t being brought against Donald Trump.
Indeed, in my book Get Trump, I predicted that Trump would be indicted.
But even writing a book about the massive attacks President Trump sustained from his political adversaries, I could not have imagined that the DOJ would suffice with a charge as meager as the mere possession of classified documents.
I thought they would go after Trump over some process crime growing out of the investigation.
I assumed that before proceeding, they would develop a far stronger case — certainly stronger than the extraordinarily weak case put forward by District Attorney Alvin Bragg in Manhattan.
It appears that I was wrong.
I gave them too much credit.
The indictment has yet to be unsealed, and there is still a slim possibility that there is a smoking gun, as there was in the obstruction cases against Richard Nixon that led his Republican colleagues to demand his resignation.
We will know better when the seven-count indictment is made public, presumably on Tuesday.
But based on what we know now, this does not seem like a strong case, especially if it is based on the Espionage Act of 1917, as a charge of illegally retaining documents is.
Ironically, the Espionage Act has been condemned by liberals, progressives, and Democrats since it became the open-ended weapon of choice aimed at political dissidents such as Eugene V. Debbs and other anti-war icons.
It is vague and capable of being stretched to cover political enemies.
Contrast these flimsy accusations with those made against Richard Nixon, which included bribing witnesses, destroying evidence, and other concrete crimes.
At the moment, there is no suggestion of such open and shut accusations.
Instead, they seem closer to the accusations made against presidential candidate Hilary Clinton, which never resulted in an indictment.
end quotes
Because as EVERYBODY knows, Hillary Clinton is precious and special, because, well, ah, okay, you know, because she happens to be the only Hillary Clinton we have, so we have the cherish her, which means she is eternally innocent, while Trump is always guilty, because, well, he is Trump and nobody likes him.
J Wheaton says
Wow, this didn’t age well
Paul R. Plante says
Laughter, they say, J Wheaton, is the BEST medicine, so from here on out, I’m going to think of you as DOCTOR Wheaton, because in these troubled times we have descended into as a dying nation under Joe Biden (Of course this is all political in here, people, what is he thinking), you still can make us set aside our monumental problems and difficulties, however briefly, to make us laugh at your inane comments which are like verbal pratfalls to those of us who meticulously and assiduously follow your writings for the knowledge and wisdom we can glean therefrom, which is never much, but still we try.
So thanks from a grateful nation, J Wheaton, for being J Wheaton as only you can pull it off!
Paul R. Plante says
According to a new poll from ABC News and Ipsos, which was conducted after the indictment against Trump was announced, the ABC/Ipsos poll pegged Biden’s favorability at just 31 percent, with 52 percent finding him unfavorable, and in an additional finding that bodes well for Trump, 47 percent of Americans believe the charges against him are politically motivated, compared to 37 percent who think politics did not play into the decision to indict.
And of course the charges against Trump are politically motivated!
With his approval rating in the toilet where it belongs, that’s the only way Joe Biden can win against Trump!
J Wheaton says
Oh please tell us how this is politically motivated. Yes, folks I’m gonna go there.
Lets get a pool together to see how many words Paul writes on this topic. I say, at least 3 comments total word count 6,500.
Paul R. Plante says
When trying to help educate you as to reality in here, J Wheaton, I always have this mental image of having to prop you up in a high chair and put a bib on you to catch the drool, because simple concepts, like how Joe Biden’s Stalinin-esque persecution of Trump, like Stalin in the 1930s who began jailing political enemies en masse and carrying out a campaign of terror against certain Soviet citizens deemed enemies of the party, is political in nature seem to elude you so.
Putting words of explanation before you is very much akin to casting pearls before swine, and I say that as a dear friend concerned for your mental, emotional and spiritual well-being.
On another note, with a far simpler question you may or may not be able to comprehend with your extremely limited cognitive abilities, what did you think of that horrible experience Taylor Swift recently had when a bug flew into her mouth during a performance and she had to eat it?
J Wheaton says
Ah Paul, you are disappointing us all. A comparison of Biden to Stalin is laughably a weak position. You claim to understand history, your comparison surely puts that in doubt.
You talk about how we are all sheep. It turns out so are you and the leader of the flock. Drink that Kool-aid !
Paul R. Plante says
J Wheaton, you are a hoot here, unleashed and uncaged as you are in here, slinging your brickbats right and left as you try, unsuccessfully so far, anyway, to wreck havoc on me.
And comparing Joe Biden to Joe Stalin, who incidentally was loved and revered by Democrat Frank Roosevelt, who wished he had Stalin’s power to deal with his political enemies, just as Joe does today, is quite apt and accurate.
So would be a comparison of Joe Biden to George III of England – somebody who is not fit to be the leader of a free people.
And while we are on the subject of Biden KOOL-AID drinkers and Democrat sheep and Joe Biden being a liar who told us, falsely, of course, that Joe was going to reduce the deficit we are all burdened with as a result of Joe’s fiscal profligacy, consider this Reuters article titled “US budget deficit mushrooms in May as revenue falls, Medicare outlays jump” on June 12, 2023, where we have Joe’s lies exposed for all the world to see, to wit:
(Reuters) – The U.S. budget deficit swelled in May from a year earlier as revenue tumbled and Medicare spending surged, the Treasury Department said on Monday in its first monthly accounting of the government’s finances since a deal was reached to suspend the debt limit and avoid a first-ever federal default.
end quote
This happens to be yet another story the CCM has been all over, J Wheaton, while you have been sleeping, which takes us back to the reality we are all confronted with by Joe Biden’s fiscal mismanagement and profligacy, to wit:
The May deficit shot up to $240 billion from $66 billion a year earlier, more than offsetting the $176 billion surplus recorded in April.
end quote
And I thought you said in an earlier post in here that Joe was going to be a hero for reducing the deficit, so what went wrong with your prediction?
What was it you failed to take into account with your inaccurate prophecy?
Going back to the story, the bad news Joe Biden has delivered us continues as follows, as Joe BURIES us further and further in debt:
Revenues for May totaled $307 billion, down 21% from $389 billion a year earlier, with a decline in non-withheld individual income taxes and higher tax return payments accounting for most of the shortfall.
Outlays rose 20% to $548 billion, with a tripling of spending on the government-run Medicare health program for seniors driving much of the increase.
Through the first eight months of the fiscal year, which began in October, the Treasury reported a cumulative deficit of $1.165 trillion, up from $426 billion a year earlier.
end quotes
But how can that be, J Wheaton?:
Both you and Joe Biden promised us the deficit under Joe was going to go down?
You disappoint us, J Wheaton, being so wrong as you were there.
And yes, I do talk about how you Biden Democrats are all sheep, precisely because you are – like sheep, you are conditioned to practice the Democrat art of NO THINK, as you drink that Biden Kool-aid, and here is a very sad case of it right here!
Joe Biden is destroying America, and you cheer him on while attacking me.
Have you ever wondered, J Wheaton, why you and Joe Biden hate the term MAGA, which means “Make America Great Again?”
It’s because you both hate America, and want to see it leveled.
Something to think about, anyway, J Wheaton.
Stuart Bell says
You got a problem with Veterans?
Paul R. Plante says
And helping our dear friend J Wheaton out here so that he too can understand how this is a Stalinesque political persecution of Trump by Joe Biden, because let’s face it, we are a compassionate people and it is the right thing to do, to help out those less fortunate than ourselves when it comes to having a functioning brain, according to the very pro-Democrat/pro-Biden/anti-Trump Washington Post, “A conviction does not require any evidence of a desire to disseminate the classified information; having it in an unauthorized location is enough.”
Accordingly, Joe Biden is as guilty as sin, BUT, Joe won’t get indicted, nor will Joe get prosecuted.
So we clearly have here a DOUBLE STANDARD in operation which is exactly what makes this political, regardless of whether or not J Wheaton can comprehend that reality.
J Wheaton says
Stewie, please drive up to Walmart and buy a cheap keyboard. We are all getting tired of your copy & paste.
..and no, I’m not gonna call you and no, I’m not gonna meet you somewhere. Come up with some original thoughts.
Stuart Bell says
I am Free, White and Over 21, I will do as I damn well please.
Freedom of speech is unnecessary if the people to whom it is granted do not think for themselves
You sir, are a Fool at best.
J Wheaton says
For you folks at home following along Paul’s response was 592 words ( the first 2 responses, I considered preludes), and as suspected, no mention of any proof this is a political witch hunt against Trump.
Sadly, Paul’s inability to differentiate between Pence/Biden indiscretions and Trump’s indiscretions leads me to question his mental acuity. Paul, how many times did you poop your pants today?
Paul R. Plante says
J Wheaton, have I ever told you exactly how many people out there, not only on earth, but throughout the galaxie, as well, which is why so very many space aliens are now crowding our airspace, think your erudition is positively awesome?
You can take mere words and turn them into the most exquisite tapestries as if you were the Michaelangelo of the computer keyboard, and above here, you have surpassed yourself at the art.
Of course, as with much that is considered art today, the truth and facts have to suffer, but such it is when it is and so it goes, J Wheaton!
As to what you say about your perception, warped and twisted as it is by your conditioning and ideological viewpoint, that I have an inability to differentiate between Pence/Biden indiscretions and Trump’s indiscretions, which you say leads you to question my mental acuity, let me put your doubts and fears to rest by assuring you that of course I understand the HUGE difference between what you call on the one hand the Pence/Biden indiscretions, which you have no problems with, and on the other hand, what you call Trump’s indiscretions, which have you puce with rage and grinding your teeth in a frenzy.
The only difference between the Pence/Biden indiscretions and Trump’s indiscretions is in the names.
All the indiscretions as you call them, when they are serious crimes, are exactly the same, and both Joe Biden and Pense are as guilty as sin, but since their names aren’t Trump. they get to skate.
Because Trump’s name is Trump, and this is about getting Trump, and has been since he committed the mortal sin of beating Hussein Obama’s chosen successor to carry on his Marxist legacy, Trump doesn’t get to skate.
See how simple that was?
And there you were fretting and wasting valuable emotional energy worrying about my mental acuity when it is your own that is seriously in doubt.
And my name isn’t Joe Biden, so no, J Wheaton, it wasn’t me that pooped in his pants today, or any day, for that matter, it was Joe, except when he did it on the white house floor and then tried to pin the blame on his poor dogs.
J Wheaton says
That response came in at miserly 375 words, folks.
I don’t know Paul do you think the difference might be Pence/Biden proactively searched for documents they may have had and then cooperated? Where Trump in his wisdom thumbed his nose at a subpoena Or did you forget about that? Have you tried Prevagen yet, Paul? It may help
Obviously, you can’t come up with any real facts to back your position this is some political witchhunt. You always seem to push the “flavor of the day” facts be damned.
Paul R. Plante says
Unlike our very dear friend and fellow CCM correspondent J Wheaton, a highly conditioned Democrat ideologue who cleaves tight to the party line because he knows no different, not having been taught to actually think for himself, and then tries to enforce the Democrat party line on the rest of us, as he is doing in here, as he vainly tries to defend the CRIME BOSS Joe “The Big Guy” Biden, while demonizing Trump, I am a law and order type (BOO HISS scream out the die-hard Democrats who hate the very concept of law and those who adhere to it), and so, I do some actual research to first of all see why the law exists in the first place, which is known as “purpose,” and then I look for both what the law does say, and then what it doesn’t say, and what it doesn’t say is that if persons in violation of the law like Pense and Biden, who we all know have taken classified documents, then proactively search for documents they have taken and then cooperated with somebody, then they are innocent.
That is pure invention of the part of J Wheaton who is struggling mightily to have Biden and Pense be innocent when they are as guilty as Trump.
And let me make it incandescently clear here, for maybe the hundreth time (J Wheaton is slow to comprehend) that as a VEET NAM combat veteran, I support NO politician of any stripe, nor do I support political parties, something a CONDITIONED IDEOLOGUE like J Wheaton simply cannot understand, so I no more support Trump than I do Joe Biden, who I have called a liar in here, because he is.
So cutting to the chase, what is the Espionage Act in simple terms?
The Espionage Act of 1917 prohibited obtaining information, recording pictures, or copying descriptions of any information relating to the national defense with intent or reason to believe that the information may be used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation.
end quotes
That part about intent to use the information for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, like China or Ukraine, clearly applies to Joe Biden, not Trump.
There is absolutely no evidence whatsoever that Trump was taking bribes from China and Ukraine to harm the US as is the case with the “BIG GUY,” Joe Biden.
So who really is the truly guilty party here, people?
Trump?
Or Biden?
Stuart Bell says
This is how you talk to a Veteran? Say more about you than him. You really got a problem.
Paul R. Plante says
Trump is charged with multiple violations of § 793, Gathering, transmitting or losing defense information, of 18 U.S. Code Chapter 37, and Joe Biden and son Hunter, who had access to Joe’s purloined state secrets should be, as we see by actually bothering to read the statutory language, to wit:
(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; or
(f) Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense, (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer —
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
(g) If two or more persons conspire to violate any of the foregoing provisions of this section, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each of the parties to such conspiracy shall be subject to the punishment provided for the offense which is the object of such conspiracy.
end quotes
Q: Were Joe Biden’s lawyers in any way entitled to receive Joe Biden’s purloined state secrets, which we know they did?
A: Of course not, and who is J Wheaton trying to kid by telling us they were?
How silly!
CONCLUSION: Joe Biden is as guilty as sin but because he owns what now passes for JUSTICE in this country, he gets to skate while at the same time, he gets to use his weaponized justice department and the armed branch of the Democrat party to persecute his main political rival, which is Trump. who is still beating Joe Biden in theoretical poll match-ups.
J Wheaton says
That friends was 483 words for a grand total of 1,282 words. Do we have a winner out there? I can only surmise by the pithy number that Paul felt he really didn’t have much behind his statement. Now for a quick rebuttal.
Paul, clean off the glasses. In subsections d and f that you so kindly provided us there is this little gem – “.. or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense ”
We are told they were classified documents, not top secret, so no one knows if they pertained to national defense at this time. Oh, and by the way his lawyer had a security clearance so he was able to handle the documents. Where oh where are you getting all your misinformation?
Paul another swing and miss. As much as you would like to make it about political parties it’s about the law. Hey, as an aside can you tell me how many Republicans were fired from government jobs when Biden was elected and how many Democrats were hired as replacements? You’re living in a fantasy world.
Paul R. Plante says
How many Republicans were fired from government jobs when Biden was elected?
Probably the majority of them, not counting those who left when Joe Biden was elected because who in their right mind would want to work for Joe Biden or Karmela Harris?
How many Democrats were hired as replacements?
Who knows, J Wheaton, certainly not me, because I am neither a Republican nor a Democrat, having nothing by contempt for either breed, because to be either to me means that they must have some kind of psychological issues with regard to defining who they are that we independents are not infected with or afflicted by, so I don’t waste valuable time or emotional energy keeping track of their silly and foolish infantile and juvenile games.
J Wheaton says
424 words, there folks. Words of wisdom from Paul or are they?
I see you mentioned The Espionage Act of 1917 which is a good start but what you didn’t mention is what Trump was charged with under the act that clearly separates him from Pence/Biden. The complete act isn’t all about spying. Here is one charge of his 37
“having unauthorized possession of, access to, and control over documents relating to the national defense, (which Pence/Biden had) did willfully retain the documents and fail to deliver them to the officer and employee of the United States entitled to receive them.” (which Trump absolutely thumbed his nose at.)
Now, you claim exceptional comprehensive skills so I’m sure you noticed the conjunction “and” in the above charge description. Pence/Biden fit the first part but not the second, so no charges for them. They might get a sternly written letter but no one is going to waste any time on that.
Trump, on the other hand, couldn’t get out of his own way. It’s like the second half of the charge was written specifically for him – willful, failed to deliver.
You can go on believing this was politically motivated but it’s not and you haven’t provided any evidence that it is., because you can’t find any.
Paul R. Plante says
Did you grow up obsessing about the Count on Sesame Street who was always counting things, J Wheaton, that now has you obsessing about counting every word I write in here?
Seems so.
And by the way, and I know this is a subtlety that escapes you, but an indictment for something, anything, and yes, prosecutors can indict ham sandwiches or pastrami on rye, is not a conviction, nor does it guarantee guilt.
It merely strips away the presumption of innocence, and that is it, so your cheering here is premature, and to help you understand the mood of the American people, whose reality you appear to be quite out of touch with, here is an article the Washington Examiner titled “Biden losing ground with voters in belief of his innocence: Poll” by Heather Hamilton on 14 June 2023 that should help raise your consciousness for you, and my goodness but do you ever need it:
Less than one-third of voters believe President Joe Biden is innocent of allegations connected to a “bribery scheme” involving foreign payments.
end quote
You, of course, have demonstrated in here that you are firmly in that less than one-third, and I went to VEET NAM to fight for yo9u right to be out of touch with mainstream America, just so you know, and don’t forget to thank veterans for your freedom to be you, J Wheaton.
Going back to the reality that you are missing out on, being a conditi0oned Democrat ideologue as you are, we have more, to wit:
A Convention of States Action poll showed only 31.4% of voters said they do not believe the Biden family has received foreign payments to influence national policy decisions.
end quote
So you do have company, anyway, J Wheaton, but still there is more:
However, the poll showed that 53.3% of overall general election voters now believe Biden is guilty following Congress’s investigations into the Biden family’s foreign business dealings.
end quotes
Whereas I am with the majority in that, which takes us back for more, to wit:
“The congressional investigation is not even complete, and this poll shows the majority of the Americans have already seen enough documented proof to believe a disgraceful and illegal scam was/is being run by President Biden’s family,” President of the Convention of States Mark Meckler said in a statement to the Washington Examiner.
The Convention of States Action poll also indicated that Biden is losing the confidence of independent voters, with 50% saying they believe his family did receive payments from foreign nationals.
end quotes
Did I say that I am an independent, J Wheaton?
But what am I saying, of course, I did!
So back to you to see how you will now deal with that beyond merely counting up the words, and I did add some to make the score lo0ok even more impressive for you!
J Wheaton says
LMAO heed your own advice there Paul about Biden and a presumption of guilt. The fine congressional investigation going on into Biden seems to keep losing their evidence – missing person there, missing tape here, a colossal waste of taxpayers’ money.
Like polls mean anything, hey Dewey won didn’t he? Evidence Paul, it’s evidence that proves guilt or innocence and there appears to be a preponderance of evidence against Trump. Indictments come from evidence. Hell, they even have him on tape admitting guilt.
To bring this whole thing to a close this is what you stated way up above :
“It’s interesting that Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Pense can be innocent of doing exactly what Trump is said to have done, which illustrates the famous DOUBLE STANDARD in America, so that Joe is held innocent while Trump is held to be guilty, and beyond that, Joe Biden OWNS JUSTICE right now in America in his fist with his control of the DOJ and the FBI, which is seen by a majority of concerned Americans as the armed wing of Joe Biden’s Democrat party, the same way the Waffen SS was the armed wing of Hitler’s Nazi party, and for the same purposes, which are political repression of Joe’s perceived “enemies,” of whom Trump is clearly one, while protecting the crimes of the Biden regime, because like Stalin was with his secret police under Beria, Joe is their master and they do what he tells them to do, which takes us to a Daily”
which is utterly incorrect and sophomoric.
As you are fond of saying, millions of people tune into the Mirror for the latest news, local and global and it’s on the internet which means it’s here to stay for eons. Gosh, I hope none of your descendants stumble upon your rant here because I’m sure it’s not going to age well.
PS. Convention of States, a wholly independent, unbiased group! LMAO a group of conservative Republican hacks. That could give a shit about evidence for or against Biden. Give up Paul, I have
Paul R. Plante says
You gave up, J Wheaton, because you were done before you even started.
Joe Biden who right now owns what passes for “justice” in this country, i8s just like his idol Joe Stalin going after Trotsky, which I know you are well aware of.
And are you so foolish, J Wheaton, as to say that poll by Convention of States was rigged and contrived so as to show false results?
But of course you are.
As to Joe’s trumped-up case against Trump, who Joe according to Five ThirtyEight is losing to right now, let’s go to a Daily Caller article titled “The DOJ Just Opened Pandora’s Box” by Alan M. Dershowitz, the Felix Frankfurter Professor of Law, Emeritus at Harvard Law School, on 9 June 2023 to see what a real law scholar has to say about Jo9e Biden’s Stalin-esque farce, to wit:
For the first time in American history, the leading candidate to defeat the incumbent president has been indicted by the incumbent’s Justice Department.
end quote
And from there, let’s go to a 1945 titled “America Hates Joe Biden” by Brent M. Eastwood on 15 June 2023, where we have this bade news for you and Joe, to wit:
You Mean Joe Biden Is Even More Disliked Than Trump? – You may think that Donald Trump was an unpopular president.
Many voters hated the ground he walked on.
He was impeached twice and endured a steady drumbeat of daily attacks in the media.
Some of his biggest fans were afraid to even wear a MAGA hat expecting an admonishment from half the people they ran into in public.
Trump stirred up passions in virtually the entire electorate.
But you may be surprised to know that President Joe Biden may be even more unpopular.
This determination has been set forth by a poll aggregation research firm called FiveThirtyEight.
This analytics company takes a daily average of presidential approval polls and weighs them for their reliability and sample size.
They then determine a mean of the numbers and report whether presidents are likable or not.
Biden is performing worse than Trump in these calculations by FiveThirtyEight.
“Biden has a net approval rating of -14.6 percent on June 11, notably lower than the -10.9 percent Trump recorded the same number of days into his administration,” Newsweek said.
end quotes
So to try and save himself, and good luck with that, he had his weaponized DOJ under his pet poodle (ARF! ARF!) indict Trump. which takes us back to Mr. Dershowitz, not known as a Trumper, to wit:
Former President Donald Trump has been indicted by a federal grand jury for illegally retaining classified government documents and obstructing justice.
This is a momentous occasion, and not only for President Trump.
This moment portends a massive change in the norms of this nation that all Americans who care about the neutral rule of law should pay close attention to, for it raises the specter of the partisan weaponization of the criminal justice system — not just by the Democrats targeting Trump but by Republicans who will certainly retaliate when they regain control of the criminal charging process.
How do we know this is about political retribution, not the rule of law?
Look at the case.
One would expect that such an unprecedented criminal prosecution would be the strongest one in political history.
And yet, what information we do have suggests a weak case that would never have been brought if it wasn’t being brought against Donald Trump.
Indeed, in my book Get Trump, I predicted that Trump would be indicted.
But even writing a book about the massive attacks President Trump sustained from his political adversaries, I could not have imagined that the DOJ would suffice with a charge as meager as the mere possession of classified documents.
I thought they would go after Trump over some process crime growing out of the investigation.
I assumed that before proceeding, they would develop a far stronger case — certainly stronger than the extraordinarily weak case put forward by District Attorney Alvin Bragg in Manhattan.
It appears that I was wrong.
I gave them too much credit.
The indictment has yet to be unsealed, and there is still a slim possibility that there is a smoking gun, as there was in the obstruction cases against Richard Nixon that led his Republican colleagues to demand his resignation.
But based on what we know now, this does not seem like a strong case, especially if it is based on the Espionage Act of 1917, as a charge of illegally retaining documents is.
Ironically, the Espionage Act has been condemned by liberals, progressives, and Democrats since it became the open-ended weapon of choice aimed at political dissidents such as Eugene V. Debbs and other anti-war icons.
It is vague and capable of being stretched to cover political enemies.
So are the other two charges that have been referenced: conspiracy to obstruct Justice and lying to law enforcement officials.
At the moment, there is no suggestion of such open and shut accusations.
Instead, they seem closer to the accusations made against presidential candidate Hilary Clinton, which never resulted in an indictment.
In order for the public to believe that the soon to be disclosed indictment is not politically motivated, it must be far stronger than the cases that were not brought against other political figures and at least as strong as that against Nixon.
That is a high bar, but it must be reached if our Justice Department is to maintain any semblance of impartiality.
It will not be enough to show technical violations that are sometimes prosecuted but often not.
It is unlikely that the recording of Trump showing classified material to a writer will suffice, unless prosecutors can establish the contents of these documents and that they were actually read by an unauthorized person.
There must be evidence of willful conduct that violates clear and unambiguous laws and that gives honest prosecutors no choice but to indict.
I doubt that these rigorous but necessary criteria have been met in the current indictment against Trump, but I have an open if skeptical mind.
As matters stand now, this “momentous” political case threatens to be a momentous challenge to our system of impartial justice.
end quotes
And there is much, much more, but let me stop there so you can make an attempt as assimilating all of that, and if we don’t hear back from you, it will be only because you had nothing of real substance to say right from the word GO!
And speaking of that, what on earth was up with the moron yesterday when he left many people puzzled and questioning his intentions after the U.S. president concluded his speech at the National Safer Communities Summit in Connecticut by saying “Alright? God save the Queen, man.”